UK

10° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Iraq hero goes on the warpath

Victoria Cross holder condemns government failure to care for veterans suffering post-combat stress.

Exclusive by Terri Judd

Johnson Beharry told The Independent it was "disgraceful" that some veterans were struggling to receive treatment

Teri Pengilley

Johnson Beharry told The Independent it was "disgraceful" that some veterans were struggling to receive treatment

The Army's most decorated serving war hero has accused the Government of failing soldiers suffering from mental trauma resulting from combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry, who was awarded the Victoria Cross for twice saving the lives of colleagues in Iraq while under heavy rocket fire, told The Independent it was "disgraceful" that some veterans were struggling to receive treatment. He said the Government was relying on military charities to cover its own deficiencies and called on it to act to better help the growing number of his comrades suffering from severe combat stress, depression and mental breakdowns.

"These are people who have served this country," said Cpl Beharry, in his most outspoken interview since receiving the VC four years ago. "Why can't they get treatment? I don't think the Government is doing enough for soldiers. Those who are still serving get some form of help for combat stress but even those who are serving don't get enough support."

Cpl Beharry became the Army's most high-profile war hero when he was awarded the VC for "repeated extreme gallantry and unquestioned valour" for the two rescues "despite a harrowing weight of incoming fire".

Yesterday the 29-year-old, who is still a serving soldier, displayed the courage which earned him the country's highest honour by standing up for the thousands of servicemen and women who are still suffering from post-traumatic and combat stress, having served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In a candid interview, Cpl Beharry broke his silence to reveal that almost five years after he suffered severe injuries saving his friends, he is still racked by mental anguish and excruciating pain. While he is aware he has received first-rate treatment, he has spoken out on behalf of less high-profile service personnel, criticising the fact that charities have been forced to step in where the Government has failed.

He described it as an outrage that former military personnel were forced to wait for NHS treatment: "I think it is disgraceful that an ex-serviceman or woman has to go to the NHS. The Government should have something in place for ex-servicemen and women."

In a week when four servicemen died in Afghanistan and as British troops prepare to pull out of Basra after six years, Cpl Beharry described the nightmares, mood swings and irrational rages that plagued many soldiers.

"It brings me back into the killing zone, to the explosion. When you hear a bang in Iraq you know it is going to be followed by something and back home you feel the same. You go tense, waiting. I go into that defence mode.

"I am learning to live with it. Everyone experiences combat stress differently. But we are all linked, we all suffer the same problem in different ways."

Serving with the 1st Battalion, The Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment in Al Amarah in the summer of 2004, Cpl Beharry's unit came under fierce attack more than 800 times.

In the last three months of 2007 alone, 868 military personnel presented with a problem at the MoD's mental health departments and 69 were so severe they had to be admitted as inpatients. While just 43 were diagnosed as having full-blown post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), hundreds more were deemed to have mood or adjustment disorders or depressive illnesses.

A report on the Ministry of Defence's Departments of Community Mental Health (DCMH) stated that there was a "significantly higher rate of PTSD among those deployed to the Iraq or Afghanistan theatres of operation".

The report stated: "[The findings] do not cover the full picture of all mental disorders in the UK armed forces. Personnel may have been seen in primary care who did not require, or wish, onward referral to the DCMHs."

Robert Marsh, a director of Combat Stress, the charity that offers a lifeline to thousands of veterans suffering from PTSD or associated conditions, said they had seen a 53 per cent increase in new veterans in the past three years. In the past year alone, they have treated 3,700 new veterans.

"Most people do not come forward for an average of 14 years after they have left the services so there is a problem storing up for the future," he said. "Combat Stress is working hard to reduce this time lag because by the time we see them they are on their uppers.

"To have someone like Johnson Beharry VC talking so candidly helps normalise this condition for other veterans and, we really hope, encourages them to come forward."

Defence minister Kevan Jones said: "We recognise mental illnesses as serious and disabling conditions but also ones that can be treated."

Psychiatric teams provided diagnosis and treatment during and after deployments but the provision of those teams was just one part of the Government's approach, he said.

The Government had also ensured support systems were in place to help non-medical staff spot those who might have been affected by traumatic events. "Decompression periods" in Cyprus also allowed personnel to begin to unwind, mentally and physically, after their operational tours.

