Ford says the worst of the recession is over
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
Ford yesterday became the first US car company to call the end of the automotive slump that has brought down its two fellow Detroit giants.
After a rough period that saw Ford sales plummet 40 per cent in February to their lowest level for more than a quarter of a century, the company expects sales for June to decline by less than 20 per cent year on year. George Pipas, the chief sales analyst, said both the car market and the US economy may be on the up. "The worst is behind us," he said. "We may see economic growth in the second half and a higher level of auto sales."
There is little sign of a recovery in the UK market. Registrations were down by more than 24 per cent in May, despite the introduction of a scrappage incentive designed to boost sales. Car sales across the world disintegrated when both consumer confidence and the availability of credit dried up in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers last autumn.
The big three Detroit car makers – Ford, Chrysler and GM – have been hit even harder than most. With last year's unprecedented oil price rises already pushing consumers away from the traditional gas-guzzling SUV ranges to more economical Japanese alternatives, the recession then exposed major structural flaws. Ford is the only one that has managed its way through the problems. Chrysler needed $4bn (£2.4bn) in loans from the US government, and was then taken over by Fiat. GM became the biggest corporate failure in history, offloading its European division just days before filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with debts of $173bn. The government is expected to take a 60 per cent stake in the slimmed-down group, putting up another $30bn on top of the $20bn in emergency loans since last year.
Meanwhile, discussions about the fate of GM Europe, which includes Vauxhall in the UK, are ongoing. The preferred bidder is Magna, a Canadian car parts manufacturer, in a consortium bankrolled by Sberbank, a Russian bank.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Interesting times.
People who are in media are a business and they have this
pattern of statement; they realize the error in the statement,
and know all the possible responses.
For example: Lets complain about the new addition to your
household electricity system, the smartmeter. Lets make the
complaint: "I expect a backstop for this product." or "I expect
this product to improve and both versions worth the investment."
(If you don't know "backstop" means replacing a product because
of environmental improvement.)
The company knows the responses, they are accepting criticism in
this way:
The initial consumer ranking game is "comfortable marriage"
1) Who is your assigned male?
2) Explain why he was employable?
3) Does your memory indicate that your finances want to fit in?
4) Are you changing the system?
The purpose of ranking consumers though marriage-ability is the
next obviously important "personal comfort". Personal comfort
is obviously important to pricing, the economic lingo that is
usually used in it's place is happiness or satisfaction. I
really want to point out that the consumer ranks those
qualities arbitrarily, it is your personal taste, style,
attitude, your cool, that you fit in the same as years ago.
Personal comfort is exactly why their are twenty times the number
of raw resources that go into a car vs. a computer, yet the pricing
is what the consumer will pay for comfort or satisfaction.
So who's "personal comfort" changes the company, by setting
consumer trends, changing prices, effecting shares changing the
CEO. The people who at the same time claim approval of a respected
male income.
The fact that the person running the business changes but follows
the same systematic conversation running the company, indicates
their is simply a pattern to running a company, they change the
company like most other consumers, they simply bring their
"marriage comfort" hence "personal comfort" for the consumers
preference, relating to the important consumers preemptively.
So is my only response to media, "dad had a perfect death".
By: Kristina Brooker, Newfoundland 126 395 086
maiden name Thomas (1942, 2002 interference)