BBC left isolated as rival channels back aid appeal
Ministers step into row over corporation's refusal to show charities' plea for donations to Gaza
The BBC was engaged in a war of words with ministers last night over its refusal to broadcast an urgent appeal for humanitarian aid to Gaza. Government figures, aid workers and BBC staff expressed outrage that the corporation has not backed down, as some of its rivals did yesterday, and broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) appeal. The BBC said yesterday it was concerned that access to aid in Gaza might be problematic, and that it did not want to endanger the public's perception of the impartiality of its reporting.
The BBC Trust chairman Sir Michael Lyons expressed concern that the "level and tone" of the political comments were "coming close to constituting undue interference in the political independence" of the corporation.
Channel 4, Five, ITV and al-Jazeera English announced they will be airing the DEC appeal tomorrow, after initially falling in behind the BBC. Sky News was considering its position last night.
Public figures were outraged by the broadcaster's decision not to air the appeal, calling it a "terrible mistake". One former senior BBC journalist referred to "a culture of timidity". The BBC has previously aired DEC pleas for humanitarian help in volatile regions such as Congo and Burma.
Yesterday a march that had been organised to complain about the BBC's alleged pro-Israel bias, which began outside Broadcasting House, was given new focus by the row.
The director-general, Mark Thompson, stood by his decision last night, despite critics' attempts to draw a distinction between politics and aid.
The row once again pitted the Government against the BBC, six years on from the David Kelly controversy. It raised further questions over the judgement of senior BBC officials weeks after the Ross/Brand affair.
In an unusual intervention by a cabinet minister, the International Development Secretary, Douglas Alexander, wrote to Mr Thompson on Friday urging him to reconsider, but Whitehall sources said the BBC seemed determined not to back down. The health minister Ben Bradshaw, a former BBC journalist, said the decision was "inexplicable" and called the corporation's justification "completely feeble". The Communities and Local Government Secretary, Hazel Blears, added: "I sincerely hope the BBC will urgently review its decision."
A motion has been tabled in the Commons for tomorrow expressing astonishment at the corporation's judgement in blocking airtime from the coalition of major aid charities, including the British Red Cross.
It is understood that it was Mr Thompson's decision, and chief operating officer Caroline Thomson was ordered to go on radio – initially on Friday on Radio 4's The World Tonight – to defend the position. A source close to the row said: "Because she [Ms Thomson] has gone so strongly on editorial independence, it is very difficult to see how they can back down."
Ms Thomson said yesterday: "It is important to remember that broadcasting appeals like this is a unique thing we do and we have to be clear about two things when we do it. First, that that money will go to the people it is intended for; but second, that we can do it within our own impartiality principles and without affecting and impinging on the audience's perception of our impartiality."
Protocol dictates that the BBC leads the way on deciding a consensus on DEC appeals with other channels. But rival channels allege the corporation made an announcement on Thursday before consulting them, forcing them to break with the convention.
The DEC is an apolitical umbrella organisation made up of UK major aid organisations ActionAid, British Red Cross, Cafod, Care International UK, Christian Aid, Concern Worldwide, Help the Aged, Islamic Relief, Merlin, Oxfam, Save the Children, Tearfund and World Vision.
Mr Alexander welcomed the move by rival broadcasters to air the appeal: "The DEC appeal is crucial to help alleviate the suffering of people injured, displaced and hungry in Gaza."
Many former BBC stalwarts were appalled at the news and called for an immediate reversal of the decision. John Tusa, former managing director of BBC World Service, said: "It's a terrible mistake and I think they have lost for the moment any sense of judgement and a good deal of courage. Anybody who thinks giving aid to badly injured children in Gaza would be taken as bias needs their heads examined."
Former BBC correspondent Martin Bell said: "Old BBC soldiers like me are appalled by the BBC's decision. There are civilians dying out there who desperately need aid."
Director-general is under pressure to go
Mark Thompson's statement last night was a typically robust reaction to the latest challenge troubling his tenure as director-general of the BBC.
A scandal surrounding rigged phone-in contests on 'Blue Peter' in 2007 led to the regulator Ofcom fining the BBC £50,000. The BBC1 controller Peter Fincham resigned in the same year over the the editing of a trailer that misleadingly suggested that the Queen had stormed out of a photo session.