"We are not complacent," Mr Jones said. The Government had commissioned mental health research into King's College London and expanded the medical assessment programme at St Thomas' Hospital to include assessment of veterans who had served in operations since 1982.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

This government does nothing for its soldiers...
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 01:22 am (UTC)
I served in a time when PTSD was something unheard of, I suffered a highly traumatic gun wound in my leg in Africa and was given no support whatsoever, kind of heal up and get on with it, I still think this was one of the major factors in my military career crashing and burning.

What we are seeing today is the inherent greed of government in action, once upon a time, there used to be a cutting edge hospital next to my old barracks on Woolwich Common, the QE Military Hospital, up the road a little, there too was an NHS hospital, the Brook and nearby the hospital where my daughter was born, Greenwich too.

The greed of government saw the QE closed down as a military unit, reopened as a NHS core hospital, the government then closed down Greenwich and the Brook and making a vast fortune on the prime land these were built on. This was replicated all over the country and the NHS was burdened greatly when Iraq and Afghanistan were opened as theatres.

The military need their own hospitals, it is not fair for soldiers to share NHS facilities, civilians do not take kindly to being shunted in a queue just because its a soldier and it draws resources away from NHS assets that do not get much more money just because they help out the military.
Battle scars
[info]nled63 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 01:25 am (UTC)

I served in the British Armed Forces in the Middle East back in the '60's. I have struggled to comprehend the changing attitudes towards our fighting forces in the years that have followed. In my day, we received the kind of treatment & outfitting that befits a nation conscious of its duties to its fighting men & women. We have never been molly-coddled, I have to admit, & where equipment & conditions were sometimes compared to American & some European units, many of us considered ourselves the "poor relations". Nevertheless, we were satisfactorily equipped; we were provided with a reasonable standard of food & excellent health-care, & the money we earned was our own. Alas, this does not appear to be the case today.

Cpl. Beharry is to be congratulated for speaking up on behalf of his brothers & sisters in arms. To be a VC holder in the British army is to carry great responsibility & to wield great moral authority. In no way could such an achievement be better utilised than for Beharry to go on demanding the kind of common respect & decency from our government that should be a soldier's by right.
Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry (V.C.) goes on the offensive
[info]rigel_abellard wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:17 am (UTC)
I think it is incumbent on the home government to provide the best health-care money can offer on behalf of those who risked their lives for their country. We cannot ask for anything less. As society we are judged by the way we treat our most vulnerable. If we fail them then we are not the kind of nation which should be galavanting abroad trying to impose our values on others. My hope is that the men and women of the armed services will be given the proper treatment and care they deserve. We owe them that!
Its incumbent on government to rpovide the best healthcare money can offer
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 08:10 am (UTC)
to all citizens, not merely its mindless thugs willing to murder innocents whose natural resources are needed to keep fat bottoms riding around cheaply in planet-busting gas guzzlers.

http://geocities.com/cronyblatcher/
A Fair Bargain
[info]colincarr99 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:54 am (UTC)
Anyone who volunteers to serve in HM Forces accepts that they must obey lawful orders unquestioningly. It seems to me that the other side of this bargain should be that the taxpayer, via the armed forces, offers the best of care to serving and former soldiers unquestioningly.

While I admire the work of the various military charities, such as the Royal British Legion, I think it is utterly shameful that they should be needed to fill in the gaps in 'official' care.

But before putting all the blame on government, remember that WE, THE VOTERS, demand low taxes at election time...

