Independent investigation
How Britons fuel destruction of the rainforest
British consumers are fuelling the rising demand for palm oil, speeding up the destruction of rainforests and killing off orangutans
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
enlarge
A cooking oil that is driving the destruction of the rainforests, displacing native people and threatening the survival of the orangutan is present in dozens of Britain's leading grocery brands, an investigation by The Independent has found.
Palm oil – blamed for a tree-felling rampage in south-east Asia – is present or suspected in 43 of 100 best-selling brands in UK, far more than the one in 10 products estimated by Friends of the Earth four years ago.
Palm oil is present in Hovis and Kingsmill bread, the country's best-selling margarine Flora, KitKat and Cadbury Dairy Milk chocolate bars, as well as Dove soap, Comfort fabric conditioner and Persil washing powder.
The research – the first time palm oil, which is usually labelled as "vegetable oil", has been definitively quantified in British products – comes amid a surge in demand for the world's cheapest cooking oil.
The United Nations Environment Programme believes palm oil is the major driver of deforestation in the vast islands of Borneo and Sumatra. Hundreds of thousands of acres of forest are cleared to make way for plantations from which 90 per cent of wildlife disappear, including the orangutan, which is fighting a losing battle against extinction. Orangutan numbers have dwindled by 90 per cent since 1900, with the rate of loss accelerating in recent decades.
Emissions from the chainsawed peat-rich forests of Indonesia (which owns Sumatra and half of Borneo) are also thought to generate 4 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.
At present only 4 per cent of palm oil production is certified sustainable by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (Rspo), meaning that the vast majority of global supply is linked to the forest gold rush. All companies contacted by The Independent said they were talking to suppliers about moving to a sustainable supply.
However most of them – including Cadbury, Kellogg's Nestlé, Mars and Heinz – have set no date for the process. Nestlé said: "Nestlé shares concerns about the serious environmental threat to rainforests in south-east Asia and supports an end to deforestation. Palm oil is not a major raw material and... the company's use of palm oil has been declining somewhat."
Mars said: "We do use palm oil in our chocolate, but only work with suppliers who respect the environment and are committed to working with all stakeholders to make progress towards sustainable production."
WWF, formerly the World Wildlife Fund, called on manufacturers to start matching rhetoric with reality by buying sustainable oil, which costs between 10 and 35 per cent more than ordinary supplies which are mixed at refineries.
Jan Kees Vis, Rspo chairman, said that manufacturers did not want to pay more for a hidden ingredient. "The volume of certified palm oil traded is disappointingly low so far, the reason for this being that many companies are not prepared to pay a premium for certified oil," he told The Independent.
Originating in West Africa, palm oil has become a £14bn-a-year industry. Some 38 million tonnes are produced annually. Manufacturers use the oil to bind and bulk out chocolate, biscuits, bread and margarine and to give a creamy consistency to soaps.
About 85 per cent of the global supply comes from Borneo and Sumatra, where corruption is rife and where incursions into the forests are enforced by gun-toting security guards.
Satellite pictures have shown the rapid loss of the islands' rainforests, which, in addition to the orangutan, contain endangered species such as the clouded leopard, Sumatran tiger, and sun bear. Survival International, the London-based human rights group, says that palm oil producers supplying world markets are evicting indigenous people such as the Penan in Borneo from their land. In an interview taped earlier this year in Borneo, a Penan villager recalled: "There were no official discussions. The company just moved in and put up signs saying the government had given them permission to plant oil palm on our land. The manager promised he would pay us whatever we wanted. But we already know that the companies lie... If oil palm is planted, we will lose our land... there will be no more forest."
Global demand for palm oil is rising at between 6 and 10 per cent a year. Although yields could be raised to meet the demand, suppliers have a financial incentive to chop down forest for hardwoods for furniture, which subsidises the plantations before the first oil is produced.
If current rates of logging continue, the UN Environment Programme estimates that 98 per cent of forests in Indonesia may be destroyed by 2020.
Around 16 per cent of global palm oil arrives in the EU. Companies often refuse to disclose whether their products contain palm oil.
