UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 11° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

G20 protesters 'will try to bring London to standstill'

Police fear anti-capitalist groups will seek violent confrontation on streets

By Mark Hughes and Jerome Taylor

Italian riot police clashed with anti-capitalist protesters in the centre of Genoa in July 2001 when the city hosted the G8 summit

Italian riot police clashed with anti-capitalist protesters in the centre of Genoa in July 2001 when the city hosted the G8 summit

Next month's G20 summit will present an "unprecedented" challenge as up to 2,000 protesters attempt to bring London to a standstill, the Metropolitan Police admitted yesterday.

The 20 world leaders, including Barack Obama, are to visit the capital for the summit on 2 and 3 April. They plan to discuss ways to tackle the global financial crisis.

But their presence is expected to encourage a large number of protests, with scores of activists from an array of different causes determined to generate publicity from demonstrations around the event.

The majority of protest groups have promised to demonstrate peacefully, but there are fears anarchist and hardcore anti-capitalists from Britain and abroad will try to fight police in pitched battles reminiscent of the anarchist riots of the late 1990s which caused millions of pounds of damage.

Senior officers at Scotland Yard say they are aware of several groups which plan to converge on the City of London financial district to cause blockades, and attempt to get inside major banks including the Bank of England.

One organiser is believed to be a senior lecturer at the University of East London. Some groups are said to be considering filling roads with sand and then sending children to play in it, making it impossible for police officers to forcibly remove them.

An anti-capitalist umbrella group calling itself "G20 – Meltdown in the City" has promised to "storm" banks and target many of the luxury hotels where world leaders will stay.

Climate change campaigners will also concentrate their protests within the Square Mile where they intend to hold one of their ubiquitous Climate Change Camps. Previous camps have been held at Heathrow and outside Kingsnorth power station in Kent, but this time thousands of activists will descend on the City in the week up to the three-day summit.

The Independent has learnt small "commando" groups of environmental activists are planning high profile publicity protests, similar to the Parliament rooftop protests last year.

One climate change activist, who has been arrested on numerous protests, said yesterday: "With so much media attention and so many world leaders coming to town next week I can guarantee there will be all sorts of groups looking to perform an array of exciting direct action stunts.

"I just hope the action won't take the form of throwing things at the police as that gets us nowhere."

Tibetan activists from around the world will also use the G20 to protest against the continuing crackdown in Tibet, where scores of people have been killed and arrested by Chinese forces since widespread rioting and protests broke out last year. The G20 meeting takes place at the ExCel centre in Docklands, and the Metropolitan Police plan to use a marine unit to prevent attempts by protesters to infiltrate the site by boat.

More than 10,000 officers' shifts will be used in the operation, which will cost the Met at least £7.2m, although £4.7m of this money would have been spent regardless of where the officers were patrolling.

Sir Paul Stephenson, the Scotland Yard Commissioner, said: "G20 is a huge challenge for the Met. Quite clearly the notice for this event is less than one would normally have, but I think we are in extraordinary times and that has led to an extraordinary event."

Commander Bob Broadhurst is in charge of the security operation – one of the biggest the Met has ever mounted. All police leave has been cancelled for the duration of the summit and officers from six forces are working to second guess "innovative" protesters determined to evade traditional security arrangements.

"We have to be flexible and mobile," he said. "These are innovative people and we must be innovative as well.

"They are very clever people and they understand our tactics and will try to outsmart us. I have encouraged officers to try to think about what these people might try and do and hopefully we will have something to mitigate that. It will be an exciting couple of days to say the least."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
bring forward a day
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:21 am (UTC)
The summit should be brought forward by a day to 1st April. That would confuse the potential protesters. It is also a much more suitable day for a meeting hosted by Gordon Clown.
Lawful Rebellion under Article 61 of The Magna Carta of 1215
[info]crazations wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:48 pm (UTC)
The answer to the corrupt and incompetent government in the UK is extremely simple?

...and it's not riots and violence - or even demonstrations!

Enter into a peaceful Lawful Rebellion under Article 61 of the Magna Carta of 1215 and become a Freeman on the Land at Common Law (search for John James Harris or TPUC for more info.) - currently, about 200 people a day are serving the Queen with Affidavits and entering into Lawful Rebellion.

Acts of parliament are not Laws, they are Statutes - and according to Black?s Law Dictionary, a Statute is a Legislative Rule of a Society, given the Force of Law by the consent of the governed - by becoming a Freeman on the Land at Common Law you are expressly removing your consent to be ruled by Acts of parliament in a manner that has been lawful for almost 800 years! - Why do you think Statues are called ?Acts?? - They only Act as Laws!

