Health & Families

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Health claim of probiotics not accepted

£220m-a-year 'dairy shots' industry in disarray following EU scientists' ruling

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

Drink this yogurt for a healthier stomach. Thirty million shoppers have swallowed the claims for probiotics as enthusiastically as the sweet fermented milk in the belief that "good bacteria" will defeat "bad bacteria" in epic microscopic battles inside our bodies.

But claims that probiotic ingredients improve health can not be supported, according to an extensive review of scientific research by a team of experts from the European Union.

Of 180 claims for probiotic ingredients, the EU's food agency the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa) threw out every one. Ten were rejected outright and a 21-member expert panel could not assess the remaining 170 because the ingredients for which the claims were made could not be identified.

The findings on ingredients such as lactobacillus and bifidobacterium are an embarrassment to the UK's £220m-a-year "dairy shots" industry, which has relied on heavy advertising to persuade shoppers of its products.

However Britain's best-selling yogurt drinks, Actimel and Yakult, were excluded from Efsa's findings yesterday because Danone, Actimel's maker, and Yakult, the Japanese firm which introduced probiotic drinks to the UK in 1996, withdrew their claims before they could be scrutinised.

They have since re-submitted them, but the results will not be available until next year.

Efsa is reviewing all health claims made for food products following the introduction of a new EU law, the 2006 Regulation on Health and Nutrition Claims, which stipulated for the first time that all medical-sounding marketing boasts must be verified. Brands whose claims are not approved will have to stop making the claims.

Efsa has been studying 2,000 applications submitted by member states on behalf of companies. Releasing results on "general health claims" yesterday, Efsa's 21-member expert panel rejected two-thirds of the 523 applications for 200 vitamins, minerals, fibre, fats, carbohydrates, and "probiotic" bacteria.

On probiotics, an Efsa spokeswoman said: "They have been assessed but the outcome was negative or our scientists said they didn't have sufficient evidence to evaluate them."

Yesterday, Danone, the French dairy giant which is thought to have withdrawn three claims for Actimel and Activia from Efsa in April, made no comment.

Yakult, which introduced probiotic drinks to the UK in 1996, said the results did "not relate to Yakult."

Yakult, which markets its best-selling yogurt as "self-defence for your gut", said an application for its principal ingredient, Lactobacillus casei Shirota, had duplicated other claims with Efsa. The Japanese firm said: "Evidence for its health benefit is based on over 70 human studies and over 70 years of research."

Sue Davies, chief policy officer at Which? said the rulings showed that eventually shoppers would be made aware of what did, and did not, work.

"For too long the fact that people are getting more interested in health has been seen as a marketing opportunity, and companies have been putting claims on their products. And now that we are getting systematic research we have been able to say some of these claims cannot be supported."

180

Number of claims for probiotic ingredients rejected by EU.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]thirteen_ravens wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
Good.

I tried a leading brand for a week or two and all I got was a weird feeling in my gut, wind, and watery bowel movements...

The best diet is a simple one, in my opinion. As long as you're getting a balance of the different food groups and not too much grease, salt or sugar, it's all good.

But then everyone is different - I reckon if one food doesn't agree with you, even if it's widely known as "healthy," then don't eat it. Fruit gives me stomach upset - excepting bananas - so I rarely eat it. Though being well aware I need Vit C in my diet, I make sure I eat vegetables to make up for it.

Whereas on the unhealthy side - crisps give me stomach cramps and wind, and milk chocolate a tendency to migraine, and a lot of tea/coffee gives me cold hands and feet....(Trial and error - it's called Reynaud's Syndrome - narrow capillaries.) So...I rarely drink either, and now drink the caffiene-free Rooibos tea instead.