However, after piecing together information from the companies, The Independent has established that palm oil is contained or suspected in 43 of the Top 100 grocery brands. Of the nation's £16bn spending on the top 100 brands, £5.5bn goes on brands which contain, or are suspected to contain, the oil. Thirty-three out of 62 food brands contain palm oil.
Only a few British firms, including Unilever and Sainsbury's, have bought large amounts of Rspo-certified oil.
Green Palm, a Hull-based company which trades Rspo certificates, says it has struggled to find corporate buyers. The Food and Drink Federation said the UK was "a small player in the complex global market for palm oil", importing only 1.2 per cent of the annual crop for manufacture here.
Andy Tait, Greenpeace's forests campaigner, said: "If you buy products from Unilever or Nestlé, ask what measures they are taking to remove unsustainable palm oil from their supply chain. Public pressure makes companies change."
Ancient oil: Modern uses
* Palm oil is made from the fruit and seeds of the oil palm (elaeis guineensis), an edible plant long used as a cooking oil by villagers in West Africa, which now has a wide range of industrial applications.
* Palm oil is so prized because in addition to being the world's cheapest, it is "uniquely fractionable". Chemical processes can separate solid (stearin) and liquid (olein). Manufacturers use the versatile oil in a wide range of foods and household products and, increasingly and controversially, it is used as a biofuel.
Household names: Big brands and palm oil
Kellogg's (US) Uses palm oil in 50 products, mostly cereal bars but also cereals such as Special K and Crunchy Nut, where it binds together clusters. Does not buy sustainable palm oil.
Cadbury (UK) Pours palm oil into chocolate bars, including Cadbury Dairy Milk, where it is listed as vegetable oil. Uses 40,000 tonnes a year, none certified as sustainable.
Mars (US/UK) Uses palm oil in Mars Bars, Galaxy and Maltesers, where it is labelled "vegetable fat". Does not buy sustainable palm oil. Says it wants to.
Procter & Gamble (US) Makes Ariel, Daz and Fairy Liquid, where use of palm oil is suspected but unproven. Says it will have a sustainable supply by 2015.
Unilever (UK) World's biggest user of palm oil, which is found in Flora margarine, Pot Noodle, Comfort and Persil. Buys 1.6m tonnes a year – 4.2 per cent of global production. Acknowledging the damage to its reputation and the environment, Unilever set up the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil.
Kraft (US) Says it does not use palm oil in Dairylea cheese but does in other products. Buys half a per cent of global supply. Says it will move to sustainable palm oil by 2015.
Heinz (US) Uses palm oil to fry potatoes for Aunt Bessie's Potatoes, which it makes under licence.
United Biscuits (UK) Uses palm oil across its range including McVitie's Digestives and McCoy's crisps. Says it is reducing quantities.
Nestle (Swiss) Palm oil in KitKat, Quality Street, Aero and other brands.
Premier Food (UK) Uses in Hovis, Mr Kipling Cakes, Bisto Gravy and Cadbury cakes (made under licence). Hopes to move to a certified sustainable supply by 2011.
Pepsico (US) Makes Walker's crisps. Has one of the best corporate policies, only using palm oil in Quaker Oat Granola and Nobby's Nuts. Intends to phase out use on those two products.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Reduce your global impact.
Comments
I've been to Borneo and seen the palm oil plantations and the stories about orang utans who are shot when clearing the land, the babies left orphaned or also murdered.
And they are truly amazing animals.
Are there no active campaigns and efforts to raise awareness? I knew nothing about this till I was there and can promise not many in my circle of people would know.
Also, ways for those of us who do feel passionately about it to get involved?
Shame about those orangutans, i'd avoid buying things with palm oil in if it was listed as an ingredient.