Once a Freeman, you are only liable to adhere to the Common Law of the Land - which in principle means you must not harm or injure another human being, cause a loss of property, or use fraud in a contract. Simple - No Victim - No Crime.

In addition, you can serve government agencies, such as the police, with a 'Notice of Understanding and Intent' and a 'Claim of Right' to clarify any issue you want (as long as it adheres to Common Law principles) - for example, you can draw up a Fee Schedule and charge the police for your time (How does 500.00 per hour sound?)

It really is that simple - I undertook the process myself last month - peaceful non-compliance with unjust laws and non-payment of unfair taxation is the only way forward?

Love, Peace, Justice, for All.

Neil Kerslake,
Freeman on the Land at Common Law.
[info]britfree wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:32 am (UTC)
if its a question of being anti -british, anti -amerikkkan or anti-zionist , against the chronic dirtiness of the capitalist ethos, you can rely on britfree to be there ,greetings from the republic of scotland struggling to be born !
G20 Protest.
[info]deano30 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:43 am (UTC)
Good luck protesters - beware of people with short (and long)sticks made of very hard wood!
G20
[info]disgruntled2 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 02:00 am (UTC)
I for one believe the UK is in dire need of some social unrest. The governments have been and obviously are at the mercy of large financial institutions and multinationals who believe they can operate in criminally negligent ways with impunity. Ordinary people (and subsequent generations) are faced with the consequences of their inaction. SERIOUS CHANGES MUST BE MADE.
Re: G20
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 02:50 pm (UTC)
I think you're right. The only way forward probably involves social unrest. Maybe that's something that just has to be factored in.
Anarchy or anger?
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 03:31 am (UTC)
Its very easy to label civil unrest as anarchy but this time round I think we will see more than just a bunch of weirdies trying to start a scrap for looking to France this week, we may see a whole different game.

People are extremely angry, years of disenchantment at the hands of New Labour, sweeping and crushing dictatorial powers being ushered in on lies, watching our society being flushed down the pan by Blair and then continued by Brown, people who have lost their businesses, jobs, homes and families see the politicians doing all right, the banks walking away with massive payouts whilst the man in the street is being beggared to pay for their greed and stupidity.

Brown is doing his unwitting best to drive this country into civil collapse, he and his colleagues will unleash the police onto the people and the people will fight back, it is not anarchy, it is not sedition or insurrection, it is pure and unadulterated anger at abysmal mismanagement and greed by this government.

And for those minding the comment on the long and short wooden sticks, go buy a newspaper and learn how to make a Millwall Brick then if you find yourself on the wrong end of a brutal police charge, you have the means to defend yourself which is your right and have done no wrong...
Re: Anarchy or anger?
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:04 pm (UTC)
The real trick is to get the police to come over to your own side, as the great Jim Larkin did in 1907


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Larkin
G20 Anger at Governments
[info]politeek wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 06:06 am (UTC)
Viva la revolution! .. capitalism has failed the same way communism failed, and as happened in soviet russia the governments of the world are bankrupting the people to pay for their failures, hopefully this protest will oust the current government , stop the tories from gaining power (we all remember how badly the screwed us up the last time they had power) and then find a new way to run and manage this country , a way in which everyone is treated fairly , paid fairly, and doesn;t have to worry about banking collapses ,Ceo and ministerial pay offs, wrongful imprisonment or repossesion of their home

It wont happen , humans are generally corrupt when given the chance, but protest does help people to see what is being kept from them , in this case, the police will start a riot as they always do , then will blame it on the protesters as they always do and then brown the clown will take away more of our civil liberties using the justification of stopping those "terrorist" protesters from destroying our way of life .

I have one thing to say to Mr Brown .. your the one destroying this country, economically, enviromentally and morally.

Remember the lesson the roman emperors never forgot Mr Brown .. the MOB rules .. and it looks like the mob is comming to your door step

