Stem cells: the first human trial
Revolutionary treatment using human embryos for patients with incurable blindness
People suffering from a form of incurable blindness could soon become the first patients in the world to benefit from a new and controversial transplant operation using stem cells derived from spare human embryos left over from IVF treatment.
Scientists working for an American biotechnology company yesterday applied for a licence to carry out a clinical trial on patients in the US suffering from a type of macular degeneration, which causes gradual loss of vision. They expect the transplant operations to begin early in the new year.
The development is highly controversial because many "pro-life" groups are opposed to using human embryos in any kind of medical research but scientists believe that the benefits could revolutionise the treatment of many incurable disorders ranging from Parkinson's to heart disease.
The company has applied for a licence from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is confident of its application being granted.
"We've seen absolutely no adverse effects whatsoever in any of the preclinical experiments and our cells are more than 99.9 per cent pure," said Dr Robert Lanza, the chief scientific officer of Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) in Worcester, Massachusetts.
"We certainly expect them [the FDA] to come back with comments and questions but our hope is that we will start sometime early next year. We're optimistic and certainly confident in our own data. We've been in dialogue [with the FDA] and we know what was on their mind and what they wanted us to do," he said. "We're hoping, assuming no hitches, to begin early next year, perhaps March."
Stem cells derived from human embryos that are only a few days old have the ability to develop into any of the scores of specialised tissues of the body. The hope is that they could be used to repair the damaged organs and tissues of patients with a relatively simple transplant procedure.
ACT has filed an "investigational new drug" application with the FDA to treat a form of progressive damage to the retina of the eye called Stargardt's macular degeneration, which destroys the central part of the retina involved in recognising faces and reading words on a page. They also intend to follow this with an application to treat age-related macular degeneration, which affects more than 500,000 people in Britain and is the most common cause of blindness.
"We hope to file a second application for age-related macular degeneration very soon within the next few months," said Dr Lanza. "I think we've put together a pretty convincing case but the FDA has to be pretty careful. I'm sure they will come back to us in the next 30 days with more questions."
The treatment for eye disease uses stem cells to recreate a type of cell in the retina that supports the photoreceptors needed for vision. These cells form the retinal pigment epithelium – which keep the light-sensing cells of the retina alive – which are often the first to die off in macular degeneration, which in turn leads to loss of vision, he said.
A single cell from a human embryo left over from IVF treatment was used in the creation of the stem cell "line" that Dr Lanza and his colleagues cultivated in the laboratory. By bathing the stem cells in a suite of chemical messengers, they were able to stimulate them to develop into fully mature retinal pigment epithelium cells.
Tests on animals found that transplants of the human cells into rats with macular degeneration resulted in a "100 per cent improvement" in vision with no side-effects, Dr Lanza said. Transplants into the 12 human volunteers chosen as guinea pigs for the first clinical trial will involve giving them mild immuno-suppressant drugs to prevent tissue rejection.
"We're going to take a precautionary approach and use low-dose immuno-suppression after the operation and after six weeks we'll taper it off. We don't know whether we will really need it," Dr Lanza said.
He said the clinical trial could well be the first in the world because the only other company that had received a licence from the FDA had had to delay the start of its own clinical trial until the end of next year.
Geron, which received its FDA licence earlier this year, has run into safety problems with experiments on animals involving the growth of cysts. It has had to provide further information to the FDA in order to satisfy nervous regulators that the new technique is as safe as possible.
Meanwhile, ACT believes it has stolen a march on Geron because its own pre-clinical studies on animals have shown that its embryonic stem cells are extremely pure and safe with no signs of the cysts seen in the animals injected with the embryonic stem cells that Geron was hoping to use in patients suffering from spinal cord injuries. "They've been through this with Geron and the company has put out an announcement that they won't start until the third quarter of next year, so ours may well be the first trial," Dr Lanza said.
A similar proposal to treat age-related macular degeneration with embryonic stem cells is being developed by scientists in Britain led by Professor Pete Coffey of University College London, but this clinical trial is unlikely to start until early 2011. "It's such a complex, wholly new process that nobody had done before and it has to be done properly," he said.
