Last rites for ID cards read by Johnson
Britons will no longer be required to register for identity cards, says Home Secretary
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson killed off the Government's cherished compulsory identity cards scheme last night, promising that British citizens would never be forced to sign up for them. Critics urged the Government to retreat further and scrap its flagship £5bn policy outright.
Mr Johnson's predecessors had argued that the cards were needed to help tackle terrorism, illegal immigration and serious crime. They suggested that the move to compulsory carrying would follow once more than 80 per cent of the population was covered.
But, in his first major announcement as Home Secretary, Mr Johnson pledged that ID cards would remain entirely voluntary for UK nationals in future, and insisted that it should be a "personal choice" for citizens to sign up. He also abandoned plans to require some pilots and airport workers to carry ID cards in the face of bitter opposition from their unions.
Mr Johnson acknowledged that the Government had been wrong to present the cards as a "panacea" against terrorism. He stressed their value in helping young people prove their age in bars or in acting as an alternative to passports for travellers in Europe.
The climbdown follows a resurgence of cabinet tensions over the scheme. The Independent disclosed in April that senior ministers were raising fresh questions over the future of the ID card programme as they came under pressure to find savings.
The Government has already started issuing compulsory ID cards to foreign nationals and now intends to offer them on a voluntary basis – at a cost of £30 – to UK nationals in Manchester later this year and elsewhere in the North-west of England in early 2010. Other people will start being added to the register in 2011-12, underpinning the scheme when they apply for biometric passports.
But failure to update names and addresses on the register will carry a fine of up to £1,000 – which critics complain will amount to compulsion by the back door.
The Conservatives have already announced their intention to bin the project if they win the next general election. Mr Johnson said yesterday that the taxpayer would save "diddly squat" if the ID cards scheme was axed, as its estimated £5bn cost would come from fees paid by people when they renewed their passports.
He said that he remained a supporter of the concept of ID cards and even wanted to accelerate their introduction. But he repeatedly stressed he wanted them to remain voluntary, making clear that any move to compulsion was off the agenda for good.
"Holding an identity card should be a personal choice for British citizens – just as it is now to obtain a passport," he said. Asked if they would ever be made mandatory, Mr Johnson replied: "No."
David Blunkett, who championed ID cards when he was Home Secretary, originally suggested that they could become compulsory in 2013. The target date was later moved back to about 2018 as practical problems over the scheme mounted.
Plans to run a trial of compulsory ID cards for airside staff at London City and Manchester airports have now been ditched amid threats of industrial action from pilots.
The opposition parties argue that billions of pounds could be saved by abandoning ID cards.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: "This is another nail in the coffin for the Government's illiberal ID cards policy, which will soon be so voluntary that only Home Office mandarins seeking promotion will have them."
David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, said that the retreat marked the "death knell of this ill-conceived scheme".
He said: "One of the fundamental design flaws in the system was that it had to be compulsory for it to work as advertised. Otherwise, how could any public servant, be they police, immigration officer, or welfare provider, demand to see it?"
But civil liberties groups warned that ministers were still plotting covert compulsion as anyone who wanted to leave the UK would be added to the ID register when they renewed their passport.
Phil Booth, national co-ordinator of NOID, said Mr Johnson's claim that the scheme would be voluntary was the "same hollow evasion it has always been". "Once you sign up, you will be tagged for life," he said. "And it is only voluntary in the sense that you can 'choose' never to have a passport and volunteer not ever to travel."
Isabella Sankey, director of policy for Liberty said: "The Home Secretary needs to be clear as to whether entry on to the National Identity Register will continue to be automatic when applying for a passport. If so, the identity scheme will be compulsory in practice.
"However you spin it, big ears, four legs and a long trunk still make an elephant. And this white elephant would be as costly to privacy and race equality as to our purses."
Retreat on the cards? Home Office policy
David Blunkett, Home Secretary "It will be compulsory... we will have to investigate the ins and outs of achieving that." (September 2001)
Charles Clarke, Home Secretary "This would be a universal scheme for everyone legally resident in the UK." (March 2006)
John Reid, Home Secretary "I favour tighter immigration controls and ID cards." (September 2006)
Jacqui Smith, Home Secretary "As more people participate and register I want to see the scheme become universal." (March 2008)
Alan Johnson, Home Secretary "Holding an identity card should be a personal choice for British citizens." (Yesterday)
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Good riddance!
The so-called ID "cards" - actually powerful computer chips, have always, all along, been promised as "voluntary."
But at the same time they are built into passports starting next year, and driving licences.
So yes, as long as you don't want or need a passport; as long as you don't want or need a driving licence; you have a "choice" on whether you use the so-called ID "cards."
That's maybe 20% of people, maximum.
That's really REALLY voluntary.
At the moment, Johnson is merely following the Blunkett line of re-packaging the ID card as an integral part of a passport or drivers license. There is no fundamental change in this announcement: British freedom and civil liberties remain as compromised as ever.
