UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

'How to break through police lines'

By Jerome Taylor and Kunal Dutta

G20 protesters are circulating detailed pamphlets advising people on how to win street battles against riot police and what to do if arrested.

Thousands of people are expected to bring the City of London to a standstill on Wednesday and Thursday, as popular anger over government bailouts of the banking sector reaches fever pitch.

The vast majority of protests are likely to be peaceful but the Metropolitan Police claims extremist and anarchist groups might resort to violence.

The online pamphlets suggest certain groups are advising their followers on how to beat the police should things turn rough. One document, called "Guide to Public Order Situations", explains how to breach lines of riot police using a "snow plough" human formation; throw rape alarms to make it hard for the police to give orders; resist baton and horse charges using nets; and "de-arrest" seized protesters.

Speaking after the Put People First march in Hyde Park, London, on Saturday, an unidentified member of an anarchy group told a crowd: "We want to see resistance on the street on Wednesday. If the police are ready for you, go and fight them. If they're not, give them a surprise."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Bashing anarcho heads
[info]jaded63 wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 03:31 am (UTC)
I can tell you one thing: the cops are really looking forward to this. There's nothing they like better than a good old spot of anarcho head bashing, especially these days when the cops are mostly stuck in their stations filling in forms. Bashing assorted anarcho heads is a sporting tradition that goes back decades, as I have personally witnessed on many occasions, and the G20 summit promises to be just about the tastiest rematch yet. The result, however, is a foregone conclusion, and will be the same as all previous matches: cops 1, bashed anarcho heads 0.
Re: Bashing anarcho heads
[info]kolyma14 wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 07:06 am (UTC)
jaded63:

previous matches between cops and anarchists include june 18, which most commentators agreed was cops 0 protestors 1, and the criminal justice bill riot of 1994, another which observers called for the protestors. let's not forget the poll tax riot either, which wasn't exactly the met's finest hour
Re: Bashing anarcho heads
[info]jaded63 wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
Well, at the end of the day the protestors didn't take control of the streets, however violent the rioting, and everyone went home for tea. The only time protestors might be regarded as having 'won' is when violent Islamists were given virtual carte blanche to do what they wanted during the Gazan war demonstration in London - they were allowed to get completely out of control. That victory came courtesy of a government determined to appease home grown Islamism, and police under strict instructions to treat the demonstrators with kid gloves.
Re: Bashing anarcho heads
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
Not forgetting those memorable matches:

Cops 0 Toxteth 1

Cops 0 Brixton 1

Cops 0 St Pauls 1

Cops 0 Tottenham Estates 1

Of course there was the memorable "friendly" where the Sun's Garry Bushell was involved with a skinhead group called the 4 Skins and proceeded to spark off a riot in Ealing, the result was Ealing 4 Skinheads -2 or did Bushell think growing a beard would hide his links to white power skinhead groups?

The point here is that when the people need to make their point, they do in fact win...
Re: Bashing anarcho heads
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 07:15 am (UTC)
and whilst they are enjoying themselves they will be earning extra money as overtime - good old rioters
[info]bowesy wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)
Shame there is no leaflet on kidnapping brown, but I suppose no one would want him back - so making the whole thing irrelevant
Rescue of the leaders
[info]d_subversiv wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
But cant you picture the scene?

All the leaders are surrounded and cannot get out of the building.

They only escape will be an American helicopter taking the leader away from the mob.

Saigon 1975 London 2009

Capitalism Kaput.

Hooray...
2009 New Labour Democracy = Anarchy
[info]andygeegood wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
The potential riots in London are nothing more than this witless and incompetent bunch deserve. It is about time the people revolt in the very best French traditions, instead of just moaning and making a bad job out of life under Mc.Broon & Bust
Public involvement in the G20 negotiations
[info]tijum wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 08:52 am (UTC)
How can I get hold of one of these leaflets? I have not forgotten the occasion when members of the public were coralled in the street by the police and prevented from continuing on their lawful business.
Worse, this illegal behaviour was upheld in court.
A peaceful snowplough manouver would have put the Police completely in thr wrong, and clearly demonstrated that they act only by consent of the public. Such an action on Wednesday coming will clearly indicate to Von Broon that the writing is on the wall. Politics is a service industry : politician is an unskilled admin worker, easily replaced from a reservoir of wannabees.
Breaking through police lines
[info]hezza14 wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 12:36 pm (UTC)
No doubt the anarchists will recall the video clip, "the flight of plod," which was filmed during a recent protest in London.

