Satyajit Das: They are all at it – but side effects of QE may turn out to be highly toxic
Midweek View: Inflation cuts the value of debt. It also induces consumer spending, as people accelerate purchases
Satyajit Das writes the Das Capital Column in the Independent. He has worked in financial markets for over 35 years, as a banker, a corporate treasurer and now as a consultant to banks, fund managers, governments, companies and regulators around the world. He is also the author of Traders Guns and Money and Extreme Money as well as a number of reference books on derivatives and risk-management, which double as 'door stops'. He became a banker because he wasn't good enough to be a professional cricketer, but would give up finance if anyone offered him a job as a cricket commentator or allowed him to pursue his other passion- wildlife (he is the co-author with Jade Novakovic of In Search of The Pangolin: The Accidental Eco-Tourist). He lives in Sydney, Australia.
Wednesday 29 February 2012
The Bank of England is doing it again. The US Federal Reserve may do it again. The Bank of Japan has been doing it for a long time. Even the Europeans are now doing it, secretly. It is quantitative easing (QE), sometimes parsed as "printing money".
With interest rates low, central banks are changing the quantity of money by buying government bonds, injecting cash into the banking system. In theory, QE lowers borrowing costs and creates liquidity, hopefully stimulating demand and inflation.
But lower rates and increasing the supply of money, of themselves, may not boost economic activity.
Crippled by high levels of debt, low house prices, uncertain employment prospects and stagnant income, household are reducing, not increasing, borrowing.
For companies, the absence of demand and, in some cases, excess capacity, means that low interest rates are unlikely to encourage borrowing and investment.
QE has primarily boosted asset values, subsidised banks, weakened the
currency and helped the Government finance its deficit.
Lower interest rates and central bank buying help boost the value of
financial securities. It increases the attractiveness of financial assets producing higher income, such as dividend-paying stocks or corporate debt.
The effect of QE on real economic activity through higher asset prices is based on the wealth effect, whereby people are likely to spend or borrow more when their investments are worth more.
QE provides discreet subsidies to banks in the short run. Lower rates reduce the cost of deposits, which can then be reinvested in low-risk government bonds at a substantial profit. But QE ultimately pushes down yield on bonds reducing returns, decreasing the net interest margin and profits earned by banks.
QE weakens the currency, improving export competitiveness. It reduces the value of a country's debt which can be paid back in devalued paper money.
But it does not work if everyone tries to do it simultaneously. In the relative game of currencies, every nation cannot have the cheapest money.
The ability of QE to generate rising prices relies on the economist Milton Friedman's observation that "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon".
Inflation cuts the value of debt. It also induces consumer spending, as people accelerate purchases, anticipating higher prices in the future. But QE's ability to create inflation is doubtful, at least in the short run.
Unfortunately, the transmission mechanism, the banking system, is broken. The velocity of money or the rate of circulation has slowed, offsetting the effect of QE.
The lack of demand due to weak consumption, lacklustre investment and now government austerity, and excess productive capacity in many industries also means low inflation.
Most developed economies have an "output gap", with total demand well below the economy's potential to produce goods.
QE also creates problems for emerging markets and commodity prices. Low interest rates and falling currency values have encouraged investors to increase investments in emerging markets, offering better returns and more encouraging growth prospects. Much of the capital flows into emerging markets are short term. A rapid withdrawal of this money could be highly destabilising, as evidenced by the Asian crisis of 1997/1998.
As most commodities are priced and traded in US dollars, the lower value of the currency causes commodity price rises. In addition, low interest rates encourage speculation in and stockpiling of commodities.
Higher commodity prices and strong capital flows fuel inflation in emerging markets. Given that emerging markets have been a key driver of the tepid comeback of economic activity globally, this risks truncating the recovery.
The side effects of QE may prove highly toxic, in part because of the risk
of retaliation from affected parties. Emerging market countries are openly talking about "currency wars". Some have already introduced controls against short-term capital flows. Such measures could affect the prospects of global economy recovery.
QE resembles fetishes, objects believed to have supernatural powers.
Despite evidence to the contrary, these financial fetishes are predicated on the belief that the theories and models are correct, policymakers know what they are doing and the actions will be effective.
Satyajit Das is author of 'Extreme Money: The Masters of the Universe and the Cult of Risk'
- 1 Revolutionary lost Caravaggio painting 'Mary Magdalen in Ecstasy' identified
- 2 McKamey Manor: This 'extreme' haunted house is the stuff of nightmares
- 3 Russell Brand says he will 'probably' give up acting to focus on his revolution
- 4 Watch what happened when food critics were unknowingly served McDonald's
- 5 David Beckham's Haig Club whisky is exactly what’s wrong with the Highlands
Putin accuses US of causing global instability
Eleven members of same family hospitalised after eating deadly pufferfish
FCKH8: YouTube reinstates provocative anti-sexism video showing young girls swearing
Phone-hacking: The Piers Morgan connection - Mirror admits some stories during Morgan's tenure may have been obtained by illegal means
Russell Brand says he will 'probably' give up acting to focus on his revolution
Of course, teenage girls need role models – but not like beauty vlogger Zoella
Cameron is warned 'no possibility' of UK reducing immigration and that bid to bring in quota on migrant workers would be illegal
Support for EU membership 'at highest level since 1991' with most Brits wanting to stay 'in'
Thousands with degenerative conditions classified as 'fit to work in future' – despite no possibility of improvement
Attacks on 'Ukip Calypso' show how skewed people’s priorities are
Putin accuses US of causing global instability
iJobs Money & Business
£60000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Compensation and Benefits Manager - Compensat...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£24000 - £28000 per annum + bonus & benefits: Ashdown Group: IT Business Syste...
£50000 - £90000 per annum + benefits: Ampersand Consulting LLP: Markit EDM (CA...