Media

11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

BBC left isolated as rival channels back aid appeal

Ministers step into row over corporation's refusal to show charities' plea for donations to Gaza

By Emily Dugan, Jane Merrick and Matthew Bell

Protesters outside BBC offices in central London yesterday

Tom Saunderson

Protesters outside BBC offices in central London yesterday

The BBC was engaged in a war of words with ministers last night over its refusal to broadcast an urgent appeal for humanitarian aid to Gaza. Government figures, aid workers and BBC staff expressed outrage that the corporation has not backed down, as some of its rivals did yesterday, and broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) appeal. The BBC said yesterday it was concerned that access to aid in Gaza might be problematic, and that it did not want to endanger the public's perception of the impartiality of its reporting.

The BBC Trust chairman Sir Michael Lyons expressed concern that the "level and tone" of the political comments were "coming close to constituting undue interference in the political independence" of the corporation.

Channel 4, Five, ITV and al-Jazeera English announced they will be airing the DEC appeal tomorrow, after initially falling in behind the BBC. Sky News was considering its position last night.

Public figures were outraged by the broadcaster's decision not to air the appeal, calling it a "terrible mistake". One former senior BBC journalist referred to "a culture of timidity". The BBC has previously aired DEC pleas for humanitarian help in volatile regions such as Congo and Burma.

Yesterday a march that had been organised to complain about the BBC's alleged pro-Israel bias, which began outside Broadcasting House, was given new focus by the row.

The director-general, Mark Thompson, stood by his decision last night, despite critics' attempts to draw a distinction between politics and aid.

The row once again pitted the Government against the BBC, six years on from the David Kelly controversy. It raised further questions over the judgement of senior BBC officials weeks after the Ross/Brand affair.

In an unusual intervention by a cabinet minister, the International Development Secretary, Douglas Alexander, wrote to Mr Thompson on Friday urging him to reconsider, but Whitehall sources said the BBC seemed determined not to back down. The health minister Ben Bradshaw, a former BBC journalist, said the decision was "inexplicable" and called the corporation's justification "completely feeble". The Communities and Local Government Secretary, Hazel Blears, added: "I sincerely hope the BBC will urgently review its decision."

A motion has been tabled in the Commons for tomorrow expressing astonishment at the corporation's judgement in blocking airtime from the coalition of major aid charities, including the British Red Cross.

It is understood that it was Mr Thompson's decision, and chief operating officer Caroline Thomson was ordered to go on radio – initially on Friday on Radio 4's The World Tonight – to defend the position. A source close to the row said: "Because she [Ms Thomson] has gone so strongly on editorial independence, it is very difficult to see how they can back down."

Ms Thomson said yesterday: "It is important to remember that broadcasting appeals like this is a unique thing we do and we have to be clear about two things when we do it. First, that that money will go to the people it is intended for; but second, that we can do it within our own impartiality principles and without affecting and impinging on the audience's perception of our impartiality."

Protocol dictates that the BBC leads the way on deciding a consensus on DEC appeals with other channels. But rival channels allege the corporation made an announcement on Thursday before consulting them, forcing them to break with the convention.

The DEC is an apolitical umbrella organisation made up of UK major aid organisations ActionAid, British Red Cross, Cafod, Care International UK, Christian Aid, Concern Worldwide, Help the Aged, Islamic Relief, Merlin, Oxfam, Save the Children, Tearfund and World Vision.

Mr Alexander welcomed the move by rival broadcasters to air the appeal: "The DEC appeal is crucial to help alleviate the suffering of people injured, displaced and hungry in Gaza."

Many former BBC stalwarts were appalled at the news and called for an immediate reversal of the decision. John Tusa, former managing director of BBC World Service, said: "It's a terrible mistake and I think they have lost for the moment any sense of judgement and a good deal of courage. Anybody who thinks giving aid to badly injured children in Gaza would be taken as bias needs their heads examined."

Former BBC correspondent Martin Bell said: "Old BBC soldiers like me are appalled by the BBC's decision. There are civilians dying out there who desperately need aid."