Mr Thompson came under pressure to resign last year, in the wake of controversy surrounding lurid calls to the actor Andrew Sachs, which resulted in the departure of Russell Brand, the resignation of BBC Radio 2 controller Lesley Douglas, and the suspension of Jonathan Ross.
Ministerial anger over his decision not to back down over the appeal will add to the pressure for Mr Thompson to do what some of his senior staff have done in recent years – resign.
Balance in the media: Has the BBC lost its nerve over Gaza?
The BBC is used to being accused of anti-Israel bias, but in 2004 it was jolted by a study that said BBC1 and ITV news were guilty, if unthinkingly, of under-reporting the Palestinian cause. Worse, the Glasgow Media Unit found viewers thought the "occupation" of the West Bank and Gaza referred to the Palestinians, not Israeli settlers.
At the same time, the BBC fell foul of the Israeli authorities over an interview with the nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu, released in 2004 after 18 years in prison, which was smuggled out of Israel. The BBC's then deputy bureau chief, Simon Wilson, had his work permit withdrawn and was barred from the country. He was allowed back in after the BBC bowed to demands that he make a written apology to the Israeli government for dodging its censors.
The BBC appointed a senior broadcaster, Malcolm Balen, to "take stock" of Middle East coverage, in his words. He drew up an internal report that has never been released, but one result appeared to be the appointment, in mid-2005, of Jeremy Bowen as the BBC's Middle East editor. His stated role was to supply context amid the footage of bloodshed and mayhem.
Why critics accuse the BBC of losing its nerve is because, several times during the present conflict, almost as much airtime has been given to the chief Israeli spokesman, Mark Regev, as if by allowing him his say, the BBC is supplying the necessary "balance" to the images of Palestinian victims. A live "two-way" between Mr Regev and Jon Snow of 'Channel 4 News' became a shouting match, but this has never happened on the BBC.
Donations can be made to the DEC Gaza appeal via its website www.dec.org.uk or by calling 0370 60 60 900
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Hamas, islamic jihad and other crazies are to blame for this.
When Palestinians declare a permanent peace with Israel and terrorist attacks against Israel permanently cease, Israel will return the favor, and a bright future will begin.
How sad and truly pathetic, when I heard the news I really had to check twice it was about the BBC. BBC Shame on you!!
I have also been freely streaming 2005, 2006, 2008 video interviews with Vanunu @
VANUNU ARCHIVES:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Vanunu was sentenced in July 2007 to 6 months more in jail just for speaking to human beings in 2004, who were NOT Israeli citizens.
Supreme Court appeal TBA and the 5th year of restrictions denying Vanunu the right to leave the state, the right to speak to foreigners runs out April 21, 2009.
Eileen Fleming, Author, Founder WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"
Why I am saying that for many things here are some:
1 - you said nothing about "dime" weapon that Israel used to experiment on women and children.
2 - you only have Israel spokesmen, few no. for the other sides.
3 - you agreed to all their lies: "Hamas is the one who started this conflict". "human shields". "It is Israel right to defend itself against the native people" .
" There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza (at first) " .
4 - you said nothing about uranium that Israel used.
5 - you tried to avoid the photos of causalities from "WP" weapons.
6 - you didn't ask Israel spokesmen when they hit the UN camps " If they hit the fighters they claim to be at UN camps ".
7 - YOU LIED ABOUT NO. OF PROTESTERS IN LONDON. They were about 200,000 you said about 10 to 50 thousands.
8 - You imaged that causalities are only Muslims "There are also Churches hit by airstrikes and Christians also died".
9 - You said nothing about the strange cases which confused lot of doctors. " The burns are inside the body not outside ".
They failed to recognize Palestinians as humans
BBC SHAME ON YOU
BBC : KILLING PALESTINIANS IS ALSO ANTI-SEMITIC . "arabs are also semitics"
Those reports and 2005, 2006, 2008 uncensored by Israel video with Vanunu are freely streaming VANUNU ARCHIVES @
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Vanunu was sentenced to 6 months more in jail-reduced to 3 months-and his Supreme Court Appeal is TBA.
