World warned over killer flu pandemic
Monday, 21 July 2008
The world is failing to guard against the inevitable spread of a devastating flu pandemic which could kill 50 million people and wreak massive disruption around the globe, the Government has warned.
In evidence to a House of Lords committee, ministers said that early warning systems for spotting emerging diseases were "poorly co-ordinated" and lacked "vision" and "clarity". They said that more needed to be done to improve detection and surveillance for potential pandemics and called for urgent improvement in rapid-response strategies.
The Government's evidence appeared in a highly critical report from the Lords Intergovernmental Organisations Committee, which attacked the World Health Organisation (WHO) as "dysfunctional" and criticised the international response to the threat of an outbreak of disease which could sweep across the globe.
The Government said: "While there has not been a pandemic since 1968, another one is inevitable." Ministers said it would could kill between two and 50 million people worldwide and that such an outbreak would leave up to 75,000 people dead in Britain and cause "massive" disruption.
Peers joined ministers calling for urgent action to build up early warning systems across the Third World that can identify and neutralise outbreaks of potentially deadly new strains of disease before they are swept across the globe by modern trade and travel. Peers also called for new action to monitor animal diseases, warning of the potentially disastrous effects of conditions such as the H5N1 bird flu virus jumping to humans and demanded that Britain step up funding for the WHO to tackle the threat.
With international tourist journeys now reaching 800 million a year, giving unprecedented potential for epidemics to spread across borders, and many cities rapidly growing in developing countries, which would provide "fertile ground" to spread disease, peers on the committee warned that conditions such as Sars, avian influenza and ebola "have the potential to cause rapid and devastating sickness and death across much of the world if they are not detected and checked in time".
Their report said: "We have been warned that an influenza pandemic is overdue and that when – rather than if – it comes the effects could be devastating, particularly if the strain of the virus should be of the H5N1 variety that has been seen in south-east Asia in recent years.
"While much progress has been made in the past 10 years in improving global surveillance and response systems, much remains to be done if we are to detect new strains of the virus and counter them before they have had the chance to spread."
The report called for a fundamental overhaul of the WHO's regional offices around the world. "Given the threats to global health that we face from newly emerging infectious diseases, a dysfunctional organisational structure within the world's principal policy-making, standard-setting and surveillance body simply cannot be afforded."
A government briefing given to the committee warned: "Not all countries have the resources or capacities to put in place a seasonal influenza vaccination policy and, in the event of an influenza pandemic, it is also recognised that current stock will not meet world-wide demand.
"There needs to be an improvement to rapid response strategies in poorer, more vulnerable, countries."
Ministers warned that there was "no agreed vision or clarity over roles" among the international bodies working in the field.
Lord Soley, the committee's chairman, welcomed efforts to guard against a flu pandemic but warned: "They are not good enough. We have a pandemic twice every century. If something developed in a country with a developed healthcare system you would stop it and stop it before it went round the world. You cannot have that confidence about the developing world," it warned.
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrats' health spokesman, likened the threat from a pandemic to the threat of international terrorism. He said: "Globally there has been massive attention to the threat from terrorism and rightly so. But the potential for loss of life from a pandemic is massive, enormous and yet we stare a disaster in the face and we see a chaotic, uncoordinated and incoherent international response to it.
"Disease can spread like wildfire. We have to dramatically step up the response."
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health acknowledged that "more clearly needs to be done improve detection, surveillance and general response capacity building". She said Britain was working to improve the international response to bird flu and a potential pandemic and was working to improve international co-ordination on the issue.
She added: "We agree that there is considerable scope to improve the effectiveness and coherence of intergovernmental organisations working in this area."
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
173 Comments
It seems the answer to bird flu is the tamiflu vaccine!
Rumsfeld and co will certainly benefit, owning some $5 million of stocks in tamiflu
The Japanese government says 54 people have died while taking the drug and have banned teenage use.
Masato Tashiro, head of flu at Japans National Institute of Infectious Diseases: My personal concern is that Tamiflu might invade the brain through the blood-brain barrier.
tThe Indonesian Government claims that the bird flu virus has been engineered by the United States.
Indonesian Health Minister Siti Fadillah Supari has called for the immediate closure of the United States Naval Medical Research Unit 2 (NAMRU-2) located in their Nation, and has stated:
This laboratory has been in Indonesia without a permit for over 40 years for research of diseases. Various types of viruses from Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Indonesia had been studied in this laboratory," she said.
