Exclusive: The human timebomb
The human timebomb: why was he given Iraq job?
He faced assault charges, had been fired and suffered from post-traumatic stress. So why did a security firm in Iraq give Daniel Fitzsimons, who is now accused of killing two people, a job with a gun?
A British military contractor accused of shooting dead two of his colleagues in Iraq was hired despite being sacked from another security firm and having a long history of psychiatric illness, The Independent has learnt.
Daniel Fitzsimons, 29, is in Iraqi custody facing charges of premeditated murder after the shooting of fellow ArmorGroup colleagues Paul McGuigan and Darren Hoar and wounding Iraqi worker Arkhan Mahdi. If convicted he faces execution.
Last night, in an interview with The Independent, his family revealed that just months before being hired by ArmorGroup, a psychiatric report had found Mr Fitzsimons was suffering from severe post-traumatic stress with repeated flashbacks, nightmares and anxiety attacks.
He had also been dismissed by the security firm Aegis while working in Iraq for "extreme negligence". At the time he was taken on by ArmorGroup he was awaiting trial for assault having already been convicted of three other crimes including robbery, possession of ammunition and public order offences. The incident happened within 36 hours of Mr Fitzsimons arriving back in Iraq.
Last night his father and stepmother, both teachers from Manchester, said others also bore responsibility for what happened: "We did not even know he had gone out there," they said. "He patently should not have been allowed to go to Iraq. He is extremely poorly."
ArmorGroup last night said they could not comment on the specific allegations due to the ongoing investigation and added: "Under our terms of employment, employees are obliged to provide a medical certificate prior to posting overseas that confirms they are fit to do so."
But Mike Hancock, the longest-serving member of the Commons defence select committee, said he would be pressing for an early investigation into the controls on private defence firms.
"It's unacceptable for any security company to take on any former member of the armed forces without thorough medical checks and pre-counselling. We need to legislate. Companies that recruit in the UK should be covered by British laws and have a responsibility to check the mental health wellbeing of the people they take on."
In the interview Mr Fitzsimons's father, Eric, and stepmother, Liz, said their son had been diagnosed with a form of stress disorder when he was discharged from the army five years ago. But this had been exacerbated by repeated tours with security companies in Iraq in which he had been injured and lost countless friends to bombs. A recent assessment had found his condition had worsened.
Mr Fitzsimons said his son should be recognised as another victim of the shooting. "We do feel very, very sorry for these two men and their families. But Daniel is also a victim."
The couple explained the family were terrified that he would be made an example of for a multi-billion dollar industry, whose employees recently lost immunity following a shootout involving US security firm Backwater in which 17 civilians were killed.
"We are worried the trial will be rushed through and he will be made a scapegoat. We can't let that happen."
The family said that Mr Fitzsimons was discharged from the 2nd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment after tours in Bosnia, Kosovo, Northern Ireland and Afghanistan. But they insisted it was the dangerous work that he carried out for private security companies in Iraq that had sent him on a dramatic spiral downwards exacerbated by drink and prescription medication.
The company have agreed to the family's request to send out their own British legal team to Baghdad adding thar ArmorGroup were making arrangement for an English speaking Iraqi lawyer as well.
Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army officer, called for regular checks on defence companies' recruitment policies. He said: "They need to be audited in terms of what strictures they apply to the people they recruit. The Government must be involved in that."
Mr Mercer, chairman of the Commons counter-terrorism sub-committee, said the performance of such firms in checking staff were "mentally grounded" was "very mixed".
He added: "I have always argued that the discharge of veterans should be very carefully handled."
Mr Fitzsimons's MP, Jim Dobbin, said last night: "Questions have to be asked about why he was out there, did the company know he had psychological problems, and that he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. Quite honestly if it did know of that, then it must be culpable."
Christopher Beese, director of human resources at ArmorGroup, said: "ArmorGroup has a duty of care to Daniel Fitzsimons as an employee and we are discharging those responsibilities.
"Senior managers are visiting him daily to ensure his human rights are being met, that he is safe, and has an opportunity to communicate with his family and with his lawyer.
"Yesterday he was visited by an ArmorGroup team and representatives of the UK embassy, and provided with medical care, food, water and access to a mobile phone. The company is making arrangements for his UK legal representative to travel to Iraq safely and securely as soon as possible."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
I hummed and ahhed about applying to some of these but to be honest after watching the Aegis trophy videos including the one where the young boy was gunned down in the street, or the other one where US Army where pacing Aegis workers as they shot out windscreen after windscreen of cars for a laugh, I chose not to.
At the end of the day, there should be probably an appeal for clemency but let us not kid ourselves that these contractors have been out of control for some time and some example HAS to be made and regardless of whether it was PTSD or not, he did kill compadres, would the same be said if he had just gunned down a couple of "rag-heads" as the chaps from Aegis called them?
I think not...
There have been many changes to policies and regulations introduced in order to bring to toe all operators in this environment. Individuals or companies that do not attain standards and policy are brought to task. Take a look at the former 'Blackwater' company that had it's operating license in Iraq revoked for incidents that should not have happened.
If you for one second believe that people just walk or drive around firing weapons then you need a dose of reality yourself. That simply is not the case.
