Sacked lap dancer loses case
Wednesday 10 November 2010
A lap dancer who attempted to bring an unfair dismissal case against Stringfellows has lost her case, a lawyer for the club said today.
Nadine Quashie, 27, was seeking permission to take the club to an employment tribunal over her sacking in December 2008, but first had to prove she had been employed by them.
The single mother, of Greenford, west London, worked topless wearing a G-string at the club over an 18-month period, taking home more than £1,000 a night when it was busy. Her garter would be stuffed with pre-paid vouchers from clients, called "heavenly vouchers", and on one night she made as much as £3,000, a central London hearing was told.
Ms Quashie, who was once a university women's officer, said she had not realised she was deemed to be self-employed until another dancer told her that was the case, five to six months after she started working at the London club.
She told a tribunal last month that she should be entitled to a full employment tribunal for unfair dismissal because conditions at the club effectively meant dancers were employees. The dancer alleged she was forced to work a minimum of three shifts a week, prevented from working elsewhere and was told how much she could charge. She also claimed she was made to fill out a holiday form if she wanted time off.
However the judgment handed down today concluded Ms Quashie was not an employee of Stringfellows.
It was alleged at the three-day tribunal that Ms Quashie has been living as a "tax exile" in her own country and has never paid "a penny" of tax in her life.
Caspar Glyn, representing Stringfellows, told the hearing Ms Quashie had misrepresented her tax affairs and therefore should not qualify to have her unfair dismissal case heard.
Catherine Rayner, representing Ms Quashie, denied any wrongdoing by her client.
Ms Quashie held a student union sabbatical position at Thames Valley University less than two years before joining Stringfellows in June 2007. The former accountancy and finance student never completed her course.
The written judgment, which is more than 20 pages long, dismissed Ms Quashie's claim, saying: "The claimant was not an employee of the respondent, and therefore the tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to hear her claim for unfair dismissal."
It continued: "There is insufficient evidence before the tribunal to conclude that the claimant's contract was illegal.
Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
Saudi Arabia says it won't rule out building nuclear weapons
Germanwings plane crash: Andreas Lubitz 'had eyesight problems' and woke from nightmares 'screaming we’re going down'
Jeremy Clarkson 'could be given minder' ahead of a potential Top Gear return
Zayn Malik's departure from One Direction shows the perils of fame in the age of social media
Ukip supporters are 55 or older, white and socially conservative, finds British Social Attitudes Report
JK Rowling responds to fan tweeting she 'can't see' Dumbledore being gay
Jeremy Clarkson sacked live: Alan Yentob 'wouldn't rule out' ex Top Gear host's BBC return
David Cameron calls Labour 'hopeless, sneering socialists' while announcing 7-day NHS plans
Revealed: Putin's army of pro-Kremlin bloggers
The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
- 1 Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
- 2 Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
- 3 The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
- 4 Scientists have discovered a simple way to cook rice that dramatically cuts the calories
- 5 Noel Gallagher: I lost sh*tloads of money, a few million, didn’t tell my wife