Nature

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 12° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Bag a polar bear for $35,000: the new threat to the species

The latest challenge for fans of extreme hunting is an expedition to the Arctic Circle. Jerome Taylor reports

Hunters pay tens of thousands of dollars to kill polar bears in the Arctic

GETTY IMAGES

Hunters pay tens of thousands of dollars to kill polar bears in the Arctic

Boyd Warner treasures the memory of killing his first polar bear. It was 2003. For days he had stalked his prey on the frozen wastelands north of Pond Inlet, one of Canada's most isolated Inuit communities deep inside the Arctic Circle. His dog team picked up the scent of an eight-foot adult male and they hurtled over the ice: the hunt was on.

"It was one of those beautiful Arctic days," recalled Mr Warner. "We'd had about 14 hours of sunlight and were completely surrounded by nature. The moment of death comes quickly for the bear. You might track one for days through the ice but a single shot to the heart kills it instantly."

For wealthy modern-day trophy hunters, bagging a polar bear is the ultimate kill. Fourteen days in harsh conditions, requiring dog-sleds, Inuit guides and a heated tent camp, does not come cheap: the minimum bill comes to $35,000 (£24,000).

Mr Warner is the man who helps them do it. Earlier this week, the 45-year-old Canadian, whose company Adventure Northwest is based in Yellowknife, sent this season's first group of hunters north to Pond Inlet, where they will track and kill up to six bears. "This is probably the toughest hunt you can ever do," he said. "The weather conditions are appalling and it takes a huge amount of patience. You're living in the Arctic where it can drop to -50C at night and everything is done with sled dogs. It's incredibly gruelling.

"This year we have a lot of Mexicans and Americans but you get hunters from Europe, mainly Norwegians and Poles. They are just genuine, ordinary folk with a lot of cash. They respect the animals enormously."

There are few animals more symbolic of the perils of climate change than the polar bear, which faces destruction as the Arctic sea ice melts away – the bears starve or drown because the distances they have to swim to find prey become too vast. Yet every year scores of wealthy hunters from around the world pay tens of thousands of dollars to travel into the frozen Arctic and bag themselves a coveted polar bear hide.

Canada, home to about 60 per cent of the world's 22,000 polar bears, is the only one of the five polar bear "range states" which allows outsiders to hunt them as a trophy sport. America, Greenland and Russia only allow their native Arctic populations to kill a quota each year whilst Norway has outlawed stalking altogether.

"I don't enjoy killing animals but I enjoy the hunt," said Mr Warner. "People find that difficult to understand but for me there is no paradox."

The kill quotas – known as "tags" – are also allotted for Canada's Inuit communities, many of whom choose to legally sell them onto outsiders willing to part with enough cash.

"Those 20 bears are going to get killed one way or another because the Inuits depend on them for food during the winter," Mr Warner insisted. "So it shouldn't really matter whether it is the indigenous population that is shooting them or outsiders."

When the animal is killed, usually with a shot to the heart just behind the bear's fore leg, the Inuits use everything apart from the liver, which contains toxic levels of vitamin A and has to be buried.

Most hunters are then allowed to take their polar bear hides back to their own country, so long as they have the completed paperwork. Last year the US banned the importation of polar bear hides but most countries, including Britain, place no restrictions on the skins.

Mr Warner reports that his business has been hit by the US restrictions. "The American ban on importing polar bear skins has definitely hit the Inuit communities hard," he said. "You're not going to part with thousands of dollars if you can't bring your trophy back."

The latest US-led scientific surveys suggest that up to two-thirds of all polar bears could be lost by 2050 – bringing the sustainability of hunting into question. Tackling the issue has been unpalatable for host governments because of the hunts' traditional role and ongoing economic importance in Inuit life. As the mercury rises, the fates of ursus maritimus, Mr Warner and the Inuit hunters will become ever more precariously intertwined.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
absolutely disgusting
[info]letthemlive wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 02:34 pm (UTC)
barbaric, despicable, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!
Appalling!
[info]michaelld2004 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 03:24 pm (UTC)
As a Canadian, I am ashamed and appalled that this occurs!
suggetion
[info]parisboy wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 04:04 pm (UTC)
A fraction of the money those douche-b*gs spend on their coward expeditions would suffice to afford them psychological treatment in order to examine the true reason that pushes any individual to kill such magnificent creatures for their sole sadistic pleasure. Just a suggestion.
Live Journal is flaky
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 04:26 pm (UTC)
First we can't post comments, now I see that comments are being lost...............I'll wait until it seems stable for a while
Hunting Boyd Warner
[info]secretmonkey08 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 04:31 pm (UTC)
How about getting a pack of dogs together and hunt Boyd Warner.

