Banks face D-Day over unfair charges
The Supreme Court decision on bank charges is due. What could it mean for you? Chiara Cavaglieri and Julian Knight report
Sunday 22 November 2009
The conclusion of the legal battle over bank charges on customers for going into overdraft has been a long time coming. The epic fight between the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds, Nationwide BS and RBS/NatWest will finally come to a head on Wednesday. The newly formed UK Supreme Court will decide then on the appeal brought by the bankers against earlier rulings that their overdraft charges can be assessed by the OFT for fairness.
If the banks lose on Wednesday, they could have to repay anything up to a massive £20bn in fees levied on customers for being overdrawn in the past six years. But more is at stake than simply money.
"I would be amazed if the Supreme Court didn't uphold the earlier decisions. It would be a disaster. There would be no legal basis for the OFT to intervene and the public would be left with no protection," says Mike Dailly, principal solicitor at the Govan Law Centre, who has recently been appointed to the Financial Services Authority consumer council.
When the High Court case between the banks and the OFT started in July 2007, it followed a massive rebellion by consumers. Hundreds of thousands of unhappy customers were in the process of taking their banks to court for the return of fees incurred for being overdrawn.
The FSA then imposed a freeze on all these claims, which runs until January 2010. In the meantime, while the case has been grinding on, the banks have continued to level exorbitant fees for going even a few pence overdrawn without permission. "Banks have stopped people from being able to get their money back. In the meantime, they have continued charging, business as usual, so it's been quite a stroke of genius to rip off the great British public," says Mr Dailly.
With mounting public pressure, Wednesday's outcome is predicted by most to fall firmly in the favour of the OFT. But if this is the case, what are the ramifications for consumers?
Many are hoping that banks will immediately take steps to reduce their fees. Ahead of the ruling and perhaps pre-empting the outcome, Santander announced the launch of its Zero current account, available from January 2010 for its current and new mortgage customers. This account has no overdraft fees so if customers go overdrawn they pay only a market leading rate of 12.9 per cent. In comparison, NatWest Current Plus Account customers pay a monthly unauthorised overdraft fee of £20 as well as £15 for paid transactions when overdrawn and a rate of 19.24 per cent.
Reduced fees aside, consumers affected by exorbitant fees in the past will be far more concerned with the issue of getting their money back. The British Bankers' Association (BBA) has been keen to play down the potential for a ruling in favour of the OFT to lead to immediate refunds.
"It's not the case that after next week anyone will be in line for a Christmas windfall," says Brian Capon, spokesman at the BBA. "At this stage, it simply means that a decision will be made as to whether the OFT can deem the fees fair or unfair. I wouldn't want to speculate about what might go on from there."
The FSA is following a similar line and insisted that its only responsibility is for the freeze on claims and nothing else until the OFT has completed its parallel investigation into the unfairness of overdraft charges. However, consumer groups contend that an outcome in favour of the OFT will undoubtedly start the ball rolling for customers to get their money back. After the FSA waiver in July 2007, more than one million people have been left with claims for an estimated £1.7bn on hold. Although this case is deciding only whether the OFT has the legal right to assess whether the charges are fair, if the Court rules that they do indeed have this right, the OFT is widely expected to confirm its original view that fees of up to £39 for unauthorised overdrafts are out of order. A much lower cap on fees is likely to be imposed.
"The OFT has already announced its preliminary findings that it thinks the charges are unfair, so a decision in its favour would certainly bring consumers an enormous step closer to getting their money back," says Mark Gander from the anti-bank charges lobbying Consumer Action Group.
In theory, it could lead to the FSA lifting the waiver on claims and introducing a repayment scheme for customers. However, banks are still free to refer the case to the European court, or perhaps more likely, they could challenge the OFT on its findings of unfairness in order to drag out the issue for years, leaving customers dangling. Although this remains a possibility, with political pressure mounting and all three party leaders saying they want a speedy resolution, the banks may decide the price of continued intransigence is too high.
Where there are real concerns, however, is in the finer details of potential repayments. There have been indications that the OFT will introduce a "fair rate" and consumers will be repaid the difference between this and the actual charge. The issue of extra compensation could cover any number of situations, from those who have been forced to take out loans to deal with bank charges or consumers who have had their credit record marked.
"This is an extremely complicated situation and there may be all sorts of unexpected problems. There are just so many questions and the fallout from this is unimaginable. How on earth are they ever going to make reparation for this?" asks Mr Gander.
Even worse, if the banks plead that to repay charges will damage their long-term stability, they may look to forge some form of agreement with the FSA, which could mean that they pay only a fraction of the charges they have levied. "I suspect the banks will look at cutting a deal with the OFT. There's so much money at stake. I don't think for a second the banks are going to hand people all their money back," says Mr Dailly.
The implications of the ruling could be colossal. "Banks are already desperately trying to recapitalise and will surely try to replace this income in different ways, which could be charges on current accounts or perhaps higher interest charges on loans," says Danny Cox from independent financial adviser Hargreaves Lansdown. "We should bear in mind that we own some of the banks that would be repaying this money."