anything but anarchy....
[info]bravebart wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 09:42 pm (UTC)
a police state including "warrantless" home invasions and all communications intercepted & recorded, wars based upon a pack of lies, honest taxpayers driven to ruin in order that the (central) bankers be rewarded for spending the night in bed with Government (in America, the Community Reinvestment Act), any and all outspoken citizens treated to voluminous and shamelessly intrusive dossiers. Anything but anarchy.
Go Brits
[info]lynchthebankers wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 10:54 pm (UTC)
And anyone else wishing to join in. As I am sure your Government is eat up with corruption like all the rest. We are taking bets as to how many banks will be burned.
It's the end of the world as we know it...
[info]ddraig_ddu wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 01:15 am (UTC)

...and I feel fine!

Or to quote another:

London is calling and I...
Waste of time
[info]cruise4 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 01:18 am (UTC)
Protests are exactly what they want. That's why the mainstream media puts out predictive programming stories about rioters BEFORE they riot. The more trouble, the better, from the establishments point of view and agent provocateurs ie. The Police, will be utilised, as always and as proved on numerous other occasions. Then the criminals in government, and above, can implement their fascist dictatorship and start killing citizens. They've robbed you, they've robbed your children, they've robbed your ancestors and will now kill you, like all good eugeniscist scum... and that's EXACTLY what they are... Nazi eugeniscists, who also funded BOTH sides during the wars. Protests??? What we need is full scale revolution with Police, Army and People united in arresting and dealing with the world threat that our corrupt leadership and their corrupt supporting institutions represent. Until then... knock yourselves out. Waste of time.
Re: Waste of time
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
Tis true, Lord Beaverbrook was part of Hitler's financing team on the British side alongside Bush's great grandfather and let us not forget that the modern Labour party was shaped by Britain's foremost fascist and there being no surprise that his son is best friends with Cherie and Tone.

Everywhere you look you can find links to the Nazi's, Arnie over in California, his dad was in the SS, Karl Rove's father was a Nazi and even laid a foundation stone for a labour camp in his district, Nazi ideals were never defeated, they were just hidden and reinvented.
how the police can stop the violence, if they want to
[info]farmer2012 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 05:47 am (UTC)
if all the police are in one place watching / assaulting / arresting the protesters...

who is protecting all the other places?

it would seem to be the perfect time for a burglar, arsonist, rapist, or kidnapper, etc. to commit all the crime they want, with impunity, as long as they were far away from the protesters.

any victims of such crime could then sue the police and / or the city for gross negligence.

the protesters want TO BE HEARD, TO BE LISTENED TO, AND TO CREATE POSITIVE CHANGE.

by IGNORING AND SILENCING THEIR VOICES and OPINIONS, you make them violent.

police are supposed to 'serve and protect' all citizens, not just the rich and powerfull.

if the police want to stop the violence, ARREST THE BANKERS AND POLITICIANS THAT CAUSED THIS FINANCIAL MELTDOWN.

THE BANKERS LOST OR STOLE BILLIONS !!

THE BANKERS COMMITTED FRAUD !!

THE POLITICIANS LET THEM DO IT.

ARREST THEM AND CONSFISCATE THE MONEY THEY STOLE FROM US.

--note to police; FRAUD IS A CRIME, and just because you never arrested anyone for it so far, doesn't mean you can't do it now.
if you don't DO YOUR JOB and arrest the 'big boys';
there are words for that : ACCOMPLICE, and CO-CONSPIRATOR.
PLEASE, PLEASE, pretty please, grow some balls,
and DO YOUR JOB and arrest the criminal 'big boys'.
you will be heros to millions of the 'little people'.


