Reinhart and Rogoff vs Herndon: the austerity maths doesn’t add up – but the theory does
As one of the many journalists who took Reinhart and Rogoff’s work to be a brilliant empirical underpinning for what appeared to be common-sense – that you simply cannot tax and borrow your way out of chronically unbalanced public finances – the discovery that it was, well, flawed, is something of a disappointment.
It is tempting to see this as an all-too real counterpart to that great spoof headline “Archduke Franz Ferdinand Found Alive – Great War a Mistake”: as in “economists’ backing for reducing government borrowing found wanting – global austerity programmes a mistake”. Except that, whatever went wrong with the spreadsheets, what Reinhart and Rogoff discovered was indeed right.
It is impossible to tax your way out of a chronic level of debt run up by a government. There does come a point when taxing and borrowing no longer yields the results governments seek. Taxing too much destroys incentives for everyone; pre-empts too much of a nation’s resources away from the productive parts of the economy; and the burden can indeed become so high that it becomes impossible for any tax take to service the debt. In that situation you end up borrowing just to pay the interest. High debt punishes the ability of an economy to grow and repay what it owes. The only other way out is via inflation (the usual British option). This is not and never will be sustainable.
Of course the British economy is an example of one that laboured under vast debts – 100 to 200 per cent-plus of national income – for the three decades after the Second World War. And it is true that in those years the UK did grow at a respectable pace – 2.5 per cent a year or so. But our decline was relative to other nations in those years, and by the 1970s, as all the Thatcher obsequies reminded us, it was becoming untenable. Our debt frustrated all attempts to make Britain grow as fast as her competitors. It is doing so again now. It is a truth that should be universally acknowledged, and we do not need a spreadsheet to prove it.
- 1 Katie Hopkins attacked me on Twitter — so I reported her to the police for inciting racial hatred
- 2 Google April Fools': company unveils backwards search engine and huggable digital assistant
- 3 I might be an MP, but that doesn't stop me fighting sexism with my breasts
- 4 April Fools' Day 2015: The best hoax news stories from around the internet
- 5 Gamers confess the worst things they've done in The Sims
Holborn fire: Chaos as 2,000 people evacuated to escape toxic smoke filling central London
University of Cambridge: Remains of 1,300 scholars are found under building
April Fools' Day 2015: The best hoax news stories from around the internet
April Fools' Day 2015 live: The best pranks and fake stories from around the world
Jeremy Clarkson 'could be given minder' ahead of a potential Top Gear return
Street preacher quoting from the Bible fined for calling homosexuality an 'abomination'
Katie Hopkins attacked me on Twitter — so I reported her to the police for inciting racial hatred
Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
David Cameron calls Labour 'hopeless, sneering socialists' while announcing 7-day NHS plans
Revealed: Putin's army of pro-Kremlin bloggers
Katie Hopkins reported to the police for race hatred by Labour MP Simon Danczuk after tweet about Pakistani men
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 per annum + commission: SThree: Sthree have an exciting opportunity for...
£18000 - £32000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Telesales Executive is requir...
£45000 - £50000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, glo...
£50,000 - £55,000: Neil Pavier: Are you a professionally qualified commercial ...