"It hasn't been done before in humans and that is affecting the last stages of the plan to get into the clinic so it's obvious that we don't want anything to go wrong. But someone has to be the first take that step."
Dr Lanza said that extensive work had been done to ensure that the cells derived from embryonic stem cells were of high enough quality to be considered clinical grade. His company has submitted nine volumes of safety data to the FDA to address concerns over purity and the possibility that the stem cells may trigger the formation of cancerous tumours.
"What we definitely have going for us is that the cells are so well purified, well characterised and there are no adverse effects. So there is nothing here to send up a flag of concern," Dr Lanza said. "It has been over a decade since human embryonic stem cells were first discovered. The field desperately needs a big clinical success."
"After years of research and political debate, we're finally on the verge of showing the potential clinical value of embryonic stem cells. Our research clearly shows that stem cell-derived retinal cells can rescue visual function in animals that otherwise would have gone blind.
"We are hopeful that the cells will be similarly efficacious in patients," Dr Lanza added.
Medical focus: Stem-cell research
Q. Why do we hear so much about stem-cell research?
A. Scientists believe that by exploiting the potential of embryonic stem cells to develop into any cells of the body, they may be able to treat many incurable conditions.
Q. What is the difference between embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells?
A. Embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos just a few days old, collected in fertility clinics. Although the embryos would have been destroyed, many people have ethical objections to their use for any purpose other than reproduction. Adult stem cells are derived from skin cells or bone marrow cells which are treated so that they acquire the properties of embryonic stem cells, but not everybody is convinced this works.
Q. What has non-embryonic stem cell research achieved?
A. Claudia Castillo, from Barcelona, received a whole organ transplant grown using her own stem cells and without the need for powerful anti-rejection drugs. Surgeons used a windpipe from a donor which they stripped of all living cells and re-seeded with cells grown in the laboratory from Ms Castillo's bone marrow.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I am blown away that embryonic stem cell clinical trial approval is still sought after.
Embryonic cells have rejection issues that require immunosuppressive drugs. What's so terrible about immunosuppressive drugs used to avoid rejection of embryonic stem cells?
"Because the majority of them act non-selectively, the immune system is less able to resist infections and the spread of malignant cells. There are also other side-effects, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, peptic ulcers, liver, and kidney injury. The immunosuppressive drugs also interact with other medicines and affect their metabolism and action."
Repair or adult stem cells have no rejection issues and require require NO IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS.
DO REPAIR STEM CELL TREATMENTS WORK?
http://www.repairstemcells.org/newslett
REPAIR STEM CELL PLACEBO EFFECT?
http://www.repairstemcells.org/newslett
10 REAL OPTIC NERVE HYPOPLASIA VICTORIES
http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/200
SCREW THE EMBRYOS, THEY'RE IRRELEVANT!
http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/200
You can already get treatment for:
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
and many more!
in regards to immunosuppresive drugs: they don't know if they need to use them, but they are using them just in case.
and thank you for someone saying these embryos would be THROWN AWAY anyway. SAVE SOMEONE'S VISION INSTEAD.
lots of people in the comments have no idea what they're talking about and simply disagree with stem cell research because of religious stupidity.
Immunosuppressive drugs (ISD) are needed because embryonic stem cells (ESC) are typically allogenic (from outside the patient's body). RSC/ASC are autologous (from patient's own body) or from other sources that do NOT require ISD. Mild ISD…is that like a little bit pregnant? They aren't sure if they need them? They need ISD to offset the potential of rejection/Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD occurs with ESC. Even when the ESCs are HLA type matched (1+2) you still need ISD because the recipient’s body can still reject the differences in many other aspects of the donated tissue.
Remember, views based 100% on science to the exclusion of all other "isms" or religious concerns is an extremely limited perspective, a religion in its own right and in fact a fundamentalist religion (movement or attitude stressing strict + literal adherence to a set of basic principles - webster). You just exchange prayer at the altar of “the church + bible” for prayer at the altar of “the laboratory + scientific dogma.” They say “Tomato,” You say…“Lycopersicon esculentum.”
