UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Exclusive: The human timebomb

The human timebomb: why was he given Iraq job?

He faced assault charges, had been fired and suffered from post-traumatic stress. So why did a security firm in Iraq give Daniel Fitzsimons, who is now accused of killing two people, a job with a gun?

By Terri Judd

Security worker Daniel Fitzsimmons has been accused of murder in Iraq

Security worker Daniel Fitzsimmons has been accused of murder in Iraq

A British military contractor accused of shooting dead two of his colleagues in Iraq was hired despite being sacked from another security firm and having a long history of psychiatric illness, The Independent has learnt.

Daniel Fitzsimons, 29, is in Iraqi custody facing charges of premeditated murder after the shooting of fellow ArmorGroup colleagues Paul McGuigan and Darren Hoar and wounding Iraqi worker Arkhan Mahdi. If convicted he faces execution.

Last night, in an interview with The Independent, his family revealed that just months before being hired by ArmorGroup, a psychiatric report had found Mr Fitzsimons was suffering from severe post-traumatic stress with repeated flashbacks, nightmares and anxiety attacks.

He had also been dismissed by the security firm Aegis while working in Iraq for "extreme negligence". At the time he was taken on by ArmorGroup he was awaiting trial for assault having already been convicted of three other crimes including robbery, possession of ammunition and public order offences. The incident happened within 36 hours of Mr Fitzsimons arriving back in Iraq.

Last night his father and stepmother, both teachers from Manchester, said others also bore responsibility for what happened: "We did not even know he had gone out there," they said. "He patently should not have been allowed to go to Iraq. He is extremely poorly."

ArmorGroup last night said they could not comment on the specific allegations due to the ongoing investigation and added: "Under our terms of employment, employees are obliged to provide a medical certificate prior to posting overseas that confirms they are fit to do so."

But Mike Hancock, the longest-serving member of the Commons defence select committee, said he would be pressing for an early investigation into the controls on private defence firms.

"It's unacceptable for any security company to take on any former member of the armed forces without thorough medical checks and pre-counselling. We need to legislate. Companies that recruit in the UK should be covered by British laws and have a responsibility to check the mental health wellbeing of the people they take on."

In the interview Mr Fitzsimons's father, Eric, and stepmother, Liz, said their son had been diagnosed with a form of stress disorder when he was discharged from the army five years ago. But this had been exacerbated by repeated tours with security companies in Iraq in which he had been injured and lost countless friends to bombs. A recent assessment had found his condition had worsened.

Mr Fitzsimons said his son should be recognised as another victim of the shooting. "We do feel very, very sorry for these two men and their families. But Daniel is also a victim."

The couple explained the family were terrified that he would be made an example of for a multi-billion dollar industry, whose employees recently lost immunity following a shootout involving US security firm Backwater in which 17 civilians were killed.

"We are worried the trial will be rushed through and he will be made a scapegoat. We can't let that happen."

The family said that Mr Fitzsimons was discharged from the 2nd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment after tours in Bosnia, Kosovo, Northern Ireland and Afghanistan. But they insisted it was the dangerous work that he carried out for private security companies in Iraq that had sent him on a dramatic spiral downwards exacerbated by drink and prescription medication.

The company have agreed to the family's request to send out their own British legal team to Baghdad adding thar ArmorGroup were making arrangement for an English speaking Iraqi lawyer as well.

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army officer, called for regular checks on defence companies' recruitment policies. He said: "They need to be audited in terms of what strictures they apply to the people they recruit. The Government must be involved in that."

Mr Mercer, chairman of the Commons counter-terrorism sub-committee, said the performance of such firms in checking staff were "mentally grounded" was "very mixed".

He added: "I have always argued that the discharge of veterans should be very carefully handled."

Mr Fitzsimons's MP, Jim Dobbin, said last night: "Questions have to be asked about why he was out there, did the company know he had psychological problems, and that he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. Quite honestly if it did know of that, then it must be culpable."

Christopher Beese, director of human resources at ArmorGroup, said: "ArmorGroup has a duty of care to Daniel Fitzsimons as an employee and we are discharging those responsibilities.

