Seconds out: bid to alter the world's time
Steve Connor is the Science Editor of The Independent. He has won many awards for his journalism, including five-times winner of the prestigious British science writers’ award; the David Perlman Award of the American Geophysical Union; twice commended as specialist journalist of the year in the UK Press Awards; UK health journalist of the year and a special merit award of the European School of Oncology for his investigative journalism. He has a degree in zoology from the University of Oxford and has a special interest in genetics and medical science, human evolution and origins, climate change and the environment.
Tuesday 10 January 2012
Time will never be the same again if the international organisation responsible for setting the world's clocks votes later this month in favour of a controversial plan to abolish the "leap" second – the extra second added to the time signal once every few years.
Experts from around the world are scheduled to vote on eradicating the leap second at a meeting in Geneva next week of the International Telecommunications Union, the UN agency responsible for timekeeping standards.
Debate about the merits and drawbacks of the leap second has raged for many years, but observers believe this ballot could mark its final demise, although not before another one is added to the midnight signal on 30 June 2012.
The leap second was first introduced in 1972 and since then has been used on 24 occasions to keep astronomical time – which is based on the rotation of the Earth – in synchrony with international atomic time, based on the highly regular vibrations of a caesium atom.
Leap seconds were introduced because the rotation of the Earth is slowing down very slightly, by about two thousandths of a second per day, which means that without leap seconds atomic time would go an extra second ahead of astronomical time once every 500 days or so.
A leap second is added when necessary to atomic time to decrease the difference between astronomical time and coordinated universal time (UTC).
And to complicate matters the slowing down of the Earth's rotation is not constant, which means it has to be monitored constantly. Many organisations, including Britain's Royal Observatory, have been happy with the leap-second arrangement to keep astronomical time in harmony with atomic time.
But other organisations, such as the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris, are not, and are now pressing for its demise."The proposal has been put forward and a decision is likely to be made one way or the other. There is little support for it here in Britain but considerable support elsewhere and there's a very real possibility that it may go through," said Jonathan Betts, senior curator of horology at the Royal Observatory.
"We think this would be a shame. We feel that it's important not to lose the link between the measurement of time and the Sun, which after all has been fundamental to the human timescale," Dr Betts said."It would disconnect us from nature, which is not what people want."
Those in favour of abolishing the leap second argue that many critical systems, such as the GPS instruments used in aircraft navigation or computer-trading systems used in international finance, depend on highly accurate timekeeping, which might fail if people forget to update them.
"The argument in favour of the change says that its dangerous setting these systems manually – they are worried about introducing errors. But we've been doing such adjustments for decades without any problems," Dr Betts said.
- 1 Exodus Gods and Kings: Ridley Scott never considered casting 'Mohammad so-and-so from such-and-such' in lead role
- 2 This letter from a reader explains why women can’t play football
- 3 'You should come to my house and eat cheeses with me': 4-year-old sends adorable love letter to girl at school
- 4 Scientists predict green energy revolution after incredible new graphene discoveries
- 5 Michael Buerk wishes he'd killed Jimmy Savile when he had the chance - by pushing him overboard a cruise ship
Ukip says babies born to immigrants in the UK should be classed as migrants – which would include Nigel Farage’s own children
Obama: The only people with the right to object to immigration are Native Americans
The young are the new poor: Sharp increase in number of under-25s living in poverty, while over-65s are better off than ever
Tamir Rice: 12-year-old boy playing with fake gun dies after being shot by Ohio police
Rochester aftermath: Sacking of Emily Thornberry will make work of Labour MPs '10 times harder'
Ed Miliband's 'north London set' must be demolished to save Labour, say critics
Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: SURREY MARKET TOWN - SENIOR PROPERTY SOLICITOR...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: What do you want to do with your career? Do yo...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This company is a leading expert in immunoassa...