So what will the police confiscate this time?
[info]jhudsy wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 07:13 am (UTC)
This sounds strangely like the police response to last year's climate camp. I expect to see the home office minister claiming that hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of police officers were injured regulating this very protest, at least 5 tons of dangerous soap being confiscated, and peoples rights trampled on in order to protect the rights of some faceless corprate entity to keep destroying the planet...
Demos
[info]sebastian_dix wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 08:19 am (UTC)
Sand for children as a protective shield? Sounds like alarmist propaganda to me! No, there might be children there, but they will be in the protective arms of their parents, as hundreds of thousands of normal, middle class people come out to protest the unmitigated excess, greed, and corruption of the past two decades that has brought the world to this pass. Most do not want revolution: they want responsible, accountable government and a sensible and reliable degree of free market regulation. Although I suppose to some of those getting the huge bonuses that's equivalent to anarchism.
do not publicise the meetings then
[info]remarketuk wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 08:23 am (UTC)
WHY BOTHER PUBLICISING THE MEETINGS IT JUST ENCOURAGES PROTESTS WHY MEET AT ALL WHY NOT USE TECHNOLOGY TO MEET IN VIDEO CONFERENCING INSTAED OF A FEW COSTING US TAX PAYERS MONEY AND WHAT FOR? TO SATISFY THEIR OWN CRAVING FOR PROTESTING WHEN 50% OF THOSE PROTESTING ARE JUST THERE AS PROTESTERS FOR PROTESTING SAKE THEY OFTEN DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE PROTESTING ABOUT.
Re: do not publicise the meetings then
[info]morgan_stephen1 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:38 pm (UTC)
Great idea - world leaders can just rule by decree from hidden bunkers and video-conference eachother without ever having to meet the victims of their policy blunders. Brilliant - the future of politics; someone in a secret place decides everything. Protesting, as I see it, is the only means available to the citizenry to make their concerns heard by the secret undemocratic 'leaders' - we can't influence their decisions in referenda, we can't reach them on the phone, if you complain to an MP, some assistant palms you off with a glib excuse. There is simply no way a citizen can influence any political decision enless, of course, that citizen is a banker, a corporate head or a billionaire. Protesters are 'democrats' - those who believe the government is supposed to reflect the will of interested citizens and not simply accept whatever rubbish they decree. Also, your comment is a kind of protest - a mindless undemocratic one, to be sure, but you seem to think that protesting is worth doing, perhaps, like most protesters, you think having a voice is worth something.
Time for change
[info]nitrambran wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
The only way to rid this pathetic government is through the ballot box.
Re: Time for change
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:03 am (UTC)
The ballot box might work if elections were not rigged to always deliver governments that facilitate coprorate agendas. As it is, there really is no difference between any of the major parties anywhere in the western world -they are all pro-corporate control, pro-globalisation, pro war, pro-the requirements of big business at the expense of everyone else and are anti-personal freedom: they just take turns at wrecking society and the environment, while transfering wealth to a very tiny group who control the whole system. The so-called democratic process is a chirade.
oh yeah - [info]tominlondon - Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:07 pm (UTC) Expand
G20 protest
[info]alterkocker wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
'Hardcore anti-capitalists'. What does this mean - that people who aren't capitalists are some kind of outlaw or criminal? And what about the 'hardcore' police, ready to bash old men's brains out and taser the women. We all know what Broadhurst means when he says 'we must be innovative'.
Re: G20 protest
[info]texastrublu wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:18 pm (UTC)
It's from the same mentality that gave the voters in the US a stimulus bill that has more spending in it than targeted stimulus. Thus do we slide into socialism...
Fifty million pounds down the drain
[info]ptstroud wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:30 am (UTC)
I support none of the protesters but neither do I support this ridiculous conference that will, we are told, cost fifty million pounds, and we know will achieve nothing but a form of words that nobody really understands. All just to make our lunatic PM look as if he is saving the world again.
Erm...
[info]bill1985 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:40 am (UTC)
Popular protest in also known as democracy
It's the G20 bonzoes who have broguht the world to a standstill
[info]roross wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
The 'company politics' of the G20 have caused huge turmoil and widespread misery around the world and yet the legitimate possibility of ordinary citizens marching against them is portrayed here by the police and the press as a threat to...what exactly? It is just another brazen example of these mafia types taking the piss all over again, while the apparently decent citizens stay safely in their mortgaged homes with their tails between their legs. It's sorry days we're living in. dear readers. We know that our money is not safe in the banks, important news are tweaked and served as pulp by the press to keep everyopne at bay and, ultimately politics are really too important to leave in the hands of politicians and . The time is ripe to have a revolution NOW!
Have it somewhere else
[info]jfkc wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:48 am (UTC)
It will be the poor taxpayers who have to foot the policing bill, normal travellers who have to suffer the inconvenience of all kinds of road clousures and diversions, and everybody to pay the higher insurance premiums if shop windows and cars are wrecked, all accidently of course, again. Can they hold these G20 meetings in the middle of Sahara and save everybody the hassles?
Protests
[info]concretedave wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 09:51 am (UTC)
I for one will not be protesting. This will be a test for 'new' crowd control methods.
Besides, I need to go to work. Otherwise, my tax money might go somewhere other than the banks.
Re: Protests
[info]tap_code wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:01 am (UTC)
Good luck to all going to show their dissent at the G20.
Anarchy
[info]fwdinsight wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
One can only hope the Police are not week kneed about these thugs because they can destroy the ability of this nation to recover. Dem,ostrations are one thing but violence is Not acceptable. As we know their are enough crazies and extremists that given the chance would kill people including children for their own ends.
Re: Anarchy
[info]roross wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:05 pm (UTC)
Great example of simplified role reversing, this one. The demontrators are now the thugs and child killers. Aye, right pal. Psychological denial problems, I would say.
Re: Anarchy - [info]tomewing - Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 03:48 pm (UTC) Expand
G20 Summit
[info]navyman57 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:11 am (UTC)
yWhy do these important people has to meet physically,when they could do it electronically by having a conference, where they all stay in their own Countries and communicate by having video cameras and mics and be able to see each other without protesters being involved, sounds simple to me, but surely someone must be able to see the advantage of this system, but as yet it has not been mentioned, more is the pity. p J Self D.S.M. Storrington West-Sussex
G20 moves to Gaza
[info]maxcleyrac wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
Lets save police money by transfering the G20 meeting to Gaza, and let Hamas police the event. That will stop them , poltico's and demo freaks, farting in public !
Why not just let them protest?
[info]morgan_stephen1 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC)
The police are gearing up fight people who have no voice in politics because that voice is owned by the political elite and the rich. The police's job is make sure the protesters have to go to extremes to make any point at all. They'll all earn a fortune in 'overtime' while those who seek to influence the government that won't listen to anyone but bankers will get beaten with sticks just like in Zimbabwe. The main point of the police action will be to ensure that the bubble of delusion in which the 'leaders' exist will not be broken. Personally, I believe that a large turn out on the day will be a positive thing as it will demonstrate that the population are not simply a passive bunch of sheep on whom the government can fob off any outrageous rubbish of their choosing. Global capitalism & its political cronies has recently proved itself to be deeply flawed, greedy, self-interested, irresponsible and a danger to the well-being of the voiceless masses. The leaders have almost unamimously decided, without any reference to the wishes of the people, to transfer trillions of pounds from the taxpayer to the capitalist - if that isn't a scandal worth taking to the streets for, what is?
"They will try to outsmart us" !!.
[info]blastarrbxiii wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:47 pm (UTC)
All this because 'up to 2000' people are going to have a say.
What a threat.
The British gov and the Police don't want anyone to have a say, about anything anymore.
Just to remain silent about the ruination of our lives, whilst they and liebour ride roughshod over us for another year or so.

