Scientists disappointed that Budget failed to help under-funded research facilities
Steve Connor is the Science Editor of The Independent. He has won many awards for his journalism, including five-times winner of the prestigious British science writers’ award; the David Perlman Award of the American Geophysical Union; twice commended as specialist journalist of the year in the UK Press Awards; UK health journalist of the year and a special merit award of the European School of Oncology for his investigative journalism. He has a degree in zoology from the University of Oxford and has a special interest in genetics and medical science, human evolution and origins, climate change and the environment.
Wednesday 20 March 2013
Science supporters were disappointed that the Budget has failed to address what they see as long-standing problems with under-funded research facilities crippled by rising running costs.
The coalition Government's last two budgets included additional commitments to capital investment in laboratories and equipment. This had reduced the research capital shortfall, which stood at nearly £1.7 billion following the 2010 Spending Review, to just over £300 million.
But Chancellor George Osborne left the shortfall unchanged today, said Beck Smith, acting director of the Campaign for Science and Engineering (CaSE).
“The string of research capital announcements over the last two years since the Spending Review have almost addressed the shortfall, but just getting us back to zero isn't going to be enough if we're to remain internationally competitive and make the most of our research base,” Ms Smith said.
”Cutting departmental R&D budgets must not be seen as an easy way to achieve the additional 1 per cent cuts to departmental budgets announced today,“ she said.
Professor Sir Peter Knight, president of the Institute of Physics, said: ”Being aware that £11.5 billion is to be cut from departmental budgets on 26 June, we need to remind the Government that science and innovation hold the key to this country's future. We need to deter the Government from inflicting irreparable damage on one of our nation's greatest assets, its science base.“
Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, said the Government was still not doing enough to support British research and development.
He said: ”An increase in R&D tax credits is good news, but the sad reality is that the Government only spends 0.57% of GDP on R&D; to keep pace with other key countries this should be closer to 0.8%. Our businesses also lack ambition, with the combined public and private sector spend on R&D being only 1.79% of GDP when countries we are competing with are spending around 4%.“
Gay couple beaten in park urge MPs to moderate language on gay marriage
Strewth mate. Aussies wave goodbye to Britain as it becomes too pricey to stay
World news in pictures
X marks the spot: The find that could rewrite Australian history
Oklahoma tornado latest: At least 91 dead, including 20 children, as massive storm rips through Oklahoma City suburbs, flattening homes, shops, hospitals and schools
- 2 Tottenham to smash pay scale with £150,000-a-week contract in attempt to tie Gareth Bale to club
- 3 Austerity has hardened the nation's heart
- 4 Gay couple beaten in park urge MPs to moderate language on gay marriage
- 5 Why Arsène Wenger must spend to put icing on the cake and buy likes of Stevan Jovetic for Arsenal
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
£18000 - £22000 per annum: Randstad Education Leicester: Please request a copy...
Negotiable: Orgtel: Change Manager, Hampshire, Telecomms, SC Cleared, £200 per...
£120 - £160 per day + negotiable depending on experience: Randstad Education L...
£180 - £230 per day: Orgtel: Operations Analyst - Leading Bank in the City of ...