UK

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Al Muhajiroun's return presents test for terror laws

Controversial Islamist group stands accused of radicalising young Muslims

By Jerome Taylor

Anjem Choudary, the new British head of the radical Islamist group Al Muhajiroun

PA

Anjem Choudary, the new British head of the radical Islamist group Al Muhajiroun

A formerly defunct radical Islamist sect led by the banned preacher Omar Bakri Muhammad has appointed a new British leader and will re-form publicly this week for the first time in five years.

Al Muhajiroun, which campaigns for the implementation of sharia in Britain and once described the 9/11 hijackers as "the Magnificent 19", supposedly disbanded in 2004. Shortly after, two offshoot groups led by Bakri Muhammad – The Saved Sect and Al Ghurabaa – were outlawed by the Home Office for "glorifying terrorism".

The group, which has little support in the wider Muslim community, has since kept a low profile, operating under the name Ahl us-Sunnah wal Jamma'ah (Adherents to the Prophet's Path and the Community). Bakri Muhammad, who is Syrian, has had to preach over the internet from Lebanon after the Government revoked his leave to remain in Britain in 2005.

He remains the group's spiritual leader but Anjem Choudary, a radical based in east London and Bakri Muhammad's former spokesman, will conduct a debate tonight under the Al Muhajiroun banner – the first time it has been used publicly since 2004.

Mr Choudary's followers caused outrage in Luton when they protested against soldiers returning from Iraq, prompting local Muslims to turn on the group and force them out of town. He told The Independent: "It is a challenge to both the Government and the media to make them understand that Al Muhajiroun was never illegal in the first place. We have been demonised but there is no proof that any of our members have done anything illegal or military." Mr Choudary intends to re-launch Al Muhajiroun at a debate entitled "Sharia Law vs British Law" between himself and the Centre for Social Cohesion think-tank, which is being adjudicated by the Global Issues Society. Mr Choudary appears on debate publicity flyers as the "UK head of Al Muhajiroun and Principle [sic] of the London School of Sharia".

The re-emergence of a group which critics have accused of radicalising young Muslims will pile pressure on the Government to outlaw it. When he was prime minister, Tony Blair announced his intention to ban the group but the Government refrained from doing so once Bakri Muhammad was told he could not return to Britain.

Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said he had agreed to attend the debate because "his opinions have to be countered". But he said the Government should move quickly to ban the group.

"Now that Al Muhajiroun have decided to officially re-form once more, the Government should ban it immediately," he said. "Al Muhajiroun is more than a conduit for radicalisation. The legislation to proscribe it is already on the books and it should be done right away." Others argue that banning Al Muhajiroun will force its supporters underground, making it harder to keep tabs on them.

Formed in 1986 by Bakri Muhammad, who came to Britain seeking asylum from Saudi Arabia, Al Muhajiroun earned a reputation for courting controversy. Charismatic but staunchly intolerant on non-Muslims (kaffirs), the "Tottenham Ayatollah" said his aim was to see the "flag of Islam" flying over Downing Street. Before 9/11, he said he had sent hundreds of British Muslims to fight jihad in Kashmir, Chechnya and Afghanistan. The group was initially regarded as made up of little more than a loudmouth preacher with scant support, but it later emerged that Muslims involved in terrorism – including some of those convicted in 2007 of planning to blow up a shopping mall – were former members of Al Muhajiroun or had attended its meetings.

Mr Choudary said Al Muhajiroun was only involved in the "peaceful propagation" of Islam and that it was unfair to associate his group with the actions of former members who had been involved in criminal activity.

"We have a presence within numerous cities, universities and mosques and we have come across a lot of people, so to say that we radicalise people is unfair. I don't think it is a surprise that a small number of people who have met us might go on to do other things. But it is not the case that anyone who comes across us automatically becomes a radical and commits a martyrdom operation."

Terrorism laws: Licence to act?

The Government is able to ban groups that "glorify terrorism" under a provision of the Terrorism Act 2006. Before it was introduced, the Home Secretary's powers of proscription could only be used against organisations directly involved in terrorism. Defended by the Government as a tool to defeat extremists, critics say that the legislation is overly pre-emptive and stifles free speech.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The real nut case is...Douglas Murray
[info]hair_clipper wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 11:29 pm (UTC)
The real nut case in this debate is Douglas Murray. The hatred that flows from his mouth for Islam is unparallel. Its astonishing that a person so arrogant, divisive and illiterate is speaking for the Centre of Social Cohesion. His think tank do nothing but spread false rumours about Islam and muslims. The fact Douglas Murray is sharing a platform with Al Muhajiroon shows the extent to which they will highlight minority groups to spread their agenda of tarring the whole muslim community due to their hatred for Islam.
we live in a democracy and freedom of speech is vital as long as no crime is commited
[info]maradona_2009 wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 12:25 am (UTC)
if al muhajiroon and anjum chaudary want to have there say i welcome it they are part of the fabric of this great country as long as they dont commit any crime then let them have there say and freedom of expression we might agree with them or disagree with them thats the way the cookie crumbles i could not understand how the right wing media in this country tried to hijack there protest where they held a few placard of dead babies and women and kids and tried to make them as the bad guys when they commited no crime
Each to it's own
[info]nos235 wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 01:13 am (UTC)
I beleive Afghanistan and pakistan should be setup as a large Sharia State - much like Israel has been for the Jews. But to even consider Saria Law in Britain is an insult to every British person who ever lived. You should never have allowed so many differing races into your tiny little homeland. It is destroying your culture - the once greatest on earth
Re: Each to it's own
[info]oszkowice wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 04:16 am (UTC)
Absolute racist garbage from I assume a Yank. Israel is a zionist construct. The muslim state you talk of in Afghanistan was the one invaded by the US and Britain Your segregationist approach will not work or are you looking for more "final" solutions
Ban this group and the racist British Nazi Party
[info]oszkowice wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 04:11 am (UTC)
Ban this group and the BNP as well. They are both evil and socially divisive
Re: Ban this group and the racist British Nazi Party
[info]repton4 wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 05:58 am (UTC)
Oszkowice were did you ever learn to breath through your arse, People like you always play the racist card you use it to silence critics, intimidate opponents, resist prosecution, aid compensation,
The only person who is racist is you towards British white people,
Re: Ban this group and the racist British Nazi Party
[info]almightymat wrote:
Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 12:23 pm (UTC)

....and yet he called for a non-white extremist group to be banned as well, how does that fit with what you just said?
Douglas Murray centre for social division
[info]oscar_ruggeri wrote:
Thursday, 18 June 2009 at 08:56 am (UTC)
We all know about anjem choudray but to have douglas murray acting as the force of good is ridiculous. If we did'nt know any better we would think he was spokesman for the bnp with his claims that any muslim should be stopped from coming into europe. Douglas murray is a dangerous bigot who should be exposed for what he is!

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date