Seven hours to save the world
As economies fracture across the globe, the capital's greatest gathering of leaders since 1946 has less than a day to agree a rescue plan. By Paul Vallely
The danger with summits is that you march people to the top of the hill and march them back down again. Gordon Brown has, unhappily, taken a leaf out of the primer of the Grand Old Duke of York in his preparations for the meeting of the leaders of the world's 20 top economies in London next week.
The agenda is an ambitious one. Beneath all the news hoo-haa about grungy protesters, cancelled police leave, be-suited City workers being told to dress down and even the spectre of a terrorist dirty bomb lies the grim reality of a deepening global financial crisis. The task before the G20 is to rescue the drowning global banking system, write the rules of the financial markets and stop a global recession tuning into a great depression. Oh, and, if possible, rebuild the ebbing electoral capital of a British Prime Minister who has invested much of his political fortunes in the success of next week's gathering.
That is why Mr Brown has spent the past month meeting leaders including Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel, ending up with a 17,500-mile three-continent trip taking in the United States, Brazil and Chile in an attempt to ensure that the London summit did not end up with what the Foreign Office minister Lord Malloch Brown this week decried as "meaningless empty commitments".
His problem is that though President Obama is singing from the same reflationary hymnbook of increased public spending, printing money and bank rescue packages, many of the other key figures at next week's meeting have turned to a different page. Germany, France and others are saying No to more of the same – and they have been given unexpected backing by the pronouncement by the Governor of the Bank of England this week that Britain has run out of cash for more moves in that direction.
This is why Mr Brown has already begun marching down the hill again in an attempt to lower expectations about what the meeting will produce in terms of a further fiscal stimulus.
This may be no bad thing. It should force the G20 to focus on a wider package. In part that will be about new rules to force banks to hold more capital and stop them paying big bonuses that encourage risky behaviour. They could also regulate tax havens, hedge funds and opaque derivatives.
But the summit offers a much greater opportunity. It already marks a significant shift in power in that it is the G20, rather than the old economic elite of the G8, which is seen as the apt forum for change. The G8 has been joined by the so-called Bric nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) whose combined economies will soon be bigger than those of the G8.
Yet it is many of those emerging economies, along with the world's poorest nations, which have been worst hit by the downturn. World trade has slumped by 25 per cent and the global economy will contract this year for the first time since 1945.
A key factor in this has been the collapse of short-term trade credits on which 90 per cent of trade among developing nations depends. The Brazilian economy, which grew by more than 5 per cent last year, has shuddered into reverse – and shrunk dramatically by 3.6 per cent in the last quarter. The summit is expected to agree a $100bn fund to underwrite export credit agreements for poorer countries. This is a crucial kickstart. Trade is the motor that pulls developing nations out of poverty, as South-east Asia and China have proved.
But it will not be enough. The World Bank recently revealed that 17 of the G20 have engaged in protectionist measures, despite promises not to do so at their last meeting in Washington. It is vital that the summit sees serious measures to counter this.
World leaders must also resist the temptation to save money by cutting aid. A UN commission chaired by the Nobel laureate, Professor Joseph Stiglitz, has just predicted that the crisis could push 200 million people into extreme poverty. Poor nations have been hit by a fall in commodity sales – diamond exports from Botswana are down 60 per cent.
There has also been a massive drop in the monies sent home by Africans who live in rich countries. Exchange rate fluctuations have also hit developing countries hard. It is therefore essential that the summit presses rich nations to deliver on the rest of the promises made at Gleneagles in 2005.
Now is also the time to move on reforms to international institutions like the International Monetary Fund to give a greater voice to both emerging and developing nations. It could happen, because nations like China will be reluctant to stump up the cash now needed to refinance the IMF, unless they are given more say in how the body is run.
Above all, what Gordon Brown must do next week is turn crisis to opportunity. The five years of economic slowdown which Chatham House yesterday predicted for the world could be the spur to take action on climate change which the world has been studiously avoiding.
Cuts in carbon use come naturally in a recession. But restructuring economies to ensure that when growth returns, it is low-carbon will require the kind of agreement which might well be more politically realistic now than in the boom years. If Mr Brown could pull that off he might even get himself re-elected.
The agenda: The timetable
*How to stimulate demand to combat global recession
*International Monetary Fund's budget to be doubled to $500bn
*To set up new rules on banks, tax havens and hedge funds
*Commitment to free trade, $100bn fund for trade finance
*Restatement of aid pledges to world's poorest nations
Wednesday
AM Gordon Brown and President Obama hold talks and give a press conference at 10 Downing Street
11am "G20 Meltdown" march begins, City of London
2pm Stop the War Coalition march to US embassy
PM President Obama to meet Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, President Hu Jintao of China and the Queen at the G20 leaders' reception, Buckingham Palace.