"You might track one for days through the ice but a single shot to the heart kills it instantly."

Don't worry it will be quick and painless for him and after all we'll get a rush out of it.


"How about getting a pack of dogs together and hunt Boyd Warner."
[info]dukejimanee wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 04:51 pm (UTC)
"Bag" yourself a Boyd
disgusting
[info]kasalexis wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC)
a bunch of men trying to 'prove ' their manhood by hunting down animals with everything already against them.
these men are nothing but cowards, and basically impotent
[info]oldpaint wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 05:11 pm (UTC)
"They respect the animals enormously." Right, Mr. Warner. I would like to show my immense respect for you and your ilk in exactly the same way that you have shown those bears your respect for them. It would make me so happy, I wouldn't even care that I couldn't bring you home and hang you on my wall.

"I don't enjoy killing animals but I enjoy the hunt," said Mr Warner." Then use a camera instead of a gun, bonehead!
bring a skin home
[info]snowdonwatcher wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 05:23 pm (UTC)
I am interested to see that the USA ban the importation of a polar bear skin but the British allow it! After all, the USA has people like Sarah "shoot it if it moves & it's endangered" Palin!

But, why does Britain allow this trade?

I think shooting hunters would make better sport, & no I don't want a skin thanks, I'll leave them in the snow for the polar bears to eat, if they can stomach it!
Life
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 06:18 pm (UTC)
Perhaps it's an Inuit problem. They're making good money by selling their quota. At twenty four thousand a hunt, they probably take a fair percentage of this. I'm sure the Inuit population would disagree with comments made here.
Re: Life
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 09:59 pm (UTC)
My immediate reaction to tales of 'recreational' hunters is that I'd like to see them dropped from a helicopter and left to face the polar bear (or wolf or tiger or elephant), naked, with only their nails and teeth to fight with. If they really do respect nature then that is how they should kill the animal.

However, if the local people have a long history of hunting these animals for their own survival, then my logical side thinks - why not? The bear will be killed by the Inuit anyway, so why not make extra money by letting rich hunters do all the hard work and charge them for the 'pleasure' of doing so.

As soon as you start to think about all of this with any broad consideration, then you have to consider the fact that the Inuit no longer live in their old world. Their world is changing due to external influences such as pollution and climate change which are reducing the viable polar bear habitat and it's very chances of survival even if nobody hunted them. If we want the polar bear to survive, there needs to be a global consideration of habitat management and perhaps even 'compensation' to the Inuit for what we, the rich nations and industries have done to their way of life, so that they don't need to hunt the polar bear anymore.
One man's meat...
[info]junkkmale wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 07:03 pm (UTC)
Hard to figure the challenge of standing off an popping a high-powered round from a distance at an unarmed creature, but heigh-ho. Last time I heard the word respect used in the context above I think it was in Grand Theft Auto/San Andreas, and the protagonist had an UZI. The other guy ended up pretty much like the polar bear, mind.

And what are they THINKING???? Don't they realise that these creatures are being wiped out by man in other ways and are to only be used for promotional purposes on melting icebergs.

Seems some folk just haven't got the whole 'Save the...' gig joined up and sorted. Darned indigenous community types.
How about this?
[info]dwfrydendall wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 07:08 pm (UTC)
$20,000 to bag a polar bear hunter?
Re: How about this?
[info]charliebirder wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 07:33 pm (UTC)
I suppose the next advert we'll get dressed up as scientific journalism from Mr Taylor will be telling us which company organises wolf hunts while asking whether it's sustainable or not. There are hunting magazines aplenty to glorify the likes of tiny brained men like Boyd Warner without The Independent joining their grubby ranks...
Re: How about this? - [info]sportingmac - Friday, 20 March 2009 at 07:46 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]mistiblues wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 08:04 pm (UTC)
Not happy with baby seals,now polarbears,what kind of humans are canadians?????
DISGRACEFUL!!!
[info]suebaur wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 09:04 pm (UTC)
I thought Canada's only shame was the seal slaughter, but there seems to be more... This is appalling! If these men 'respect the animals enormously', like the article says, they would NOT take their lives. Polar bears are already facing tremendous life challenges, such as the ice melting. Why allow trophy hunters to decimate them too? The Inuits are not doing this for subsistence, they are doing it out of greed!
Put the retards in a ring and let 'em pop eachother
[info]merdencore wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 09:39 pm (UTC)
Anyone who thinks it's OK to indulge in rifle sports with endangered species, particularly large mammals, needs to be put in a ring with other like-minded people, so they can fight it out together to see who is a "real man". The polar bears can pick up the scraps. When I read stuff like this, my skin crawls and I start to think that global warming and mass famine/extinction of humans will be a good thing.

