Facebook sued for allegedly scanning users' private messages
Class action lawsuit seeks at least $10,000 per user for scanning the content of private Facebook messages and following the enclosed link
Facebook has been hit by a class action lawsuit claiming that the social network scans private messages sent by users in order to share this information with “advertisers, marketers, and other data aggregators”.
The suit claims that this practice is “an especially profitable opportunity for Facebook, because users who believe they are communicating on a service free from surveillance are likely to reveal facts about themselves that they would not reveal had they known the content was being monitored.”
Facebook have responded by saying that the allegations are “without merit,” adding that the company will “defend [itself] vigorously”.
The case cites independent research carried out last August by a security company named High-Tech Bridge, in which a link to a secret website was shared across various social networks and then monitored to see who attempted to access it.
The test suggested that automated computer programs operated by Facebook and other social networks followed the link. Both Google+ and Twitter were also implicated.
The lawsuit is requesting compensation of either $100 (£61) for each day of alleged violation or a $10,000 lump sum for each user - whichever is the greater amount.
Facebook has been hit by similar allegations in the past, but some think the site is right to scan links shared via users’ private message. Security expert Graham Cluley has noted that this is necessary process in curbing spam online.
“Facebook would be failing to properly protect message recipients if it didn't automatically check links to third party sites,” Cluley told The Independent. “Without protections in place, the site would be even more rife with scams and phishing attacks than it already is.”
“Of course, they should still be transparent about what they do and why as users' trust in Facebook has been rattled in the past by numerous privacy and security concerns.”
The question seems to be whether Facebook is checking links in order to protect its users, or whether this information is then added to the data profiles it sells on to third parties.
Life & Style blogs
Snapchat removed the Best Friends list feature and 'stalkers' are upset
Virtual reality thrusts viewers into the frontline of global events - and puts film-goers at the heart of the action
Fifty years of David Bowie's hairstyles in one animated gif
A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
Eculizumab: 'The £10m-per-patient NHS drug gave me my life back’
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British Muslim school children suffering a backlash of abuse following Paris attacks
British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
Liberal Democrat minister defends comments suggesting immigration causes pub closures
- 3 Amal Clooney gives excellent response to fashion question at European Court of Human Rights
- 4 A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
- 5 Isis publicly behead man in Syrian town square for 'insulting Allah' as he screams for help
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£60000 per annum: Ashdown Group: SQL DBA (SSIS, ETL) - Central London, £60,000...
£18000 per annum: Ashdown Group: This role is a perfect opportunity for someon...
£35 - 45K + COMMISSION (NEG): Guru Careers: A Sales Director / Business Develo...
£50k ( neg) plus benefits : Freshtechit: ColdFusion roles available in Surrey ...