Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

GCSE results 2018: Exam board apologises for unanswerable business question

'Typographical error' leaves just one correct answer for two-mark question

Nina Massey
Friday 24 August 2018 12:53 BST
Comments
What is the new GCSE grading system?

An exam board has apologised for a typo that left GCSE pupils searching for two correct answers in a question that contained only one.

Pearson, which runs the Edexcel board, said the mistake in its business exam happened because of a “typographical error” affecting a question that asked students to pick two from five possible options, rendering it unanswerable.

The error was identified in question 14 on the GCSE Business unit 1 paper, which students sat on 23 May.

To make up for the mistake – which it described as “extremely rare” – the board awarded both available marks to everyone who picked the one correct response.

A Pearson spokesman said: “Errors are extremely rare and all of our examination papers and mark schemes go through a rigorous development, review and scrutiny process.

“We apologise for the error in a GCSE business examination paper. Unfortunately, as a result of a typographical error, there was only one correct response to a two-mark question that asked candidates to select two answers from five possible options.

“We take this issue very seriously and if errors do occur we have systems in place to ensure no student is disadvantaged.

“In this case, following a review, we decided to award both available marks to every candidate who selected the one correct response provided.”

The question asked for two conclusions to be drawn from a table.

Response D read: “More than 6 customers think the least important reason is the design of the shop.”

But it ought to have read: “More than 6 customers think the most important reason is the design of the shop.”

Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in