Health & Families

6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Multivitamin supplements a 'waste of time'

Healthy diet provides all the vitamins needed to prevent serious deficiencies

By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

Researchers found multivitamins did not lower the risk of most common cancers

REX

Researchers found multivitamins did not lower the risk of most common cancers

Middle-aged women who swallow multivitamin supplements are not doing their health any favours – and are just creating expensive urine, according to the world's largest study into the subject.

Researchers who examined the pill-popping habits of nearly 162,000 American women aged 50 to 79 found that although they swallowed dietary supplements by the bucketload, there was no sign that they reduced common cancers, heart disease or deaths.

People who eat a healthy diet get all the vitamins they need from their food. Any excess of vitamins (the water soluble C, B1, B2 and B6), whether in the food or in dietary supplements, is excreted. Fat soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) are stored in the liver and an excess can result in side effects.

"Based on our results, if you fall into the category of the women described here and you do in fact have an adequate diet, there really is no reason to take a multivitamin," said Dr Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, professor of epidemiology at Albert Einstein College, Yeshiva University.

Around half of Americans use vitamin supplements, spending $20bn (£13.4bn) a year on the pills which are believed to improve health and longevity. In Britain, a Food Standards Agency survey last year found 31 per cent of adults claimed to be taking the supplements, which typically cost £7 for a month's supply. The market in the UK is estimated to be worth over £330m a year.

The researchers recorded around 10,000 cases of cancer, 9,000 heart attacks and 10,000 deaths, and compared the incidence among the women who took supplements with those who did not. Marian Neuhouser of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre in Seattle, who led the study published in Archives of Internal Medicine, said: "To our surprise we found that multivitamins did not lower the risk of the most common cancers and also had no impact on heart disease."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

vitamins
[info]srcangemi62 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 12:50 am (UTC)
MY family has been taking a multitude of vitiams almost every day. Our meals at home are balanced and cooked properly. PLENTY OF FRUIT AND VEGTABLES. I cannot believe I have wasted a small fortune, because of advertising and magazine articles. I truthfully could never ascertain if they were helping. Yet their are so many vitamins and trace elements not readily found in everday foods, on a year round basis. I felt because of the ease or absorbtion their must be some good. Maybe less than promised, something had to leak into the system. Then the argument is did it do more good or harm.
I believe it is unfare to expect vitamins to have a measurable effect on illnesses that are inherited, basic to the bodies DNA, affected by invironment, body mistreatment, medical failure, etc. Did you measure the people that did not take vitamins and studied haow they fared.
Re: vitamins
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 02:28 am (UTC)
Yes it is pretty well known that vitamin pills don't do anything for the average person and especially multivitamin pills which clearly are not targeted.

If you are someone with a vitamin deficiency, then you will need to take that vitamin, and your doctor is going to tell you. But the vast majority of people have no such deficiency and don't need these pills.

In general, if you each more vitamins and supplements than you need, your body gets rid of the excess without any harmful effects. There are some that if you take in vast quantities will be bad for you.

But basically, if you are not known to have a vitamin deficiency, then you are wasting your time with these things. That is one reason why they are not marketed as a medicine but as a food supplement. They can't be marketed as a medicine because there is no evidence that they do anything.

Save you money and buy more enjoyable food.
Vitains
[info]srcangemi62 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 01:21 am (UTC)
If the vitamins derived from foods are good for you and of sufficent quanity it then follows: that vitamin supplements mfg to be absorbable in know quanities vs recongnized daily min/max should be no worse or better within the body performing their tasks. especially the watwer soluble variety.
Re: Vitamins
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 02:35 am (UTC)
Yes they are the same vitamins. No difference. But if you are getting them all from food, and the vast majority of people are, then you are wasting your time taking extra. The research isn't saying they are bad for you, they are saying that they are totally unnecessary the way they are marketed to be used.

For them to be effective you either have to have some serious defect (i.e. genetic defect) or be severely malnourished. The first you will find out eventually and need targeted supplements advised by a doctor; the second you better get some good food in you rather than wasting your money on expensive vitamin pills. Food provides lots of other things you need not just vitamins; you can't survive on vitamin pills alone.
Re: Vitamins
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 12:38 pm (UTC)
I remember a similar thing a while ago saying that vitimain suplements were completely useless becausr only in food do they have the correct minerals to be absobed properly (or something like that, any scientists feel free to expand/correct!) so even in the water soluable kind, just because it has dissolved it doesn't mean it is going into your system and being used.