The reason ESCs cause tumors is because their raison d'etre is to divide for weeks on end until there is a fetus the size of a thumbnail. It is possible to manipulate ESCs so they engage in regeneration for a time, but studies show it is nearly impossible to force them to be something they are not wired for. They eventually go back towards trying to generate that fetus…ergo – cysts + tumors develop. Perhaps this aspect of behavior has been stalled or even fixed; perhaps not.
The pro-ESC research position has always relied on the fall back position of: "yes, RSC/ASC are safer + are treating people successfully now + require no ISD…BUT THEY ARE NOT PLURIPOTENT (the ability to transform into any of the 320 odd cells in the human body)! ONLY ESC ARE PLURIPOTENT!" Not true.
It WAS believed that there are no pluripotent RSC/ASC. This is erroneous as there are at least 3 PLURIPOTENT non-ESC sources.
Whether we research ESCs, use existing lines, etc. will be decided in the courtrooms + town halls of America. Such is life (no pun intended). That is how our laws + society move forward (or backwards) in the USA.
And you may pray to a god other than pure science; Stem420. Is religion “a mind expanded awareness of the universe + the desire to better understand one's place in it + be comfortable there?” Does your interest in regenerative medicine "stem" from an interest in stem cells’ ability to regrow lung tissue damaged by smoking too much weed (as the use of “420” in one's title typically construes)? You are in luck!
There are a number of top-notch facilities around the world that are successfully treating lung disease with RSC/ASC (now, not in 10-15 years). You don’t need ISD. There is no history of cysts, tumors or GVHD. Lungs are the greediest organ in the body for stem cells…treatment has a high potential of success.
HOW TO FIND THE BEST PLACE TO TREAT YOUR SPECIFIC CONDITION...
Fill out this form + the top treatment centers in the world will review your data.
http://www.repairstemcells.org/Treatmen
They will contact you with info on procedure, travel, costs, statistics, etc.
They don’t even charge you when they determine if you are a candidate for treatment! (Imagine that! People are turned away before they pay anything if they prove to be poor candidates for successful treatment.)
…and unlike you, the treatment centers are very tolerant. They will treat you regardless of your religious or scientific positions. Thank god (no offense intended) or you would be out of luck for a decade or two.
the choice is simple.
Opinions without knowledge are prejudices, are you a biggot?
Say, we could try non-embryonic stem cell research, because this has actually produced FORTY cures and treatments in the last 20 years. Forty cures and treatments from non-embryonic stem cell research!!! Now that's what I call promise from "emerging" technology!
80% of the German war effort was directed against the RUSSIAN COMMUNISTS My God, when you look at it analytically the communists saved the world from Axis domination. But full respects to anyone who fought against the axis where ever they came from.
Also more Americans are murdered every year by fellow Americans than have ever been killed in the whole of history by Muslims and that includes Iraq and Afghanistan.
You need to get a perspective…..
Back to the main event: If one day my eyes go I’ll not lament a few cells having been saved from the bin to restore my sight. Roll on not having to die horribly...... maybe that is really Gods work.....
-Don
Why so much focus on embryonic when they clearly don't work?
American scientists and doctors have been trained to believe that the American way (FDA, clinical trials, drug development = $500 million and 7-12 yrs to develop) is the only way to go. This is the only way the pharma companies can get patents and sell their drugs exclusively for 5-10 yrs to make back the $500 mill cost of bringing a drug to public.
And make no mistake; the FDA considers stem cells a drug. http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/200
The scientists and docs have also been trained with an extremely exclusive amero-centric philosophy. Just about every US scientist will take a verified, completed, peer reviewed clinical trial…even in a well-respected publication like the New England Journal of Medicine, but PERFORMED IN ANOTHER COUNTRY and they will REPEAT IT while following US codes and standards before they will allow themselves to begin to believe the results despite the fact that the USA is years behind the rest of the world in regard to stem cell research. [I have confirmed this with 3 different scientists.]
