Green Living

null 14° London Hi 20°C / Lo 12°C

Supermarkets warned over waste packaging

By Josie Clarke, PA
Thursday, 29 May 2008

null

AP

An 18-month study found that "too many supermarket practices are still unhealthy, unjust and unsustainable"

Leading supermarkets are making little progress in increasing their recyclable packaging, a report out today said.

Up to 38 per cent of packaging cannot be recycled, down just 2 per cent from the first report in October last year, the Local Government Association (LGA) warned.

Retailers still have "a lot further to go" if Britain is to hit recycling targets and avoid landfill tax and EU fines, the survey found.

Marks & Spencer and Lidl used the lowest percentage of packaging which could be recycled, at 62 per cent. M&S took the same title last year.

And Lidl was again the worst offender when it came to total volume of packaging used, with a basket of groceries using 813g, up from 799.5g last year.

M&S used the second-highest total amount of packaging at 807g for a basket, while Sainsbury's used the third-highest amount by weight at 746g.

Environment Minister Joan Ruddock said: "We announced higher recycling targets for the UK in February and we have an existing agreement with retailers to end the growth in packaging waste this year. I will continue to keep these targets under review.

"Producers' obligations have already increased packaging recovery from just 27 per cent in 1998 to 59 per cent last year."

A Defra spokesman added: "Individual local authorities have the responsibility to determine the recycling solutions that best suit their communities.

"Five local authorities will next year be undertaking pilot schemes to create incentives for recycling. We will evaluate the impact of those pilots before making a final decision on whether other local authorities can introduce similar schemes."

The findings were based on analysis of packaging used for a basket of 29 common grocery items bought from Asda, Lidl, M&S, Morrisons, Sainsbury's, Tesco, a local retailer and a market.

Asda's packaging weighed the least among the major supermarkets at 646g, 69 per cent of which was recyclable.

The local market used the least weighty packaging (617g) and the highest amount that could be recycled at 76 per cent.

Sainsbury's was the supermarket with the highest proportion of recyclable packaging, at 70 per cent.

Asda used 69 per cent recyclable packaging followed by Morrisons at 67 per cent and Tesco at 65 per cent.

LGA environment board chairman Cllr Paul Bettison said: "The days of the cling-film coconut must come to an end. We all have a responsibility to reduce the amount of waste being thrown into landfill, which is damaging the environment and contributing to climate change.

"Families will be pleased to see that more packaging in their shopping baskets can now be recycled. However, this survey shows there is still a lot further to go.

"Reducing packaging is vital if we are to avoid paying more landfill tax and EU fines, which could lead to cuts in frontline services and increases in council tax."

Recycling rates had increased to 33 per cent in England but this figure had to increase, the report said.

Councils pay £32 in tax for every tonne of rubbish that is sent to landfill, which will increase to £48 a tonne by 2010.

From 2010 councils also face EU fines of £150 for every tonne that is dumped, which could cost an estimated £200 million by 2013.

The LGA is calling on the Government to make retailers and producers responsible for paying for the collection of packaging as an incentive to cut back.

Cllr Bettison said: "Some packaging is often needed, particularly to prevent food becoming spoilt and then ending up in landfill sites. Many retailers are also taking some very positive environmental initiatives, such as Marks & Spencer agreeing to work with councils to part-fund a recycling plant in East London.

"The LGA is in very constructive discussions with some of the leading supermarkets, and we hope this dialogue will lead to further steps in the direction of reducing packaging.

"Many countries on the continent operate a system where retailers contribute towards household collection and recycling services. This acts as an incentive for them not to produce excessive packaging in the first place.

"Government urgently needs to change its approach so retailers are incentivised to minimise unnecessary packaging and support maximum recycling."

The research was carried out for the LGA by the British Market Research Bureau.

Researchers bought items representing a regular shopping basket from the eight retailers, then recorded the total weight of the products and total weight of packaging.

The component parts of the packaging were weighed separately to measure the proportion of recyclable material and of rubbish.

Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Steve Webb said: "Consumers are told to sort and cut down on their household waste only to come back from the supermarket with mounds of unnecessary packaging which cannot be recycled.

"This survey shows how much further we still have to go to eliminate unnecessary waste and make sure that all packaging is recyclable.

"While markets and local stores are performing far better on reducing waste packaging, the supermarket giants are lagging behind.

"It is time that the supermarkets used their huge market power with their suppliers to demand dramatic improvements in cutting out unnecessary packaging and increasing the proportion that can be recycled."

Dr Helene Roberts, head of food packaging at Marks & Spencer, said: "We're really disappointed with the report, which does not reflect reality. From our independently audited data we know that 91 per cent of our food packaging is recyclable. By 2012 we want to reach 100 per cent.

"The LGA has chosen to only look at a skewed sample of 29 products out of our 5,500 lines, which are not representative. The real issue at the moment is the inconsistency in recycling facilities across the UK.

"We all have a part to play in tackling packaging - retailers, manufacturers, local and national government, as well as consumers. However, further improvements to recycling across the UK are limited by the current facilities provided by local authorities, which is why we've been working closely with the LGA, as referred to in the report, to help create a more consistent approach to recycling across the UK."

British Retail Consortium director general Stephen Robertson said: "This research only sampled 29 products out of the thousands retailers sell, yet it concluded retailers reduced packaging by 5 per cent in just seven months - a significant achievement.

"But the LGA is right to recognise packaging plays a key part in reducing waste by preventing food deteriorating and goods being damaged. The environmental cost of wasted food is much greater than the packaging used to stop that waste.