You get all the vitimains from food anyway.
Vitamins
[info]mmdzr wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 03:44 am (UTC)
According to this article multivitamins don't help to keep cancer and heart attacks at bay, but what about helping your immune system? What about colds, flu and other virus'? If you take a good quality vitamin you can tell a difference in how you feel verses not taking them even if you do eat healthy. As a challange to all of you who read this put your multivitamin in a glass of water. If it does not dissolve in 20 minutes you are symply pooping the pill out and not obsorbing the nutrients. If it does dissolve you have a good one. Check out Nutrilite.com for excellent quality vitamins and more info.
Re: Vitamins
[info]alan2345 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:06 pm (UTC)
Have you ever heard of the Placebo effect?
Re: Vitamins
[info]parafahrenheit wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 07:14 pm (UTC)
Water and stomach fluid which is very acidic are not the same, so that's not much of a quality test.
Doctor, are YOU Feeling All Right?
[info]kaptainkitten wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 04:18 am (UTC)
"You seem to have an unhealthy obsession with vitamins..."

-------

Multi-vitamins are so safe you could glug an entire bottle without problems and yet the medical profession just keep going on and on about them.

Why is this? Partly their fascist tendancies (they do like to be the boss) and partly a lack of interest in human beings (I love doctors, but I couldn't eat a whole one)


Taking supplements is surely harmless and perhaps a symptom of a failure by the medical profession to deal with peoples day to day well-being.

Suppress a symptom and you don't make the underlying problem go away. The rather obvious desire to ban sales of supplements will not suddenly remove the desire to take them.

Perhaps, oh wise doctors, you could address the problem instead? Start dealing with peoples non-fatal health issues (sense of well-being) and maybe vitamin sales will plummet.
chips and vitamins
[info]pete_fly wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 04:32 am (UTC)
We need someone to go on a diet of fried chips and all the vitamins they can get.
Anyone done that, or know of such a thing?
If that works as a viable diet then all us pill poppers are fine if not, then throw the lot out and go back to eating food for living.
Re: chips and vitamins
[info]fulkehunke wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 09:39 am (UTC)
Lots of people eat only chips and no vitamins and don't die instantly. They do however develop health problems associated with a fatty diet, multi vitamins would not stop this development. Save money buy an apple from tesco's instead of the multi vits, the profit margin is lower.
most vitamins and many other pills
[info]jumpinjmm wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 06:00 am (UTC)
it has been clear to me after having read several materials over the yrs that most of these pills have all been hype pushed by pharmicutical drug companies to make another buck, all while paying off the fda and other such lobying forces out there to push these things they tout quite loudly, all this when even the natural supplements by nature can do things to help our bodis, but the fda, which is "thought to be for you" but is actually a system bought out by the drug companies on a regular basis, put it this way, they say this "pill" will help you, you may feel better but it does not take care of the real problem, then you have other problems that may come after having taken all these for yrs, the doc says, ok take these with those, you should be fine, the drug companies say these work together, then you need more cause these are chemical bound, our bodies are not meant to be chemical bound, thats why the bodies break down and fail, hence more problems,more money for them and they pay lobies to allow more "great" drugs to be pushed. How many drugs have been put out but then taken out of circulation, hint hint, these are not good for you, mother nature does know better, we just need to study it more and not taint with it so much, it's some sort of credo with fda and drug companies, if someone has all natural supplements that are good for you, they work hard to shut you down early so they continue to make more money, all at your expense, people have had their lives turned upside down promoting a healthy natural way to healing thyself, and there fore we never hear or see from them again, we need to take a stand for our right to better stuff naturally, and not be pushed around by the corperate junkies who want to push more of these craps around and down our throtes, MOTHER NATURE knows better for us, we just need to listen more closely, notice how even there is more and more drug comercials where you are supposed to ask your doctor, they want you to tell your doctor that the new drug is what you want, cause they say it is better, doc will get payed to prescribe them for you if you fit the profile, we have to watch out for ourselves, our big fda brothers are not in our best interest, lets take a stand and learn what we have been missing with nature!
in perspective
[info]phelix_da_kat wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
1. The article is saying if you eat healthly... you do not need a broad spectrum multi vitamin.
2. Also the article targets middle ages women. Most middle ages adults probably eat well, and the demands on their body (ie not kids/teenagers) is low.


Kind of obvious...

But unfortuately, not everyone does eat well.
Just look at the recommended "portions" of fruit and veg different countries give. In the UK it is 5, in Japan its 10... If you tell someone to eat 5 portions for an ideal range, you know most of them will have 3 or less..