pain, stress, depression
[info]purpleenergy wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 03:48 am (UTC)
Dear Readers,
We all need the now proven PURPLE ENERGY or the Universal Free Energy to control what is now becoming uncontrolloble.SHIPPING / COURIER CHARGES FREE
DESIGNED FOR LIFE LONG USE ON HUMANS, ANIMALS & PLANTS
We introduce ourselves as Vedic Research & Innovations, Uttarakhand,INDIA & are the only developers of Tesla Purple Positive Energy Products in India.THESE PLATES ARE THE NATURAL ENERGISER of foods & liquids.Its a natural pain reliever, which provides relief FASTER than TODAYS PAIN KILLERS. These are being used world over as the only Natural Tool to provide protection from ELECTRO MAGNENETIC RADIATION This EMR results in what is called COMPUTER RELATED INJURIES, viz, pain, stress, fatigue, depression & eventually---..
USE IN : Migraine: Headache: Toothache: Backache: Spinal Injuries: Cervical:SPONDALITIES:Nausea & Vomiting during PREGNENCY: Insect bite or ANY TYPE OF PAINS , CUTS & BURNS.
It is a wonder in INSOMNIA. Sleeeping with the plate beneath the pillow induces sound sleep.
Simply place the plate on the affected part for about 20 minutes.

VEDIC RESEARCH & INNOVATIONS
WEB:purpleenergyproducts.com


Re: pain, stress, depression
[info]proximaking wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
I suggest you look at this if you really want to help the world get access to energy and a lot more besides. You won't be able to charge for it though, ........ and that's a promise.

http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/01/06/crackpot-or-genius-has-a-shell-boffin-stumbled-on-a-scientific-breakthrough/

PTSD Information For You
[info]highstreet44 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 04:00 am (UTC)
To find out more about PTSD that the MSM isn't telling you, go to ptsdsurvival.blogspot.com.
Unique conditions
[info]testing_times wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 06:35 am (UTC)
Quite agree. There should be something in place specifically for ex-servicemen & women, whose conditions are unique, which is available not just to those who served in war zones but to all. Being in the services is a drastically different regime from civilian life and unquestionably affects one's outlook/mentality - quite possibly in a negative way. The transformation can be quite acute & readjustment to & from can prove problematic (nothing new). Fortunately, most are "made of the right stuff" & cope with such dramatic change capably, but there are many who need qualified assistance.

An example of this is my brother who served in the Parachute Regiment for five+half yrs, most in Northern Ireland. Although never an angel & not having served in a 'war zone', his experiences - many very violent, abusive & even degrading, & in which he collectively took part - certainly impacted upon his mental health. He suffered ongoing mood swings, often snapping & becoming very aggressive/violent. Within ten yrs became an alcoholic & suffered mental breakdown along with family break up. Now it's not fair to say that this was all due to the fallout from his army career, they may have happened anyway, but I'm certain it played it's part. Incidentally, relations became so strained, we've had no contact in several yrs.
VC Promotion?
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 06:56 am (UTC)
I hope Cpl Beharry will not be penalised for his courageous action in speaking out on behalf of his fellow soldiers.
I would also like to know why this man is still a corporal 4 years after recieving the VC, surley he should be at least a sergeant by now
why
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 08:30 am (UTC)
You know the answer to that. Why not spit it out?

http://geocities.com/cronyblatcher/
Armed forces PTSD
[info]jaded63 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 08:26 am (UTC)
The programme of military hospital closures was an utter disgrace, and has a lot to do with the inadequate treatment now on offer in the NHS. Soldiers with PTSD having to queue for treatment in the NHS is obscene.

Are the enemies who fight in the Iraq insurgency or the Afghan Taliban somehow immune from PTSD? It might be instructive to find out exactly what the extent of mental trauma is for our enemy combatants. At the moment there is absolutely no mention of this, as if PTSD is something which exclusively affects Coalition forces.

