Concern as China clamps down on rare earth exports
Neodymium is one of 17 metals crucial to green technology. There’s only one snag – China produces 97% of the world’s supply. And they’re not selling
ALAMY
A neodymium magnet, commonly used in motors, loudspeakers and other appliances. Neodymium is a rare earth element
Britain and other Western countries risk running out of supplies of certain highly sought-after rare metals that are vital to a host of green technologies, amid growing evidence that China, which has a monopoly on global production, is set to choke off exports of valuable compounds.
Failure to secure alternative long-term sources of rare earth elements (REEs) would affect the manufacturing and development of low-carbon technology, which relies on the unique properties of the 17 metals to mass-produce eco-friendly innovations such as wind turbines and low-energy lightbulbs.
China, whose mines account for 97 per cent of global supplies, is trying to ensure that all raw REE materials are processed within its borders. During the past seven years it has reduced by 40 per cent the amount of rare earths available for export.
Industry sources have told The Independent that China could halt shipments of at least two metals as early as next year, and that by 2012 it is likely to be producing only enough REE ore to satisfy its own booming domestic demand, creating a potential crisis as Western countries rush to find alternative supplies, and companies open new mines in locations from South Africa to Greenland to satisfy international demand.
Amid claims that Beijing is using its rare earths monopoly as a tool of foreign policy, the British Department of Business, Industry and Skills said it was "monitoring" the supply of REEs to ensure China was observing international trade rules.
Jack Lifton, an independent consultant and a world expert on REEs, said: "A real crunch is coming. In America, Britain and elsewhere we have not yet woken up to the fact that there is an urgent need to secure the supply of rare earths from sources outside China. China has gone from exporting 75 per cent of the raw ore it produces to shipping just 25 per cent, and it does not consider itself to be under any obligation to ensure supplies of rare earths to anyone but itself. There has been an effort in the West to set up new mines but these are five to 10 years away from significant production."
After decades in which they were considered little more than geological oddities, rare earths have recently become a boom industry after the invention of a succession of devices, including iPhones and X-ray machines, which rely on their specific properties.
Global demand has tripled from 40,000 tonnes to 120,000 tonnes over the past 10 years, during which time China has steadily cut annual exports from 48,500 tonnes to 31,310 tonnes.
Worldwide, the industries reliant on REEs, which produce anything from fibre-optic cables to missile guidance systems, are estimated to be worth £3 trillion, or 5 per cent of global GDP.
Beijing announced last month that it was setting exports at 35,000 tonnes for each of the next six years, barely enough to satisfy demand in Japan. From this year, Toyota alone will produce annually one million of its hybrid Prius cars, each of which contains 16kg of rare earths. By 2014, global demand for rare earths is predicted to reach 200,000 tonnes a year as the green revolution takes hold.
Nearly all of China's supply of rare earths comes from a single mine near the city of Baotou, in Inner Mongolia. The remainder comes from small and sometimes illegal mines in the south of the country, leading to devastating pollution from the poisonous and sometimes radioactive ores.
Environmentalists argue that this, coupled with widespread criticism of China's stance during the Copenhagen climate summit, adds to the need for a "plurality" of rare earth resources. One campaigner said: "There are legitimate questions over Beijing's control of these resources. Copenhagen showed they are not above putting national interest ahead of global efforts to curtail global warming."
Once extracted and refined, the rare earth metals can be put to a dizzying range of hi-tech uses. Neodymium, one of the most common rare earths, is a key part of neodymium-iron-boron magnets used in hyper-efficient motors and generators. Around two tonnes of neodymium are needed for each wind turbine. Lanthanum, another REE, is a major ingredient for hybrid car batteries (each Prius uses up to 15kg), while terbium is vital for low-energy light bulbs and cerium is used in catalytic converters.
In October, an internal report by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology disclosed proposals to ban the export of five rare earths and restrict supplies of the remaining metals. Beijing strenuously denied that the document was an accurate reflection of its strategy, saying it had no desire to reduce trade in rare earths. But The Independent understands that the level of demand in China means that supplies of at least two crucial REEs – terbium and dysprosium – are likely to be curtailed by as early as next year.
Dr Ian Higgins, general manager of Birkenhead-based Less Common Metals, which specialises in rare earth products, said: "There is a threat that in the next 12 to 18 months, there might be some quite severe shortages of these rare earths. That is certainly going to impact those hi-tech green industries outside China."
Both Western countries and China are already dashing to secure new sources of rare earths. Last year, Australian regulators imposed restrictions on the purchase of one of the country's richest rare earth mines, causing a Chinese company to walk away from a £400m deal to buy its operator.
European and North American companies are meanwhile racing to open or re-open mines in Canada, South Africa and Greenland amid calls in the US for government-backed loans to secure supplies of some REEs which are used in the guidance systems of missiles and laser-guided munitions. Toyota has effectively bought its own rare earth mine in Vietnam by signing an exclusive supply deal.
The Department for Business, Industry and Skills acknowledged the growing concern in Western capitals. A spokesman said: "We are monitoring the situation, particularly with regard to World Trade Organisation rules. We are working with UK industry to assess the long-term demand for strategically important resources, including rare earth elements."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Isn't it as likely that it's one reason why the Chinese are stalling over an agreement on limiting fossil fuels?
If they can establish a comparative (or even asolute) advantage in renewable technologies, they can choke western economies for generations.
China is a country that would (I did say would) be extraordinarily hard hit by a rise in global temperatures (a massive population coupled with centuries of deforestation, salination and soil erosion if predictions are correct would be devastating).
In the medium to long term its attitude just didn't make sense
Peace & love
The thing is, what is 'green' about this? It's less dirty, it's not green. The answer is less production, period. Also, what sort of green economy is sustainable using an already scarce resource?
