UK

8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Mandelson slime protester arrested

PA

Leila Deen, 29, accosted the Business Secretary outside the Royal Society in London on Friday

2009 Getty Images

Leila Deen, 29, accosted the Business Secretary outside the Royal Society in London on Friday

The climate change protester who "slimed" Lord Mandelson with green custard has been arrested, police said today.

Scotland Yard said Leila Deen, 29, attended a central London police station "by arrangement" yesterday. She was released on bail until early April.

The anti Heathrow expansion campaigner accosted the Business Secretary outside the Royal Society in London on Friday morning.

She flung a cupful of custard in his face, before walking away unchallenged and talking to journalists.

Lord Mandelson today expressed "surprise" that Ms Deen had been able to bypass security, and added that he had suffered a rash after the incident.

In his previous role as Northern Ireland Secretary, Lord Mandelson received round-the-clock police protection, but he later dropped it. The dangers of the job were highlighted last night with the shooting dead of two soldiers in Antrim.

Asked on BBC 1's Andrew Marr show today whether he was worried at the security breach, Lord Mandelson said: "It could have been something nastier. It did actually leave a slight sort of irritation on my face.

"I was slightly surprised that she could just saunter off without being apprehended. I was also slightly disappointed that some in the media just took her into their studios and started interviewing her."

He went on: "It's a bit surprising, but we do not live in a police state in Britain and thank goodness for it."

The Yard initially said it was not going to investigate because no complaint had been made against Ms Deen, a member of the Plane Stupid campaigning group.

However, an inquiry was later launched after former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott suggested the incident amounted to assault.

Mr Prescott - who punched a protester after receiving an egg in the face during the 2001 general election campaign - welcomed the arrest.

"I'm glad to see that the police are now taking the attack on Peter Mandelson seriously and that an arrest has been made," he said on his Go Fourth blog.

"I spoke out publicly on Friday as I felt that the media seemed to be presenting it as an amusing incident and the police said they wouldn't act until they had a 'formal complaint'.

"I hope now that if something like this happens again, police forces across the country will investigate immediately."

Speaking before news of the arrest became public, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith told Sky News' Sunday Live: "I don't think in a democracy where people are able to speak up that anybody should chuck custard at anybody in the street.

"Peter himself made the point that the protester was so busy chucking the custard she wasn't actually explaining what the point of her protest was."

But she insisted it was important people did not overreact to the incident, and said security arrangements offered to ministers were "appropriate".

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Really good use of tax payers money...
[info]zansal wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
Throw custard at Mandy and get arrested. Be an Executive of a failed Bank, have a knighthood and a fat cat pension. Make dodgy deals with the government that sees your company share price dive by 85% and refuse to apologise or resign.
Re: Really good use of tax payers money...
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 01:49 pm (UTC)
A Honour for Boadicia Deen the formidable. She is needed in the "upper" house of bloodstained planet-busting snouts
It is such a trifling offence.....
[info]reedsmith wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 12:40 pm (UTC)
...but I suppose she was bound to end up in custody. I expect her knees went to jelly when they arrested her.
Personally, I think they're bananas for taking it so seriously!!
Re: It is such a trifling offence.....
[info]hodgeey wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 12:49 pm (UTC)
Is being in custody better than being in custard? Not a trifling offence, hope she gets out of the jam she's in!
Re: It is such a trifling offence.....
[info]testing_times wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 12:24 am (UTC)
Jam? This tart? I think more of a pickle. It's her own fault for being such a silly sausage. She should've shown more respect to the old fruit; maybe've blown a raspberry. Now it's she who ends up with egg on her face. Prezza knows what it is to make a right plum of yourself. He dished out a couple of bangs to some spud over a smashed egg - a highly publicised case of bang(er)s & smash...

Sorry folks!