"The report takes a very simplistic view of environmental management as packaging cannot simply be defined as recyclable or not recyclable, because this differs from one area to another depending on the policies and facilities of each local authority.

"Stores are rewarding and encouraging recycling. They are offering a variety of recycling facilities where practical. The LGA's own figures show this approach is contributing to increasing recycling rates.

"Retailers are contributing millions of pounds a year to help support Government-approved recycling schemes. Retailers are giving local authorities £10 million to upgrade sites for collecting waste electricals and they pay £4.5 billion a year in business rates towards local authority funding.

"Rather than looking for new ways to tap retailers and, in turn, hard-pressed customers for extra cash, local authorities would make a more positive contribution by developing their recycling facilities and increasing and standardising the range of materials they will accept for recycling."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

16 Comments

We used to go to the grocery store and buy allour dry groceries from large tubs,with what we required being weighed out into suitably sized paper bags. Liquid goods were sold in returnable bottles (milk, at the doorstep)Frrruit and vegetables were sold loose,and you took a string or canvas (re-useable,of course) bag to carry them. Your Mother saved the paper bags for sandwich lunches etc. and put the organic waste to compost.Sweets were weighed out from large glass jars. Household goods were repairedClothes were worn until they fell apart,at which stage they became dustersThere was hardly any rubbish in the waste bin ...even from our extended family of eight. And....if the family wanted a holiday,they didn't do "poorist".They went for a week to Brighton, or Ayr....or Ardnamurchan(yes, it exists...and it's cheaper and more carbon friendly than Thailand or Goa.....if a bit colder and wetter)Add to all these advantages of the "dreary" fiftiesthe fact that there were no utterly gross young women swivelling truly horrible bellies around in public....because sport was both compulsory and popular at schooland women WALKED to the local shops... so they rarely got bigger than a size twelve.In short...it was a lot tidier and less harrassing than it is now. Let's get back to Austerity. It was paradise compared with the present overpriced,overwhelming cornucopia of mainly purposeless consumer goods....and packaging

Posted by A. Macmillan | 31.05.08, 17:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Supermarkets should be required to give away a eco friendly bag to every purchase of $100.00.

Posted by jeff | 31.05.08, 06:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The consumer has got used to a lot of fancy packaging and so supermarkets produce more of it. Recently I moved to New Zealand which is a bit 'old fashioned' in that there is much less packaging about so I can buy loose veg - and other old fashioned products - what a relief. On the matter of recycling all govts should be looking at New tech eg Plasma converters - an innovative way to process rubbish and producing ENERGY !!Its expensive at the moment but cheap in the long run and stacks up for most govts. The developed worlds problems seem to revolve around an obsession with consumerism and a complete inability to see true technical advances that can help us all. Forget gloss, consumerism and alot of the BS and look for efficiency !!

Posted by kiwibob | 31.05.08, 03:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

...Retailers still have "a lot further to go" if Britain is to hit recycling targets and avoid landfill tax and EU fines, the survey found....

When's the deadline to meet these targets? I have a feeling we're about to get stung.

To be honest, as a busy, busy, busy mum, I don't have time to digest all these stats. If they're aimed at the likes of moi, then please show me quickly and simply what shade of 'green' all these supermarkets are. While we're busy rating and banding our white goods, our house values and our children's schools, why not just slap a rating on these stores? They're so keen to plaster health and ethical information all over their packaging - let's have a rating over their door, and then I'll decide whether my foot will pass their threshold.

Posted by Amanda Hill | 30.05.08, 14:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

in this case look how the germans have managed the situation, i think it is a good example... before I was using plastic bags like everyone, after some years living in Germany i always carry a cloth bag with me when i go shopping, I've been using the same bag over and over since 5 years ago, still now that I live in UK. It is a nice bag I must say :)

Posted by rodrigo | 30.05.08, 14:21 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I wonder if Sainsburys really assessed the environmental pros and cons of replacing their wire baskets with virgin plastic ones. Why aren't they made from recycled or other more environmentally friendly materials ? They also become dirty more easily ,meaning less incentive to place unpackaged items in them, and more cleaning .

Posted by Pete | 30.05.08, 13:57 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Why dont the supermarkets have a responsibility to accept packaging back from consumers like in Germany. When we shop we could return the packaging from the week before, saving on unneccessary car joureys or refuse trucks journeys.
If the supermarkets had to deal with it, they would soon change their attitudes.
Any our local authority has accepted paper and cardboard as a seperate collection for decades and now does not -Dunfermline District in Fife. They landfill it.

Posted by Brian | 30.05.08, 12:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If you shop at the greengrocers, butchers etc. you find yourself with almost no excess packaging. With the increasing likelihood that local councils will put legally enforcable limits on waste, perhaps more people should start supporting their local shops rather than the big megastores.

Posted by Esther | 29.05.08, 18:00 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I work in the Consumer electronics field and know that it costs about £100/tonne to recycle our type goods, £32/tonne is just not an incentive to avoid landfill.

As a household of 2, I would much prefer to buy potatoes and other veg from loose buckets, but there just isn't that much choice even in Sainsburys. Often the loose potatoes are empty or poor quality, or very small. Whats the point of cling film wrapping everthing, its just not necessary, they should be fined under the Packaging directive.

Posted by Tony | 29.05.08, 16:26 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

why not encourage the supermarkets by not using their thin plastic bags for loose fruits & vegetables?Put them in your bag/box unwrapped.It only takes the checkout a few secs more to weigh them.

Posted by Bill | 29.05.08, 16:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

16 Comments


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date