I think you will be hard pressed to find a true 'Green' who advocates the use of food for fuel. If you believe you have found one, I think you are mistaken. This is the reaction of the corporate world to pressure from us 'Greens' threatening their existence, a pathetic, half-arsed reaction to the problem that our western society is too greedy and selfish to care that we are destroying the planet. Anyone with half a green-inclined brain can see that food for fuel is a ridiculous proposition. I'm fairly sure this is a way of appeasing those too stupid to realise this, ensuring that you still drive your cars with some heightened sense of morality.
If you don't give a damn about the environment, about deforestation, about the extinction of amazing species, get some balls and just say it. I DON'T CARE. I AM A SELFISH INDIVIDUAL. There. Say it. Don't come up with all these ridiculous and cynical comments about those of us who do.
For the record, I don't even think I would call myself 'Green' or an 'environmentalist'. Rather, a reasonably-educated individual capeable of thinking about something other than themselves. People like you make me sick.
I wouldn't buy palm oil to cook with,yet how can I eat healthily if it is in many of the foods on the shelves of the supermarket?
This is an important story but 'consumers' must be empowered to boycott manufacturers not made to feel as though they are the guilty parties.
Consumers do not actively want palm oil in any of the products we buy, it's just that the EU regulations permit the corporations to include it in their products without indentifying it.
The regs and the corporate mindset must change.
Profit is what guides them. I would go out of my way to avoid those products as far as possible, but unless there is a mass boycott it does not mak much difference
I too have been in Borneo and was shocked by the devastation of the forests, it is well documented and pressure needs to be put on the Indonesian and Malaysian governments to stop their short sighted and damaging policies
www.survival-international.org/tribes/pe
The fact is that industries like palm oil are helping countries like Indonesia rise out of poverty and become a modern industrialized nation. The environment may be being damaged, but you can't have it both ways. Increased human prosperity is a greater good than the "evil" of environmental degradation. Whining European greenies will never get off their high horse, but all the average Indonesian cares about is having more money in his pocket, and rightly so. Meddling Westerners never stop patronizing developing countries and believe they know what's in those countries' best interests, whereas in fact those countries are just trying to increase their own economic wealth, and the average person in Indonesia, for example, doesn't give a rat's ass about the environment because his focus is on putting food on his family's table. That's why all this meddling environmental interventionism by do-gooders in the West is doomed to fail miserably. Poor people crave and will attain economic progress, regardless of the cost in other areas such as the environment. That's human nature and there's nothing you can do about it.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
Survival International and Bruno Manser Fonds are campaigning for the Penan so please visit their websites to find out how you can help.
The best way of ensuring the conservation of the rainforest, and its species, is to let the indigenous people live there as they always have done. If this happened then the orang utans would also have a safe home too.
The comments below focus on the orang utans and the food vs fuel debate. Let's not forget the people affected by this either.
So please stop believing propaganda by paid NGOs and their mindless machinery (Independent being one of them) to protect the local vegetable oil market. They are getting paid cheat all of you and deprive your rights for cheap, nutritious food!
It appears that independent and government research and agencies support the contention that palm oil is a health risk. Who disagrees? Naturally, the palm oil industry as one would expect since they have lots of skin in a negative outcome for them. The question is: Who paid for the studies in China and who did them?
From Wikipedia under a search for "palm oil":
Many health authorities state that palm oil promotes heart disease, citing research and metastudies that go back to 1970.[24] For many years now, it has been established that the primary cholesterol-elevating fatty acids are the saturated fatty acids with 12 (lauric acid), 14 (myristic acid) and 16 (palmitic acid) carbon atoms with a concomitant increase in the risk of coronary heart disease.[71] The World Health Organization (WHO) states there is convincing evidence that palmitic oil consumption contributes to an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases.[72] Research in the US and Europe support the WHO report.[73]
In a response to the WHO report, the Malaysian Palm Oil Promotion Council has argued that there is insufficient scientific evidence to produce general guidelines for worldwide consumption of palm oil and cited a research study in China comparing palm, soybean, peanut oils, and lard (all of which contain saturated fat) showing that palm oil increased the levels of good cholesterol and reduced the levels of bad cholesterol in the blood, and that palm is a better solid fat to use in products where trans fats would otherwise be chosen.[74]