Answers on a postcard.
Get used to it, because those resources linked to being 'green' all seem to be in short supply. So as long as our Government seem intent on bankrupting us on the altar of going green, we may as well just hand over our wallets and purses now.
That laughing you hear, is the rest of the World!
New Year is the traditional time for new resolutions...
...so maybe we should resolve to....(?)
"There are legitimate questions over Beijing's control of these resources. Copenhagen showed they are not above putting national interest ahead of global efforts to curtail global warming."
I smell the strong wind of liberal interventionism, cruise missile diplomacy and limited nuclear exchanges. All in the name of Gaia.
How shameless this report is.
Does britons tend to lie?
Is any country obligated to sell its anything? Then, why not send me the London Bridge? Are your country so poor?
Too late for London Bridge I am afraid. It was flogged off years ago, and is somewhere in Arizona
http://images.realtravel.com/media/lg/a
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20
Very interesting link, thanks.
Why not bomb them - Iraq style? They don't even have democracy, human rights and free speech etc. Ooh and they even have WMDs, this time not from some obscure taxi driver but a certainty. But wait, it is China, not some Muslim or poor country. No one can mess up with them.
No sane politician or military strategist would dare provoke the Chinese.
if we are to save ourselves, it will be by technology - dare I say "Green" Biofuels engineered from algae, wave power (anybody who has ever upchucked on the Liverpool-Dublin ferry knows the power of the oceans) and (buries head in shame) small-scale nuclear installations (what we do with the waste in a closed ecosystem doesn't bear thinking about). Err, maybe skip that one.
Civilisations die, and we are (seriously) on our last warning.
Peace & love
The issue is overpopulation, what other country has the intelligence/balls to deal with it?, all the rest is window dressing.
Countries need to be able to feed there own population. Many third world countries with ample food to feed their populations (Ethiopia?).
Unfortunately for one reason and another the people don't have access to it
Peace & love
From the corner of the globe that gave the Congo Leopold and Mobutu, and gave Vietnam Calley and The gap, comes an editor's honourably anti-protectionist, pro-'hidden hand' exhortation to China to 'play fair'.
This article is - I'll be generous - misconceived on every conceivable level.
China has had mandatory energy-efficiency targets for five years already. China is investing massively in renewables and energy efficiency. China is the world's biggest wind turbine producer. So the Indy and all the rest of the western China-bashing wurlitzer media can stuff it up their pieholes, China doesn't give a damn about your lies. Besides, at the rate your Crash Gordon and Banker Obama are emptying the public till into the pockets of high-finance scammers, you will all be working for a Woo or Yi or Lee before long.
the solution is simple: do not bother with hybrid cars the battery technology negates any green credentials.
As to light bulbs - similarly go back tot eh old tried and tested technology. "Long life" bulbs are nothing of a sort.
The power savings from switching off would outweigh savings from "green bulbs". Look at any major city nearly all the buildings leave the lights on all night, especially government ones. Also stop blancket lighting - when I was at university I had a desk light, and low level lighting in the room.
Its just pure, basic, supply and demand capitalism.
Oh how we have this one coming to us.
Because we've never done that to anyone have we?
We are due for a couple of centuries of pent up frustration being taken out on us.
Of course, it will hurt the ordinary people (that weren't responsible for that policy) and won't really hurt those who were. Never-the-less - we have ridden rough shod over the greater part of the world for decades. We denied them technology. We denied them fair markets. We kept them poor and broken in the name of cheap resources and profit. We patronised them in international meetings. We excluded them from debate and decision.
And they are angry, rightly so. And they sense our current weakness and vulnerability and have uncharitable thoughts in mind.
And we probably deserve it all.
I am no cheerleader for the Chinese government, who seem to behave like sulky dictators in foreign policy, but exactly why should they feel obliged to supply the rest of the world with a rare resource if they need it themselves?
There will be a lot more things that will make us in the West, realise that the way we handle China needs some serious thinking. I read an article once, that said that the Chinese had a 'cure' for malaria for 30 years before the West found out about it, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they do the same thing with cancer. If they find the cure, we'll be the last to hear about it. It's not that they are unwilling, it's the fact that as they say in Glasgow 'they have been smarted', ie. we have basically annoyed the hell out of them, so as they are in the huff, we can go swing for it!
If I had to fight, the way the Chinese do, to have respect, I don't think I'd be that willing to help thy neighbour. As for their human rights issues, to them, if someone is dead, why waste that person's organs, as they are of use to someone else. I know, we don't it's right or ethical, but they waste nothing out there, and as my brother (a chef) used to say 'If it's got four legs and it's not a table, they'll eat it'. It is just their way of doing things, to survive, so why not give them a bit of the respect we give each other over here, or we, my friends, are going to pay dear.
Tibetans, political dissidents and Falun Dafa practitioners are regularly imprisoned and tortured in China. I have spoken to many Tibetans who were severely tortured in Chinese prisons and seen their scars.
This is not to imply that Western governments respect the concept of universal human rights at all times. Most Western governments (and by extension, us?) are implicit in the exploitation and coercion of the world's poor and powerless for the sake of oil, timber, metals and power - in Iraq, Palestine, Papua, the Congo, NW Ireland, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Aboriginal Australia, the Amazon, Nigeria, etc etc etc etc etc.
What's different in the West is that we have the ability (somewhat) to express our opposition to this if we feel so inclined.
All this is a symptom of one key problem - there are now rather a lot of people, the wealthy among whom are pursuing scarce materials in a relentless drive to maintain or even further improve their living standards. The result will be a big problem for everyone, especially as our social policies are predicated on endless growth. Range Rovers for everyone? I think not.