Judge rules on 'Do Not Resuscitate' case
Friday 21 December 2012
A judge has ruled against a further hearing in a case involving a terminally-ill woman who was not consulted before a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) notice was placed on her medical records.
Earlier this week, Mrs Justice Nicola Davies said the failure to inform or involve 63-year-old Janet Tracey had "minimal causative effect", as the notice was cancelled five days later when her family objected, and not acted upon.
On that occasion, the doctor involved did consult Mrs Tracey's daughter and believed she had agreed to the notice.
The judge also found that a second notice, which followed three days afterwards and two days before Mrs Tracey's death, was put in place with the agreement of her family, who were unwilling to speak to her about it.
Today, the judge said it would be neither "appropriate nor proportionate", in the light of those limited findings of fact, to have a judicial review hearing on the legal issues, which would also involve the Health Secretary.
She refused permission to appeal but lawyers for Mrs Tracey can pursue the application directly with the Court of Appeal.
They want a judicial review to clarify whether there is a legal duty to inform patients with capacity whether a DNR has been placed on their notes and whether they have any right to be consulted about it.
Mrs Tracey, a care home manager, died in March last year following a transfer to Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, after breaking her neck in a car crash on February 19 - two weeks after being diagnosed with terminal lung cancer.
The first notice, on February 27, was cancelled on March 2, while a second was imposed on March 5, two days before she died.
Urging the go-ahead for a judicial review, Philip Havers QC said the issue was not academic but of real concern to many patients, their relatives and doctors.
Lord Faulks QC, for the trust, said there was certainly a public interest in such delicate and sensitive matters but that did not justify the court involving itself in rewriting policy.
Giving her ruling today, the judge said such a hearing would involve the court grappling with issues of policy and clinical decision-making on the basis of limited evidence.
The public interest would not be served by embarking upon a wide-ranging inquiry on such a basis.
- 1 I've been called an abusive and dangerous parent, when all I did was listen to my transgender child
- 2 Smartphones are making children borderline autistic, says psychiatrist
- 3 Why this father didn’t hide his daughter’s heroin overdose in her obituary
- 4 Company breaks open Apple Watch to discover what it says is 'planned obsolescence'
- 5 Teaching profession headed for crisis as numbers continue to drop and working lives become 'unbearable'
Smartphones are making children borderline autistic, says psychiatrist
Nepal earthquake: More than 1,100 killed across four countries and in Mount Everest avalanche
Nepal earthquake: The race is on to help thousands trapped under rubble around Kathmandu, while remote villages face a long wait for help
Royal baby: Live updates as superbug closes ward at St Mary's Hospital where Duchess of Cambridge is due to give birth
Teaching profession headed for crisis as numbers continue to drop and working lives become 'unbearable'
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
General Election 2015: Chuka Umunna on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband
Migrant boat disaster: Ukip candidate mocks victims in sickening Twitter post
Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making programmes like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, and Top Gear
Global warming: Scientists say temperatures could rise by 6C by 2100 and call for action ahead of UN meeting in Paris
Rupert Murdoch berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband and stop him winning the general election
£26000 - £28000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: Senior Accounts Assistan...
£24000 - £26000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, glo...
£22000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This company is part of a Group...
£16000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you a a young, dynamic pers...