If you're taking a yoghurt supplement to help stop feeling bloated, then why not just take a look at your diet and change/ substitute the problem-causers, rather than spending extra cash on something else?
Not every yogurt makes you feel good
[info]aliceinwondera wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 02:40 pm (UTC)
I also tried a number of healthy yogurts and my stomach was hurting afterwards. So, I thought it was weird.
Probiotic
[info]exportskip wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 03:14 pm (UTC)
It's a shame that there's no money in telling people that a good handful of strawberries a day will give over 10 times the probiotic benefit of any synthetic product. People want to improve their health but while there's no fruit and vegetable marketing body that can compete with Big Dairy or Big Pharma, they'll believe anyone who appears on TV in a white coat. People would rather pop a pill or down a shot than just eat what is good for them.
Lactobacillus reduces bowel cancer spread
[info]drlizmiller wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 05:28 pm (UTC)
There is however good evidence that lactobacillus reduces the recurrences of bowel cancer . There is some evidence that it may prevent tumours in the first place, but the evidence for lactobacillus reducing secondary spread of cancer of the bowel has been published in Drugs and Therapeutics

And one thing is certain, the bacteria wont harm you as much as the milk
Re: Lactobacillus reduces bowel cancer spread
[info]derekcolman wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC)
drlizmiller, can you substantiate your claim that milk is harmful? It is a natural product with no chemical additives. What could be more healthy? Past claims that it contains too much fat were simply untrue, and did a great deal of harm to the dairy industry. Full cream milk is only 4% fat, much lower than the amount in many products labelled as healthy. It should only be of concern to anyone drinking large amounts. In the years after the war, free milk was given to all school children, and was instrumental in eliminating ricketts from this country. Apparently it has made a return because many children get no milk but instead are drinking soft drinks, which incidentally often contain the toxic chemical aspartame as a sweetener, instead of the more healthy sucrose. All the things condemned by modern nutritionists such as milk, sugar, red meat, real butter and so on are very healthy if not consumed in excess. The proof of this is that the people brought up on these foods are the generation that are now living into the mid 70s and beyond. If you really are a doctor, you should not always believe those glossy leaflets that big pharma pushes through your letterbox.
Re: Lactobacillus reduces bowel cancer spread
[info]drlizmiller wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 03:59 am (UTC)
The source for my information about Lactobacillus reducing the spread of bowel cancer comes from Drugs & Therapeutics bulletin - once an independent publication but now part of the BMJ group http://dtb.bmj.com/

The information about cows milk is
a) common sense - Modern Diary cows produce between 20 and 30 litres of milk a day for nine or more months of the year. They were designed to produce two or three litres a day, until their calves were weaned. The Insulin growth factors and other hormones necessary for this prodigious feat are put out in the milk. The diet of these animals is any but healthy, including, at least in the past, other cows. Something in the industrial food complex has to give, in this case it is the cow, usually dead after five or six years.

No other adult animal drinks the milk of another species and even a fighting bull (pure muscle) does it, without milk products, on a vegetable based diet.

b) the book by Professor Jane Plant "Your life in their hands" This is based on her own story of overcoming three recurrences of breast cancer, which is rare to survive. Professor Plant's book is a thoroughly researched book on the epidemiology of diseases associated with the consumption of dairy products, which includes breast cancer. Insulin growth factor stimulates tumour growth.

Of course the diary industry and pharmacological industry are some of the most powerful forces in society today and to speak out against them is to invite censorship and punishment on a scale only matched by the Chinese abuse of human rights ;-)

One reason that people brought up on a diet of milk etc is firstly the generation you are referring to is in part the war generation, which had rationing.

Another perhaps more important reason is the quality of products was significantly better in those days. Nowadays vegetables have a fifth of the nutrients that 50 years ago. It is no coincidence that where once it was "An apple a day" it is now "Five a day"

If I had to choose between drinking a pint of milk from a cow the 1950s or even 1960s or a pint of Diet cola, I would choose the milk without a moment's hesitation.

Finally, I never believe the glossy leaflets from big Pharma, the more they have to spend to persuade me of their claims, the more they are likely to be lying. "Truths" can be passed on for free!
Re: Lactobacillus reduces bowel cancer spread
[info]drlizmiller wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 04:04 am (UTC)
* For the record, my beverages of choice are tap water and black tea and tea is not ideal
Re: Lactobacillus reduces bowel cancer spread
[info]nullius123 wrote:
Monday, 5 October 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
Just because something is "natural" or "additive free" doesn't mean it's good for you. Lots of "natural" foods are poisonous unless cooked or processed (or the toxin is genetically engineered out). Others are benign in small amounts (like saturated fats, sugars and coffee) but harmful if over-done.