'How to break through police lines'
[info]mikecawood wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 06:28 am (UTC)
These protests will not make a jot of difference to government policy, they are simply wasting their time.
What we all need is a General Election to rid ourselves of this corrupt government.
Misreported
[info]freethepeeps wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 07:22 am (UTC)
The quote in the last paragraph has been misreported by the Independent, and its meaning has been reversed.

What was actually said was:

"And we want resistance on the streets, when I say resistance on the
streets thats exactly what I mean. If we're kicked around we should
fight back. But don't fight the police till you can beat them. When
they're ready for you DON'T fight them. When they're not ready for
you, give them a surprise."

About 20m30s into the audio which can be found at
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/03/425587.html

The cops have been spinning this as an almighty ruck, and vastly exaggerating expected numbers (normally they play down the numbers at demos) but now they are claiming they will have to defend themselves against 100 000 anti-capitalists - if only.....

I wonder why the Independent made this 'mistake'.
[info]aristotle300 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
In the 1966-1971 most of us knew to
1. wear hardhats, football helmets to a march
2. carry a baseball bat-not considered a 'lethal' weapon
3 garbage can lids- to deflect rubber bullets- CS gas canisters
4 gas masks or wet cloth/eye googles construction safety eye goggles are maybe your best friend
you tend to suck little air into them and a wet cloth to cover t hem will make you 75% more ENABLED
than those w/o
5 work gloves
The Police-bots are now way over dressed in hot heavy equipment-their sight and hearing are dramatically impaired make them earn that paycheck-make them run after you-or better yet-away from you!
Tazers? pshaw! bring wads of aluminum foil to toss at them i have heard that this will short circuit them-I have no idea-with gloves and a jacket you can go and rip major portions right from their hands
Girls-bring your anti rape spray and whistles-it will unnerve them
[info]lu_blissett wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
The online pamphlet directly referred to in the article was last modified in May 2007, and created 2000/2001.
How then does it follow that this pamphlet is "advising their followers on how to beat the police' when it actually advises people on what to do if they find themselves caught up in a riot!
"With all that in mind, we suggest you stick to these three basic aims when you find yourself in a riot:
1. Get you and your mates away safely, rather than fighting.
2. Find a place to cause embarrassment and economic damage to your real target, rather than fighting.
3. Help others in trouble by administering first aid and de-arresting, rather than fighting."

Frankly, this was an appalling article and not what I've come to expect from the Independents usually high standard of reportage.
Fear
[info]katzfreedman wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 12:54 pm (UTC)
So, is this paper advocating attacking police during a peaceful demonstration? I can come to no other conclusion that this. I'm surprised. These G20 don't care about protestors. Do you really think this is going to stop them? They don't care. Get that thru your head. Protest, all you want. Go ahead and make a scene, it won't stop them. Until you start protesting the lack of law enforcement of traitors, war criminals and theives, you won't get anywhere.
The only answer is prosecution of these men. There are laws to protect us. Our issue is that we don't have prosecutors who take the law seriously. The prosecutors work for the traitors and war criminals. It's time to protest them, as they are closer to home, and NOT DOING THEIR JOB>!
Meanwhile, this article is not helpful to getting things right, or putting us on a clean path. We are overrun with criminals, and nobody wants to do anything to enforce the law.
What They DON'T Want
[info]chemtrails99 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC)
You're wasting your time if you think violence is gonna get you anywhere, as this is what the authorities expect. That way they'll win every time as they have enough of people from the same classes in uniform who'll turn on their fellow beings and do the dirty business for their paymasters. What would work is a large segment of people arriving in the capital and just sitting down and refusing to move. That or a couple of million people refusing to pay their electric/gas bills etc.....they can't lock you all up! A community of people united is what scares these big fish big time. (ever wonder why we've been softened up and bombarded with entertainment, video games, TV etc?)
DON'T BOTHER
[info]ffoulkes_aycke wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)


WOULDN'T IT BE FUNNY IF NO PROTESTERS TURNED UP,,,,OR PROTESTED SOMEWHERE ELSE,,,ALL THOSE NICE POLICEMEN STANDING AROUND DOING NOTHING,,,,AS USUAL
Re: DON'T BOTHER
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 03:24 pm (UTC)
The content of these comments is absolutely disgusting, shocking, depraved, amoral and contrary to the best social traditions of the UK. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

Why would anyone want the police to "lose"? The police are tasked with the job of preventing violence and protecting good order. If they lose, we all lose.