vitamins
[info]dude_dudeson wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 01:10 pm (UTC)
Who paid for this study? Studies like this should only be trusted if they're done independently (as opposed to being funded by the pharmaceutical industry). It should also be noted that nothing is said about which vitamin/mineral supplements were in use in this study. Quite a few supplements, maybe even most, are worthless, either because manufacturers do not know enough about what they are doing, or because they don't care anyway and only want to make a quick and easy profit. It's not easy for most people to do the necessary research to pick food supplements that actually work and do what they're supposed to do, but they are available. To suggest that all supplements are useless is quite simply wrong, because that would be tantamount to saying that all vitamins, minerals and trace elements are unnecessary. Food nowadays has lots less nutrients than just a few decades ago, so high quality supplements are necessary for most people. The pharmaceutical industry would like us to think otherwise of course, and that's where all the anti-supplements propaganda comes from. Think for yourself, do your own research and make your own decisions. An article like this one is useless in this respect.
Dosage anyone?
[info]gibby1 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC)
Isn't a rather important aspect of this dosage? What dose were the women studied taking? Was it the same for all women studied and most importantly was it sufficient? This seems like bad science to me and the reporting in this article is atrocious. "although they swallowed dietary supplements by the bucketload, there was no sign that they reduced common cancers, heart disease or deaths." By the bucketload?!! Please.
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 01:50 pm (UTC)
I used to take so many multivitamin pills (and metabolic boosters, and muscle building amino-acids, HGH promoters, and various other 'performance enhancing stuff, such as creatine), as part of my gym and weight-training regime, that I almost rattled! And they probably cost me a small fortune, too.

I still think that there is some justification in taking some of these things if one is doing high-intensity physical training, but have now scaled back considerably on my intake of the rest.

I was alarmed to read in the New Scientist a while ago that, far from lengthening one's lifespan, there was statistical evidence to suggest that taking certain vitamin supplements in certain does could, in fact, shorten it!

Of course, neither medical science nor nutrition are exact sciences, and scientists in these areas seem to change their minds - often from one extreme to the other - about the possible harm or benefit of various supplements every few years. This is terribly confusing for the consumer and doesn't exactly instil very much trust or confidence in the pronouncements of these 'experts'.

Two final thoughts:

1. it may even be that there is a placebo effect with certain supplements, and that they do us good simply because we believe they will, and not because of what they contain.

2. It's all very well having educated, affluent, middle-class, suburban professionals (doctors, media health pundits, TV chefs, etc.), lecturing to people about how a 'properly balanced diet' removes the need for dietary supplements, but these people probably live near - or can drive to - quality supermarkets and grocers that stock all the right, health-giving foods, and they can afford to buy them, and they have enough spare time and sufficiently well-equipped kitchens to enable them to prepare properly balanced meals. But just how attainable is this 'food lifestyle' for low-income groups in urban areas, such as students, the unemployed, single-parent families and so on, who might not have quality food outlets near them, and cannot afford to travel to them, or who don't have the money to buy quality foods, or lack the time or the kitchens in which to create healthy, appetizing meals? I sometimes think these smug foodie-types need to come down to earth, stop patronizing people, and realize that having a properly balanced diet is a far more difficult thing to achieve, for both practical and financial reasons, for a lot of people than it is for them. (My own circumstances are that, though I am lucky enough to be able to afford to shop for quality foods, and live in a house with a large, well-equipped kitchen, I rarely have the time or the energy to prepare a balanced evening meal when I get home from work, usually quite late, in the evenings, and usually opt either for a microwave meal or a bowl of soup. Lunch is usually a take-away eaten at my desk, or - occasionally - a pub lunch. I suspect many single professional people are in the same position).
But what about all those people who don't heat a healthy diet
[info]londonjohn wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 01:58 pm (UTC)
There have been many of these studies recently and they all say that vitamin tablets give no benefit over a healthy diet. No kidding! You're saying that if I consume all the vitamins that I need through my diet then I don't need to take any supplements? Who would have guessed. Next they'll be saying that if I don't drive a car then I don't have to weat a seatbelt.

Wake up researchers! I'm a well informed health aware professional, but I frequently skip meals, sometimes go from dinner time to dinner time with nothing but coffee in the intervening 24 hours, I expose myself to second hand smoke, live in a highly polluted city, sometimes drink too much, eat junk food, occasionally take recreational drugs; in short, I don't always eat a healthy diet full of all those essential bits. Does it harm me my taking vitamins? Certainly not. Does it help? Maybe yes.

