Food & Drink

11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

'Ruining drive to buy British'

Crackdown ordered on food label loopholes

Supermarkets must stop suggesting cheaper foreign meat comes from Britain

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

Supermarkets have been told by ministers to stop selling processed food containing cheaper foreign meat with labels suggesting it is British. The Environment Secretary, Hilary Benn, said retailers were undermining the Government's drive to persuade shoppers to buy British and putting at risk the Government's policies on food security and animal welfare.

A labelling loophole allows grocery chains to mark products as "Produced in the UK" if the last significant change to it took place in Britain, even if the main ingredient comes from abroad.

As such, they can legally label chicken sandwiches as "Produced in the UK", even if the chicken has come from intensive poultry sheds in Thailand, because they have placed the chicken between bread and, similarly, sell ready meals containing cheap foreign pork.

In a selection of "Produced in the UK" goods on sale yesterday, Tesco was selling chicken sandwiches with imported poultry, Somerfield "Wiltshire cured bacon" from Denmark, and Asda Cornish pasties with beef from Ireland.

In an interview with The Independent, Mr Benn said that Britain was lobbying for new European laws that would outlaw the practice – which he described as "hard to justify".

At a meeting at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) last week, he and the Farming minister Jane Kennedy urged stores to stamp out misleading labelling before the new legislation comes into force in several years.

Tesco and Sainsbury failed to turn up to the meeting, which was attended by Asda, Morrisons, Waitrose, Marks & Spencer and the British Retail Consortium, which represents all big stores.

Mr Benn suggested to the Food and Drink Federation this week that manufacturers should state the percentage of British ingredients in ready meals, pies and other products.

He told The Independent that labelling of fresh meat was generally good but he suggested some products were giving a false impression to consumers.

He said: "If you buy something that has on the package 'Wiltshire cured bacon', I think most people would assume the bacon came from Wiltshire, but under the current European rules that is not necessarily the case. You may turn it over and discover that actually it came from Denmark. Or if you buy, for example, Cumberland sausage you might assume that that is where the pork came from, but then you discover it's not from there – it's from somewhere else.

"So, we are pressing strongly in Europe... because consumers are not getting clear information. "

"We know a great deal about the origin of our car or the house we buy," he added. "I think we should have better information about where our food comes from."

Farmers' representatives welcomed the minister's "excellent" contribution, which it hoped would raise pressure on the stores to increase their backing for Britain's 152,000 farmers. Helen Ferrier, chief scientific adviser for the National Farmers' Union, said: "If people do want to buy British, we want them to be able to go into a shop and easily find those products – and at the moment they can't. The extra element of advantage our members might have over Dutch or Brazilian producers is not there."

Supermarkets defended their labelling, saying that they could not always source British meat or were supplying "value" products that consumers would not expect to have come from within the UK.

Tesco said: "'Produced in the UK'... will be in small writing on the back of pack and is intended only to indicate where the food has been produced. It is not used in a way that suggests any of the ingredients are British and is not used to market the food as a 'British' product."

Somerfield said of its Wiltshire cured bacon: "The suggestion that customers automatically think the pigs are reared in Wiltshire is questionable. But we will revisit how we label country of origin in that product."

Confusion about country of origin labelling was raised by the TV chef Jamie Oliver last night in his show, Jamie Saves Our Bacon, in which he criticised grocery stores for their labelling of pork.

Setting out the Government's stance, Mr Benn said that he wanted to ensure the UK had a thriving farming sector at a time when the rapidly rising global population might reduce the willingness of other countries to export food to the United Kingdom.

He has been working on improving labelling for a month, having warned that government policy could only be allowed to take place if shoppers were informed of the origin of their food.

"I think the public and I have the opportunity to raise that and change it because it is clearly wrong that something should be labelled in a way that makes people believe that the meat product came from somewhere it didn't come from.

