UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Al-Megrahi 'pressured into abandoning appeal'

By Jerome Taylor

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi

PA

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi

Supporters of the only man convicted of carrying out the Lockerbie bombing accused the Scottish officials today of pressurising him into abandoning his appeal against his conviction and called on the Government to hold a full public inquiry into Britain’s worst terrorist attack.

Lawyers for Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi announced this morning that the former Libyan intelligence officer would no longer pursue his second appeal against his conviction.

Megrahi is currently serving a life sentence for his involvement in Britain’s worst terrorist attack but only has months to live because he is suffering from terminal prostate cancer.

His decision to abandon the appeal will likely bring him even closer to being returned to Libya, either on compassionate grounds because he is dying or under a controversial prisoner exchange treaty signed between Britain and Libya earlier this year which would only allow him to return to Tripoli if he abandoned his appeal.

Speaking to The Independent today, Pamela Dix - whose brother Peter was on board Pan Am flight 103 when it exploded above the skies of Lockerbie in December 1988 - said Megrahi’s decision to abandon the appeal would mean that those relatives of victims who believe the truth about the bombing has yet to be ascertained will be even further from discovering what really happened.

“It’s a massive disappointment,” said Mrs Dix, whose organisation UK Families Flight 103 represents a number of British families that believe the full facts of the bombing have yet to be fully explained. “I’m always a little hesitant to speak for other people but I certainly know that a number of families who lost loved ones and were very keen for the appeal process to reach its full conclusion.”

She added: “The actual appeal itself had a rather narrow focus but we wanted it because we would hopefully find out more about what actually happened and whether Megrahi was innocent or guilty. At the moment only one man has supposedly been found guilty for an act which would have involved a number of people.”

Megrahi has always staunchly maintained his innocence, a view that is shared by a number of British families of those who died in the attack he was convicted of carrying out – a view which is in stark contrast to most American families who are convinced of his guilt. Last year, however, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission gave Megrahi permission to appeal his conviction after a four year review of the evidence against him.

But a statement released by Megrahi’s lawyers today revealed that the 57-year-old had applied to the High Court in Edinburgh on the 12th of August to abandon that appeal after his health took a “significant turn for the worse”.

MSP Christine Grahame, who has met Megrahi in prison on numerous occasions, said she believed the Libyan had been pressured into dropping the appeal.

"I saw Megrahi not so long ago and apart from his number one priority of seeing his family he was absolutely determined to clear his family’s name and prove his innocence,” she said.

“If he had found a way to do both I know he would have chosen that route. That’s why I’m highly surprised by his decision to drop the appeal and why I believe he has been leaned on.”

Mrs Grahame claimed she had seen an email from an official in the Scottish Justice Department warning that senior Scottish officials were exerting undue pressure to have Megrahi drop his appeal.

She added: “We will now absolutely do everything we can to push for a full public inquiry. There are six hundred pages of evidence from the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, much of which suggests Megrahi is innocent, which will no longer see the light of day and that is simply not right.”

Sources close to the Megrahi family say he is desperate to return to Triploi to spend the remainder of days with his wife and five children. The decision to abandon his appeal may stem from a hope that doing so could quicken his release. Although the BBC said earlier this week that Scotland’s Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill was about to release the Libyan on “compassionate grounds”, he is also potentially eligible for return to Tripoli under the prisoner exchange scheme as long as the appeal was abandoned or concluded.

In the statement Tony Kelly, Megrahi’s lawyer said: "As the appeal hearing has commenced... leave of the court is required before the appeal can be formally abandoned."

The Libyan’s decision to abandon his appeal has lead to fresh calls for a full independent inquiry into the Lockerbie bombing, a request which has been regularly rebuffed by the Government who have argued that an inquiry might prejudice Megrahi’s appeal.

“The next step we will have to take is to make sure a full inquiry is held if we are to ever find out the truth,” said Mrs Dix. “The ongoing criminal process surrounding Megrahi has always been used by the Government as an excuse not to hold an inquiry, but if that appeal is abandoned it is only right that a full inquiry should be held.”

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

disreputation, disreputation, disreputation
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/minister-under-pressure-over-lockerbie-decision-1772055.html

An appeal taken to the better end would have corroborated the existing findings that trial was a charactersitic Scotch kangaroo - a political 'trial' to cover up reality. There is a horse trade to the effect that if you don't rock the boat by pursuing it, we'll free you.
Re: disreputation, disreputation, disreputation
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 12:16 pm (UTC)
there's a headline today 15th to the effect that now that the guy has been conned into withdrawing an appeal that threatened to publicly corroborate that the disreputable Scotch kangaroo was a kangaroo, there is a move to blame 'Murkan "parents" for a decision to welch on the deal, in case he reopens the appeal from a safe haven. It's known that Ghaddafi is safe, having already sold his sold as consideration for being able to strut on the world stage with vermin like Blair
The whole question here is: an innocent man went into jail healthy and now is leaving dying.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
The whole question here is: an innocent man went into jail healthy and now is leaving dying. That's why they begged him to drop his appeal and release him.
Hmm
[info]faulksd wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 12:52 pm (UTC)
This episode always had a strange smell to it - nothing is as it seems. I remember a man speaking to us who had lost his daughter in the Lockerbie atrocity - he told us that dignatories were warned beforehand not to take the flight. There are more questions than answers, and I'm quite sure that the Libyan chap who was imprisoned was a fall-guy to mollify an angry public on both sides of the Atlantic.
Re: Hmm
[info]infangthief wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 03:29 pm (UTC)