We can sum it up like this: Some people say vitamins don't help. Some people say they do help. Nobody says that they do any harm. Make your own decisions while you can, until some fool legislates against vitamin supplements.
Contradiction and...
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 02:29 pm (UTC)
exaggeration. Multivitamin supplements is the headline, bucketfuls of supplements is the story line. With that, this is already reading like a hit piece, which it is. Multis. They usually contain minute amounts of useless, synthetic vitamins. These minute amounts are based on RDAs, recommended daily allowances. RDAs are purely guess-work. They are based on assumed population`s (USA) intake of a certain vitamin, and then, deciding whether a deficiency disease of that vitamin exists in that population. In other words its a guesstimate of what you may need to prevent a deficiency disease. This more than useless calculation does not address differing individual requirements, optimum health, food grown in depleted soils, nor the 30,000 studies that show the efficacy of supplemental vitamins, minerals, herbs. Cancer. The supplements to rev-up the immune system (CD4, CD 8, and CD 14 white blood cells) are daily.. 3 grams natural Vitamin C, organic selenium and organic germanium. No one has ever seen this in a a Multi, That combo will enable those white killer cells to digest a tumor, once you have addressed the causes and pathways of the malgnancy. These have been identified, and published in The Cure and Prevention of All Cancers, 2007, H R Clark, PhD ND. So agreed, a multi will have NO effect on cancer! Heart disese. The three main causes are elevated blood homocysteine, lowered with supplemental Vitamins B6, B12 and folic acid; elevated blood lipo-protein alpha, lowered with Vitamin C, all in doses much greater than found in a multi, but definely found in that bucketful. You will also need to lower your raised blood triglycerides by reducing carbs, mainly sugars, and alcohol. These so-called-studies are getting more frequent. The EU is trying to get laws passed that would ban all natural vitamin supplements and herbs, apart from the useless minute- dosage synthetic multis. This misinformation is either to soften up the public to that day, or maybe the Pharma Industry is getting worried that too many will get enlightened, and move away from the toxic, dependent, useless drugs. Many of the so-called chronic diseases being deficiencies, or caused by eating the wrong foods. A population in optimum health is not profitable. I`ll give an example of a typical hit piece study. This one had the papers screaming Beta Carotene Causes Cancer. Elderly Danish male smokers, (health already compromised) were given a minute 25 mg twice daily dose of useless syntheitc beta carotene. The control group got none. At the end of the study, by chance, more on the synthetic beta carotene succumbed to lung cancer, hence the headlines. 200 mgs of natural beta carotene shows benefits. Its your body, your health. Go learn the alternatives. Free health sites such as mercoladotcom will help, as will publcations such as the Vita-Nutrient Solution by Dr R. Atkins.
A message to the Health Editor..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 03:43 pm (UTC)
Why didnt you stick up for real health and pull the quoted study to pieces? Why did you choose to go along with it and even to exaggerate it? Why are you marching in step with Big Pharma`s anti-supplement campaign? Why do you never talk about alternatives, when 30,000,plus studies exist to show efficasy? We all know doctors, (limited in nutritional lore), so-called-dieticians, (who spout the official misinformatio) all say DONT supplement. Yet, in a study about 10 years ago, it was found found that 8 out of 10 US doctors were mega-dosing themselves with Natural Vitamin E. That doesnt tally, does it? Is it too much to expect that a Health Editor will one day write an article on health, even though it may antagonise the medical profession, so-called-dieticians and Big Pharma? I was hoping, as the Indy is presumably your paymaster, that as Health Editor you would be doing some service for Indy readers and for humanitys health.
Re: A message to the Health Editor..
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 11:37 pm (UTC)
Big Pharma's anti-supplement campaign?

You do know that most of the vitamin companies are owned by Big Pharma? Make a pill with cheap ingredients sell it for a massive markup, and it won't kill anyone (but won't cure anything either), all without any research expenses. For Big Pharma it is a gift.
Cell Binding for Multivitimins
[info]lazertat wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:01 pm (UTC)
As these studies may show the lack of absorption to the body at the cell level. I tend to agree that in most cases this may be true and all we do is create expensive urine and fill the settling ponds with untold amounts of unprocessed supplements.
Recently I began a regiment of vitamin supplements this particular brand has something different. Unlike the others where in order to get any absorption into your system you are recommended to take with food thus the supplement can adhere to the food and be carried to the cellular level. While utilizing this method, at best you will only experience a maximum of 10% of the supplement absorbing to the cells.
The product that I am using has a patented method of binding the supplement and delivering it to the cell so that absorption is at the 85% level.
I can't speak to the studies or the truths of fictions about supplements aiding in the fight against cancer and heart disease but certainly for a great number of us we are not getting the benefit of a balanced diet and as with added stresses in our daily lives are burning the few vitamins faster than we absorb them. I will speak to how I feel since starting this program, it is incredible my energy levels have skyrocketed, I am far more alert clear thinking and sleep far more peacefully than I have for great number of years.
Vitamins help detoxify the body, even in Cancer treatment you are not to take vitamin C as it counters the effects of the Chemo drugs. Thus I would conclude that even as the water soluble vitamins travel through our systems they carry out with them the toxic impurities which we all absorb from the environment.
Back to the 85% cell absorption you can talk to me at tattall@hotmail.com.
Isnt this article kinda like "duh"
[info]onyx784 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:25 pm (UTC)
I mean who honestly thought vitamins reduced cancer rates or heart disease? If you did then you deserved to wasted all that money.

