Green Living

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Palm oil and climate change

By James Turner, Greenpeace forests campaigner

Palm oil is an inescapable part of everyday life. As the new research from the Independent shows, it is now virtually impossible to avoid buying products that contain palm oil in every supermarket, chemist and sweet shop in Britain. Considering the fact that this commodity is now one of the most environmentally damaging on earth, this can seem like a gloomy prospect - but there are a few reasons for hope.

In Indonesia, the picture is extremely worrying. In the last two decades, millions of hectares of rainforest have been destroyed to make way for new plantations. Peat forests and swamps which have stood for centuries are being chopped down, drained and burned, to be replaced with gigantic monoculture crops. This systematic destruction is now responsible for an astonishing four percent of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, and the orang-utan, perhaps the most potent symbol of man’s kinship with nature, could be less than ten years from extinction.

This crisis stems from the failure of the industry to grasp the consequences of explosive, unrestrained growth. It was not until 2003 that attempts were made to slow the destruction by creating the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm oil (RSPO), a body which brought together growers, transporters and consumers of palm oil. It set criteria for companies who wished to claim that their oil was “sustainable”, allowing them to benefit from the good PR that this kind of initiative can bring. Yet six years later only a trickle of certified palm oil has entered the marketplace, and some RSPO members freely admit that it is failing to achieve its objectives. Meanwhile RSPO member companies operating in Indonesia are able to use the organisation to burnish their green credentials whilst simultaneously destroying rainforests with impunity.

British companies have a key role to play here. Some are rightly frustrated by the slow progress of the Roundtable and are looking to do more, by engaging with their suppliers and supporting campaigns for an end to rainforest clearance for palm oil. Others insist that their influence is limited, but Greenpeace believes that all UK retailers and manufacturers have powerful tools at their disposal. If these companies were to cancel their purchasing contracts with the worst offending palm oil producers, it would reverberate through the industry. This kind of financial signal would enable those producers who are committed to sustainability to come to the fore, offering the British consumer the chance to support environmentally responsible palm oil for the very first time.

The sheer number of products that contain palm oil can seem daunting. But with consumer pressure, industry leadership and political incentives these tropical rainforests can be placed off limits - for good.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

oil
[info]yambas wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 11:08 pm (UTC)
All manufacturers have a free phone number.Complain!
Orang-utan/Palm oil
[info]grissell wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 12:29 pm (UTC)
I have just completed a small essay at college on this subject.

I was shocked and disturbed by the way these poor creatures have been slaughtered and injured in the name of logging and palm oil.

It would be good to show some of these photos/images and some of the rehabilitation that takes place the general public needs a wake call!!

This needs to be covered over several article and/or a diary section - its a huge subject that needs attention right now.

Thank you for your article.
Re: Orang-utan/Palm oil
[info]rikanauck wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 02:33 pm (UTC)
I agree!
I don't know what sources you used, I find the BOS site very helpful: http://redapes.org/bos-projects/nyaru-menteng/ as well as the article they published: http://redapes.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/bospalm_oil_report.pdf

A lot of sites which allow comment allow the addition of links as well, as I just did. All it needs is to copy and paste the links into the text and it will be formatted automatically.

This is just an idea, but if you bookmark the links of the sources you used in your essay so whenever you leave a comment you have them handy and can add the most appropriate one or two. This way people can investigate further very easily and the word is spread :o)
Re: Orang-utan/Palm oil
[info]essexgirl7 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
Hiya,

I am working with many associations, including the BOS and have just posted my details and stuff on this article if you would like to take a look....

Sandra
info@notjustanessexgirl.com
Re: Orang-utan/Palm oil
[info]essexgirl7 wrote:
Friday, 8 May 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC)
Hiya,

I am working with many associations, including the BOS and many others and I am campaigning for palm oil and the orangutans. I have a website http://www.notjustanessexgirl.com/orang-utan-appeal to which I am adding how to help today actually! I think

I am hoping to get a campaign into the newspapers and womens magazine too so take a look, write a comment and help to spread the word!

Sandra
info@notjustanessexgirl.com UK
How independent is The Independent?
[info]theobruce wrote:
Monday, 11 May 2009 at 01:56 pm (UTC)
Allow me to post a comment that I'd posted on Independent Minds:

"Spotted the above mentioned article in www.palmoiltruthfoundation.com in which the writer suggests that the Independent "has joined the ranks of the integrity-challenged witch-hunters" and that 'it cannot escape the attention of neutral observers that this dubious club is made up of a disparate group of desperadoes, reliant on sludge money to stay afloat or to fund their operations!'

The writer further alludes that the reason for this is the recent well publicised financial travails of The Independent News and Media, your holding company.

I must say that I was initially sceptical, but on further reflection, I suppose that there cannot be smoke without fire. Tell me it isn't so."

Tell me.
Has "The Independent lost its marbles on Palm Oil?
[info]theobruce wrote:
Monday, 11 May 2009 at 02:19 pm (UTC)
This was a rejoinder to the above comment that I posted on Independent Minds too:

"It's truly disturbing. Now another website, www.deforestationwatch.org has also published another article called "Has 'The Independent' lost its marbles on palm oil?"

Again, the author has accused the Independent of having "joined the lucrative palm oil-bashing bandwagon", suggesting that the financial difficulties faced by your holding company, The Independent News and Media could have forced your paper to compromise your "ethical beliefs for the greenback that governments, corporations and even lottery boards are quite happy to throw (your) their way.
They further allege that "This explains why this industry (yes, climate change IS an industry) has drawn a disparate cohort of organizations and individuals ranging from pandering politicians, celebrities, demagogues and dishonest scientists to forge a self interested movement whose proposed policy initiatives could ultimately devastate the economies of the developing countries they purport to help!"

Can it be true that the Independent can stoop so low as to take slush money to work for anti-palm oil competition lobbies? It's really disturbing, for the timing of your articles, coming so soon after the widely publicised financial troubles of your group, makes it appear more than merely coincidental."

Tell me that it is coincidence.
Has "The Independent lost its marbles on Palm Oil?
[info]theobruce wrote:
Monday, 11 May 2009 at 03:06 pm (UTC)
This was a rejoinder to the above comment that I posted on Independent Minds too:

"It's truly disturbing. Now another website, www.deforestationwatch.org has also published another article called "Has 'The Independent' lost its marbles on palm oil?"

Again, the author has accused the Independent of having "joined the lucrative palm oil-bashing bandwagon", suggesting that the financial difficulties faced by your holding company, The Independent News and Media could have forced your paper to compromise your "ethical beliefs for the greenback that governments, corporations and even lottery boards are quite happy to throw (your) their way.
They further allege that "This explains why this industry (yes, climate change IS an industry) has drawn a disparate cohort of organizations and individuals ranging from pandering politicians, celebrities, demagogues and dishonest scientists to forge a self interested movement whose proposed policy initiatives could ultimately devastate the economies of the developing countries they purport to help!"

Can it be true that the Independent can stoop so low as to take slush money to work for anti-palm oil competition lobbies? It's really disturbing, for the timing of your articles, coming so soon after the widely publicised financial troubles of your group, makes it appear more than merely coincidental."

Tell me that it is a coincidence.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date