Evening G20 leaders' dinner, Downing Street, hosted by Gordon Brown
Thursday
Seven demonstrations, including 7am march on ExCel centre in Docklands
AM G20 leaders arrive at ExCel – Leaders and finance ministers hold separate working breakfasts
– Leaders' "family photograph"
– Opening session
Lunch Leaders and finance ministers' separate working lunches
PM Afternoon session
Closing press conference
Friday
Nato 60th anniversary Strasbourg
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
1. Exclusion from all meetings of anyone who not support business as usual [as determined by a band of globalist elites].
2. Exclusion from all meetings of anyone who disagrees with the [absurd] notion of perpetual growth on a finite planet.
3. Ensuring there is no speaking opportunities for anyone who has any sensible strategies for preventing economic chaos.
4. After-function party to celebrate yet another successful duping of the general public.
But also, people in the U.K. are forgetting a few things. Here, you can beaten, tasered and arrested by the cops for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. You can be arrested for saying to the Vice Presdent "I don't like your policies." Can the London police do this to you?
These two sites have more angles on this:
http://whereismybailout.weebly.com
http://globalcomedy.wordpress.com
Yes.
People in Britain have been arrested for reading the names of soldiers killed in energy resource wars in the wrong place (Westminster). for wearing tee shirts with the wrong slogans etc. and there has been at least one case of a completely innocent person (Brazilian) being murdered by the police 'by mistake', with no accountability whatsoever for murderers.
In fact. from about 1700 onwards Britain became a major terrorist state -using armed forces to terrorise and subdue much of the rest of the world in order to loot resources.
Things have changed very little since then, though people who are starving are no longer hung for stealing food.
Who is the Vice President? Do you mean the Vice President of America?
There are few problems.
There is no certain leadership, as all are in red, one way or another.
Everyone wants to have his cake and, eats it. That is an impossible deal.
Theoretically, there are plenty of suggestions and alternatives.
Reality is that no one has financial backup and properly knowing what happens.
There is a sense that this gathering is mainly for cosmetic sakes - something to do with "anyway, I did my part folks..."
Generally speaking, I could hardly see a very good constructive comes out of it, and we all feel the chill already.
Let's do what we are good at; hoping for the best.
http://www.jamesrobertson.com
For a comprehensive answer to the problem and if you agree sign the petition and lets get something done.
Focus on the solutions.
The only thing this Summit in Browns eyes is about him looking good ,if it is any help Gordon you can't apparently make a silk purse out of a sows ear.
And tell that minister quoting "no meaningless empty commitments"he has just sabotaged the only thing New Labour are good at !
Suggest we all read some other national press eg Canada, Australia, to get a proper perspective......
Obama = An inexperianced boy trying to do a man's job
Brown = Unelected, unwanted leader and a proven failure
Sarkozy = Man who mariies ex model with naked pics all over internet. How can he be taken seriously.
Berlusconi = Changed law so he would't be arrested for corruption charges
Heaven help us !
Brown: You vote for a party not for a president the UK. The governing party elected him as their leader, he is Prime-minister. Simple but true.
Sarkozy: I don't like most of his proposals but personal lives of politicians are nobody's business.
Berlusconi: I agree with you on this one. I feel sorry for the Italians but angry with them as well for re-electing him.
Also here is a list of G20 members:
* Argentina
* Australia
* Brazil
* Canada
* China
* France
* Germany
* India
* Indonesia
* Italy
* Japan
* Mexico
* Russia
* Saudi Arabia
* South Africa
* South Korea
* Turkey
* United Kingdom
* United States
The 20th member is the European Union, represented by the rotating Council presidency and the European Central Bank.
2. the world has not and will not suddenly stop/stopped- things have a way of sorting themselves out in my experience
The agenda speaks to the narrowness of their perspective...If, as the global-warmers pretend, we need to cut back energy consumption and CO2 creation, why are we trying to stimulate demand?...Why are we not instead trying to develop ways in which people need not be forced into penury if they are not incessantly wasting energy to create, market and dispose of senseless gee-gaws and other consumables whose production leads directly to adverse ecological outcomes?
Its time to put an end to the piracy that is euphemisticly called "high finance" and have a people-centered political economy.
Increase the IMF budget?--So their strong arm men can further destroy the 'developing' world for the sake of usurers?
"New rules for the thieves to live under?"--Haven't we had enough of the promise of new laws to fix things up so the public goes back to sleep? Remember the S&L crisis...how did that 'learning experience' and all the changes help us?--NOT AT ALL!
"Free trade"?--We have had enough of the free trade of rigged currency markets and corrupt foreign exchange rates that keep some currencies artificially high so that debt denominated in them is more difficult to obtain...(For the same reason that the debt-mongers of the City wanted a return to the gold standard after World War I so their pounds would be worth more in goods coming into Britain.