How scientists cracked puzzle of the Falklands wolf
The origin of the mysterious Falkland Islands wolf, which was persecuted to extinction in the late 19th century, may finally have been solved – 175 years after Charles Darwin puzzled over the nature of this curious fox-like creature.
A DNA analysis of four stuffed museum specimens has revealed that the wolf did not, as previously thought, come to the Falklands as the pets of early South American natives who voyaged to the islands, but travelled there long before humans had populated the Americas.
The genetic study of tissue samples taken from the four stuffed specimens has revealed that they last shared a common ancestor more than 70,000 years ago, showing that the species must have come to the Falklands long before the end of the last ice age.
But even though the study has gone some way to clarifying the evolutionary origins of the Falklands wolf, the species still represents a great biogeographical conundrum because the Falklands have never been connected to the South American mainland and no other land mammals – not even small rodents – have managed to live there.
“It is really strange that the only native mammal on an island would be a large canid. There are no other native terrestrial mammals, not even a mouse,” said Graham Slater of the University of California, Los Angeles, whose DNA analysis of the Falklands wolf is published in the journal Current Biology.
“It’s even stranger when you consider that the Falklands are 480km [300 miles] from the South American mainland. The question is, how did they get there?”
When Darwin wrote about the wolf in 1834 during his travels on HMS Beagle, he noted how peculiar it was for such a large animal to be living on a remote archipelago. He also commented on its unusually tame nature, which led others to speculate that the animals must be the descendents of escaped pets brought to the archipelago by natives.
The wolves grow to the size of coyotes or larges foxes, but are much stockier with thick, reddish fur and short muzzles, rather like grey wolves. Little is known about their behaviour but they probably lived off nesting ground birds, seal pups, insects and other grubs.
The DNA study found that the closet living relative of the Falkland Islands wolf, Dusicyon australis, is the maned wolf, an unusually long-legged, fox-like canid that lives on the South American mainland. But they last shared a common ancestor some 6 million years ago, Dr Slater said. “Canids don’t show up in the South American fossil record until 2.5 million years ago, which means these lineages must have evolved in North America. The problem is that there are no good fossils that can be assigned to the Falklands wolf lineages in North America,” he said.
Another close relative of the Falklands wolf is likely to be a canid species, called Dusicyon avus, which lived in Patagonia but went exinct about 7,000 years ago, Dr Slater said.
The Falklands wolf quickly went extinct after Europeans arrived on the islands from the 17th century. The last wolves are believed to have been killed in the 1870s by sheep farmers.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
So if the wolf was extinct in the years leading up to 1700... how did the farmers kill the last ones off some 150+ years later?
Its a very interesting story but the last passage is very confusing still... Extinction evokes the thought of total annihilation of a species only to find that Falklanders were still knocking them off some decades later, were they only a little bit extinct in the 1600's and became really extinct in the 1800's?
Perhaps the a better word in the fore part of the paragraph would have been endangered rather than extinct, pedantic I know...
Yes, I discount your "theory" as it isn't a theory at all. It is a statement of faith, not fact.
Scientists appear to have cracked the puzzle of when this wolf came to the Falklands. As there is in most of science, there needs to be alot more study to confirm their hypothesis.
geology shows that due to the Massive ice caps prevalent at that time & remember,
that the Northern ice sheet extended down as far as Luton to a average height of 2 miles !!!,
& covered most of the Northern Hemisphere, it is Known that with So Much water locked away as ice,
that sea levels were more than 500FEET Lower than than are today !!!
Much of the land between what is now Argentina & the Falklands Would have been land,
albeit a tad chillier than today ;o )
Surely that'd be the answer to how they got there in the 1st place...
incidentally, there's No Reason why the ice caps won't come back & the warmer our Home gets,
the more ice will melt, the quicker our planet Will cool & then it'll be a scramble for land near the
warmer equator...mind you, once the ski shops have sold out, my Grandmother's Real fur coat
May just come in handy or fetch a nice profit...uhum.
ps. the scorn that was poured on the 'Flood' idea...
have a look at the date & effects on the Indian Basin, Madagascar, the Middle East, Egypt &
the west coast of Australia, of the newly discovered 'Burckle Crater'...Very Sobering.