The last thing the country needs at this time is a descent into violence, bloodshed or disorder. Anger? If you like, though it's not a useful emotion. Violence? Never. Absolutely never.
Re: DON'T BOTHER
[info]jonny_socialist wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 05:20 pm (UTC)
Have you ever considered that the police love a good ruck and actively get involved in or actually deliberately provoke violence? Cos Ive seen it happen. The police in this country are thugs.
Re: DON'T BOTHER
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC)
It takes two to be violent and, frankly, being provoked is no excuse. What are you, 12?

Re: DON'T BOTHER
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
I think you're in a parallel "Heartbeat" universe, it isn't like that any more. The police nowadays are mindless thugs, dressed up to the nines in armour and weapons, and they're looking for a ruck. They've been the ones talking up violence, not the vast majority of protesters.

Try getting help from them when you're being attacked or you've been burgled. Chance would be a fine thing.

Can you say "lackey"?
[info]paschn wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 05:30 pm (UTC)
During the draft riots of 1863 in New York, the elites' toadies were concerned for their safety. The crooks, (insert bankers/politicians), of the day assured them not to worry about the masses, they'll hire half to kill the other half.
It would bode you all well to remember who those cops work for and who they're protecting. I'm sure it's just a matter of time before the militias and urban gangs who have born the brunt of treasonous groups like the CIA and FBI, et al start their little campaigns of "payback" as the patrol cars make their way along the streets looking for home-grown terrorists, (insert hungry masses), to beat and taze for their handlers. When the leaders of a nation sell their people out, use our constitution to wipe their asses and finally legislate patriotism as a terrorist act, ANY that support those actions are traitors and cowards and deserve no more compassion than they have shown those whom their acts of treason and cowardice have disposessed.
[info]xyberia44 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 10:11 pm (UTC)
Must be a field day for boys in blue, nothing beats(up) a fine morning of clubbing (with) the anarchists, with the smell of fresh tear gas in their nostrils, wild eyed, batons glistening in the morning sun, as the Police Cavalry readys themself for their version of the Charge of Lightbrigade, and the Police Infantry ready to rumble.

It is a sorry state of affairs, when the constitutionally racist police police force in this country are trying to impose a POLICE STATE DICTATORSHIP upon it own citizens, and denying its citizens the right to protest against a corrupt leadership of politicians and bankers who have caused nothing but misery to millions of people world wide. And to have the Government to use the Police to enforce the same culture of suppression and oppression upon its electorate as seen in Zimbabwe and other totalitarian regimes.

And the sad fact is that these individuals actually believe in their own bulls...t, and as such are now putting them self above the law, they are meant to uphold, My heart rejoices every time I see one of these combat ready dominions of the state getting a real trashing. As Instant Karma works in the most wonderful ways and you get what you put into it, It is time for Society to sit up and recognise the Police is not here to uphold the law and protect the civil liberties of the individual, but to oppress the many on the behalf of the few. Oppress the Poor so the Rich can get richer and who cares if the tax payers loose in the end.

More Police does not create a more secure society, Only Accountability, Equality, Equal distribution and Equal opportunities is the key to success, but it seems in the land of the Blind the One Eyed man rules Supreme. With The Police Storm Troopers to quiet dissent.


Support your Local Anarchists, At least they have the balls to do what so many of us are just thinking... Direct Action, Brings Direct Results. Don't let a racist and corrupt Police Force and Spineless Corrupt and Greedy Politicians and Bankers Stop your Day...Demonstrate and have your Say...
They Can't Arrest, Beat and Kill us all...In the End you know the score..
How do you know when a Politician/banker/Police is Lying??? Their Lips are Moving.
Moderator - please check
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 07:37 am (UTC)
There are people actively inciting violence on this forum. That is against several statutes and PCC guidelines. Please moderate this forum.
Re: Moderator - please check
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
I guess you don't like being in a minority of one then.

There are a surprising number of people who have had bad experiences with the Police, and most of them are what you would term "respectable", well educated with well paid normal jobs and careers, who have, through no fault of their own had reason to contact the police (or been victimised by them), and have found them severely wanting.