"Senior managers are visiting him daily to ensure his human rights are being met, that he is safe, and has an opportunity to communicate with his family and with his lawyer.

"Yesterday he was visited by an ArmorGroup team and representatives of the UK embassy, and provided with medical care, food, water and access to a mobile phone. The company is making arrangements for his UK legal representative to travel to Iraq safely and securely as soon as possible."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Hmm
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 02:50 am (UTC)
Seems to be a lot of issues still with these companies.

I hummed and ahhed about applying to some of these but to be honest after watching the Aegis trophy videos including the one where the young boy was gunned down in the street, or the other one where US Army where pacing Aegis workers as they shot out windscreen after windscreen of cars for a laugh, I chose not to.

At the end of the day, there should be probably an appeal for clemency but let us not kid ourselves that these contractors have been out of control for some time and some example HAS to be made and regardless of whether it was PTSD or not, he did kill compadres, would the same be said if he had just gunned down a couple of "rag-heads" as the chaps from Aegis called them?

I think not...
Re: Hmm
[info]sincewheneh wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 04:35 pm (UTC)
To be blunt, you are not in a position to comment on what goes on in this environment if you personally do not work here. What you are saying there is inaccurate and out-dated. I think you should brush up on your knowledge of the current situation a bit more before bad-mouthing any specific company. Sounds to me like you are a disgruntled individual who was turned down on an interview for such a company.

There have been many changes to policies and regulations introduced in order to bring to toe all operators in this environment. Individuals or companies that do not attain standards and policy are brought to task. Take a look at the former 'Blackwater' company that had it's operating license in Iraq revoked for incidents that should not have happened.
If you for one second believe that people just walk or drive around firing weapons then you need a dose of reality yourself. That simply is not the case.
Re: Hmm - [info]ancientoneuk - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 05:34 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]matt_91912113 - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 06:56 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]shojo76 - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 10:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]matt_91912113 - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 07:29 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]shojo76 - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]matt_91912113 - Sunday, 16 August 2009 at 09:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]shojo76 - Monday, 17 August 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]matt_91912113 - Monday, 17 August 2009 at 10:41 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hmm - [info]haroldplinth - Saturday, 22 August 2009 at 04:28 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]abha74 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 06:36 am (UTC)
Doubt the human "time bomb" label would have ever been used if the victims were two Iraqis. We probably would have just been fed the usual lies about how the "private security personnel" are doing a "difficult and dangerous job". Interesting how shooting dead two fellow Westerners suddenly sheds light on the murky recruitment practices of mercenary, oops sorry, "private security firms".
Hired Goons
[info]matt_91912113 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 07:05 am (UTC)
Why didn't he just say that he came under attack by a group of Westerners and he shot at who he believed was the gunman and killed a crowd of unarmed people. They've been getting away with that one so far.

Suddenly when two white guys are killed it's a scramble for "justice." There have been countless Iraqi's killed by these thugs, some of which have been videotaped and strewn across the internet with the most obnoxious comments written about them. Now one of these ruthless scumbags butchers his fellow employees and suddenly he "mentally ill" and "a victim" as well?? He is NOT a victim, he gets paid a huge amount of money to go to Iraq, kill people for sport, get a photo beside their corpse, go home and brag about it in the pub. They are ALL mentally ill, you can't be a normal person if you drive around shooting at famlies through the windscreens of their cars and laugh about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZX1odzHdAo&feature=PlayList&p=771EF14FA51F49CA&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=10


If this idiot had got drunk and killed some Iraqi's this would not be in the news.