Suddenly when two white guys are killed it's a scramble for "justice." There have been countless Iraqi's killed by these thugs, some of which have been videotaped and strewn across the internet with the most obnoxious comments written about them. Now one of these ruthless scumbags butchers his fellow employees and suddenly he "mentally ill" and "a victim" as well?? He is NOT a victim, he gets paid a huge amount of money to go to Iraq, kill people for sport, get a photo beside their corpse, go home and brag about it in the pub. They are ALL mentally ill, you can't be a normal person if you drive around shooting at famlies through the windscreens of their cars and laugh about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZX1odzH
If this idiot had got drunk and killed some Iraqi's this would not be in the news.
It also says a lot about these what these cretins do that he was OK in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan and then suddenly lost the plot because of what he saw mercenaries in Iraq doing.
Western armed contractor shoots dead an unarmed family of Iraqis = "collateral damage" or " the private security firms are highly trained and are doing a darn good job in a very dangerous country" . Now same Western armed contractor shoots dead fellow Westerners = "legal case and quick rush to justice". Of course the murderer's family will be pushing for the "he's got a psychiatric illness" argument simply because they know that with his victims being fellow Westerners this will go to trial and not be swept under the carpet like the murders of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Modern training techniques aim for a cold, dispassionate approach - to desensitise the soldier to killing. They're just popping targets, "engaging" the enemy; not killing real people with lives, loves, hopes and dreams. And then they wonder why these killing machines get confused back in civilian life.
“Mirza Mohammed Dost stood at the foot of his son's grave, near a headstone that read, "Raheb Dost, martyred by Americans."
His son was no insurgent, Dost said. He was walking home from prayers on the night of May 5 when he was shot and killed on a busy Kabul street by U.S. security contractors.
"The Americans must answer for my son's death," Dost said as a large crowd of young men murmured in approval.
The shooting deaths of Raheb Dost, 24, and another Afghan civilian by four gunmen with the company once known as Blackwater have turned an entire neighborhood against the U.S. presence here.”
http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/that
Daniel has no one to blame but himself for this.
Don't act so surprised Independent News paper this has always gone on.
Money is more important than morality.
Ask Bliar!
Could it be possible that mercenaries caught up in illegal war are going insane and killing each other?
You have much, much more to answer for than you ever imagined ... Mr Bliar.
9/11 7/7 Tony Blaire... Bush...Coiln Poweel.... Rice... Pudding....
Mr Fitzsimons was suffering from severe post-traumatic stress with repeated flashbacks, nightmares and anxiety attacks.
He need to be shifted to the places he was, given some pictures of the above say 3 millions and may be he will relax. At times the vengeance is bad. You take this out on others. I want to get Tony in the court for the economy as Germans and French sing oyyye oyyye oyye ehaah ahh oyyeye
Silly
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
I remember Armor Group's on-site management staff being extremely vigilant in monitoring the conduct of their PSDs, and even sacking some for what I felt were minor offenses. But at the end of the day, every one of our ex-pat employees got home alive, and I will always have the opinion that the Armor Group team had everything to do with it. I was also fortunate to have been body-guarded by one of the men killed in the incident, Paul McGuigan. I know I am not alone in saying that he was truly one of the best at what he did, and a lot of people felt that their safety was in the best hands possible when Paul was in charge.
Armor Group obviously made a mistake in vetting Mr. Fitzsimons, but I wouldn't put my life in any other security company's hands, and I truly hope that they weather the bad press.
With regards to your youtube video.. again you need to do your research. AEGIS as a company was cleared in all cases by an American investigation and it was found that they acted under the Rules of Engagement used at that time. Many of the videos on Youtube are misleading, for instance there is one on there for AEGIS doing convoys in Lorries (AEGIS DONT DO CONVOYS) and if you look closely it is american US military! and again the company involved sacked the person who made the 'trophy video' (the fact that it was made at least 2 yrs ago really does show you are out dated to say the least).
If you knew your facts you would know that PSD and indeed the US military know longer use the 'bubble' (sorry I will explain, because you obviously have no idea about tactics used, or indeed Iraq in general) the bubble was used to keep a vehicle threat 100m away from vehicles and worked very well. This tactic ceased to be used by PSD at the end of last year and indeed we stopped using it prior to the US military! traffic is allowed to pass freely now although the threat of suicide bombers has not diminished.
You may think we are all out here for the glory and the greed and are all nutters... however, speaking for myself, I couldnt care what you think about me, I am here purely for greed!! I earn over 100k a year sterling, whereas in the British military I was earning 30k... you do the math. Am I making a profit from the Iraq War, hell yeah! I have no debt, no mortgage, enjoy tax free wages, and when this finishes I will go to Afghan and work there! why? because I love my job, I take my leave and live like a king and have enough money in the bank to retire at 35... bragging? too right! I face death every day, I have seen my friends die, not for countries, not for money, for their FRIENDS.
As with many companies in UK, employers do not always have all the facts at interview, I am sure many of your peers can't believe you got a job for instance. Well the same applies out here as with everywhere! I know for a fact you cannot work with certain PSC without a CRB check or an SIA licence, however this does not apply to all companies! Companies employed by the US military are on General Order Number 1, which means no Alcohol, however, those employed by private companies do not come under that rule.
There are many Walter Mitty's in this life and for 'ancientoneuk to comment that his military career surpassed someone elses just proves it. We dont brag about our history, because thats what it is... HISTORY. In this job its a small world (although I wouldnt like to paint it) there is always someone that knew you prior to the current contract.
These mercenary companies are perfect in that they do not involve politics at all, if the sh*t hits the fan it's down to individuals and corporations, not the government. Just like the Foreign Legion there is no adhesion or loyalty, they are privateers who operate with the full knowledge and cooperation of the government.