Director-general is under pressure to go

Mark Thompson's statement last night was a typically robust reaction to the latest challenge troubling his tenure as director-general of the BBC.

A scandal surrounding rigged phone-in contests on 'Blue Peter' in 2007 led to the regulator Ofcom fining the BBC £50,000. The BBC1 controller Peter Fincham resigned in the same year over the the editing of a trailer that misleadingly suggested that the Queen had stormed out of a photo session.

Mr Thompson came under pressure to resign last year, in the wake of controversy surrounding lurid calls to the actor Andrew Sachs, which resulted in the departure of Russell Brand, the resignation of BBC Radio 2 controller Lesley Douglas, and the suspension of Jonathan Ross.

Ministerial anger over his decision not to back down over the appeal will add to the pressure for Mr Thompson to do what some of his senior staff have done in recent years – resign.

Balance in the media: Has the BBC lost its nerve over Gaza?

The BBC is used to being accused of anti-Israel bias, but in 2004 it was jolted by a study that said BBC1 and ITV news were guilty, if unthinkingly, of under-reporting the Palestinian cause. Worse, the Glasgow Media Unit found viewers thought the "occupation" of the West Bank and Gaza referred to the Palestinians, not Israeli settlers.

At the same time, the BBC fell foul of the Israeli authorities over an interview with the nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu, released in 2004 after 18 years in prison, which was smuggled out of Israel. The BBC's then deputy bureau chief, Simon Wilson, had his work permit withdrawn and was barred from the country. He was allowed back in after the BBC bowed to demands that he make a written apology to the Israeli government for dodging its censors.

The BBC appointed a senior broadcaster, Malcolm Balen, to "take stock" of Middle East coverage, in his words. He drew up an internal report that has never been released, but one result appeared to be the appointment, in mid-2005, of Jeremy Bowen as the BBC's Middle East editor. His stated role was to supply context amid the footage of bloodshed and mayhem.

Why critics accuse the BBC of losing its nerve is because, several times during the present conflict, almost as much airtime has been given to the chief Israeli spokesman, Mark Regev, as if by allowing him his say, the BBC is supplying the necessary "balance" to the images of Palestinian victims. A live "two-way" between Mr Regev and Jon Snow of 'Channel 4 News' became a shouting match, but this has never happened on the BBC.

Donations can be made to the DEC Gaza appeal via its website www.dec.org.uk or by calling 0370 60 60 900

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
When Palestinian fundamentalists become sane and declare peace with Israel, both sides will be OK
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:32 am (UTC)
As long as the irrational loons who control the Palestinians want to keep their war on Israel's very existence going, I'm afraid peace will come and go.

Hamas, islamic jihad and other crazies are to blame for this.

When Palestinians declare a permanent peace with Israel and terrorist attacks against Israel permanently cease, Israel will return the favor, and a bright future will begin.
Re: When Palestinian fundamentalists become sane and declare peace with Israel, both sides will be O
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
All of which is completely irrelevent to the subject at hand.
As for donations, starving Africans need the money much more than anyone else
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:33 am (UTC)
I'm very hesitant to donate money to a group of people whose democratically elected leaders are hamas, a completely insane radical fundamentalist organization.
Re: As for donations, starving Africans need the money much more than anyone else
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:45 am (UTC)
So don't. What do you want, a medal?
Read all about it
[info]brightstation wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:44 am (UTC)
Fox News takes over the BBC.

How sad and truly pathetic, when I heard the news I really had to check twice it was about the BBC. BBC Shame on you!!
Dodging Israeli Censors
[info]eileenfleming wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:52 am (UTC)
This USA citizen journalist has been reporting on Vanunu's FREEDOM OF SPEECH Trial since it began January 25, 2006-same day Hamas was democratically elected.

I have also been freely streaming 2005, 2006, 2008 video interviews with Vanunu @
VANUNU ARCHIVES:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/


Vanunu was sentenced in July 2007 to 6 months more in jail just for speaking to human beings in 2004, who were NOT Israeli citizens.

