Green Living

null 23° London Hi 25°C / Lo 13°C

Britain tries to block vital GM safeguard

By Geoffrey Lean

Britain is this week single-handedly setting out to sabotage a vital safeguard against farmers unwittingly growing GM crops, a secret document seen by The Independent on Sunday reveals.

The document – the final version of a negotiating text to be finalised by ministers from across Europe on Thursday – shows that the UK government is alone in opposing a provision that would keep GM contamination of seed to the "lowest possible" levels.

Without the safeguard, European farmers could sow billions of GM seeds every year without realising it, causing the modified crops to spread throughout the continent, which is at present almost entirely free of them.

The provision has been inserted into the text, which has been drawn up by France to lay down guidelines for using the technology, because conventional seeds are often mixed with small amounts of GM ones. One study found that two-thirds of US conventional crops are "contaminated" in this way.

Four years ago the EU drew up rules that would allow 0.5 per cent contamination of beet seeds, and 0.3 per cent of maize and oilseed rape ones. These would have allowed the unwitting growing of up to 4.5 billion GM oilseed rape plants, and 2.3 billion GM beet plants, across Europe every year, but they were dropped after protests.

Now every European government except Britain wants to reduce the permitted level to the lowest level that can be scientifically detected. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says it is being "pragmatic and proportionate" in opposing this, but Clare Oxborrow of Friends of the Earth says its position is "an indefensible threat to GM-free farming".

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

bias
[info]ajkmsteph wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 02:22 am (UTC)
I think you need to provide an un-bias report rather than be a voice box for FOE. The FOE and anti-GM crowd do not have a monopoly on the truth and facts. There should be realistic workable measures to keep GM and non-GM separate. The reality is GM crops are as safe as non-GM crops and there no evidence that is supported by reputable scientific review that is to the contrary. Denying growers the choices that will reduce insecticide use and improve soil quality is not only potentially irresponsible its just not sensible in a world that will need to increase food production to feed people.
Re: bias
[info]jessieso wrote:
Tuesday, 28 April 2009 at 11:24 pm (UTC)
*GM crops have contributed substantially to increased pesticide use
*most new GM crop varieties are also pesticide-promoting
*GM crops have caused an epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds
*this is encouraging the use of more toxic petsicides, including ones banned in some European countries
"Who Benefits from GM crops?: Feeding the biotech giants, not the world's poor", Friends of the Earth International (2009)
Full report:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/full_report_2009.pdf
Executive Summary:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/Exec_summary_2009.pdf
EU briefing:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/EU_briefing_2009.pdf

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date