It also says a lot about these what these cretins do that he was OK in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan and then suddenly lost the plot because of what he saw mercenaries in Iraq doing.
Re: Hired Goons
[info]abha74 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 08:07 am (UTC)
Excellent post. Cuts right to the heart of this particular shooting.
Western armed contractor shoots dead an unarmed family of Iraqis = "collateral damage" or " the private security firms are highly trained and are doing a darn good job in a very dangerous country" . Now same Western armed contractor shoots dead fellow Westerners = "legal case and quick rush to justice". Of course the murderer's family will be pushing for the "he's got a psychiatric illness" argument simply because they know that with his victims being fellow Westerners this will go to trial and not be swept under the carpet like the murders of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Re: Hired Goons - [info]sincewheneh - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 04:46 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]ancientoneuk - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]manindesert - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 06:28 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]haroldplinth - Saturday, 22 August 2009 at 04:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]matt_91912113 - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 06:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]manindesert - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 08:58 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]matt_91912113 - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 09:19 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]manindesert - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 06:32 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]matt_91912113 - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 07:18 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]manindesert - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]matt_91912113 - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 08:21 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Hired Goons - [info]shojo76 - Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 10:10 am (UTC) Expand
[info]cm999 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 07:11 am (UTC)
I suspect the short answer to your question is simply money and greed both from the individual and the company
[info]ajwimble wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 07:21 am (UTC)
It seems to be that Iraq at the moment if full of private contractors, armed with deadly weapons and acting without the discipline and support of the regular army. Add to this the fact that these firms seem to be very poorly regulated and in the past at least appear to have been above the law, it is was always only a matter of time before something like this happened. Regardless of the final result of the trial in this case, I hope this can act as a catalyst to bring uch needed change to way that private security operations operate. At the very least I would expect a duty of care so that as well as the individual concerned, those running ArmorGroup would be facing prosecution for causing death through gross negligence, for putting a gun in the hands of someone so obviously unsuited to carry one
Why was he given Iraq Job?
[info]mindsmusing09 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 08:07 am (UTC)
BECAUSE HE WAS THE PERFECT KILLING MACHINE!!!! WHAT A STUPID ARTICLE! WHAT A STUPID QUESTION! YOU DON'T SEND SERVICEMAN TO IRAQ AND HOPE THEY'LL NUTURE EVERYONE. THE WAR IN IRAQ IS NOT ABOUT PEACE .... IT'S ABOUT WAR, THE NEGATION OF A HIERACHY, A TAKE OVER BID. THE MILITARY OPERATION IS DESIGNED TO KILL. DON'T YOU KNOW ABOUT THE HISTORY OF WAR TERRI JUDD? During the First World War most soldiers lacked the capacity to kill; so they changed their training from a bullseye to a human looking target. ~That only increased killing to 12%. And most returned completely traumatised - what we now call Post Traumatic Stress ... and still do. In order to maximise killing soldiers are trained TO KILL HUMANS using various techniques to ensure maximum success. They still haven't worked out how to minimise PTSD from developing but they are trying. (Not through love for humanity but to minimise their responsibility). And so those who go out there fairly normal, return like the chap you are talking about, screwed up. Read about the history of DARPA, and about their current military operations, how PSTD in soldiers is related to empathy and fear and how through Gene Therapy the Military Operation want to switch off those genes ... to minimise the impact of war and their after care responsibility and then write a decent article that informs the public about WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON and stope leading people astray with your whimsical, far fetched, romantic ideas.
Re: Why was he given Iraq Job?
[info]gloops wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
I think it was WW II that the military switched from the bullseye to human shaped targets, when they discovered two thirds of soldiers aimed to miss. During WW I training still shrived for aggression - hate the enemy enough to want to kill him; but it was found that this led to reckless, inefficient soldiers.

Modern training techniques aim for a cold, dispassionate approach - to desensitise the soldier to killing. They're just popping targets, "engaging" the enemy; not killing real people with lives, loves, hopes and dreams. And then they wonder why these killing machines get confused back in civilian life.
Re: Why was he given Iraq Job? - [info]john_b_ellis - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC) Expand
Looking forward...
[info]fastguyeddie wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
To lots of these "Human Timebombs" as put it; returning home and left untreated.
Another British export
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
This also is what Britain is now manufacturing--death loving psychopaths--stripped, or devoid of humanity to do a dirty job for corporate Britain. How like America, The Brutish Isle becomes!
Regulation?
[info]johnnycaustic wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
Tighter regulation would obviously be a very good thing, but you must remeber that these British security firms are doing well despite a recession, so t would be a fool-hardy minister who injects morality into decisions that could negatively affect UK plc.
Re: HOW LIKE AMERICA...THE BRUTISH ISLE BECOMES! - [info]pozac - Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC) Expand
And they're at it in Afghansitan
[info]slingyerhook wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)

“Mirza Mohammed Dost stood at the foot of his son's grave, near a headstone that read, "Raheb Dost, martyred by Americans."