Supreme Court appeal TBA and the 5th year of restrictions denying Vanunu the right to leave the state, the right to speak to foreigners runs out April 21, 2009.

Eileen Fleming, Author, Founder WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"
BBC was totally pro-Israel
[info]ahmed20 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 12:56 am (UTC)
BBC was totally pro - Israel

Why I am saying that for many things here are some:

1 - you said nothing about "dime" weapon that Israel used to experiment on women and children.
2 - you only have Israel spokesmen, few no. for the other sides.
3 - you agreed to all their lies: "Hamas is the one who started this conflict". "human shields". "It is Israel right to defend itself against the native people" .
" There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza (at first) " .
4 - you said nothing about uranium that Israel used.
5 - you tried to avoid the photos of causalities from "WP" weapons.
6 - you didn't ask Israel spokesmen when they hit the UN camps " If they hit the fighters they claim to be at UN camps ".
7 - YOU LIED ABOUT NO. OF PROTESTERS IN LONDON. They were about 200,000 you said about 10 to 50 thousands.
8 - You imaged that causalities are only Muslims "There are also Churches hit by airstrikes and Christians also died".
9 - You said nothing about the strange cases which confused lot of doctors. " The burns are inside the body not outside ".

They failed to recognize Palestinians as humans

BBC SHAME ON YOU

BBC : KILLING PALESTINIANS IS ALSO ANTI-SEMITIC . "arabs are also semitics"
Dodged Israeli Censors
[info]eileenfleming wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:01 am (UTC)
This citizen journalist has been reporting on Vanunu's FREEDOM OF SPEECH Trial since it began January 25, 2006; same day Hamas was democratically elected.

Those reports and 2005, 2006, 2008 uncensored by Israel video with Vanunu are freely streaming VANUNU ARCHIVES @

http://www.wearewideawake.org/

Vanunu was sentenced to 6 months more in jail-reduced to 3 months-and his Supreme Court Appeal is TBA.

The 5th year of restrictions that deny Vanunu the right to leave the state and to speak to anyone who is not Israeli citizen will expire April 21, 2009.



The Times They Are a'Changin'- FREE Vanunu Mordechai! Now!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=798919682#/group.php?gid=52776865024


So give your money to the Africans too
[info]phouri wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:15 am (UTC)
Israel keeps it's justifications for murdering children inside the ambit of a blame for indiscriminate rocket attacks. This is intellectually dishonest. The Mosad know: 'If you're going to tell a lie make it a big one and then everybody will believe you'.
Re: So give your money to the Africans too
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:51 am (UTC)
Israel doesn't aim to murder children. Hamas, however, does.