Luckily, because your average Plod isn't over endowed with brains, these highly intelligent (mostly) young people will run rings around them. I suspect that the police have been talking up the possibility of violence, just so they have an excuse to go in with full riot gear and kick it all off.
Re: Moderator - please check
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
I don't doubt that the police are far from blameless - I know some socially and to call them jaded, cynical and authoritarian would be an understatement.

I simply don't understand the call to violence. It's horrible and it's wrong. Period.
Direct action is justified
[info]mike_spain wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
No one wins in situations like this and if the police over-react that will just add more fuel to claims of a police state, and if the protesters win a little, they'll go further next time. Either way it will make Britain look like some banana republic run by a dictator which of course is part of the real problem. When honest debate is stifled, prevented and controlled as has been happening under this fascist Labour government, there is every justification in taking to the streets. If you asked any Labour minister whether direct action inspired by injustice is justifiable such as the Toll Puddle Martyrs or the Suffragettes they'll all agree to a man and woman. If you ask them about today's issues, of course they'll say its un-democratic or a terrorist inspired plot to overthrow the country. Every hundred years or so, out of control ruling elites need a severe kicking to halt their slide into dictatorship and the time is ripe for this Labour government. If the concerns of the majority were taken on board then the smaller extremist groups wouldn't get any traction but leaders like Brown don't do reasoned debate, they only react to anarchy.
Re: Direct action is justified
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
I do wish people wouldn't overuse words like "facist" - it makes them less powerful and is insulting to the victims of real facist states, like the survivors of the holocaust.

Britain is not a facist state - Germany in 1939 was a facist state and if you think Britain is even a tenth as bad as that, you obviously have no idea about what a real facist state would be like.

Britain's current situation has too much surveillance and an over-emphasis on security, agreed, but don't call it facist. That's not a word you should use lightly.
Re: Direct action is justified
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:52 am (UTC)
I agree in part, but the true fascist states didn't go that way overnight, there was totalitarian creep as liberties were gradually whittled away until nothing was left.

Identity cards, cameras everywhere, construction of giant databases, DNA collection.....what would you call it?
Re: Direct action is justified
[info]jzlondon wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 09:00 am (UTC)
You'll hear no argument from me about identity cards, cameras, databases, DNA collection, etc.

Not to mention:

Suspicion as a default attitude from authority

The presumption of required permission for activities, rather than the assumption of freedom.

Instinctive mistrust of non-mainstream activities or choices.

I agree with all the points and dislike it all intensely. But I don't think we're in danger of a slide into facism. I think we're in danger of a slide into mediocratism, conformism. We need new words, I think.
Re: Direct action is justified
[info]mike_spain wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
You have a point that maybe I do overuse the word 'fascist' but within the limits of my vocabulary I can't find a short simple word that describes this government better. The last three well known fascist states in Europe were Hitlers Germany, Mussolini's Italy & Franco's Spain and all of them used spying and surveillance to crush opposition and set neighbor on neighbor to report non conformers. Labour does the same and uses surveillance, cameras, & perverts anti-terrorism laws all in an attempt to crush protest of dissent. I don't think I'm either paranoid nor a scaremonger in saying there's a very thin line between Britain today and Germany in the mid to late 1930's. I certainly had no intention of insulting victims of previous fascist states but if there's a danger for Britain, its coming from this government and its big brother approach. I dread to think what Hitler, Mussolini or Franco could have done had they had Labours big brother apparatus aided by a politicized police force.
Guide to Public Order Situations
[info]billstclair wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 02:29 pm (UTC)
There are a number of copies of the "Guide" floating around.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Guide+to+Public+Order+Situations%22
http://www.uhc-collective.org.uk/webpages/toolbox/defence/guide_to_public_order.htm

It appears to me to be a pretty good guide on avoiding arrest, using organized non-compliance, not violence.
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Tuesday, 28 April 2009 at 01:01 pm (UTC)
Great article - the Internet is such a great medium and resource and I thank you for taking the time out to write, it is always a pleasure to read.

Matthew Anderson
how to franchise

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date