combat ptsd and families
[info]nikkiewitch wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 09:48 am (UTC)
I would like to thank Johnson Beharry for speaking up on behalf of our servicemen and women, past and present, something needs to be done by the goverment as my husband is only just now getting the treatment he has so desperately needed and that was because as a last ditched effort I contacted a national newspaper and basically begged for their help, as I wasn't getting any at all!!
My husband served in the army, and was a peacekeeper in Bosnia and Kosovo, and had to do and see many horrific things, he has been suffering with ptsd for six years and tried to take his own life 3 times at the end of last year, all he wanted to do was stop the pain and be able to sleep, the BBC(south west) Inside Out programme aired a small documentary about my husband's ptsd and how it has affected my family on Wednesday 25th Febuary (you can view it on BBC iplayer).
The thing is, that ptsd doesn't just effect the servicemen or woman, it effects the whole family, sometimes bringing it to breaking point and consequently the break down of a marriage and family life, I have proudly stood by my husband, but I will openly admit that sometimes I just wanted to walk away, as I felt completely helpless and alone, watching him suffer was unbearable, he went to Combat Stress in January and is now slowly making progress.
The goverment sent our men out to serve our country, but when they come back damaged, they just wash their hands of them, and leave it to charities like The Royal British Legion and Combat Stress to deal with or their families.Something needs to be done NOW!! as this has been going on for much too long, soon there will be more casualties of ptsd than there will be from the wars!!!
Nicola Whannell, Liskeard,Cornwall
Numptie Govt
[info]nylaroc wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 10:41 am (UTC)
All credit to Cpl Beharry for having the courage of his convictions. In comparison with USA UK treats its military abominably!
PTSD
[info]optelicmum wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 11:11 am (UTC)
I have been campaigning for three years, not only to help my son, who served in Op Telic, but for other veterans who might also be suffering with PTSD. In that time I have been led to despair by the cowardice and agendas of others. I was threatened with arrest and being shot if I attempted to make personal contact with the Prime Minister who sent our armed forces to war. When I have followed complaints procedures, people have lied. My contact with a national newspaper - the Mail on Sunday - left me absolutely crushed and humiliated. When I summoned up the to courage to take part in a radio 5 programme to keep the issue in the public consciousness, I was accused by the Veterans Minister of 'complaining bitterly to the media' and not 'following through'.

I am just an 'ordinary' mother who has had to draw on a confidence I don't really possess and I have found myselft in situations that have left me deeply uncomfortable or even frightened. I have been left utterly emotionally drained and battered by the process.

But I passionately believe that this is a cause worth fighting for as it does indeed affect the whole family and it has broken my heart to see my son in complete torment and despair. Not only because of the horrors he witnessed, but because he was unable to do more to help the beleaguered people he encountered in Iraq. No one who should, seems to suffer similar anguish in not being able to provide our veterans with the care and treatment they deserve.
Post combat stress
[info]n_s_eakins wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 12:53 pm (UTC)
It is a shame that the multicultural taxpayer who funds our military training doesn't demand the best.

To provide security to people, vehicles (think of the Navy) or locations against nature when British people are British, or rather 'English mate!' sounds tricky.

How lumberjacks are mentally troubled for the horror they inflict or a slaughterman (the last vestige of an un PC world?) is almost impossible to compare, trees don't shoot back or plant IEDs but the job of security is to do as you are told so Beharry look for a house with a spare bedroom and sleep alone, with a jam doughnut wrapped up in clingfilm beside you, when you awake you'll have company beside you that you love.

I've been criticised for not buying British also but the message that I can buy what I like and people who don't live in the UK must buy British is, in my opinion, a more progressive stance.

Right wing opinions have no place in the public sector.
The Universal Solder
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 12:55 pm (UTC)
He's the universal soldier and he is really is to blame
His orders come from far away no more
They come from him and you and me and brothers, can't you see
This is not the way to put an end to war

(from "The Universal Soldier" - lyrics by Buffy Sainte-Marie
iraq hero
[info]bigmac3 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
More claptrap from lesser men
Re: iraq hero
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:22 pm (UTC)
He's a Catholic, a Hindu, an atheist, a Jain
A Buddhist and a Baptist and a Jew
And he knows he shouldn't kill and he knows he always will
Kill you for me, my friends, and me for you


(there's more)
Tony Blair just won a $1M from a Zionist fund
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:26 pm (UTC)
Maybe he could make a contribution to the footsoldiers of the New World Order?