No. People have other ideas about that.

Police Commander Bob Broadhurst says these G20 protesters "will try to outsmart us",
well Bob, they certainly won't be going out of their way to do that if they do.
It will be just part of the usuall goings on and outcome of daily life.

G20 protesters 'will try to bring London to standstill'.....so what if they do.
They'll be doing us all a favour.
Having a voice of the People being heard.
Even if it's from this shower.
G20 is NGO like the ECONOMIC FORUM for the rich
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC)
The 20 world leaders, including Barack Obama, are to visit the capital for the summit on 2 and 3 April. They plan to discuss ways to tackle the global financial crisis.
There is an article I read about the dams coming back and there is a similar attitude so I thought I would save the politicians and my time repeating this here in the form I had written, the message being the same. Rest of the tale is all b******* my meaning for no future on the forums.
But their presence is expected to encourage a large number of protests, with scores of activists from an array of different causes determined to generate publicity from demonstrations around the event.
Why cannot the dams make a comeback when you have many times stated in Latin these headings? Dams gave water to the small villagers who had no water. This is how. The water was accumulated and then diverted in the manner the villager?s demands. The tributaries were formed and water was used for the houses and the irrigation. That is how we flourished. Then we preserved the water and with the jest created the power. These are still in use. Like stick and grass with the spark from the stone, we created the fire, so did we learn the use of water from the dams. I see nothing wrong when the striped shirts were in design coming back or the bell-bottom trousers coming back. What is wrong with us in power is we think we have conquered the space and we do not have to go back to the basic of the villages. Our ego does not allow us to go back in these fields all others going back are fine. Are not the poor countries staying with these small dams built with the stones? Water forums like economic forums are for the rich, is that it?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Viva la revolution!
[info]berlin2009 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:16 pm (UTC)
Viva la revolution!
Headline wrong way round
[info]rjm77 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:18 pm (UTC)
Actually, as an anti-capitalist demonstrator (Socialist Party member) I fear it is the police who will be seeking a violent confrontation. I certainly will not be attending with the aim of starting a fight.
Prevention
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Saturday, 21 March 2009 at 01:47 pm (UTC)
The Police should arrest all the trouble makers before they can make trouble. Some dawn raids before the G20 meeting will stop these nutters from causing havok in London.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date