Google reportedly paying AdBlock Plus to greenlight their ads
Search giant among companies paying to have their ad content added to app's 'whitelist'
Monday 08 July 2013
According to reports from German news site Horizont, Google and other companies are paying the makers of AdBlock Plus to add their content to the app’s list of ‘acceptable ads’.
AdBlock Plus, the single most popular browser extension for both Firefox and Chrome, is a free application that users install to remove advertising from their web experience. Despite this, the company has always been open about its 'whitelisting' of certain content.
The makers define advertisements they consider acceptable as those which are static (ie, without animation or sounds), that do not obscure page content, are clearly marked as advertising and that are preferably text-only.
In a survey of AdBlock's users they reportedly found that only 25% wanted no advertising at all, and even these individuals can still disable the whitelist. AdBlock also charges certain large companies to have their content automatically whitelisted (it's this that Google is allegedly guilty of), in order to help maintain their database of acceptable sites.
The information gained attention via a posting on Hacker News, where users have been discussing the pros and cons of such a system. One commenter named RyanZAG notes that whilst the news seems fairly innocuous it sets a bad precedent by creating a two-tiered system of advertising. Giants like Google can give their own content an automatic boost, whilst "removing the ability for other players to compete on a level footing."
Another user responds saying that this is just how advertising has always worked - companies pay gateholders in order to let their ads appear in front of users. The only oddity is that AdBlock sell themselves as keeping such advertisements hidden so the whole situation has become, in md224's words, "meta".
However, if AdBlock didn't work with companies in some way then brands would almost certainly take action against them. So it seems that having at least some standards - ie, AdBlock's criteria of what makes an 'acceptable advertisement' - is preferable to having no standards at all.
Life & Style blogs
The Evil Within preview: a survival horror fan’s best worst nightmare
Porn film production likely to stop in Los Angeles after actor tests positive for HIV
The 3D-printed key that can unlock anything
Ice Bucket Challenge: ALS Association doesn't yet know what to do with all of the money raised
Anal sex study reveals climate of 'coercion'
Robin Williams Emmys tribute led by Billy Crystal criticised for including 'racist' joke about Muslim woman
The Rotherham child abuse scandal is a tale of apologists, misogyny and double standards
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral
Scottish independence TV debate: Pumped-up Alex Salmond bounces back in bruising second round against Alistair Darling
Do you realise just how foolish the UK looks?
With Douglas Carswell joining Ukip, my party has taken another giant step forward
- 1 Keira Knightley topless: Usually conservative actress does own take on #Freethenipple campaign for Interview Magazine
- 2 Oil tanker with $100 million cargo goes missing off Texas coast
- 3 George Galloway left with severe bruising after attack in Notting Hill by man 'shouting about the Holocaust'
- 4 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
- 5 Lady al-Qa’ida: On the trail of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, the world’s most wanted prisoner
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£28000 - £30000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: Junior VB.NET ...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# .NET Web De...
£45000 - £69999 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# Algo-Develo...
£60000 - £70000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: Senior Data Sc...