Vitamins were always taken to make up for any nutrients not gotten from your food. I take them because i dont eat a normal diet.
really
[info]eat_right_now wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:32 pm (UTC)
Where's the study this was based on ? PROOF ?

you people will believe anything , if this author comes out in a few months and says " I was wrong , multis are good for you " then you'll start taking them again.

Do your own studies and research. A lot of variables play a huge role in this that was not mentioned. Do these people workout ? are the active ? what do they consider a healthy diet ? How much water do they drink in a day ? How often do they eat ? What are the macro breakdowns of their diets ?

etc....

I take multis everyday , when I go without I can totally tell the difference. If you think your just pissing your $ away then think again and try drinking over 1 gallon of water a day. Try doing some exercise so that your body will use these vitamins. In todays world the food is crap , processed food makes up more that 80% of peoples diets even when they think they're eating proper.
Sad
[info]rttech82 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 05:58 pm (UTC)
Bo y that really ticks me off dude!

RT
www.privacy-center.be.tc
vitamin D and health
[info]mbarnes01 wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 06:28 pm (UTC)
This article contradicts a large body of data on vitamin D. The Canadian Cancer Society now recommends that everyone takes vitamin D to help prevent cancer. Several health care agencies in the US are advising people to take vitamin D, including the Mayo clinic. There are numerous publications showing that the population of the UK is grossly vitamin D deficient. Take a look at this web site: www.vitaminD3world.com It has a good summary of all the data on cancer prevention. Everyone should read this and decide for themselves.
a waste of "time"???
[info]thelatimes wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 06:32 pm (UTC)
How can multivitamin supplements be a waste of TIME? How much time is wasted by swallowing one tablet in the morning after breakfast? It must take 10 seconds to walk over to the vitamin bottle, open it and swallow the tablet. Therefore, you would waste at most 70 seconds per week. That's a waste of 3640 seconds or just over one hour per year. Hardly a waste of time! A waste of money, probably, if you don't have a deficiency of any vitamin in your body.

However, there's one group of people who can benefit from extra vitamin supplementation, and those are athletes, bodybuilders or anyone who does hard physical training (or has a very physical job) and who sweats a lot.
It's not all vitamins
[info]feelingperkier wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 07:45 pm (UTC)
This is rather broad. It's true that a shortage of vitamin D is associated with all manner of problems and our diet, exposure to sun (or lack of), and lifestyle contribute to that. The evidence on the website mabrnes01 mentions below maybe persuasive. As with all researchers there are differing opinions and today's publication demonstrates that rather well. Read the data and make you own mind up.
re: vitamins
[info]fljeremy wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 08:09 pm (UTC)
Try some that actually work http://www.MaxSuccessNow.com

clinical studies, double patented and Flat out work!
Health
[info]needforreform wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 08:16 pm (UTC)
The problem is 'guarding the self-interests of the medical profession and, in particular, of the Pharmaceutical companies. I profess not to aid either institution.

No, I don't eat dietary supplements either as I do not wish to aid a third wolverine monster - the alternative medicine industry.

Instead, I imbibe aloe vera concentrates, obtained at health food stores and not chemists. I also imbibe cranberry juice concentrates, other tropical fruit concentrates. These supplements to one's diet are positive and without side effects (as long as you do not get them from the Chemist's).

In addition, or primarily, I have read copiously about the benefits of urea. Instead of supporting wolverine industries injesting pills / tablets containing urea (other people's), I do drink my own urine daily. Each morning, the second string of urine is extremely healing and beneficial for skin, gums, and, of course, digestive, stomach, oesphagal problems.

Personally, to me life is very important. I have no aspirations to life other than here on earth - while it lasts - and by the Lord, I will make it last, rejuvenated and so on indefinitely as I don't believe in the classic life cycle and in growing old and dying. At whatever point I am not enjoying life to the full and without an iota of side effects or nagging to share with other naggers, I will freely pass through the Dignity Clinic in Zurich from where there is no exit. No fairy tales emanating from hungry medics, pharma fiends, compulsive religious liars or mentally deficient faith practitioners are likely to influence me.
Re: Health
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 09:00 am (UTC)
needforreform. Concentrates of cranberry and other juices are usually boiled down to make the concentrates, thereby reducing or destroying the active chemicals that in their combinations have a pharmacalogical effect to improve health. You are absolutely entitled not to fund alternatives, but to term them wolverines when you have not or are not beneficially using their products is poor judgement. There are side effects and caution that needs to be noted and / or exercised while using aloe vera as part of a natural treatment regimen over extended periods of time. This could result in side effects such as loss of potassium, hematuria, albuminuria and fluid imbalance. You may develop hyperaldosteronism, inhibition of intestinal motility and the development of cardioactive steroid. Lack of potassium can lead to muscular weakness. Aloe IMHO should only be taken for gastro intestinal problems, and then only until solved.


re: vitamins
[info]jerabilis wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 11:04 pm (UTC)
I started taking a multivitamin with iron 2 years ago and noticed a marked improvement in my general health.