"Minutes before flight 103 took off from London's Heathrow airport, FBI Assistant Director Oliver 'Buck' Revell took his son and daughter-in-law off the plane."
Megrahi
[info]ltowers wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 01:08 pm (UTC)
It is absolutely appalling that this man is going to be released - even on compassionate grounds. Did he and his 'colleagues' have any compassion for the families of the poor souls who perished on that fateful December flight?! Harsh as it may sound, this man should die amongst strangers and alone, just as those poor innocent people did aboard flight 103.
Re: Megrahi
[info]branzal wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 03:29 pm (UTC)
But if he is innocent - then he is just another victim of Lockerbie.

There are people who know the truth who could settle this matter by admitting their guilt, but that's as likely as the Pope being a Protestant.
Re: Megrahi
[info]ltowers wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 06:20 pm (UTC)
That is as may be, however, there MUST be enough against him to have been able to detain him for this long. There's the old saying "no smoke without fire" and I don't believe for one minute that he is completely innocent. As always, there will be someone who knows 100% who what where etc and like you say, the liklihood of them coming forward with truths is extremely slim.
Ronnie Biggs robbed a train and there has been more debate about him being released than there has been this mass murderer. What Mr Biggs did wasnt right by any stretch.
Re: Megrahi
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 03:13 pm (UTC)
Test your "must" with the known facts. Even a high level Scotch judicial inquiry has found miscarriage of justice - that's why the appeal has to be stopped, by hook or by crook, because it irredeemably and more importantly , loudly, will expose the fact of disreputable kangaroo 'justice', the purpose of which was to blow smoke in the eyes of relatives and of the general public.

-----------------------------------------

I've asked the question before and don't apologise for taking the opportunity to ask it again, since it is arguably on-topic. When can we expect to see those responsible for this crime http://www.geocities.com/cronyblatcher/ and many others, to be brought to justice?
Re: Megrahi
[info]themaidencity wrote:
Thursday, 20 August 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
If Jim Swire knows that Megrahi is innocent and after he lost his daughter in the crash, what gives you the right to condem or are you another one of these apologists for THE ESTABLISHMENT ?

Good luck to Megrahi, maybe now he will get proper tretment for his cancer instead of the pathetic 3rd world system that passes for health care in Scottieland!
The Two Tragedies of Lockerbie
[info]gerry3273 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 03:34 pm (UTC)
After the bombing, we were told by the press for several months that it was likely the work of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC), a terrorist organization led by Ahmed Jibril. Later, it began to appear that the PFLP-GC carried out the attack on behalf of Iran, in response to the missile that was fired five months earlier by the USS Vincennes, destroying an Iranian civil airliner and killing everyone aboard. After that attack, Ayatollah Khomeini said that the skies would "rain with blood".

Then the stories in the press changed, and started to blame Libya. But there remained many unanswered questions. Why did so many well-connected people originally booked on the flight choose to change their reservations (South African President Pic Botha, several other high-ranking officials, and the family of Oliver 'Buck' Revell, then executive assistant director of the FBI)? And how did a large team of Americans arrive on the scene in Lockerbie so quickly? As one member of a mountain rescue team stated, "We arrived within two hours [of the crash]. We found Americans already there".

One compelling explanation for the bombing of PanAm 103 is that it was carried out on behalf of Iran for the reasons described above, and that some extreme elements of the CIA turned a blind eye to what was happening. They did so in part because Charles McKee and his team were booked on the flight. McKee was working on behalf of the CIA in Beirut and was about to expose (internally, within the CIA) some uncomfortable truths about arms and drug smuggling operations being carried out by parts of the CIA. They used their existing drug smuggling pipeline to put the bomb on Flight 103.

The evidence against Megrahi is weak, and the Maltese shopkeeper who testified against him is unreliable. There are two tragedies here: that of an innocent man sent to jail, and that of the 270 people who died, and whose true killers have never been brought to justice (and probably never will be).
Scottish Justice is a Joke!
[info]themaidencity wrote:
Thursday, 20 August 2009 at 11:45 am (UTC)
It is quite obvious that Megrahi was coerced into dropping his appeal so that he can go home to die. Who do these Scottish idiots think they are kidding?

The appeal should have proceeded even after Megrahi dies should that actually occur. It is the policy of the Scottish Justice (Injustice) System to encourage all appellants to abandon their appeals.

On another point, it is time the Yanks handed over the IRA terrorist scum who fled to the USA and thereafter have been given shelter by them. Hand them over now so that they can face British justice instead of hiding under the apron strings of their women!

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date