Even so, there are over 1500 positive successful RSC/ASC FDA approved clinical trials. I already compiled a list of those associated with Hearing Disorders, Diabetes, SCI, MS, Optic Disorders and many more...give a shout if you want me to send them to you – dsgrano@gmail.com
The result is identical (as far as known at this point) to having a dish full of the patient's original embryonic stem cells ready to be reprogrammed to become whatever cell types that are needed. NO REJECTION, since each cell contains exactly the patient's own DNA.
This completely eliminates the ethical questions and is safer for the patient anyway.
Meanwhile..... there has been widespread use in America of adult stem cells to grow tissue, bone and organ cells used in successful treatment for many years.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/scienc
It should be 10 to 15 minutes in length and uses sicle cell anemia as an example of a genetic desease that may be cured with stem cells created from skin cells. I've bandwidth limitations where I am now that prevents me from verifying this is the video I saw.... if a couple of African American kids appear describing their anemia, you've got it.
Note: it originally aired summer of '08.
A. Claudia Castillo, from Barcelona, received a whole organ transplant grown using her own stem cells and without the need for powerful anti-rejection drugs. Surgeons used a windpipe from a donor which they stripped of all living cells and re-seeded with cells grown in the laboratory from Ms Castillo's bone marrow.
This minimalist, dismissive answer is a deliberate attempt by the pro-abortion groups to minimize the actual effectiveness of adult stem cell achievements. To this date, over 70 treatments from adult stem cells have been developed and are in use (not in trials, but as actual cures).
Among these are:
Brain Cancer
Retinoblastoma
Ovarian Cancer
Skin Cancer: Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Testicular Cancer
Tumors abdominal organs Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Cancer of the lymph nodes: Angioimmunoblastic Lymphadenopathy
Multiple Myeloma
Myelodysplasia
Breast Cancer
Neuroblastoma
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Various Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Ewing’s Sarcoma
Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
POEMS syndrome
Myelofibrosis
Auto-Immune Diseases
Diabetes Type I (Juvenile)
Systemic Lupus
Sjogren’s Syndrome
Myasthenia
Autoimmune Cytopenia
Scleromyxedema
Scleroderma
Crohn’s Disease
Behcet’s Disease
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Juvenile Arthritis
Multiple Sclerosis
Polychondritis
Systemic Vasculitis
Alopecia Universalis
Buerger’s Disease
Cardiovascular
Acute Heart Damage
Chronic Coronary Artery Disease
Ocular
Corneal regeneration
Immunodeficiencies
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Syndrome
X-linked Lymphoproliferative Syndrome
X-linked Hyper immunoglobulin M Syndrome
Neural Degenerative Diseases and Injuries
Parkinson’s Disease
Spinal Cord Injury
Stroke Damage
Anemias and Other Blood Conditions
Sickle Cell Anemia
Sideroblastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia
Red Cell Aplasia
Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia
Thalassemia
Primary Amyloidosis
Diamond Blackfan Anemia
Fanconi’s Anemia
Chronic Epstein-Barr Infection
Wounds and Injuries
Limb Gangrene
Surface Wound Healing
Jawbone Replacement
Skull Bone Repair
Other Metabolic Disorders
Hurler’s Syndrome
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Krabbe Leukodystrophy
Osteopetrosis
Cerebral X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
Liver Disease
Chronic Liver Failure
Liver Cirrhosis
Bladder Disease
End-Stage Bladder Disease
There have been NO treatments developed from embryonic stem cells.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/scienc
The whole argument about the ethics of embryonic stem cells is now moot.
a) research demonstrates the relative ease with which any adult stem cell can reprogrammed;
b) there are NO ethical restrictions on ANY research treating animal diseases with animal embryonic stem cells.
End of story.
This link brings you to the Snowflakes Embryo Adoption website:
http://www.nightlight.org/adoption-serv
most pro-lifers are against embroyonic stem cell research they are against finding
cures for serious diseases? Adult stems cells have already shown success in
clinical trails. Why not defund the embroyonic research and put the money
into the already proven adult stem-cells.