"It seems to me that is wrong. It needs to change," Mr Benn said.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Why Europe?
[info]truewit wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
And why does Mr Benn need Europe to do this? Britain is a sovereign state and if its laws require greater precision than the European standard, then that is no great matter. As long as such legislation does not tell other countries what to do, and as long as it meets minimum European standards, then he should legislate, and if a food producer wants to take the government to the European Court, so be it: such a case would speed European legislative change. So, get on with it. Legislate that all food must truly and honestly reflect its origins, and if that means M&S, Sainsbury's, Tesco's, Boots, et al have to say 'Made with French bread, New Zealand butter, British Chicken, Israeli lettuce, and Spanish tomatoes', so be it: for the likes of M&S that probably means an extra 10p a sandwich.
Crackdown ordered on food label loopholes
[info]ajwheeldon wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:53 am (UTC)
Supermarkets would defend themselves as you describe, wouldn't they. In truth they have no interest in the true quality of what they provide and they have no interest in the morality of what they are providing. They just exist to make money for their shareholders. They (and I would say Tesco in particular at the moment) have no respect for their customers.
British?
[info]liveon35mm wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:56 am (UTC)
Point is not whether is British or not, point is that it is still "cheap processed meat"

Valueless - The Decline of The British Empire
A photographic diary into UK gloomy recession

http://valueless.wordpress.com
Use of Term "Flavours" on Food Labels
[info]angelw123 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:42 am (UTC)
Can someone please address the issue of food manufacturers using the loophole vague term "FAVOURS" on their labels? Surely that can mean that just about anything can be added and invalidates the whole concept of the label. Why not be more specific - what is there to hide?!
supermarket semantics and ethical diet
[info]dhammadinna_9 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
How silly of consumers, according to Tesco and Somerfield, to think that a label means what it says!

In any case, the best way to avoid these undesirable meats is to stop eating meat altogether. However humanely raised, the animal still loses his or her life, at only a fraction of the normal lifespan. There's nothing humane about that, any more than it would be humane to breed humans for slaughter but keep them in good conditions until the time came to kill them.

Small and welcome steps are being taken to address the cruelty of meat production. How long before the majority of people begin to step back and see in perspective the horror of the whole totally unnecessary business?
Food labeling
[info]dennypoos wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:13 am (UTC)
Mr Benn, when talking to 'The Independent' atates that if you bought cumberland sausages you would assume that that was where they came from. Mr Benn shuold be aware that cumberland sausages are so called because they originally were made from meat from the cumberland breed of pig. The location of the animal in this case has no bearing on its naming in sausage production.
"British" food labels
[info]streathamman wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:21 am (UTC)
Many people must be outraged by the loopholes in labelling. For some years I have used "British" produce wherever possible. Why should I buy Irish beef, when I can find "British", similarly with "British" bacon as opposed to "Danish". I want to support British farmers, not be tricked into buying a foreign product.

The EU laid down strict rules to ensure that consumers knew what they were buying. Who do food processing companies think that they are, deliberately flouting the intentions of elected national and European government?

Chris B
Re: "British" food labels
[info]berserkerboy wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
EU ministers who have created the laws regarding labelling are not elected! They are well paid to give their country of origin an advantage over others. A shame we haven't caught on yet!
The sooner we stop letting them make our laws the better.
Look at pig farmers, as shown on Jamie Olivers show last night. How is it we allow pig meat to be sold in this country that it would be illegal for our own farmers to produce in the same way?
Our politicians are letting us all down. What is the matter with them? Do they have no common sense at all!?
[info]tobyandtoby wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Why will it take several years, not months, to introduce?
Because...
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC)
Because a committee can be made of "industry experts" (read political donors), MPs and workshy toffs to draw large salaries with little work for an extended period of time at taxpayers expense.
And then...?
[info]junkkmale wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
Having read the piece, and some excellent responses, the 'It weren't me, Guv'... again, from a British Minister is depressing... tellingly so. Especially when, and when it suits, the EU is invoked to impose whatever new fad takes their fancy.

I live in dread of the small novel we are to expect on a tube of smarties once they fudge their way to carbon footprints, food miles, etc. And, of course, how the data will be of equal accuracy or use.


Bang their heads together
[info]chrisasmith wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
Government should ask retailers to adopt a voluntary code of conduct to correctly label food with country or countries of produce origin or face more stringent controls.

They should then publicise which chains have agreed to the adoption of the code, so that consumers can make an informed choice.
Labels telling lies
[info]foodie09 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 11:08 am (UTC)
'Tesco said: "'Produced in the UK'... will be in small writing on the back of pack and is intended only to indicate where the food has been produced. It is not used in a way that suggests any of the ingredients are British and is not used to market the food as a 'British' product."