1.
Would a politician hold a press conference before a masked anonymous audience?
2.
If you've been added to a list, wouldn't you like to know who by, and who is reading that list?
3.
The state knows precisely who you are. Why shouldn't you know who everyone else is including those state representatives?
4.
If your children are in an Internet chat room, wouldn't you like to know who with?
With DNA finger printing we are all already walking ID cards... Do you want to live in a society that acknowledges that fact?
5.
With anonymity it is almost impossible to discern a persons real motives in a debate..................
6.
In time digital identity and mandatory digital signatures will bring to society a renewed trust in the communiqué we exchange, information will be regarded as false unless accompanied by the identity of the author. Encouraging accountability. If it were simply priests hiding in walls, I wouldn't be concerned.
7.
Identity cards: you are one, a DNA or biometric fingerprint. It is going to work against you if you know about it or not. Wouldn't you like to enjoy the advantages of authentic identification?
8.
'n' hundred comments. How many by one extremist using multiple pseudonymns?
9.
IS THIS TEXT WORTH READING!?
10.
The information revolution that has made a sieve of the offices of banks, educational facilities and government. Using a writeable CD, a USB data key, a mobile phone, a web browser or even a floppy disk it is possible to transport data out of a building. Can there be any hope of digital security without identifying the individual?
11.
Accountability: why is it when you provide someone with a mask they simply do not act responsibly? Anonymity has its uses, particularly when we are discussing current limits of freedom itself. Otherwise let us keep masks for Venetian party events and not political debate.
My blog entry on digital identity cards.
"What of the individual's freedoms? The dual between the monolithic political entities of the last century brought with it the legacy of the cold war which lead society to new levels of surveillance and new levels of anonymity, a state which is now being compounded by the arrival of the information age. The news papers inform us that secret black lists are being kept and circulated via email, that secret catalogues of fascists are being leaked. Information about you or me, compiled by the masked and circulated electronically amongst the anonymous. If you've been added to a list, wouldn't you like to know who by? Or who has read that list?
What of photographs taken covertly and circulated anonymously with no signature of ownership? Media circulated via the Internet could be prevented by the Internet's search engines unless signed with an individual's digital identity, whilst also enforcing artist acknowledgment; this is a solution many would welcome.
In time digital identity and mandatory digital signatures could bring to society a renewed trust in the communiqué we exchange, information will be regarded as false unless accompanied by the identity of the author, encouraging accountability."
Anyway, great post- keep it up!
I do have an alterior motive, I'd like to sleep at night, and course there is more power in politics here:
After the next general election they will be gone, never to return. It matters not one jot what they say now. After 12yrs of back stabbing lies, who's listening?
It's the same way as its always been; the reds screw up and the blues make their way back into power, then the blues screw up and the reds get back into power. Rince and repeat.
Both parties must thank god every night for the gift of the recency effect.
This could be a very clever move to get J Public to adopt ID cards by stealth, using social and commercial pressures to nudge us to 'volunteer' for one.
What is interesting is how much of this 'databasification' has come from European rather than domestic legislative plans - Google Project STORK - not a conspiracy theorist's fantasy but a real EU project for establishing and linking databases on EU citizens, regardless of their desire for privacy, is still in development. A quick read of the material on it shows that the UK is being used as a testing-ground for this scheme. Who in our government benefits and how remains to be seen, but I'm sure some will end up at the EU's top table as a result of their selling out of our liberty.
HOKAY
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
Corrupt MPs face axe from angry voters sorry this mouse run on the pee and write
This is how India is compiling its population register for issuing national ID cards.
Did you hear about that, last week, India is introducing universal biometric smart ID cards, to be complete by 2011 (just two years time) at a cost of US$ 2 billion
Statewatch has published documentary accounts of this: -
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2005/j
EU: Biometrics - from visas to passports to ID cards
On 11 July the UK Presidency of the Council of the European Union (the 25 governments) put forward a proposal that all ID cards in the EU should have biometrics (EU doc no: 11092/05 (http://www.statewatch.org/news/2005/ju
See: UK Presidency proposes that all ID cards have biometrics - everyone to be fingerprinted
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2005/j
We can only dread to think what will happen if Blair become first President of the EU under the Lisbon Treaty.
ID cards are just the first part of what the EU calls the 'Digital Tsunami'
A lot of the biometric information for passports was forced on Britain by the Bush/Cheney regime who used 9/11 as a marketing tool for the security industry. Fortunately Obama cares about civil liberties and personal responsibility, so we no longer have the same pressures to serve our master.
One of the few benefits of the credit crisis is that countries no longer have funds to enrich the security industry.
However, I dread to think how much taxpayers' money has already been wasted on this idiotic, unworkable, illiberal piece of government control freakery. We should all get a refund!
I would like to know the real number of crimes that CCTV's have helped solve in the past 8 years. Though they can help sometimes but i fail to see how can an ID deter terrorists & criminals.