And hamas wants palestinian children dead, too, so they can fool idiots into blaming Israel for it.
Re: So give your money to the Africans too - [info]steve_wilds - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 10:45 am (UTC) Expand
Re: So give your money to the Africans too - [info]lkdamo - Monday, 26 January 2009 at 03:06 am (UTC) Expand
Re: So give your money to the Africans too - [info]falsafa - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So give your money to the Africans too - [info]fakhry - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 09:23 pm (UTC) Expand
BBC Bias
[info]bundubasher wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:16 am (UTC)
Mr Thompson should surely be aware he has already shown their bias by refusing to run aid advert for innocent civilians.Impartial? Not at all ,and it is rotten from the people we have to pay licenses to.Shame on them.Running the advert shows humanity and caring, not support for this that or the other "side".Pathetic excuses.
Children are dying!!!!
[info]jan12345 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:25 am (UTC)
Am I missing something here? We are talking about innocent babies! The reports say that over 400 hundred children have been killed and thousands more need our help. There is no argument against them. They are totally innocent and have casued no one any harm. If we had done more to stop the conflict earlier many of them could still be alive. We are not baby killers but a civilised nation with great ideals. We should do whatever we can to help them including broadcasting appeals for help - regardless of the politics. Do the bosses at the BBC even have a heart? I have not seen disturbing scenes like this since I was in the War.
BBc behaviour
[info]humanright wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:29 am (UTC)
Some years ago the BBC for me was a good source of information. After siding with the agressor who committed war crimes and who is the occupying power , neglecting the horrible crimes against mostly women and children and at the end refusing to broadcast the appeal of british humanitarian agencies to help the uprooted children, I am not only chocked by the inhumanity of this important medium.The BBC is well advised to let the responsible go. If not the shame will remain on BBC
bbc /gaza
[info]vandrivergeezer wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:30 am (UTC)
The bbc are well out of order for not showing dec appeal. What happenned in gaza was a massacre, a slaughter of gazans.The shear scale of dead in gaza justifies the dec appeal. Its so plainly obvious to the ordinary person in the street that the bbc reporting in gaza is biased towards the I.D.F. This is a war crime and justice will prevail.
PS Mark Thompson should resign. The amount of trouble in the bbc under him says it all. Its in the best interest for the bbc license payer that he goes.
pps- What about comedy on the bbc? We got no decent NEW comedy in the bbc. Comedians get cheap larfs at making jokes on private parts and lude jokes. Cant beat old british comedy. TIME TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY .
Re: bbc /gaza
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:51 am (UTC)
The majority of dead appear to be hamas members. So, your statement is false.
Re: bbc /gaza - [info]ahmed20 - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 02:26 am (UTC) Expand
Re: bbc /gaza - [info]fakhry - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 10:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: bbc /gaza - [info]lkdamo - Monday, 26 January 2009 at 03:08 am (UTC) Expand
[info]riversand wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:31 am (UTC)
It is the biased BBC which had also fallen in line with Bush, Blair, the British Queen, and Jack Straw to whip up the drama of war on Iraq. It fields partisan participants in fora and disallows comments that are not to its design.
DEC appeal
[info]gg_22 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:47 am (UTC)
Congratulations to the BBC management. Not only have you let down the people of Gaza, your own correspondents but also the people of Britain. I would like to know why I am forced to pay licence fee to an organisation that indulges in feeble excuses and fails to live up to its supposed 'independent' reputation. We should all campaign for removal of the licence fee so the BBC has to compete with other broadcasters who are not only more competitive but also more humane.
Re: DEC appeal
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:26 am (UTC)
There's nothing stopping you, or anyone, from donating money. You don't need the BBC to devote air time to it.

Hopefully you donate to responsible organizations, not supporters of palestinian terrorist groups.
SHAME ON YOU, BBC!
[info]mrquin wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 02:39 am (UTC)
It is outrageous that the BBC (paid with taxpayers money) is so strikingly siding the murderers of Israel, their colonial wars and their ethnic cleansings. Shame on you BBC, shame on you!
Re: SHAME ON YOU, BBC!
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
One million Israeli citizens are Arab Muslims. Does that sound like Israel actually engaged in 'ethnic cleansing?'

If ethnic cleansing angers you, there are lots of Muslim countries that are close to being 100 percent muslim, with christians or Jews ethnically cleansed out.
Re: SHAME ON YOU, BBC! - [info]lkdamo - Monday, 26 January 2009 at 03:10 am (UTC) Expand
To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)...
[info]adamanthony wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:42 am (UTC)
You (ie: the UK via Tony Blair) have been "PREACHING" democracy to the rest of the world. -Totally contradicting your own values by attempting to enforce the values of the west (ie: democracy) into areas where it was not suited, nor wanted (Iraq and Afghanistan). Now here, in Palestine, when we have a party elected democratically (Hamas) you fail to respect your own values by raising such objections. YOU LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY by doing so.

Before you criticise Hamas, recognise the history of the region!

Recognise that the territory of Israel was forced into existence in the region by the rest of the world but was opposed by ALL the states of the middle east. This fact dilutes the legitamacy of the UN vote to create Israel for the Jews of Europe. After all would the UK consider valid, a decision to divide it's land for the immigration of say, unwanted Jews of the middle east, despite objections by itself and the rest of Europe?

Furthermore, Isreal's territories have expanded illegally from 1967. All Hamas OFFICIALLY want, are a return to 1967 borders.

