Man sacked for belief in psychics backed by judge (but, of course, he knew that would happen)
A police worker who was sacked because he believed psychics can help solve criminal investigations is to go to court today to defend his right to legal protection from religious discrimination.
In the first case of its kind Alan Power, a trainer with Greater Manchester Police, will rely on a previous judgment that found his belief in mediums who contact the dead is akin to a religious or philosophical conviction.
In an unpublished judgement in Mr Power's favour seen by The Independent, the employment specialist Judge Peter Russell said that psychic beliefs are capable of being religious beliefs for the purpose of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. This is the same law which was used by the environmental campaigner Tim Nicholson when he successfully argued that green beliefs were the same as religious beliefs in a case decided last week.
In Mr Power's case Judge Peter Russell, sitting at Manchester Employment Tribunal, said: "I am satisfied that the claimant's beliefs that there is life after death and that the dead can be contacted through mediums are worthy of respect in a democratic society and have sufficient cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance to fall into the category of a philosophical belief for the purpose of the 2003 Regulations."
Mr Power told the court that he had a belief in psychics and their "usefulness in police investigations" and wanted the judge to confirm that holding such a belief is not a justification for dismissal. Mr Power has been a member of a Spiritualist church for more than 30 years and gave evidence that Spiritualist churches have ordained ministers and that hymns are sung at church services. When cross-examined by lawyers for the Greater Manchester Police he said his religion was one of love because he believed in a God of love rather than one of retribution.
Judge Russell said that a later hearing would have to establish whether the claimant was "dismissed for the possession of religious or philosophical beliefs or for his alleged inappropriate foisting of his beliefs on others."
Mr Power is to call a psychic whom he has known since 1980 to testify that Mr Power's association with him has "proved detrimental" to Mr Power's career with the police.
But Greater Manchester Police will argue today at an employment appeal tribunal in London that Judge Russsell "erred in law" because Mr Power did not originally claim to have had a religious belief, only that he had a belief in psychics and their usefulness to the police force. The police lawyer will also say that Judge Russell failed to give sufficient reasons for his ruling.
Last week legal experts said the landmark Nicholson case could open the floodgates to thousands of claims brought by those with strong environmental views who are victimised or discriminated against in the workplace. Yesterday lawyers said the Power case showed how wide the equality at work regulations had been drawn.
A spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said: "GMP can confirm that a member of police staff was dismissed from his role as a trainer. The former staff member has appealed this dismissal. As the appeals process is underway it would be inappropriate to comment further."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Either way, it is a worrying notion that such practices may get used.
If on the other hand it never affects Alan Powers' police work, who the hell cares what he believes in?
T.V. police characters saying "I really thought there was something fishy about that man in the blue cap with a limp, and he stuttered when I put it to him he is a murderer" has always been really suspect. One has always hoped that the police don't proceed in that way at all.
It is heartening to see this police trainer sacked, to see that the police are doing the right thing in this instance. But I know there are other divisions or area groups of the police in The U.K. who do take psychic advice very seriously - I watched a program on T.V. about it recently. They shouldn't. It's very serious.
So the question that Judge Peter Russell should be asking himself about this police trainer is; 'would I accept, in this courtroom, testimony from police officers trained by this man to conduct criminal investigations on the basis of psychic evidence?'
Hopefully more of the same will follow. one day someone will coem up with a rational, plausible explanation why the big four are actually any different from the tooth fairy and santa.