If you like milk, buy organic - that way you'll know that the cows have only eaten vegetable matter and haven't had too much in the way of hormones and antibiotics. And if milk doesn't agree with you, then it won't matter how "natural" it is.
Let Down
[info]yambas wrote:
Friday, 2 October 2009 at 11:09 pm (UTC)
That is a real kick in the guts.
Health claims for probiotics not accepted
[info]tbird33 wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 04:56 am (UTC)
It is a great pity that these august bodies that judge things like probiotics are not prepared to reject the claims of benefit and no harm that are made for water fluoridation.
healthy
[info]orangiey wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 06:05 am (UTC)
i live in Spain and the best 'healthy' product I always see in the 'health' section is DIGESTIVE biscuits because they are full of fibre....and sugar and fat etc.....
Kefir
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
I make my own kefir from raw goat milk. I dont bother with pasteurised cow milk products. Cows milk tests positive for chlorogenic acid, which degrades the pituatary, degrading it, and making the first part of the triplet essential for all malignancies. H R Clark PhD ND 2007 The Cure and Prevention of All Cancers. pp105
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 11:01 am (UTC)

At last. The ridiculous make-it-up-as-you-go-along health claims for these drinks and all that "good bacteria / bad bacteria" marketing nonsense has been irritating me for years. I'm just amazed they were allowed to get away with it for so ling.
MILK BLOODY MILK ONE GLASS 8 WATER, 1 ASPIRIN, TEA IS GOOS, INDIAND FOOD SMELLS
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 06:52 pm (UTC)
Please note I have not anything( nothing?) against the games or Olympics. At 87, I cannot even lift my leg leave aside the spear.
This post is very long and you are hungry. CARE for some milk?
"The 9 million cows living on dairy farms in the United States spend most of their lives in large sheds or on feces-caked mud lots, where disease is rampant. Cows raised for their milk are repeatedly impregnated. Their babies are taken away so that humans can drink the milk intended for the calves. When their exhausted bodies can no longer provide enough milk, they are sent to slaughter and ground up for hamburgers."
By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer David Bauder, Ap Television Writer ? 8 mins ago
Late-night host David Letterman acknowledged on Thursday's show that he had sexual relationships with female employees and that someone tried to extort $2 million from him over the affairs. CBS says an employee has been charged with attempted grand larceny in the case.
No this ^^^^is a virus
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

PROBIOTIC BULL FAECES
[info]misterbull wrote:
Saturday, 3 October 2009 at 11:48 pm (UTC)
I NEVER FELL FOR IT, BUT I SEE MANY PEOPLE DID. I HOPE PEOPLE DEMAND THEIR MONEY BACK, AS THIS WAS ONE HUGELY OVER-PRICED RIP OFF. TIP OUT 6 MICRO BOTTLES OF YOGHURT DRINK AND SEE HOW LITTLE YOU GET FOR YOUR 2 POUNDS PLUS. AN ABSOLUTE RIP-OFF AND IT MADE A MUG OUT OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE. I HOPE THE COMPANIES ARE SUED FOR ALL THEIR PROFIT OR PUNISHED HEAVILY BY SOME LEGAL BODY. IF YOU FEEL GUTTED, HAVE A PROBIOTIC YOGHURT DRINK... IT CURES DEPRESSION... HA HA...
SOME probiotics work wonders for ECZEMA
[info]simonetaylor wrote:
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 at 06:16 pm (UTC)
The OTHER thing is that Yakult has 18grams of sugar per 100!

The yogurt drinks really upset me because there are actually some really good probiotics out there. My son, for example, had extremely bad eczema for years and its only since taking probiotics (thankfully recommended in my local health food shop) that it has cleared up. Years of using lotions never worked. I give him Optibac probiotics - fantastic!
Not bad news for probiotic companies
[info]sugarraya_1 wrote:
Friday, 23 October 2009 at 05:03 pm (UTC)
I think this message heavily misconstrues the ongoings between the EFSA and food supplements such as probiotics. 170 of the 180 probiotics were not rejected or failed, they were simply returned to manufacturers who now need to resubmit the applications with more specific information about the species and strains used. OptiBac Probiotics issued a response today - http://bit.ly/mG9dm

Most popular in Life & Style


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date