The 5th year of restrictions that deny Vanunu the right to leave the state and to speak to anyone who is not Israeli citizen will expire April 21, 2009.
The Times They Are a'Changin'- FREE Vanunu Mordechai! Now!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?i
And hamas wants palestinian children dead, too, so they can fool idiots into blaming Israel for it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlZd3vR6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXfD7uH2
PS Mark Thompson should resign. The amount of trouble in the bbc under him says it all. Its in the best interest for the bbc license payer that he goes.
pps- What about comedy on the bbc? We got no decent NEW comedy in the bbc. Comedians get cheap larfs at making jokes on private parts and lude jokes. Cant beat old british comedy. TIME TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY .
Hopefully you donate to responsible organizations, not supporters of palestinian terrorist groups.
If ethnic cleansing angers you, there are lots of Muslim countries that are close to being 100 percent muslim, with christians or Jews ethnically cleansed out.
Before you criticise Hamas, recognise the history of the region!
Recognise that the territory of Israel was forced into existence in the region by the rest of the world but was opposed by ALL the states of the middle east. This fact dilutes the legitamacy of the UN vote to create Israel for the Jews of Europe. After all would the UK consider valid, a decision to divide it's land for the immigration of say, unwanted Jews of the middle east, despite objections by itself and the rest of Europe?
Furthermore, Isreal's territories have expanded illegally from 1967. All Hamas OFFICIALLY want, are a return to 1967 borders.
Hamas are the only force with the courage to make a principled stand against the tyrranies that Israel has inflicted onto the Palestinian people -such as blockades and sanctions which have reduced the Palestinians to poverty.
Does this make Hamas a villain?
Exec_ceo, your opinions suggest deep ignorance. Go and do some reading!
YOUR opinions are deeply ignorant.
Also, Israel did not "reduce" the palestinians to povery. That ENTIRE REGION is poor, except parts of Israel.
And, Isarel's blockades are a DEFENSIVE REACTION to being surruonded by countries which repeatedly tried to wipe israel out, and by people who keep trying to sneak in to blow israelis up.
What an excuse! Totally unacceptable! The BBC should have the courage and conviction to rise above what might be expected of them for the sake of such large scale suffering. They have so got their priorities wrong.
This mistake will cost the BBC deerly! It will not be forgotten. This poor decision will haunt the reputation, image and credibility of the corporation, globally for a long time!
Bad mistake!
Stand down Mr. Thomson! Shame on you!
A war that wouldn't have started if it wasn't for the aid of the British colonial power in creating the state of Israel in the first place.
BBC is hopefully the last vestige of the same colonial power.
No, I think you are wrong unless men, women, children and babies who are not Hama fighters as now considered legitimate targets. Oh yes, I forgot, Isreal now considers anyone living in Gaza as a legitimate target so maybe with that twisted logic you're right after all.
However, if you take a more generally agreed view of who are legimate targets, out of the 1300+ plus dead, HAMAS have said about 100 were HAMAS fighters. That makes 1,200 innocent civilians. Regarding the 1000's of casualities no breakdown is possible, but it's highly likely well over 90% would fall into that category given the fighter kill figures.
The real question Exec-ceo needs to consider is: is it at all legimimate to have so called targetting killings that result in 93% of those killed as being civilian.
Is it legimate to blockade 1.5 million people into the most densely population packed region in the world, starved of food or medicine, and terrorised by intensive missile bombing a legimate tactic of any civilised country state? Is it o.k for a countries to be so consumed with such haterd that it backs the terrorist actions of it government without a murmer? In short, is it right that exec-ceo and those others writing in these threads to think all these actions are fine for Israel to carry out. No moral issues, no issues of concious, no nothing but blind support for what is clearly an indefensible state action.
I'm sure Mr Lyon is expressing concern. Since it is because of government interference that the BBC's decision not to air the DEC Gaza Appeal has been partial and biased towards the Governments foreign policies. The Government has made the BBC partial to its foreign polices stance by bullying, blackmail and threats of removal of lincence fees, and by placing "yes sir " people in control.
Wake up UK, Blair destroyed the BBC back in 2004. The BBC is no longer indepedent