Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How old is the moon? True age is finally revealed

The Earth's moon is 60 million years younger than previously thought

Heather Saul
Thursday 03 April 2014 16:03 BST
Comments
Photo of the full moon, on August 21, 2013 in Nice, southeastern France.
Photo of the full moon, on August 21, 2013 in Nice, southeastern France. (VALERY HACHE/AFP/Getty Images)

A new study has revealed the moon is 4.47 billion-years-old, after a team of planetary scientists discovered it was formed 95 million years after the birth of the solar system.

This makes the Earth's moon up to 60 million years younger than some previous estimates, a study published on Wednesday found.

Researchers used a new way to calculate the birthday of the planet's only natural satellite.

Astronomer John Chambers, with the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington DC, said the mega-asteroid that smashed into Earth, launching debris that later became the moon, occurred about 95 million years after the birth of the solar system.

"We think that the thing that hit Earth and ended up forming the moon, the lion's share of it stayed on Earth," he explained.

"A small fraction of its mass and some material from Earth was pushed off into space to form the moon. That was probably the last big event," he added.

The study, published in the journal Nature, is based on 259 computer simulations of how the solar system evolved.

The programs simulate the crashes and mergers of the small bodies until they meld into the rocky planets that exist today.

Earth's last big chuck came from a Mars-sized body that hit about 95 million years after the solar system's formation when measured by that geologic clock, the study showed.

At 99.9 per cent accurate, the study disputes some previous estimates that the moon-forming impact occurred as early as 30 million to 40 million years after the solar system's formation.

The results also open another even bigger mystery about why some planets, like Mars, form relatively quickly, while others, like Earth and possibly Venus, take far longer.

Analysis of Martian meteorites and the computer simulations indicate Mars was finished in just a few million years.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in