Compare with the Independent: See how much you could save by switching credit cards. Compare now
Threat of 'catastrophic cascade of collisions' must be averted, warn scientists
- 1 Australian man Rod Sommerville reacts to bite from deadly snake by reaching for cold beer
- 2 Pakistan vs Paul Smith: Sandal-wearers bemused by famed British designer's attempts to sell traditional Peshawari chappal-style shoes for the distinctly untraditional sum of £300
- 3 North Korea elections: Kim Jong-un wins 100% of the vote
- 4 Steve Irwin’s final words: Cameraman present at death opens up about deadly stingray attack for the first time
- 5 Sharknado 2: Former WWE wrestler Kurt Angle to fight second wave of flying sharks
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Poor 'live like animals' says Boris's privately educated sister after going on 'poverty safari'
Exclusive: Impact of immigrants on British workers ‘negligible’
Vince Cable: Teachers 'know absolutely nothing' about the world of work
Ukraine crisis: Russia pledges to 'retaliate against sanctions' as Ukrainian president says Crimea vote will not be recognised
The quiet diplomat: Catherine Ashton - recognised and admired in all the world’s troubled countries, yet ridiculed at home
iJobs Money & Business
£32000 - £36000 per annum + generous benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: * TAX * ...
£55000 - £70000 per annum + benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: In-House Corporat...
£80000 - £100000 per annum + benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: In-House Opportu...
£30000 - £35000 per annum + generous benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: Mixed Ta...
Day In a Page
A four-bedroom house in Hermitage Gardens with three reception rooms and landscaped gardens
A seven-bedroom Grade II-listed property with a separate self-contained apartment
A five-bedroom Victorian house with three reception rooms and galleried landing, £695,000
A six-bedroom farmhouse with five acres of land in a former cloth-making village
A secluded seven-bedroom detached house with large private garden, £490,000
A three-bedroom cottage overlooking Sarratt village green with open fires and solid oak floors
A three-bedroom maisonette flat in a Grade I-listed, Georgian townhouse in a sought-after location
A one-bedroom apartment located within a private gated development, north of Turnham Green
Look forward to a brighter future at two-bedroom Sunny Cottages, ideal for Londoners looking to downsize
A three-bedroom red-brick cottage with outbuildings and pretty gardens, £200,000
This three-bedroom flat within a former textile factory spans the corner of the fourth floor and has a balcony
A charming four-bedroom Oxfordshire cottage with oak floors and chunky-beamed ceilings, £465,000
A beautiful one-bed flat in a sought-after portered block, with access to Norland Square communal gardens
A one-bedroom flat within a Sixties school conversion with high-spec design and open-plan kitchen, close to Lambeth North Tube, £435,000
A 17th century four-bedroom house, with open fireplaces, cellar and pool, £600,000
A three-bedroom, coach house with luxury open-plan living space and contemporary breakfast bar
A newly refurbished one-bedroom flat in the heart of Mayfair, close to Grosvenor Square
A charming four-bedroom house overlooking Burleigh Square Park, close to Thorpe Bay
A three-bedroom farmhouse with a large inglenook fireplace and exposed beams
A boutique mews house, set around a central courtyard, with three bedrooms and a private roof terrace
A four-bedroom farm-conversion with three bathrooms and two reception rooms
A two-bedroom detached house with ensuite bathrooms and a sun-drenched decked terrace, £750,000
A modern and spacious two-bedroom, penthouse flat with two bathrooms in a prestigious development
A beautifully renovated five-bedroom terrace with three reception rooms and a courtyard garden, £700,000
A four-bedroom period house which has been extended to provide almost 2,500sq ft of living space, £675,000
A pretty three-bedroom Georgian home with a 22ft drawing room and a master suite with a balcony, £525,000
A substanstial family home with five bedrooms and landscaped gardens in the much sought-after Branksome Park area
A well-presented three-bedroom house with front and rear gardens, close to White City station, £475,000
A handsome five-bedroom house in a sought-after location close to the city centre
A five-bedroom country home with valley views, equestrian stables and 27 acres of land, £725,000
A six-bedroom farm house with separate, detached cottages and 371 acres of land
A two-bedroom cottage with parquet floors, chunky beams and an open fireplace
A three-bedrrom flat with 2,733sq feet of living space, a beautiful private garden and 15 acres of communal grounds
A four-bedroom chalet bungalow with three bathrooms and a spacious garden, £525,000
A two-bedroom flat with an open plan kitchen and two balconies, close to Arsenal station
A Grade II-listed home with six bedrooms, secluded landscaped gardens and views across Hadley Green
A Grade II-listed mansion with two apartments and a cottage, near Gretna Green
A three-bedroom Grade II-listed mews house with vaulted ceilings and roof garden
A spacious Grade II-listed family home with annexe and equestrian facilities among four acres of land in Itchingfield
A four-bedroom home with exposed brick walls and open fires in the picturesque village of Northill