Ah Canada - first the seal pups and now polar bears. With tar sand mining added in, it's starting to look pretty pathetic.
$35,000 - bargain
[info]david134 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:20 pm (UTC)
I knew nothing about these trips until now but will be signing up. As a hunter I would love to test myself against both the harsh conditions and the mighty polar bear. People who attack hunting just don't understand the incredible feeling of oneness with nature that stalking an animal can bring.
Re: $35,000 - bargain. Parachuting without a parachute is cheaper!
[info]serrallonga wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:57 pm (UTC)
If what you want is "oneness with Nature" try walking in the hills or the Artic barefoot, unclothed and unarmed. You can hardly be serious using this mystical term for the outrageous activity of stalking with technology, dogs, sleds, rifles and guides at your beck and call..oneness with Nature, my foot. Try seeing a shrink..that's may do you more good and save a few animals the pain of sharing your ridiculous one-sided therapy.
Words escape me! Tears of shame well up in my eyes.
[info]serrallonga wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:39 pm (UTC)
Hunting for food is one thing, and although I would rather go hungry I can just about understand it but to hunt for pleasure is sick, shameful and makes me sorry to belong to the human race. Anyone who promotes, allows or goes on hunts of this type needs their head examining because they must be profoundly disturbed in some way. "It was one of those beautiful Arctic days," recalled Mr Warner..does he not even stop to think that it might have been a beautiful day for the polar bear had it not been unfortunate enough to share his space with this lunitic? When will our anthropocentralism see the light?
Teddy Boy?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:48 pm (UTC)
David134, you are a bit naughty, a tease perhaps. We all love you. Now take teddy to bed and give him a damn good oral job. Night, night, petal.
Bag a polar bear for $35,000: the new threat to the species
[info]serrallonga wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:50 pm (UTC)

As if the article isn't bad enough, has anyone noticed the tasteless, disgusting Google ad at the top to catch more potencial B. Warners HUNT BUCKS, I can't believe The Independent approves of heartless advertising using their page. Please, get rid of it!
Polar bears -
[info]regina1959 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 10:59 pm (UTC)
Why is it so important for man to keep killing animals for sport? It is an outrage that these beautiful animals are taken down for fun!
Tears....
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 11:00 pm (UTC)
Serrrallonga. Now we're going too far the other way. This is Kate Winslet stuff. Calm down and have a pork pie.
Simple!
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC)
Look this is a bit tiring. Simple solution. Shoot the Inuits, no more killing. Ban everybody else from hunting. Simple.
Hunting Polar Bears
[info]doxiedogs2 wrote:
Friday, 20 March 2009 at 11:17 pm (UTC)
This is completely unacceptable and disgusting!!!! Polar bears are in enough trouble as it is!! How could anyone condone or participate in this heinous crime. Come on Canada..put a stop to this as well as the slaughtering of seals!!!! Stephen Harper needs to end this immediately. As for Mr. Warner and the sick bastards that are his clients may the rot in Hell. I have to wonder about the mind of someone who takes pleasure in doing such evil things..it is so sick. Canadians need to rally and stop this.
[info]deano30 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:06 am (UTC)
I have to agree with so many of the posters here - I have real problems with a mouse in a trap let alone a polar bear in someone's sights.

If you really want to shoot something I have a better use for your trigger finger - stick it up your bum and then suck it - tossers.
Finger Problems
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:46 am (UTC)
Deano30. So, we know how you've been putting your finger to good use. Keep it up. Just remember, you're mum's going to kiss you tonight with big cuddles. Nighty-night tiddles.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date