'Ruining drive to buy British'
Crackdown ordered on food label loopholes
Supermarkets must stop suggesting cheaper foreign meat comes from Britain
Supermarkets have been told by ministers to stop selling processed food containing cheaper foreign meat with labels suggesting it is British. The Environment Secretary, Hilary Benn, said retailers were undermining the Government's drive to persuade shoppers to buy British and putting at risk the Government's policies on food security and animal welfare.
A labelling loophole allows grocery chains to mark products as "Produced in the UK" if the last significant change to it took place in Britain, even if the main ingredient comes from abroad.
As such, they can legally label chicken sandwiches as "Produced in the UK", even if the chicken has come from intensive poultry sheds in Thailand, because they have placed the chicken between bread and, similarly, sell ready meals containing cheap foreign pork.
In a selection of "Produced in the UK" goods on sale yesterday, Tesco was selling chicken sandwiches with imported poultry, Somerfield "Wiltshire cured bacon" from Denmark, and Asda Cornish pasties with beef from Ireland.
In an interview with The Independent, Mr Benn said that Britain was lobbying for new European laws that would outlaw the practice – which he described as "hard to justify".
At a meeting at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) last week, he and the Farming minister Jane Kennedy urged stores to stamp out misleading labelling before the new legislation comes into force in several years.
Tesco and Sainsbury failed to turn up to the meeting, which was attended by Asda, Morrisons, Waitrose, Marks & Spencer and the British Retail Consortium, which represents all big stores.
Mr Benn suggested to the Food and Drink Federation this week that manufacturers should state the percentage of British ingredients in ready meals, pies and other products.
He told The Independent that labelling of fresh meat was generally good but he suggested some products were giving a false impression to consumers.
He said: "If you buy something that has on the package 'Wiltshire cured bacon', I think most people would assume the bacon came from Wiltshire, but under the current European rules that is not necessarily the case. You may turn it over and discover that actually it came from Denmark. Or if you buy, for example, Cumberland sausage you might assume that that is where the pork came from, but then you discover it's not from there – it's from somewhere else.
"So, we are pressing strongly in Europe... because consumers are not getting clear information. "
"We know a great deal about the origin of our car or the house we buy," he added. "I think we should have better information about where our food comes from."
Farmers' representatives welcomed the minister's "excellent" contribution, which it hoped would raise pressure on the stores to increase their backing for Britain's 152,000 farmers. Helen Ferrier, chief scientific adviser for the National Farmers' Union, said: "If people do want to buy British, we want them to be able to go into a shop and easily find those products – and at the moment they can't. The extra element of advantage our members might have over Dutch or Brazilian producers is not there."
Supermarkets defended their labelling, saying that they could not always source British meat or were supplying "value" products that consumers would not expect to have come from within the UK.
Tesco said: "'Produced in the UK'... will be in small writing on the back of pack and is intended only to indicate where the food has been produced. It is not used in a way that suggests any of the ingredients are British and is not used to market the food as a 'British' product."
Somerfield said of its Wiltshire cured bacon: "The suggestion that customers automatically think the pigs are reared in Wiltshire is questionable. But we will revisit how we label country of origin in that product."
Confusion about country of origin labelling was raised by the TV chef Jamie Oliver last night in his show, Jamie Saves Our Bacon, in which he criticised grocery stores for their labelling of pork.
Setting out the Government's stance, Mr Benn said that he wanted to ensure the UK had a thriving farming sector at a time when the rapidly rising global population might reduce the willingness of other countries to export food to the United Kingdom.
He has been working on improving labelling for a month, having warned that government policy could only be allowed to take place if shoppers were informed of the origin of their food.
"I think the public and I have the opportunity to raise that and change it because it is clearly wrong that something should be labelled in a way that makes people believe that the meat product came from somewhere it didn't come from.
"It seems to me that is wrong. It needs to change," Mr Benn said.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
Valueless - The Decline of The British Empire
A photographic diary into UK gloomy recession
http://valueless.wordpress.com
In any case, the best way to avoid these undesirable meats is to stop eating meat altogether. However humanely raised, the animal still loses his or her life, at only a fraction of the normal lifespan. There's nothing humane about that, any more than it would be humane to breed humans for slaughter but keep them in good conditions until the time came to kill them.
Small and welcome steps are being taken to address the cruelty of meat production. How long before the majority of people begin to step back and see in perspective the horror of the whole totally unnecessary business?
The EU laid down strict rules to ensure that consumers knew what they were buying. Who do food processing companies think that they are, deliberately flouting the intentions of elected national and European government?
Chris B
The sooner we stop letting them make our laws the better.
Look at pig farmers, as shown on Jamie Olivers show last night. How is it we allow pig meat to be sold in this country that it would be illegal for our own farmers to produce in the same way?
Our politicians are letting us all down. What is the matter with them? Do they have no common sense at all!?
I live in dread of the small novel we are to expect on a tube of smarties once they fudge their way to carbon footprints, food miles, etc. And, of course, how the data will be of equal accuracy or use.
They should then publicise which chains have agreed to the adoption of the code, so that consumers can make an informed choice.
Somerfield said of its Wiltshire cured bacon: "The suggestion that customers automatically think the pigs are reared in Wiltshire is questionable. But we will revisit how we label country of origin in that product." '
This suggests to me that the supermarkets KNOW they are telling lies, or at least half-truths on their packets. This loophole must be closed as soon as possible.
For example if in England I produce a chicken sandwhich with chicken from Thailand, bread from France, and Mayonaise from Italy how should I label it? Produced in UK, EU, or the world?
What if all but one of the English ingredients comes from England, should it be labelled 'British' or 'Foreign'?
Does anyone else here yearn for the day when barefaced manipulation and outright lying is viewed less than desirable. It's like it's okay to do it, if you've got some clever little loophole in your semantic arsenal. Tesco and the rest of them should be ashamed. Morally vacuous. Well done Mr Benn, only next time call them the liars that they are.
I think you'll find the "Cornish" part refers to the traditional recipe having originated from Cornwall - everyone knows that! - it really doesnt matter where the meat comes from... although I suppose maybe they could mention it in the ingredients.
Me thinks you picked a bad example there... and to think, it even made your front page!
I don't think I am alone in wondering why we the public are deliberately being misled.
It seems that the smaller your business the more you have to comply with legislation, whereas if you have a large business you can hide behind a distinct lack of staff training. It seems as if there is no one person that is actually accountable.