Despite having a very healthy diet I have always been anaemic and diagnosed as not having enough vitamins in tests.

Iron tablets made me feel il but the multivitamin with iron has been really good - I've felt less tired, I'm picking up fewer colds and minor ailments and generally just feel a lot better.
multivitamins
[info]nkboecker wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 11:18 pm (UTC)
What type of multivitamin was studied? All vitamins are not created equal! Unfortunately, most multivitamins are a waste of money, and may even be doing more harm than good. So few people eat the way they should, in which case a good multivitamin can make a difference! If you are interested, check out melaleuca.com/oligo. Feel free to contact me for more info: nkboecker@wedeliverwellness.com.
multivits are great
[info]dr_gv wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 05:19 am (UTC)
Here are some questions that were not addressed in the article: Who funded the study? What brand of vitamins were used, and at what dosage? There is a huge variation in quality from one company to the next. How did the subjects eat? There are no vitamins, herbs, or even drugs that will counteract a junk food diet in the long run? There was no decrease in cancer or heart disease at commercial, synthetic vitamin dosages. But even with those next to worthless heavily advertised brands, were there any other benefits? Like improved energy, better sleep, less infections, less days of lost work, etc? As others have noted in these comments, what about the 30,000 other studies over the last 40 years that show that multilples have value? For example, the one that sticks in my mind was a large survey about 10 years ago that showed that peolpe that take a daily multiple have half the rate of heart disease.
Mr. laurance, are you ignorant of all this, or do you have a bias?
No proof
[info]stdgml12 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
There has never been any medical evidence that dietary supplements are safe or effective. Not to mention that after the manufacturing process, there is nothing natural about it anymore. There is a reason why they are not regulated by the FDA, so why would you take them.
Re: No proof
[info]pleasegetreal wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 07:31 am (UTC)
People, there's a LOT more to health than death, cancer and heart disease.
Jumping to a conclusion that these things are worthless, like the journalist has done, without considering possible effects on ordinary infections, metabolism and other non-lethal conditions is irresponsible and misleading. The readers should realize this.
Conspiracy
[info]drwillip wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 03:28 pm (UTC)
Call it what you will, it is blatantly business-as-usual. This type of study appeals to those who cannot discern a good study from a flawed one. If you ask people what vitamins they take without knowing anything about their quality or frequency of use, you have nothing to base your conclusions on. There is an enormous difference between high quality supplements and the cheap synthetic and non-absorbable drugstore junk made by the pharmaceutical industry.

There are literally thousands of studies that support the safety and effectiveness of vitamins and minerals. I read them daily from reputable sources. I also have been watching how the pharmaceutical industry and medical journals selectively promote negative studies on vitamins and rarely acknowledge the far more frequent positive studies. Take it from someone who has worked in the field all his life, and who has no vested interests, besides wanting the freedom to choose my path to health. If you haven't noticed, Big Pharma will do almost anything to get you on drugs and keep you from being healthy. I have spent a lifetime studying nutrition, and I may as well be teaching 5th graders.

Basically, we are witnessing the decline of western culture. Despite all the billions put into medical research, people are getting sicker. Just like with the housing market, there is a big bubble about to pop in the health care industry, and they are doing everything to patch the cracks. It is nothing short of criminal what they are doing.
My gratitude...
[info]needforreform wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 09:22 pm (UTC)
to tommytcg for his seemingly erudite riposte to my strong reaction to medical preparatory drugs. I was taken aback at the knowledge freely offered by this co-blogger. I am truly grateful and will be looking up all the long words he mentioned very carefully.

Naturally, one has to be philosophical as absolutely everything could have a positive or negative effect in life - carrots, nuts even water have been accused of turning into violent killers when misused. The Italians tend to blame carrots or spinach, especially out of season, for most child ailments from chickenpox to whooping cough.

Nevertheless, I do my best to keep my health in balance with the judicious consumption of spinach, carrots, beetroot, artichokes, beans and pulses, rice, lentils, potatoes, leeks, bananas, plums, cranberry juice and a longer string of fruits and vegetables - in or out of season.

