Revealed: scientist who sparked racism row has black genes
Monday, 10 December 2007
A Nobel Prize-winning scientist who provoked a public outcry by claiming black Africans were less intelligent than whites has a DNA profile with up to 16 times more genes of black origin than the average white European.
An analysis of the genome of James Watson showed that 16 per cent of his genes were likely to have come from a black ancestor of African descent. By contrast, most people of European descent would have no more than 1 per cent.
"This level is what you would expect in someone who had a great-grandparent who was African," said Kari Stefansson of deCODE Genetics, whose company carried out the analysis. "It was very surprising to get this result for Jim."
The findings were made available after Dr Watson became only the second person to publish his fully sequenced genome online earlier this year. Dr Watson was forced to resign his post as head of a research laboratory in New York shortly after triggering an international furore by questioning the comparative intelligence of Africans. In an interview during his recent British book tour, the American scientist said he was "inherently gloomy about the prospects for Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours whereas all the testing says not really".
The Science Museum in London cancelled a lecture by him, while the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, branded his comments "racist propaganda".
Other scientists working in the field of molecular biology quickly distanced themselves from the comments, saying that it was not possible to draw such conclusions from the work that had been done on DNA.
The study of the DNA of Dr Watson who shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for medicine adds another twist to the controversy surrounding the American scientist's comments.
In addition to the 16 per cent of his genes which were identified as likely to have come from a black ancestor of African descent, a further 9 per cent were likely to have come from an ancestor of Asian descent, the test indicated.
Post a comment
Limit: 1000 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
14 Comments
I like Dr. Watson, but I think he is way off on that particular comment, I'm an educated white man and I have read all kinds of books on the human anatomy, and various books on science in particular physics and molecular biology. And throughout my life I have the pleasure o meeting some of the most intellegent black people that I think would be comparable to the intellegent white community.
Posted by Craig Breuwet | 01.12.08, 20:19 GMT
im a white male with know scientific backround to back up my statement, but the same could be said for fitness and strength. When was the last time a white person broke a record for the 100 meter sprint. Its got to be true that white, black and asian people are slightly different in there genetic make up.
Posted by darren | 21.11.08, 05:52 GMT
The main problem with these populist articles is they try put a racist tint on these articles buy using phrases such as 'Black Gene' etc. This hinders the readers ability to weigh up the facts without some sort of bias. The entire subject has nothing to do with being black or white it's genetic and genetic only. The responses received to this mans work just highlight human inability to accept the fact that we are animals just like dogs that can have different breeds, we are not some divine species unfortunately.
Posted by Web | 20.11.08, 03:50 GMT
This is CRAZY...... blacks are first according to sceince and math. we should focus on learning that for ourselves. We have to just look around us; the proof can not be disputed. If what you see don't convince you than you are the racist dummy. The first are last and the last is first for now. May Peace be with you in your search for TRUTH!!!!
Posted by Enoch | 01.11.08, 23:52 GMT
First let me say that it's a travesty, and quite laughable that people are jumping down this man's throat insofar that they require him to resign. The fact of the matter is this illusion of "Free Dissemination of Information" credo we love to espouse in the western world is a croc.
We love information that agree with, and validates our own preconceptions about a specific topic. It's assumed this man is trying to advocate bigotry and segregation or any sort of other politicized "flash-words" but if in earnest these were his findings it cost him his job, his reputation as well as a myriad of other things I'm sure he held dear to saying the truth. Everyone damning him without any sort of knowledge of genetics should be ashamed.
It's also hilarious how people are using their own personal anecdotes to dismiss his argument. Alright, Chanda, you're an intelligent man from the Sub-Saharan desert region. I'm European, and I'm a certifiable genius - that alone validates his thesis by those
Posted by Fen | 03.10.08, 20:37 GMT
The reason that Dr Watson is so intelligent is probably due to the diversity of his genetic pool, including that fairly recent African ancestor of his. A diverse genetic pool frequently produces stronger, smarter offspring. I think Dr Watson should thank ALL his ancestors for endowing him with such great genes for health, intelligence and longevity. He should also quit talking about comparative intelligence. Being an expert on DNA structure clearly does not qualify him as an expert on all subjects, and the media should also quit reporting on every odd celebrity's views of unrelated subjects out of their area of expertise. I for one want to hear about informed views, not just sensationalist nonsense!
Posted by Sarah Hougie | 17.09.08, 22:56 GMT
I understand that we human have 99.99% DNA in common and only .01% is individual difference . If we could agreed that the difference is negligent and cant't make our IQ's different based on our race and/or ethnicity this world woul have a better future.
I believe that appart from genius that are born with special conditions we are very much alike, it is our social environment what account for interpersonal differences.
Posted by Eliana | 03.08.08, 06:23 GMT
I remembe Prof Crick replying to a the question of racial differences saying something like his colleague Dr Watson.
As social anthropologist Dr Louis B. Leakey said many years ago there are major differences, both mental and psychological which separate the different races of mankind.
Take the politics out of the equation and common sence and observation will tell you the races of mankind are different and no social engineering will make any improvement.
To quote Curt Stern , Prof. of Genetics at the University of California :- "Men are born genetically unequal. This is a fact of nature".
Posted by Vernon | 05.07.08, 13:02 GMT
There's a bigger IQ discrepancy within a race than between races, and in my opinion (no difference betwwen races). Since we don't live in similar conditions, and aspire different goals in life, then we can't be equally intelligent. I have 3 degrees and am just intelligent, certainly not a genius. Dr. Watson is a just another egoist, self centered Dr. That cooment alone reveals his part of not being intelligent, or may he is intelligent but not wise, which is equally a negative attribute. The fact that he as bee found with a black gene speaks volume, it 's even that black gene that won him a nobel prize. I went to school in the USA and i saw american white dummies than i have seen in black africa. My point here is "similar conditions" which doesn't exist, we live in "imperfect situations" . History, politics and geography, economics needed to be studies to understand this. To have clue on this subject, you need a "whole knowledge which does not actually exist" a, not just this lame du
Posted by Damas Kizenga | 26.06.08, 10:51 GMT
Why it would be so bad if africans were less "intelligent" on average? We cant ALL be geniuses, I certainly am not. It's always pointed out that asians are smarter than whites yet its not seen as an insult to whites. Some people have intelligence,some better health some something else. Thats the nature of nature. Are less intelligent people less valuable than those who have iq of 200?
I think this is just liberal "we are all equal and some are more equal than others"-bullcrap.
Posted by Johanna | 26.06.08, 08:52 GMT
14 Comments