Cannabis use could implant false memories, scientists warn

Long-term use can disrupt the ways that the brain understands reality

Andrew Griffin
Monday 27 April 2015 16:46 BST
Comments
A man smokes a joint in an Amsterdam cannabis coffeeshop, where small amounts of cannabis can be bought for personal use
A man smokes a joint in an Amsterdam cannabis coffeeshop, where small amounts of cannabis can be bought for personal use

Cannabis use can lead to people remembering things that never happened, according to a new study.

While scientists have long known that the drug makes people forgetful, the new study finds that it can make them more likely to remember something that didn’t happen at all.

The study, published in Molecular Psychiatry, compared a group of 16 regular weed smokers with a control group that had smoked less than 50 times in their lives. They were asked to remember a series of words and the shortly after told to recognise them, with the scientists also adding some words that hadn’t been there the first time around.

Brain scans showed that the regular smokers were more likely to recognise “lure words” — which were similar to the first set of words but weren’t there. The scientists behind the study say that it shows “that abstinent cannabis users have an increased susceptibility to false memories, failing to identify lure stimuli as events that never occurred”.

Since all of those involved in the study didn’t smoke for a month before it was conducted, scientists said that it was likely that the effects happened “even when abstinent and drug-free, suggesting a long-lasting compromise of memory and cognitive control mechanisms involved in reality monitoring”.

The disruption could be related to the physical changes that cannabis has on the brain. Both the commonly-associated forgetfulness and the false memories could come from the effects on the size of the hippocampus, a key part of the brain that helps process memories.

While the differences between the two groups were large, and the scientists claim that the results were statistically significant, the size of both groups studied were quite small.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in