Older father, younger mother, bad idea for baby?
Children conceived by men over the age of 45 struggle in intelligence tests
Getty Images
Sir Michael Gambon was 66 when his partner, Philippa Hart, 42, gave birth to their son Michael in May 2007. She is now pregnant again.
The trend for men to follow in the fertile footsteps of Michael Douglas, Mick Jagger and Rupert Murdoch by becoming fathers in later life may have unforeseen and unwanted consequences for their children.
The offspring of older fathers are more likely to do less well in intelligence tests than the children of younger men, scientists say, and it may be the result of genetic problems with the sperm of men over 45. The children of older mothers, by contrast, tend to fare better in intelligence tests than children with younger mothers. The researchers believe this may be the result of better nurturing by more mature women.
It is well established that more older men are fathering children. In 1993, for instance, about 25 per cent of births within marriage in England and Wales were to fathers aged 35 to 54, but this had risen to 40 per cent by 2003.
Well-known older fathers include the Harry Potter actor Sir Michael Gambon, 68, whose partner Philippa Hart, 44, is reportedly pregnant with their second child. The BBC's world affairs editor, John Simpson, and his second wife, Dee Kruger, a television producer, had a son, Rafe, in January 2006, when Simpson was 61.
In women, it becomes increasingly difficult with age to conceive, but this is less so with men, who can father children for as long as they are capable of having sex – which can be well into their 70s or 80s. While there has been extensive coverage of the health problems associated with older motherhood, scant attention has been paid to any potential difficulties faced by the children of older men. However, recent studies have linked paternal age with congenital problems such as neural tube defects and a range of medical disorders of later life, such as schizophrenia, dyslexia, bipolar disorder and autism.
The latest study was based on a retrospective analysis of nearly 33,500 children born in America between 1959 and 1965, whose cognitive abilities were tested at the ages of eight months, four years and seven years. In addition to being assessed on hand-to-eye co-ordination, sensory discrimination and conceptual knowledge, the older children were also tested on their reading, spelling and arithmetic ability.
John McGrath, of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, who led the study published in the online Public Library of Science, said there was a clear decrease in performance linked to paternal age – something not seen in the children of older mothers. "We report, to our knowledge for the first time, that the offspring of older fathers show impairments on a range of neurocognitive tasks during infancy and childhood.
"The patterns of these findings were relatively consistent across ages and across neurocognitive domains," Professor McGrath said. "In light of secular trends to delayed fatherhood, the clinical implications of the mechanisms underlying these findings warrant closer scrutiny."
The study, however, could not shed light on whether those children catch up with their peers in later life.
Although women are born with all the cells that evolve into future egg cells, men produce new sperm cells throughout their lives. This was thought to protect against the sort of degradation of the sex cells seen in the female egg cells as they age.
Scientists now believe that as men age, their sperm are at an increased risk of picking up minor mutations that may be passed on to offspring and can affect their development. "While most of the neurocognitive differences were small at the individual level, these could have important implications from a public health perspective," Professor McGrath said.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
What is new is the proportion of older fathers. That is new and worth further study. The higher proportion of older fathers is due to women delaying having children until their 30s, and the fewer children being born. That too is new and worthy of study.
The falling birthrates, especially in highly developed societies such as Europe, lower male fertility rates, combined with a trend to older fathers suggests that a profound genetic shift is under way.
It would suggest that white Europeans and their descendents in North America, have failed to inter-marry with other cultures sufficiently to renew the gene pool whence the need for older fathers. Now that is worthy of long term study.
The article says that the survey was undertaken in America.
I presume by "America" the journalist that wrote this article means the USA.
Maybe if one shuts ones eyes and thinks about the Knight bearing down or the kudos of a famous broadcasting voice uttering the words 'How was it for you darling'? well then sex perhaps maybe become a little bearable, wrinkled though it is. Ughhhhhh
My wife is 26 years younger than me & we are expecting our second child.
I am neither wrinkled, gnarled or any other derogatory remark you may care to think of.
Neither am I obese or a fashionable drunkard.
If my wife were to get involved with a 22 year old acne ridden, foul mouthed, criminal minded chav who beats her up every night after becoming 'trollied', would this be more acceptable to you?
I am personally very sorry that our relationship offends your obviously refined sensibilities but would like to respectfully point out that there is far more to a good relationship than just sex.
I merely point this out as that particular subject appears to be of paramount importance to you.
For a start, some men father lots of children all through life - these men are often of a low social class and under or uneducated. This factor is ignored.
Also, nowhere in the article are facts, figure or stats given - what is the probability increase from the sample tested of children fathered by older men of being more likely to be autistic, bipolar or anything else? The research I've seen says the increase is less than 10% which is tiny. And it is MORE than balanced by the likelihood of an older father to be more responsible and richer, therefore more able to be a good father and to create a good childhood for his kids.
Or possibly, lack of engagement witn an older busier professional father means children see their father less in childhood and this creates a situation where the child only has a mother in effect - this is known to create mental illnesses and anxieties in children (look at single parent family stats).
All in all this srticle is as shoddy as the research it cites. It is merely an attempt inspired by envy at men to avenge tha fact of biology that means women and men are not equal and men can father kids at any age. THAT is the inspiration behind this shoddy research - it's political. End of.
Carry on fathering children older men - you'll be fine. Ignore the bitter old hags who envy you.
Men of a certain age , middle aged and above , either mellow or become shall we say hypersensitive?
Ps , Have you asked your wifey whether she needs another visit to the opticians.
What on earth can an old man talk about to a younger woman apart from that looks nice on you dear, or is she so submissive to you, or you are laying down the loyal foundation of a personal care to tie your shoe laces up and dab your mouth?
I think you're stereotyping a bit.