His son was no insurgent, Dost said. He was walking home from prayers on the night of May 5 when he was shot and killed on a busy Kabul street by U.S. security contractors.

"The Americans must answer for my son's death," Dost said as a large crowd of young men murmured in approval.

The shooting deaths of Raheb Dost, 24, and another Afghan civilian by four gunmen with the company once known as Blackwater have turned an entire neighborhood against the U.S. presence here.”

http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/thatseemsfair/latimes0287.html
Why serve in combat?
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
It seems that his relatives are under the impression that Daniel is not to blame because ArmorGroup sent him to Iraq, even though he was unwell. If Daniel was so unwell why didn't he refuse to go or resign?

Daniel has no one to blame but himself for this.
Justice
[info]bootneck1973 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:22 am (UTC)
It seems that there is a recent trend of "victims" seeking clemency / early release because of illness both mental and physical. In the past he would have been shipped out of Iraq to not face charges. His suitability is clearly an issue and one which the private security firm should have picked up during his selection interview. His service record alone would have highlighted that he had been discharged from the Army with a blotted copy book. There is a need for regulation of this industry and quite frankly a fair trial, which if it leads to execution is tragic for him, but it sets the precedent for others. The Iraqi the legal system must be supported - otherwise it makes a mockery of all that we have been trying to do there in the form of nation building.
premeditated murder?
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
there is no such offence/charge ; only murder, the mens rea(mental element) of murder is intent to kill or cause or inflict grievous bodily harm- one can infer intent to kill if one shoots someone with a gun. the only thing that makes killing in war not murder is the unlawful element of the offence; it is not unlawful to kill in war or in self-defence
Daniel Fitzsimons
[info]caribbeancritic wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC)
He was employed because he is just the right sort of amoral scumbag the security firms/mercenary employment agencies use, these firms have taken their lead from the UK police force. The police employ the same sort of scum bags from within their ranks in the regional support squads, the police know who the violent amoral scum bags in their ranks are, result of course is intimidation, assaults of men women and Kids and for example the murder of Mr Thompson during the G20 summit.

Don't act so surprised Independent News paper this has always gone on.
Why did the British government invade over lies and killed a million Iraqis?
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
How can war criminal Bliar be at large for invading and killing a million Iraqis over a pack of lies and not a single British solier faced justice?
Why was he given Iraq job?
[info]igor1st wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 12:23 pm (UTC)
Ask the directors of the firm he worked for.....
Why was he given this job?
[info]rbingham wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 01:06 pm (UTC)
Anyone who would want this job should be immediately suspect.

Money is more important than morality.