I must admit my propensity to emulate the old French woman who knew van Gogh well and who lived to the amazing age of 122 partly by drinking one modest glass of red wine each day. One tries not to overdo it. I couldn't afford wine every day but I do my best. It is also fascinating that the Queen Mum who lived just short of 102 years drank gin and tonic every evening. I know I couldn't do that myself. I don't like gin or vodka. However, I am partial to the occasional measure of single malt Macallan (12 years).
Vitamins
[info]spookeyuk wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 10:11 pm (UTC)
Actually vitamins are just chemicals and it doesnt matter how you consume them - food or tablets. If no vitamins were absorbed from the gut into body then there would be no point in taking other tablets eg aspirin, prescribed tablets. The key question here, as with other tablets, is 'what is the bioavialability of the vitamins?'. The better companies have addressed this and demonstrated that vitamins are absorbed from the gut, for example Nature's Best. (I am a biochemist!)
Vitamins and ADME
[info]spookeyuk wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 10:17 pm (UTC)
Actually vitamins are just chemicals and it doesnt matter how you consume them - food or tablets. If no vitamins were absorbed from the gut into body then there would be no point in taking other tablets eg aspirin, prescribed tablets. The key question here, as with other tablets, is 'what is the bioavialability of the vitamins?'. The better companies have addressed this and demonstrated that vitamins are absorbed from the gut, for example Nature's Best. (I am a biochemist!)
Misleading Article
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 10:43 pm (UTC)
This article should mention that the results relate only to postmenopausal women, and that the follow-up time may have been insufficient for cancers that take many years to develop.

The title should read "MV supp's no defense against chronic illnesses in postmenopausal women"

Andrew Shao, PhD, vice president, scientific and regulatory affairs, for the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) said: ?From a practical standpoint, this study does not change the fact that the majority of consumers could benefit from taking an affordable multivitamin, particularly as the majority of Americans fail to consume the recommended amounts of a variety of essential nutrients established by the Institute of Medicine.

?It is better to meet these recommendations than not, and consistently taking a multivitamin over the long-term, could help fill these nutrient gaps and may help consumers lead healthier lives... the key to good health is a commitment to an overall wellness approach and that includes daily use of a multivitamin,?.

After a few days of my favorite MV, I know I feel revitalized, more resistant to minor illnesses, less stressed, more sociable... I now call them "good luck pills", and do a month cure every year at the start of winter. I haven't caught a cold since I started taking them and using tea tree oil, and I'm not going to stop now because one
re: multi-vitamins a waste of time
[info]theoddgoal wrote:
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 11:59 pm (UTC)
A recent study has linked vitamin D with the prevention of multiple sclerosis. That is not mentioned in this article. The majority of a person's daily quota of vitamin D is through the absorbption of sunlight. In places like Canada, where I live, where it is a must to cover up agianst the cold for a good 5 months of the year, this could prove very important. Further studies are required but, in the meantime, we have been advised to take vitamin D supplements in pill form.
Multi-vitamins
[info]countrysilk wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:02 am (UTC)
There are a whole lot of other diseases, besides energy levels, functioning of glands, organs, and muscles that multi-vitamins apply themselves to assisting. This blanket statement without clear statistics is very suspect. Don't believe health advice from people who make money off of your being sick.
Ask a nutritionist.
Depends on the Supplement
[info]mrsbostwick wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:45 am (UTC)
Our environment, our food suply and our diet has changed more in the last 75 years and there is an ever-increasing levels of chemicals (pesticides, fertilizer, hormones, chemical food additives). Our food supply contains genetically modified foods. Watch www.thefutureoffood.com.
To say that supplements are not needed is neglegent on their part. There are more foods and environmental devices that are breaking down our immune system and premature aging. The key is finding a quality supplement. There aren't many, but check out a Landmark Study done by UC Berkely a few years back comparing certain supplement users and the long range effects over 20 years. That's right 20 years. People commited to their health. It is also published and peer-reviewed. www.landmarkstudy.com. Absorption and bioavailability are key.
If you haave any questions I can be contacted at mrsbostwick@bellsouth.net
Waste of time and money
[info]dbegley wrote:
Tuesday, 17 February 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
Let's establish a few things up front. First off to say that all supplements are worthless would be like me saying just because this piece of lettuce I just ate was bad, therefore all lettuce must be bad. Secondly, the term supplements encompasses a huge variety of products from juice to minerals to animal parts to vitamins.

Thirdly, if we are talking only about a multi-vitamins, all such vitamin supplements are not created the same. Nurses call them bed pan bullets for obvious reasons. You can't digest a lot of them. Then consider that most if not all of these so called vitamins do not contain what is on the label and those that do often have synthetic varieties that your body may not be able to use. And recognize even those that do actually contain vitamins and minerals do so at a minimal RDA level. Your body needs an optimum level of these nutrients not a minimum level, ie the RDA says you need 40 iu of Vitamin E, the optimum level is 400 iu. (That would require 28 lbs of spinach a day.)

Studies show that optimum levels of nutrients do have an impact on health. Is it not a contradiction that eating healthy food is good for you but adding a "good" vitamin supplement has no impact? Shouldn't the results be comparable? Unless of course the supplement was worthless or the study was.