My 'wifey', as you so eloquently put it is not some immature fashion & 'celeb' obsessed chavette & is quite capable of maintaining an intelligent conversation.
Once again, sorry we don't fit in with your jaundiced, view of the world.
Let's not beat about the bush here out of a desire to put an overly PC interpretation on the results. Older mothers tend to have put off childbirth because they have had a career, and have had the intelligence to plan their family thoughtfully. Many younger mothers are just too stupid to have mastered contraception. Hardly surprising, then, that the children of the older mothers are more intelligent - they have more intelligent parents.
Yes, I know that's a sweeping generalisation, but it's a relevant factor and one that, if ignored for ideological reasons, simply skews the conclusions from the data.
If this research was to have any real value, it wouldn't just look at the father's age, but also his degree of involvement in his child's life, and if this article was to have any value at all, the journalist covering the research would have pointed that out. Typical crappy Independent schmience coverage.
This older man business interests pyschologists all the time.
Your wife has issues! (Which will balance out in her late forties / fifties)
Didn't you know this is all based on sound facts , wise up old thing.
Old man and young woman is the way it should be. In fact, men should have several wives (and divorce should be banned) - then he could have some pretty ones to shag and the older ones to cook and clean and look after the kids when he's bonking his babes.
I have to say that one of the joys of having a long legged and beautiful wife some 21 years my junior is the looks of burning jealousy upon the kiddies faces!
Some women just do not like, after adeqate experience, the purile immaturity of the de-masculinated youth of today!
I must admit that when I told her my age, after we had been going out for a couple of months, she instantly asked me what I wanted!
I told her!
'No way' in French, was the reply!
Of course I did look about 35 years old when I was actually 48, and now at 57 I pass for 45 easily!
A couple of months later she was saying 'This way'
Some woman want mental maturity, experience, in and out of the feather.
They like interesting and adventurous as well!
Intersting is rather hard to find with the kiddies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am an unreconstucted hippy and skint!
This is, witjout doubt, the best relationship that I have ever been involved in!
We have masses in common in terms of outlook and attitude!
Mrs H is not a hippy!
I must add that the age difference is noticable because Mrs H looks 10 years younger tha she actually is!
mekap wrote
'Facts' are great ammuntion in the arsenal of the narrow minded and self opinionated.
If a person tries hard enough they can always find 'facts' that agree with their opinion.
At one time it was a 'fact' that the earth was flat.
At another time, it was 'fact' that a whole unfortunate race of people in Nazi Germany were 'sub-human'.
We all know these 'facts' to be utter drivel but at the time they were implicitly believed.
Pilate asked "What is truth"?
Perhaps he could have asked the same about facts.
Actually mekap, the thing is (and I'm sorry to shatter your illusions about your own infallibility here) assertions do not become facts even if you believe them strongly, or repeat them ad nauseum - they remain assertions based merely upon your own subjective viewpoint. I realise this will come as a shockto you. Maybe in future you could try really hard not to judge people you don't actually know.
Get a grip.
After the years upon years of berating women for leaving motherhood too late, it is good to have some gender equality in the research undertaken.
But I would say, having parents that love their child and give them the care they deserve and the encouragement that gives them the motivation to do well is clearly far more important than the age of each!
Nice to know though thet you admit you like this research which proves it was done to feministsic rather thans cientific reasons. Men can breed at any age - after 30 most women are past it. Always they look ugly and fat and nag. Your problem. No wonder men like the young ones.
And sadly for you, I'm over 19. It would just not work between us.
I must say this 'ahem' gutting news, but 'ahem' thanks for the interest - one must soldier on.
Jealousy
When I see you, who were so wise and cool,
Gazing with silly sickness on that fool
You've given your love to, your adoring hands
Touch his so intimately that each understands,
I know, most hidden things; and when I know
Your holiest dreams yield to the stupid bow
Of his red lips, and that the empty grace
Of those strong legs and arms, that rosy face,
Has beaten your heart to such a flame of love,
That you have given him every touch and move,
Wrinkle and secret of you, all your life,
-- Oh! then I know I'm waiting, lover-wife,
For the great time when love is at a close,
And all its fruit's to watch the thickening nose
And sweaty neck and dulling face and eye,
That are yours, and you, most surely, till you die!
Day after day you'll sit with him and note
The greasier tie, the dingy wrinkling coat;
As prettiness turns to pomp, and strength to fat,
And love, love, love to habit!
And after that,
When all that's fine in man is at an end,
And you, that loved young life and clean, must tend
A foul sick fumbling dribbling body and old,
When his rare lips hang flabby and can't hold
Slobber, and you're enduring that worst thing,
Senility's queasy furtive love-making,
And searching those dear eyes for human meaning,
Propping the bald and helpless head, and cleaning
A scrap that life's flung by, and love's forgotten, -- -
Then you'll be tired; and passion dead and rotten;
And he'll be dirty, dirty!
O lithe and free
And lightfoot, that the poor heart cries to see,
That's how I'll see your man and you! -- -
But you
-- Oh, when that time comes, you'll be dirty too!
Useful hindsight in these times , where the 'crisis' may lop off some inessentials of instant gratification........ re: intelligence , I was 2 yrs ahead academically @ 11 , then dropped out . I look at around and see intelligent people of my age , who just performed well in education and career , and woke up around middle age to ask themselves who they are , whilst contaminating the world doing well in useless jobs that maintain family status and finance , but contribute little in overall cultural expansion.( in the etymological sense)
Mekap, your nasty little ageist ad hominem attacks against an individual poster are not wanted here. Whatever your age and whatever you look like, you seem to have a nasty, shrivelled up soul in there, lady. I really would take a very good look at yourself. But don't do it here.
Sweetheart, don't take on so. Don't worry about a thing, it may never happen. I bet she still loves you. Sleep easy, okay?