Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US cybersecurity law could allow government to look in on citizens’ computers, experts warn

Association representing companies including Google and Facebook have come out against the US government’s plans for the internet

Andrew Griffin
Friday 16 October 2015 09:57 BST
Comments
James Jeffery, a hacker associated with the global hacking group Anonymous, was able to access women's details on the British Pregnancy Advice Service website
James Jeffery, a hacker associated with the global hacking group Anonymous, was able to access women's details on the British Pregnancy Advice Service website (Getty Images)

Many of the biggest technology companies in the world are opposing a US cybersecurity bill that it is feared could lead to the invasion of citizens’ privacy.

The Senate will soon vote on the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (Cisa), which has wide support across parties and is endorsed by Obama and is intended to allow government agencies and companies to share information about cybersecurity threats. But it is being opposed by most of the world’s tech giants — as well as the government agency that it is intended to help.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CISA), which represents companies including Google and Facebook, has written an open letter arguing that the bill could cause “collateral harm” to innocent internet users.

The group recognised that it was important to ensure that threats are shared to ensure that people remain safe.

“However, CCIA is unable to support CISA as it is currently written,” the association’s policy counsel wrote. “CISA’s prescribed mechanism for sharing of cyber threat information does not sufficiently protect users’ privacy or appropriately limit the permissible uses of information shared with the government.

“In addition, the bill authorizes entities to employ network defense measures that might cause collateral harm to the systems of innocent third parties.”

The bill was intended to allow tech companies to share user information that was “anonymised” with the Department for Homeland Security (DHS). But the DHS itself has opposed the bill, because it would mean that information could be passed onto the NSA and FBI.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in