OK, you can give me the custard...
Re: It is such a trifling offence.....
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 05:36 am (UTC)
She has a solid career ahead, if she continues to play her cards well.
The trend is her friend and the only high profile competitors are wimmin like Harperson et al
http://www.alphabetvsgoddess.com/

Mandelson
[info]neil639 wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 12:50 pm (UTC)
Peter Mandelson talks about a slight irritation to his face. Clearly he is oblivious to the fact that his face is a huge irritation to over 80 per cent of the population.
Insult to my generation?
[info]rojaws wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 01:05 pm (UTC)
More like an insult to the species!
Perhaps they should up security on genetic research establishments, so more things like Mandelson can't escape.
Custard...
[info]reedsmith wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 01:12 pm (UTC)
Perhaps she should have thrown guacamole, of which Mandy is supposed to be a big fan- or would it have been too tempting to leave it in the avocado?
Trust the violent slob Prescot to complain
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 01:54 pm (UTC)
We citizens will not forget about you Boadicia Deen the formidable. If they jail you we *will* get you out in what could be the start of something substantial.
Slight Irritation
[info]rossglory wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 02:13 pm (UTC)
I live about 1/2 mile from the proposed third runway and am asthmatic, so I'll be looking forward to many years of lung irritation thanks to Mr Mandelson. You have to ask yourself who's the bigger villain.
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 02:37 pm (UTC)
ljlk
so amusing
[info]lodger41 wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 04:00 pm (UTC)
It's takes a really fanatical 'activist' to regard a physical assault on someone as in any way amusing, it does make one wonder for how long they will confine themselves to using custard ?... they are after all 'saving the planet' aren't they? What next ?
The creature Mandelsohn
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 04:36 pm (UTC)
asked during the Marr show if he will throw off the boodstained ermine and stand for election, replied "I am not allowed to" and Marr, dootifully BBC to the bone, didn't refer to Benn senior (the more respectable)
Re: The creature Mandelsohn
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:12 pm (UTC)
queers are physiologically unable to worship the goddess
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-65173645159783472
Re: The creature Mandelsohn and Boadicea Deen the formidable
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 05:29 am (UTC)
They see women as competitors.
http://www.alphabetvsgoddess.com/
mandy
[info]markpostie wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:41 pm (UTC)
mandy usually gets his guacamole mixed up with his mushy peas- how do you do that and end up as mp for hartlepool???????????????????????????
PEOPLE IN GLASS HOUSES
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:42 pm (UTC)
How can Two Jabs Prescott report someone for assault by custard when he knocked seven bells out of someone and managed to get away with it in 2001?!?! If someone complained to the Police that his boxing antics in 2001 constituted assault, would the Police be obliged to arrest him and do us all a favour (I'd go as far to say that this would be the one example of Labour making good use of taxpayers money)? If so, take this as my formal complaint. I'd like to add the words "and multiply" in response to Prescott's blog in respect to his totally hypocritical latest whinging. Just because Lady Mandy never listens, unless he stands to benefit in one way or another, it doesn't mean that Leila Deen hasn't spoken more sense in a couple of sentences than Mandy has in his entire lifetime. I somehow wonder whether Lady Mandy and his other partners in slime would like us to live in a police state so nobody could say anything against them. Mandy complaining of a "slight irritation" on his face...he's only a fraction of the way towards understanding how at least 80% of the population feel when we have to watch him and his fellow slimy Labour cabinet chronies. Grow up Mandy and listen to the public or we'll have to start calling you the "Incredible Sulk"!
What do you get if you combine John Prescott and Lord Mandelson?
Answer: Egg Custard.
[info]markpostie wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:45 pm (UTC)
leila you are citizen of the year in my book........................
the real criminals
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:51 pm (UTC)
'we do not live in a police state in Britain'

So what should we call it? A fascist state? A modern-day medieval serfdom?