Speaking of misleading studies, I suggest further investigation into these expert studies. You will often find the studies are financed by drug company money. Isn't that a coincidence? Why would a drug company want to sponsor a study that says vitamins are worthless? Perhaps this makes more of a statement about the need to take vitamins for health then any study.

Lastly, show me a study that shows the average person is eating properly. I have seen studies in the
US that say 100% of the people studied do not get even the minimal RDA levels. And few if any are eating the five portions of fruits and vegetables daily. If our diets are so great why did I hear recently that in the US 1 out of 3 children born today will earn Diabetes Type II? Dr. Christine Woods even said on this interview that this generation of children will be the first that will not outlive their parents. The fastest growing group in the US getting cancer and diabetes II are children. Poor lifestyle choices, poor food choices. All the diseases that are killing us are degenerative diseases. Degenerative diseases are a direct result of poor nutrition and lifestyle choices. Most of us live too short and die too long.

And to add one last comment on food choices, in the US the USDA files a report on the nutritional quality of produce. Every year, the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables in this country has declined. Read the reports. Farmers are paid for quantity of product not quality of product. A recent study showed that organic produce had 50-100% more nutrition than the factory farm products that thrive on chemicals. The only purpose of the soil is to hold the roots. Crops are not being rotated. You don't need to with chemicals. Where are the minerals and vitamins suppose to come from? Monsanto?

Enough said. I obviously feel we should supplement. I have seen the results. But you need a pharmaceutical grade supplement with optimum levels not some off the shelf consumer product. You would be better off eating the box they come in rather than the product within. I read recently that 80% of the vitamin C used today comes from China. What more can I say?
Vitamins
[info]rodleith wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
At the root of this study, I would like to know who sponsored it if it was not independently undertken and the consistency of the subject group relative to the established ctirteria, if there was one.

It is well known and logical that multivitamin supplements will not reduce the risk of cancer but if taken with good quality food will enhance those foods and their content as some food substances are lacking as are the diets that some people consume. Regardless of the lack of research it stands to reason that the immune system if enhanced will at least provide a greater resistance to some disease factors although there are many other co-factors that are unpredictable. As an analogy, haveing a flu shot does not mean you will not get the prevailing strain of flu but it does, as is touted by current medical evidence, assist to support the immune system over time against risk of contracting it or being better able to fight it off if one does contract an influenza virus.
HELP
[info]cezermeno wrote:
Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 03:15 am (UTC)
im always on the run. therefor i neglect my health. i try to eat a banana, healthy shake, etc whenever i can but i know im lacking important vitamins. i cant figure out what to buy to supplement what im not getting enough of. i dont even know what im not getting enough of! please, someone help me! im 25, 170lbs (due to over eating when i was pregnant with my now 8 month old son), full time student and a waitress. i have high stress and anxiety to boot. HELP!!!
health supplements
[info]abduh999 wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 06:34 pm (UTC)
Although ideally we should be able to get all of our multivitamin from a balanced diet, it is becoming increasingly difficult to do this in reality. Busy lifestyles, overly processed foods, and other factors all contribute to the need for a natural health supplement in order to keep yourself in top health. Even a diet full of fruits and vegetables will not necessarily deliver optimal levels of essential nutrients, as some of the most vital nutrients are destroyed by the cooking process. The foods we eat are also becoming less nutritious due to the use of artificial fertilizers and other changes in the way food is grown, shipped great distances, and stored.
Vitamins
[info]donnaeosborne wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
In essence i would agree that SOME types of supplements are not good for you....but not all.
In fact the American medical council recommend that everyone should supplement as the vits and minerals that used to be available from our diet are no longer available..due to modern farming methods and practices.
everyone can perhaps remember those cans of spinach the popeye used to chuck down...well today you would need to consume 109 cans to obtain the same nutritional value....the vits amd minerals are simply not there anymore.. added to that we have had vast increases in world pollution that is also having a diverse affect on our body's ability to fight free radical damage....so supplementation boosts our imune systems ability to cope.
so what supplements are viable and what are not.?
In order for our bodys to utilize vitamins and minerals they need to come from nature, after all thats how our bodies are designed...so supplementation from nature is not only affective but also a safe system...
manufacturers in general are copying the dna from natural products and reproducing them synthetically for pennies in their labs and cashing in on the demand...and there is huge demand!, These synthetics are not always processed by the human body and often pass right through and expel in the same form as they were injested...yes a waste of effort and money..some synthetic supplements are far more sinister and can in fact cause free radical damage themselves...for instance, a study done in america on synthetic vitamin b12 showed an increased risk of cancer by 27%....thats scary!!
make sure if you are supplementing that you use Organic food supplements only....not "naturally Inspired" or otherwise...these claims are misleading and are often used to hide the fact that these products are synthetics.
either take the real thing...or forget it entirely...those synthetic supplements are better for you if you put them in your trash !!!

Most popular in Life & Style


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date