Hamas are the only force with the courage to make a principled stand against the tyrranies that Israel has inflicted onto the Palestinian people -such as blockades and sanctions which have reduced the Palestinians to poverty.

Does this make Hamas a villain?

Exec_ceo, your opinions suggest deep ignorance. Go and do some reading!
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)...
[info]exec_ceo wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 04:37 am (UTC)
Have you actually listened to hamas, or read their official charter which declares that 'israel will exist until islam destroys it'? What makes hamas a "villian" is that they are a radical, extremist terrorist organization who have devoted their lives to destroying Israel. YOU ARE MISINFORMED in stating all hamas wants is a return to 1967 borders. They declare every inch of israel to be 'occupied' and want the jewish state destroyed. They spent years brainwashing psychotic lunatics to strap bombs to themselves and try to sneak into jewish schoolbuses or hotels and restaurants to blow up as many innocent peole as possible, and they were succeeding regularly until israel put a defensive barrier up.

YOUR opinions are deeply ignorant.

Also, Israel did not "reduce" the palestinians to povery. That ENTIRE REGION is poor, except parts of Israel.

And, Isarel's blockades are a DEFENSIVE REACTION to being surruonded by countries which repeatedly tried to wipe israel out, and by people who keep trying to sneak in to blow israelis up.
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)... - [info]raff786 - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC) Expand
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)... - [info]justicero - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:11 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)... - [info]adamanthony - Monday, 26 January 2009 at 02:28 am (UTC) Expand
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)... - [info]neil_mcgowan - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:11 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: To all you anti-hamas commantators (Exec_ceo)... - [info]exec_ceo - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:20 pm (UTC) Expand
This Shame will stain the image of the BBC globally, for a very long time.
[info]adamanthony wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:55 am (UTC)
I would like to echo humanright's sentiments here.

What an excuse! Totally unacceptable! The BBC should have the courage and conviction to rise above what might be expected of them for the sake of such large scale suffering. They have so got their priorities wrong.

This mistake will cost the BBC deerly! It will not be forgotten. This poor decision will haunt the reputation, image and credibility of the corporation, globally for a long time!

Bad mistake!

Stand down Mr. Thomson! Shame on you!
BBC is timid and biased
[info]zmk00 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 04:23 am (UTC)
BBC has shown its bias for one party by clubbing all gazans as combatants. I will it would take a broader view that it is human to help other human beings.
DEC Appeal
[info]uplater wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:33 am (UTC)
My TV Licence is going to the DEC Appeal, I think the BBC has made a big mistake this time.
Barely Believable Cowards
[info]nobbig wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:55 am (UTC)
Lebanon - Gaza - Let Israel have their way then keep quiet and it'll all blow over. Where did Israel's weapons come from? Why is the aid paid to Israel by the USA not being used to rebuild Gaza? Why do we hear so little about the Jews who oppose Israel's actions? The claim that the BBC is unbiased is hard to maintain. Surely a plea for help for the hungry, frightened and homeless children of this world cannot be construed in political terms.
BBC true color
[info]alenb1 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 06:00 am (UTC)
BBC has shown its true "biased" political colors by refusing a charity event to help the children of war.

A war that wouldn't have started if it wasn't for the aid of the British colonial power in creating the state of Israel in the first place.

BBC is hopefully the last vestige of the same colonial power.
Gaza's civilian casualties
[info]jandah wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 06:20 am (UTC)
It is appalling that the BBC would decline to air an appeal of humanitarian needs, on behalf of the civilian population in Gaza who were killed or injured by the devastating and inhumane Israeli attacks on the mainly civilian population. Is the BBC aware that their refusal smacks with anti Palestinian prejudice? Does the BBC, now, make airing such an appeal dependent on the nationality and or religion of the victims? I hope the directors of the BBC can reconsider their unjust and unworthy decision and that they remember that charity and humanity applies to ALL humans regardless of their ethnicity, their religion or their geographic location.
Think again
[info]ftgt wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 07:21 am (UTC)
Exec-ceo wrote: 'The majority of dead appear to be hamas members. So, your statement is false'.