One thing is very clear: the real criminals are the government, those who instruct the government what has to be done next to promote short term the interests of global corporations and international bankers, and those who enforce the irrational and unjust policies that will lead to destitution for the majority of people (inclusing 'security forces) in the short term and ultimately lead to a dead planet.
Green custard thrower
[info]mowns wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 07:52 pm (UTC)
I think it is right in a lawful society like Britain that anyone who assaults another person should be arrested. No question about it. What would she have done if something was thrown at her instead.
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:01 pm (UTC)
Arrest the Prescott Two Jabs then!
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]lodger41 wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:19 pm (UTC)
For your information ,Mr Prescott was simply defending himself against an assault, the assault was illegal, the defence was legal. I hope that some stranger never throws something in your face, or perhaps you might learn something !
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:42 pm (UTC)
See my comments re the legal definition of "assault" and you may learn something. Two Jabs Prescott was not assaulted under the terms of UK law and neither did he respond with anything that could be termed reasonable force. I think we have all been on the receiving end of incoming edible material at some time or other. Are you really saying that University students should sue for assualt during Rag week (I didn't)? No wonder this country is rapidly going down the pan when illegal wars kill millions of innocent people and incompetent bankers can destroy peoples lives but someone is arrested for throwing custard at a known crook who is only in politics for his own personal ends.
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:22 am (UTC)
Seconded
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:30 pm (UTC)
It's my understanding that in law "assualt" is an unlawful threat or attempt to do bodily injury to another or an act or an instance of unlawfully threatening or attempting to injure another. Throwing an egg or custard in the cases of John Prescott or Lady Mandy respectively (especially as a last ditch attempt to get them to take notice of large sections of the public) would hardly be upheld in a court of law and Two Jabs Prescott is quite clearly guilty of wasting police time with his complaint. However, hurling an expert punch at a member of the public is a totally different story. Arrest the Prescott Two (Jabs)!
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]lodger41 wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:59 pm (UTC)
Your arrogance is typical of someone who is determined NOT to learn.........I repeat , wait until some stranger throws something into your face.......you might learn something !
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]board_member wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 09:26 pm (UTC)
You're being silly. The number of pies you've had shoved in your face (I can only begin to guess at the reasons why THAT might happen...) won't change the law or the fact that it'd be impossible to make a case against Deen stick. Thinking that it will is a psychosis. You should have that looked at.
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 09:45 pm (UTC)
How am I being "arrogant" and doesn't the fact that I've checked my facts in a legal dictionary before going into print mean that I do learn? Why, like John Prescott, do you feel the need to resort to aggressive behaviour to defend your opinions? Is it because your opinions, like some of this Governments policies, are unfounded? I, like many other people, have had far worse things happen in my life than receiving huge amounts of money for doing a disservice to the people that vote for you and having to put up with some custard or an egg being thrown at me by those self same people who put you in the privileged position that you are in when you fail to take notice of any reasonable representations. The throwing of food products, I'm afraid to say, almost goes hand in hand with being a politician and dates back hundreds of years. Politicians are very good at accepting the privileges which go with their status (Mandy didn't turn down his peerage and he doesn't seem to mind taking the privileges which go with it) but are quick to start whinging when they are on the receiving end of the less desirable elements of being a politician. People like Mandelson treat everyone as their best mate and kiss their babies when it suits them at election time so how after the election can they claim that eveyone is a "stranger"? There are innocent people out there having bullets, bombs and house repossession orders thrown at them as a result of the policies of this Government comprising people like Prescott and Mandelson. Get out of your ivory (or should I say glass) tower (or should I say armchair) and prey that you don't have something truly devastating thrown at you. If I was destroying my neighbours environment (noise pollution, destroying their garden, etc) as this Government along with others are doing to the planet and my neighbour threw custard over me would I sue...no, firstly I'm not stupid enough to do something like that nor am I a self centred hypocrite. By the way I have no involvement with any environmental group, political party or interest group apart from being a member of the public who is sick to death of this Government's holier than thou and "do as we say, not as we do" attitude.
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]macholibra wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 09:58 pm (UTC)
To paraphrase the words of Ringo Star, nothing will be replied to from lodger41 from 0945 on 8th March 2009. If that is the time and date on the post, it's gonna be tossed. I'm warning you with peace and love I have too much to do.
Re: Green custard thrower
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC)
Seconded