Somerfield said of its Wiltshire cured bacon: "The suggestion that customers automatically think the pigs are reared in Wiltshire is questionable. But we will revisit how we label country of origin in that product." '

This suggests to me that the supermarkets KNOW they are telling lies, or at least half-truths on their packets. This loophole must be closed as soon as possible.
Labeling problem
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:36 pm (UTC)
How should these products be labeled then?

For example if in England I produce a chicken sandwhich with chicken from Thailand, bread from France, and Mayonaise from Italy how should I label it? Produced in UK, EU, or the world?

What if all but one of the English ingredients comes from England, should it be labelled 'British' or 'Foreign'?
Priceless
[info]budnubac wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC)
Tesco said: "'Produced in the UK'... will be in small writing on the back of pack and is intended only to indicate where the food has been produced. It is not used in a way that suggests any of the ingredients are British and is not used to market the food as a 'British' product."

Does anyone else here yearn for the day when barefaced manipulation and outright lying is viewed less than desirable. It's like it's okay to do it, if you've got some clever little loophole in your semantic arsenal. Tesco and the rest of them should be ashamed. Morally vacuous. Well done Mr Benn, only next time call them the liars that they are.
Anyone fancy an Irish Pasty...? LOL!
[info]jamieolives wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 04:11 am (UTC)
Oh dear me... so I take it Asda should start up a new line in "Irish Pasties"...

I think you'll find the "Cornish" part refers to the traditional recipe having originated from Cornwall - everyone knows that! - it really doesnt matter where the meat comes from... although I suppose maybe they could mention it in the ingredients.

Me thinks you picked a bad example there... and to think, it even made your front page!
Stop whinging
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 08:12 pm (UTC)
Support your local butcher and you don't have to worry. Our butcher is cheaper than the supermarkets and owns their own farm, but since we had a Tesco built across the road (I wanted a park but it seems that the council were not interested in suggestion letters without large cheques enclosed) they have found their business hit hard. It mystifies me why people choose pre-packed food of dubious origin when they could have something decent for the same price.
Not just place of origin
[info]nmr_bristol wrote:
Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 02:35 pm (UTC)
I want to know HOW and WHERE my food was reared/produced from 'craddle to grave'. I dont want any abiguity as to whether it contains genetically modified ingredients, or if the animals I am eating was fed on GM grain. If a product states outdoor reared, then to the majority of people that would mean reared outside in a field until it was slaughtered. Why when I asked in tesco if their soya beans contained any genetically modified soya no-one in the store knew?
I don't think I am alone in wondering why we the public are deliberately being misled.
Labelling
[info]loveukbabe wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
I have read all the posts and I am one of the one's still trying to support British or should I say uk farmers. British seems to be the problem, meaningless now. However, perhaps Mr Benn should take note of a sign in a French Supermarket in Normandy - Dont worry no British meat sold here! According to him this is illegal. Additionally - some French supermarkets stock meat labelled Welsh lamb, usually in very small quantities, next to their own frozen lamb. I am told reliably by a French butcher that the French wouldnt buy Welsh lamb because it is too fatty. Do they put this label (Welsh) as a warning to their consumers to make them buy the homegrown lamb! If they can stock meat saying Welsh, then why cant we stock chicken with the origin of Bulgaria!!
Misrepresentation of vegetables by ASDA
[info]markbaravelli wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
In times of recession, such as these, people are looking to either get the best value for their pound or ensure that the money they spend on essentials stays in the UK. It is disappointing that over the past week I have been checking the origin of vegetables marked as British or displaying the Union flag at Asda and have found that Asda, Llandudno will sell you British Cabbage (from Spain), British Spinach (from Spain) and British Celery (from Spain). Until I pointed it out to a store 'colleague' they also sold British Broccoli (from Spain).

It seems that the smaller your business the more you have to comply with legislation, whereas if you have a large business you can hide behind a distinct lack of staff training. It seems as if there is no one person that is actually accountable.
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 01:21 pm (UTC)
more concerned about packageing than labling to be honest, Food Franchises across the country need to be targetted for this waste
Food Labels
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 10:42 am (UTC)
Does this mean they will require barcode label printers to support the label industry

Tuck into our A-to-Z of recipes

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date