No, I think you are wrong unless men, women, children and babies who are not Hama fighters as now considered legitimate targets. Oh yes, I forgot, Isreal now considers anyone living in Gaza as a legitimate target so maybe with that twisted logic you're right after all.

However, if you take a more generally agreed view of who are legimate targets, out of the 1300+ plus dead, HAMAS have said about 100 were HAMAS fighters. That makes 1,200 innocent civilians. Regarding the 1000's of casualities no breakdown is possible, but it's highly likely well over 90% would fall into that category given the fighter kill figures.

The real question Exec-ceo needs to consider is: is it at all legimimate to have so called targetting killings that result in 93% of those killed as being civilian.
Is it legimate to blockade 1.5 million people into the most densely population packed region in the world, starved of food or medicine, and terrorised by intensive missile bombing a legimate tactic of any civilised country state? Is it o.k for a countries to be so consumed with such haterd that it backs the terrorist actions of it government without a murmer? In short, is it right that exec-ceo and those others writing in these threads to think all these actions are fine for Israel to carry out. No moral issues, no issues of concious, no nothing but blind support for what is clearly an indefensible state action.

BBC is a mouth piece for the Governments foreign policies
[info]raff786 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 07:25 am (UTC)
Why don't the reporters get to the heart of the matter. The govermnet is behind the BBC's decision not to air the Charity Appeal for Gaza. Mark Thompson is appointed ( he would be not there if he did not have lyons blessing) by Sir Michael Lyons. Lyons became Chairman of the BBC Trust in a dubious manner. A House of Lords all-party select committee criticised the way the appointment was handled, saying government ministers had too much influence over his appointment.

I'm sure Mr Lyon is expressing concern. Since it is because of government interference that the BBC's decision not to air the DEC Gaza Appeal has been partial and biased towards the Governments foreign policies. The Government has made the BBC partial to its foreign polices stance by bullying, blackmail and threats of removal of lincence fees, and by placing "yes sir " people in control.

Wake up UK, Blair destroyed the BBC back in 2004. The BBC is no longer indepedent


Re: BBC is a mouth piece for the Governments foreign policies
[info]militantsisidf wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)
This is well said. Every since the Gilligan/Kelly affair, the BBC has been supine. And in this case a bit stupid - wakey, wakey - it's post-Bush now and the Government is trying to fall in with Obama's marching tune. Also, the Government doesn't want to pay for the damage in Gaza that its weapons helped the Israelis to wreak so it desperately needs us mugs to raise the money necessary. The BBC has jumped on up to tug its forelock to the BBC at a time ad place where it is not wanted. I know several people who are not renewing their licence fees/cancelling their direct debits. Why bother with a TV when you can get everything you need via broadband - and INDEPENDENT NEWS CHANNELS which don't show bias by referring to one side constantly as 'militants' whilst the other side is not - even though the ideology motivating zionists is full of anti-Arab hate speech. Check it out for yourselves.
impartiality! Look who is talking?
[info]aadam210502 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 08:20 am (UTC)
BBC HAS NEVER BEEN IMPARTIAL IN MIDDLE EAST, ESPECIALLLY IN PALESTINE, IT HAS ALWAYS SIDED WITH THE ZIONIST ISRAHELL. BBC AND MANY OF ITS CRONIES DOSEN'T SEEMS TO KNOW WHO IS THE OPPRESS AND OPPRESSOR, WHO IS INNOCENT AND WHO IS VICTIM, WHO HAS WMD AND WHO DOSEN'T, WHO IS OCCUPIER AND WHO OCCUPIED. ITS A SHAME. FOR GODS SAKE DON'T TALK ABOUT IMPARTIALITY, SHUT YOUR MOUTH.
Re: impartiality! Look who is talking?
[info]justicero wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 03:13 pm (UTC)
Yes, Jews (13 million) are oppressing the muslim (religion of peace) people, 1,3 billion
Re: impartiality! Look who is talking? - [info]exec_ceo - Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Most popular