If he's not too busy kissing yankee boots on another press tour of the USA, that is.
VC
[info]shirleyrose wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:31 pm (UTC)
I hope that the government listen to this brave young man - because he knows what he is talking about, having suffered through it all, and from reading the interview, I think he is still suffering. You are a very brave young man especially for speaking up for your fellow soldiers.
Re: LISTEN UP
[info]steein wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 12:27 am (UTC)
What? the bunch of corrupt criminals called government listen..... to busy creating the Orwellian state
to LISTEN to the common slave who believe the illusion that their there to work for them.
When you grow up and inform yourself which you wont via the established mainstream controlled media, otherwords the governments PR offices.
You may WAKE UP........many have globally.
Steevin from Australia.
Thank-you Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry
[info]shahin1867 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 02:39 pm (UTC)
Dear Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry,

I would like to take this opportunity to thank-you Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry personally for your duty and gallantry with regard to serving our country. Furthermore, a thank-you is also well deserved to all of our service men and women in the field of battle and support units around the world. As an American, I find it shameful that our government has despicably failed with regard to addressing the anguish and pain that is caused by war. Then again, we as Americans are to blame as well. For the past thirty years, we have allowed our government to do as it pleases. The corruption at the highest levels is truly disgraceful. We have witnessed the elimination of the middle class in America, especially within the last eight years of the moron administration however, I see hope for our future by electing our new President. I have great hopes in this man and I hope that he will take care of our veterans because they are truly deserving, since they willfully place the ultimate sacrifice by serving their family and Our Country. Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry, I am truly sorry for what you have been and still going through. I will never understand the demons that you are fighting within but, I wish and prey for your recovery and may you find happiness within first and then in life. May God bless you and all of our veterans.

Kindest regards,
Shahin Khourdepaz
Rockville, MD, USA
Re: Thank-you Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry
[info]trooper66 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC)
IF you can read thank a teacher
If you can write thank a teacher
IF IT'S IN ENGLISH THANK A SOLDIER

Well done Johonson
Leave the army IF....
[info]chadi_salim wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 06:02 pm (UTC)
I can't see why you shouldn't join the NHS list, you are a job & we're doing a job, you are vulnerable but we're also vulnerable so I can't see why you should be of any difference to anybody else.

Besides, why should we have a military hospital to treat the vetrens only when they can be treated on the NHS. I appreciate your job but DON'T complain to much about it, remember it was your choice to join the army & if you're not happy about it simply LEAVE.
[info]cm999 wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 06:13 pm (UTC)
People join the military as a career choice. I dont see why that makes them entitled to better health care than the rest of the populations. I suspect this has only become an issue in recent years as both Iraq wars mean that our military are actually doing what they are paid to do.
Better health care?
[info]testing_times wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 11:07 pm (UTC)
"People join the military as a career choice. I dont see why that makes them entitled to better health care than the rest of the population"
cm999 wrote

OK...

he sits today joking, laughing with family & friends, dancing, kissing, walks in the park, plays with dogs, feeds the ducks, illegal to carry a knife or offensive weapon of course, or use threatening behaviour...

tomorrow he runs, he stumbles, he sweats & pants, he's on edge, he ducks, weaves, falls & rolls, heart pumping, adrenalin running, flashing, crashing, thunder, noise, fear - no time, he's there, looks into dilated eyes, fearful eyes, he stabs, stabs again, & stabs once more... then another, and another, they're all about, takes aim fires - he hits, then another, and another still... they writhe, they scream, they whimper, they die.

the day ends... he's lost a leg, and an arm, and an eye, and he can't hear... next to him lie comrades... writhing, screaming, whimpering and dying... like those he saw earlier that day. He's back home... he doesn't laugh or dance or kiss or walk, play with dogs or feed the ducks.

How many did you kill today at the office? How do you feel at the end of the day - perhaps a headache, a little tired & sleepy?