Posted by Sue | 25.07.08, 01:36 GMT
With this World wide Global Weather Changes We all should come UP with NEW IDEAS in all our Country to Protect all our lifes,and specialy when you TRAVEL WORLD WIDE. OUR Health Department and our Country Government Leaderships should work together on this very Impotant Health Issues, in Travel in and out the Country in the Future, or now is the rght time to do action on it to Protect all our Lifes in severe FLU that Flying around in the World Today.Families and Communitys should be told to do MRI OR SEE Their DOCTORS before they live the Country and also when they come back in the country, thats goes to the Country they all VISIT to do the same check all the People in the Airport before they all go in the Country.Thank you.
Posted by Thank You. | 24.07.08, 14:55 GMT
The Government should pass a law banning pandemics from the U.K.
Posted by Hubert | 24.07.08, 01:15 GMT
Such talk of a pandemic is deeply suspect, as is the media's obsession with avian flu, which currently ranks as one of the world's least significant diseases. There has been an attempt to drum up fear on this subject for almost a decade. If there is a real threat, then why has it not yet been forestalled; if it is not a real threat, or if it is a deliberately manufactured threat, in whose interests is this macabre narrative being spun? All the usual suspects, including leading pharmaceutical giants and leading plutocrats with giant shareholdings in such corporations, and the right-wing death lobbies yearning for centuries for something to cull the great unwashed.
Posted by Joseph | 22.07.08, 21:52 GMT
I don't suppose there is a huge stock of anitivrals laying about that the pharmaceutical industry has so far been unable to sell?
Posted by Kuki | 22.07.08, 20:31 GMT
Many readers appear to wish to bury their heads in the sand.
My grandfather (a young man) died in the 1918 pandemic, and this had huge consequences for the family.
The HIV/AIDS epidemic is still going on.
Posted by David H | 22.07.08, 20:07 GMT
Some of you are of the mistaken belief that a pandemic flu will most affect children and the elderly. That is not necessarily true. It absolutely was not true during the 1918-19 pandemic. One of its most notable traits was the unusual age distribution of its victims. Instead of plotting as the normal "U-shaped" mortality curve (higher mortality among children and older adults, lower mortality among young adults), it had a "W-shaped" curve (there was a peak among young adults). The same shift was seen in the milder pandemics of 1957 and 1968. In 1918-19, while the 0-9 age group and the elderly age group died at a rate 5-to-10 times greater than normal, the mortality rate for the 20-29 age group was 175 times greater than normal!
What would be the economic impact from high sickness and mortality among people in their prime working years?
See a graph and discussion at ht888tp://reports.typepad.com/pandemic_plan/2006/11/the_1918_pandem.html [remove the 888 from the "http"]
Posted by C Louder | 22.07.08, 18:36 GMT
Some of you assume a flu vaccine will mitigate any pandemic. Please understand, the current flu vaccine you get every year is for CURRENTLY-CIRCULATING flu viruses, not for a NEW (PANDEMIC) FLU VIRUS. The vaccine must be matched to a particular strain of flu. With a pandemic flu, the medical community won't know the exact characteristics of the virus until the virus appears. ONLY THEN can they begin defining and manufacturing vaccines. In will take weeks, if not a few months, to get production underway. Meanwhile, the new virus is spreading.
Compounding the situation, there's limited vaccine manufacturing capacity - nowhere near enough to produce vaccine for the world's 6.5 billion residents. Therefore, the vaccine will be initially allocated to priority groups.
Don't assume a vaccine will be your life jacket during the next flu pandemic. Make other plans.
To better understand the pandemic risk, check: ht888tp://reports.typepad.com/pandemic_plan/ [remove the 888]
Posted by C Louder | 22.07.08, 18:29 GMT
@grandpa, @Mary and @WalterIJK: Don't confuse "bird flu" with "pandemic flu." Bird flu is a flu virus that makes birds sick. Flu viruses regularly mutate or change their genetic structure. If a bird flu virus changes in such a way that it can bind to human cells easily, then you'd have a new HUMAN virus - which likely would cause a pandemic.
A strain of H5N1 in birds is not the same as a strain of H5N1 in people. I'm not worried about contracting bird flu from birds; that's a one-in-a-million chance. But if the bird flu develops a human-transmissible (pandemic) strain, I have about a one-in-three chance of getting sick. I'm very worried about that.
This failure to distinguish between two diseases leaves people in the dark and, as a consequence, unprepared. Here's a good blog post that clarifies the differences: "Seasonal flu, bird flu, and pandemic flu are not the same": ht888tp://reports.typepad.com/pandemic_plan/2006/07/seasonal_flu_bi.html [remove the 888 from the "http"]
Posted by C Louder | 22.07.08, 18:20 GMT
20 years ago, weren't we told everyone would die from aids?
Another piece of hearsay to s**t the public up. Keep them afraid, keep them buying and keep them listening to those who have consistently peddled biased speculation as fact.
Posted by Bill | 22.07.08, 11:26 GMT
173 Comments