Good on y' Boadicia Deen the formidable. You will go far.
BHUDDy LANGWYTCH
[info]charityplayer wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 08:17 pm (UTC)

IS THAT A JEWISH HAIRDO MON WRINGLET
[info]mr_buzby wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 10:54 pm (UTC)
Drive-by custarding
Sucess or Failure
[info]chadi_salim wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 10:55 pm (UTC)
If your aim behind the protest was to draw attention t the airport expansion the well done you've thrushed it back into the spotlight but, if your point was to reverse the government plan then you have failed miserably because is still going ahead. ACTS SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS
what a stupid girl
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Sunday, 8 March 2009 at 11:11 pm (UTC)
I think the actions of this immature girl are meaningless for the cause of environmental improvements -she has brought negative publicity - Plane Stupid has plainly stupid people heading
their campaigns and doing more damage than good for important agendas
Re: what a brave girl
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 06:35 am (UTC)
She has a solid career ahead of her if she intelligently uses the very high level of support and approval she is offered from every kind and class of citizen. Ride the groundswell girl. We citizens are behind you. Your choice of target was extremely intelligent. A professional couldn't have done better with the available resources.
Re: what a brave girl
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 07:55 am (UTC)
Shame she chose Green Custard Slime to make her point -anyone could do that - it is called assault - it won't make any difference to the agenda and it only makes someone like Mandelson more determined not to listen - humiliating another person like that does not make the agenda any easier to achieve - in fact I would go so far as to call her a bully
Re: what a brave girl
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 08:27 am (UTC)
You evidently are unable to see what she has skilfully accomplished. That ain't a crime, just a pity. Message to Bo : get yourself a greybeard advisor to counterbalance the youth and inexperience - you'll then go far with that instinctive skill.
What a Banker
[info]loftwork wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 01:21 am (UTC)
that Prescott is. The fool has overreacted and created a heroine where Mandelson's low key approach would have ended the matter with everyone feeling that for a ferret he was quite reasonable.

The matter is unlikely to succeed in court if a jury is involved - politicians must expect some organic consultation feedback from people unhappy about, for example, the way one unelected friend of BAA could outweigh tens of thousands of ordinary voters and ram the third runway through at a time when the Met Office is giving civilization 50-50 survival odds. What depresses me is that, after a decade of Labour I'm begining to think we deserve to become extinct. It will be a branch on an evlutionary tree dead-ending with a species tagged "Homo Stultus". Mandelson plays with matches while the world burns. Prescott shoots the messenger. And we thought Neanderthal Man was a bit thick.
Pot calling the kettle ...
[info]deimosp wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 10:37 am (UTC)
So Prescott with his public display of violence (fists et. al) now decides that a bit of custard and a slight irritation is an assault. And do we suspect any double standards here ?

Mandy with an irritation might just start to understand how he makes the rest of us feel (but without the "slight").
Britain is a police state
[info]sobo123 wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 12:16 pm (UTC)
Britain is a police state. Royal and political mistakes during the time caused video cameras all over the public place. Still, nobody answers to an elementary question: who are really some of the people in the news? Uk , as Australia became a state that do not believe in God, where the authorities have a convenient but not true answer for the recent intense storms, winters - they say it is because of global warming. The existing establishment is so afraid to lose power to new parties, then they prefer to crush any apposition from the very beginning. Unfortunately UK became an "let's send a signal" or PR state, where the guys that hammered the economy are grabing the power and not let it go every 2 or 4 years .One or 2 heads are replaced just for PR show, but the next one in line from the same party grabs the power and the same policies and mistakes are repeated.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date