Notice the difference?
Re: Better health care?
[info]proximaking wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 08:06 am (UTC)
"Career CHOICE" answers the point. I'm all for special treatment for conscripts not for those who for once in their "CHOSEN careers" are actually doing what they are paid to do.
Re: Better health care?
[info]cm999 wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 06:49 pm (UTC)
Never said it wasnt different just that it is a career choice. If you dont want to have the life you describe then dont join the military. It really is that simple. The problem is that until Iraq 1 you were unlikely to have to go on active service and joining up was a ticket to a life of adventure training and not much else. Now members for the military are having to do what they signed up for and dont like it.
Johnson Beharry
[info]hartletts wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 07:14 pm (UTC)
The people on this site who suggest that veterans do not deserve special health care should try doing a six month tour of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan themselves. The fact is servicemen and women know what the risks are and are paid for the job they do but being prepared to give your life for your country or your comrades whilst operating in an extremely hostile environment puts them in a slightly more deserving category than some of the morons here who suggest otherwise.
Beharry is deluded.
[info]bilejones wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 09:15 pm (UTC)
"These are people who have served this country"
No. They didn't "serve this country" they served the corrupt political filth who started the Iraq war crime.
I'm sick and tired of people who conflate the actions of foul politicians with "the country".
Re: Beharry is deluded.
[info]hartletts wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 10:14 pm (UTC)
Quite why I'm bothering to reply I don't know. The political filth otherwise known as The New Labour Party represent the country thats what they were voted in to do. Injured soldiers are the victims not the perpetrators. Got it?
Re: Beharry is deluded.
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 10:33 pm (UTC)
without those willing, obedient soldiers, ready to do anything they were told, Blair's obscene and illegal invasion of Iraq would have been a non-starter. Thank you, o brave ones.
its a tragedy, but...
[info]hanks6 wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 01:42 am (UTC)
screw the politicians. none of them represent the people any more. that includes david cameron and his conservative party who will ride in on an obama style mandate the absorb/clean up the current mess only to make it worse and expand government.

i'm surprised anyone would join/stay in the army after it was determined the official reason for the iraq invasion was based on lies/fabricated evidence. is there no common sense left in this country?
Not supporting Vets is commonplace; not rare.
[info]joevet wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 02:38 am (UTC)
Talk is cheap; Taking care of those who sacrifice and willingly give so much for their nation - priceless.
Placing uniformed men and women into harm's way is something officers and our nation's leaders do with great ease, but then have insufficient or hard-to access treatment in place to care for them after. I served for 2 decades in military intelligence. In March 2006, I was going through my final medical out process screening at the Chesapeake Naval Hospital in Virginia, USA. I met an officer working in the mental health clinic there who said 65% of returning Vets were experiencing some level of PTSD, and there is not enough adequate care for all of them.

This number was shocking. Another shock came when I attempted to have a final required dental screening, and four area military dental clinics refused to examine me because of the short time I had remaining on active duty. The excuse given was if something is discovered, this will delay my getting out.

Commissioned officers who ignore the oath they take and turn their backs on their uniformed men and women do not deserve respect the gold on their shoulders or rank they hold. A leader who makes false promises to care for Vets should be treated accordingly; and may all such officers and leaders only be given the same access to care and treatment they attempt to pass off on Vets.
Help for the vets suffering PTSD
[info]revsteveapthorp wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 06:20 am (UTC)
For vets suffering Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) there is hope. The book, Emotional Freedom Techniques for PTSD by Gary Craig, is a lifeline for those enduring this terrible burden. In scientific studies of war veterans and other traumatized groups, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) has been shown to reduce or eliminate PTSD, sometime in just a few short sessions. Not only do PTSD sufferers experience immediate relief, but positive results extend long after treatment. What's more, EFT can be easily learned as a self-help procedure. The book can be ordered from: www.energypsychologypress.com. To learn more about EFT see: www.emofree.com.
At present we are working hard to teach EFT to American war vets. They, too, are not getting the help they need and deserve.

The Rev. Steve Apthorp, D.Min.
Emotional Freedom Fnd.
Tucson, AZ. USA
emotionalfreedom@mindspring.com
A failure of command. So what's new?
[info]proximaking wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 07:57 am (UTC)
Let's face it after seeing the guy speaking on TV yesterday the guy has problems. I can forgive his view of the situation being distorted as we even have the head of the armed forces the other day agreeing with him, the loonies really are in charge of the asylum when a leader will not lead and say to someone who is plain and simply wrong that he is wrong.

I pay my taxes for police, nurses, soldiers, postal workers etc who do the jobs they have CHOSEN to do well and not go carping for special treatment.

I cannot forgive someone for losing it in the street with someone else and saying they actually wanted to kill them and then effectively try to blame it on you and me for being stupid enough to give him a job murdering people, ........ then again put like that he may have a good point. Should we have an armed forces? The answer is almost certainly no, not if it turns out damaged people like him.

