Google says it should not be tried in UK courts for allegedly tracking British citizens
The firm is accused of illegally tracking users of the web browser Safari
Monday 16 December 2013
Google will today argue that a court case accusing the company of illegally tracking individuals using the Safari web browser should not be held in British courts.
In the high court, Google is expected to suggest that the hearing should instead be held in California, where the search engine firm is based.
Earlier this year, a social media campaign, ‘Safari Users Against Google’s Secret Tracking’, was started and claimed that between September 2011 and February 2012, Google illegally tracked users of Apple’s web-browser Safari in order to provide personalised adverts online.
The campaigners accused the firm of bypassing the privacy settings on Safari for iPhones, iPads and desktops to install tracking cookies without users’ consent.
Law-firm Olswang subsequently announced that it would be representing the UK-based claimants in what is the first group claim brought against Google in the UK.
Olswang are set to highlight three cases in court, although since the campaign, hundreds have expressed their intention to sue Google if the case is held in the UK.
Google’s argument that the case should instead be held in the US has been criticised by some campaigners, who think that as Google operates so broadly in the UK, it should stand up to UK law.
However, Google has said that British courts have “no jurisdiction” and that no harm has come to Safari users, even if they were tracked.
A spokesperson for Google pointed out that a case “almost identical to this one” was dismissed two months ago in the US.
The spokesperson added: “We’re asking the court to re-examine whether this case meets the standards required in the UK for a case like this to go to trial.”
In August 2012, Google agreed to pay $22.5 million (£14.4 million) to settle charges of misrepresentation of how Safari users were tracked. The firm more recently paid out $17 million (£10.5 million) to US states for similar reasons.
Life & Style blogs
Alexander McQueen at auction: What makes a really great piece of fashion?
A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
No female ejaculation, please, we’re British: a history of porn and censorship
Stressed nurses are 'forced to choose between health of patients and their own'
Pornhub: Kim Kardashian's sex tape is the most-watched porn video of all-time
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Rozanne Duncan: Ukip expels councillor for 'jaw-dropping' comments made in BBC TV interview
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£17000 - £20000 per annum: Ashdown Group: IT Helpdesk Support Technician - 12 ...
£16000 - £19000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Our client is the UK's leading ...
£20000 - £30000 per annum + OTE £50k: SThree: SThree are a global FTSE 250 bus...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000 + Car + Pension: SThree: SThree are a ...