Remember we have seen hundreds of stories like this over the years with British soldiers being banned from many towns up and down the UK, Cyprus etc because too many of them think they have a God given right to be thugs. Here we have golden opportunity for the head of the armed forces to get such thugs in line and what does he do instead? ....... he offers to get him a knife on a tray next time a member of the public dares to get in this "hero's" way down at the laundrette, after all shouldn't he be given a free washer-drier for heroism? What about a free house, he can always use his training and chase out a family from a decent sized mansion with a gun.

The head of the armed forces will reap what he has sown by failing to stand up to such utter nonsense for such thoughts are where "special treatment" ultimately leads. Never appease a madman, I thought we had at least learned that one.

I find it extraordinary that
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 10:10 am (UTC)
nobody seems disturbed by this devastating admissions from the corporal's inerview:

"People don't realise how hard it is for soldiers. You spend six months on the battlefield and you have to defend yourself every day and then you come back to normal life and go to Tesco's and someone runs into your trolley. You have to stop and think it is only a trolley, you are not on the battlefield. We are trained to be angry. We are trained to kill and then at five o'clock you have to go home, adjust, change completely to a different person. You can't react the same way."

So these are British (or should I say, as encouraged by British value-mongers, "Judeo-Christian") values? We take normal young men and train them into abnormal, murderous states of mind, then dump them back into normal life? And we still glamorise the violence and mindless discipline of the armed forces, and refuse to face the moral implications of what they actually mean? Just what sort of "civilisation" are we, when we delude ourselves about such savage practices and refuse to accept that there is nothing Christian, civilised or advanced about deliberately setting out to kill other people? A lot more honesty about our supposed righteousness and morality is long overdue.
This is the reason why
[info]hotstuff56 wrote:
Sunday, 1 March 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
soldiers need to start saying NO to these illegal, politically motivated wars. Until you say no, you will continue to suffer the consequences from our politicians decisions. It is not patriotic to follow blindly, its patriotic to stand up for whats right, even in the military.
The human is waking up
[info]hum23 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 07:04 pm (UTC)
Why would the government want to spend money on health care for slaves that are used to fight illegal wars all over the planet. They are classed as cannon fodder to our rulers.
You are all waking up to new revelations about who and what controls our world, your armed forces were created, in the first place, by lords, kings and queens, a) to guard their riches from the serfs and slaves known as 'the people'. b) to attack weaker lands to add to their domains, land, resources, wood, metal, more slaves to do their bidding etc. The army, navy and eventually the air force became known as a defence force so as to dupe 'the people' into believing they were there for them, to defend their lands and resources. This has never been the case, ever. All nations across the world are still being duped into believing that their armed forces are there for defence when, in fact, the majority of wars have been planned by both sides by men working behind the scenes to create wealth for themselves and their families. Haliburton and Raytheon are 2 of the biggest arms dealers in the world and they sell to ANYONE. These companies are owned and run by men who have no allegiance to any side other than commerce and profit. I understand the feelings of grievance toward the government and the ministry of defence but how naive are you to think that the government (govern = control, ment = mind. work it out for your self) would want to throw good money after bad, the injured soldiers are now useless to the powers that be, they cant fight for god, queen and country, notice the order in which that last statement puts its priorities, country comes last. Wake up before its too late.
PTSD - UK Veterans
[info]barry78 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 07:13 pm (UTC)
Lance Cpl Johnson Beharry VC is absolutely right. Not only is the UK Govt not really providing apprpriate treatment for PTSD the entire Psychiatric Organisation of UK (and other nationals) are absolutelyat a loss on how to deal with it. I have been trying to help but it would seem that people selling DIY books and CD's are good for the market place. Too many people more interested in their professional standing or obtaining financial uindeserved awards. Sadly people do not seem to care about people! If L/Cpl Johnson Beharry would care to accept some assistance I would be most happy to offer it. Assistance no one else seems able, or willing, to provide.
[info]trooper66 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 07:35 pm (UTC)
this site is full of shit and scum, all you wankers need a sharp shot of history, for without it you would all be in a gulag/ concentration camp, and that would not be a bad thing, ungratefull shit
sorry you feel that way about us
[info]hum23 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 10:42 pm (UTC)
If anyone needs a sharp shot of history its you, if you think what the official history books tell about Nazi Germany are true and if you believe the media hype about the war in Iraq and the Taliban etc etc (I could ream off a list as long as your arm) then you are a very unread human being, the truth is far more intriguing. If it wasn't for the Rothschilds family none of the wars that have been fought in the last 300 or more years would of happened, You seriously need to do some homework on your history. I've been studying the history of war for 30 years now and I can tell you with a degree of certainty that what you read in the official history books is absolute tosh.
And to be honest people like you, who throw insults at others just because you have no other way of expressing yourself, should be ashamed of your lack of knowledge.
You may feel justified because of god queen and country but then thats just subservience doing its job.
PS
[info]hum23 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 11:24 pm (UTC)
My father served in the air force during WWII and was given an opportunity to do his bit for god queen and country by volunteering for experiments at Porton Down, during the year of 1940 (type it into google if you don't believe me) They put 6 men including my father into an office, dropped some liquid onto their wrists (while wearing all over body suits and gas masks) then walked briskly out of the room and 'locked it from the outside' my father described what happened next as ..."not being able to breath properly then severe chest pains, panic attacks sweating profusely a feeling of wanting to die from the pain,,," after 6 hours of this they unlocked the door and took them off to a hospital and just observed them. They told my father that they were working on cure for the common cold. This was a blatant lie because once the information, which had been kept under the official secrets act for over 40 years was finally released it was revealed that it was SARIN that had been placed on my fathers wrist. He believed the MOD then and he now has infarction dementia and is in a living hell due to their experiments, they also experiment on the general public all over the world using aircraft to spread toxins, if you don't believe me google CHEMTRAILS and see what comes up. If you don't do your home work I will assume you enjoy the idea of being led like a lamb to the slaughter and are quite happy to be a blindly obedient servant to your masters. I myself do not have to look up to anyone because I understand the truth of every one is equal...WAKE UP
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
[info]barry78 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
PTSD is a MENTAL ILLNESS due to an EXCESS of STRESS. Over the years it has been described as battle fatigue, shell shock etc. It is conventionally regarded as a problem of the MIND. The treatment is a combination of activities under the description of COGNITIVE THERAPY. The results to date are that a CURE is NOT being achieved. Historically psychiatists are those who deal with 'diseases of the mind [in one case as 'minds deranged']. MoD (the Govt) publish the fact that a lot of useful help is available. That help is less than useful as it does NOT CURE patients. At best (via Charity No 206002 COMBAT STRESS) patients are helped to COPE!That is NOT an OPTION! The condition can be CURED as it is not a problem of the MIND but a problem of EMOTIONS - patients' FEELINGS. A MIND can not be out of balance- it is another name for personality. L/Cpl Johnson Beharry said he was concerned about his FEELINGS - but that has not likely been observed. Yet that is the key. Re STABILISE the FEELINGS and that is the CURE. By CURE we mean RESTORATION to NORMALITY.
Cpl Johnson Beharry
[info]stu_1982 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 March 2009 at 05:32 pm (UTC)
I have only just read this article albeit a little late. I do think there should be greater support for those in the position such as Cpl Beharry and having also heard him speak at an event about a year ago and take a Q & A session I was very impressed with such a Courageous man. I hope that speaking out leads to the support that he and other servicemen need; there can be no doubt that war is a truly horrific experience and many people will experience PTSD although I understand that Cpl Beharry has also suffered a severe traumatic brain injury, for which he shall also require considerable support.
WE WOULD LOVE TO HELP YOU MATE
[info]voicesofwar09 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 March 2009 at 10:24 pm (UTC)
MY NAME IS MARTIN WEBSTER FROM A ORGANISATION CALLED www.voicesofwar.co.uk We would love to help you Jono we have about 7 members so far and we are planning a mass surf festival on the 5th and 6th of September and we would be a honor to see you there.
We aint journalist as you can see by my crap gramma but we are a colection of Light Infantry and Coldstream Guards to French Forigne Leigion.
We have all come through the mixer and we are coping by ringing and setting up awerness and charity events we have a documentry out this year and we have written our own music.
Its too hard to exsplain so give us a email any soldier suffering it is hard but together we will live and ease the fear.
websterfilms@gmail.com Get in contact any soldier who thinks he has it !

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date