Ask Bliar!
pozac
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 01:16 pm (UTC)
America is not a land of Pilgrims now--America NOW was my analogy. Get a grip on your flippancy.
Re: pozac
[info]pozac wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 10:43 pm (UTC)
And Britain STILL thinks they control the world...wars NEVER end...physically or mentally...as soon as you realise that you are heading towards a one world government, then there will be no blaming America or any other country for that matter.
does this stop him from being a human being?
[info]chrisdoyle45 wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 02:01 pm (UTC)
Well, it's clear that this incident highlights once again another individual hopelessly let down by the government. He is a human being, let's not forget this, and his sense of alienation and isolation from the reality of society is mirrored in thousands of others. I left the armed forces after 12 years service and for two years suffered terrible doubts and fears about myself and the society that I had been released into. I had served in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Bosnia and seen things that people really shouldn't have to see - my training allowed me to operate. This poor bloke was not in Iraq for the money, he was there to feel the rush of excitement that only combat can give you - look at the testimony of soldiers returning from Vietnam, re-enlisting to go back because they just didnt seem to fit in anymore. He is a victim, don't let the generalisation about the conflict in Iraq stop us from seeing individuals - I accept the arguments that have been put forward from all contributors and can see their validity but this bloke was literally screaming out to be helped. He went back to what he knew best. I feel sorry for him and all the countless others who are suffering the same types of psychological problems brought about by fighing illegal wars in countries we should not be in.
BUT WHY ARE THEY THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
[info]infohiway wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 02:36 pm (UTC)
With the greatest respect to the bereaved, at some point we must all ask:
Could it be possible that mercenaries caught up in illegal war are going insane and killing each other?
You have much, much more to answer for than you ever imagined ... Mr Bliar.
there are many like him
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC)
there are HUNDREDS of guys like him in the private security firms or ex soldiers with massive problems adapting back to civilian life. It is really sad. In the old days guys like this were called 'cannon fodder' and sent out to fight and die for the king and country never to be heard of again. Guys like Harry Patch recently deceased are few and far between. These new guys are products of modern life - already damaged goods from bad upbringings etc; go into the services and made into killing machines and then with this new thing of mercenaries PAID to kill in the name of private security firms - well nothing is surprising except the tragedy of it and for the poor people of Iraq and Afghanistan WHAT A MESS UK and USA have created over there.
[info]famulla wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 04:44 pm (UTC)
He faced assault charges, had been fired and suffered from post-traumatic stress. So why did a security firm in Iraq give Daniel Fitzsimons, who is now accused of killing two people, a job with a gun?
9/11 7/7 Tony Blaire... Bush...Coiln Poweel.... Rice... Pudding....
Mr Fitzsimons was suffering from severe post-traumatic stress with repeated flashbacks, nightmares and anxiety attacks.
He need to be shifted to the places he was, given some pictures of the above say 3 millions and may be he will relax. At times the vengeance is bad. You take this out on others. I want to get Tony in the court for the economy as Germans and French sing oyyye oyyye oyye ehaah ahh oyyeye
Silly
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
I'd Put My Life in Armor Group's Hands Any Day!
[info]bboronia wrote:
Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:06 pm (UTC)
I worked as a private contractor for 16 months in Iraq, and was protected by Armor Group at 4 separate locations during that time. I found Armor Group's management and staff to be completely competent, and they conducted themselves in a very professional manner on and off "the ground".

I remember Armor Group's on-site management staff being extremely vigilant in monitoring the conduct of their PSDs, and even sacking some for what I felt were minor offenses. But at the end of the day, every one of our ex-pat employees got home alive, and I will always have the opinion that the Armor Group team had everything to do with it. I was also fortunate to have been body-guarded by one of the men killed in the incident, Paul McGuigan. I know I am not alone in saying that he was truly one of the best at what he did, and a lot of people felt that their safety was in the best hands possible when Paul was in charge.

Armor Group obviously made a mistake in vetting Mr. Fitzsimons, but I wouldn't put my life in any other security company's hands, and I truly hope that they weather the bad press.
some home truths
[info]britcontractor wrote:
Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 05:20 pm (UTC)
I have been working in Iraq as a Private Security Contractor for the past 3 years providing close protection for american clients. Now for all you that like the dictionary terms... thats right,... I am employed as a Close Protection Officer... nowhere in that job description does it mention mercenary, baby killer, pyscho, nutter or any other rubbish you are trying to call us. We are professionals and strive to maintain the highest standards in order that we maintain the current contract we are employed on. Like a self employed contractor in UK, if we dont come up to expectations or the client (customer) is not happy with the product, they find another supplier!! We are not employed for offensive operations, we are employed for client protection!

With regards to your youtube video.. again you need to do your research. AEGIS as a company was cleared in all cases by an American investigation and it was found that they acted under the Rules of Engagement used at that time. Many of the videos on Youtube are misleading, for instance there is one on there for AEGIS doing convoys in Lorries (AEGIS DONT DO CONVOYS) and if you look closely it is american US military! and again the company involved sacked the person who made the 'trophy video' (the fact that it was made at least 2 yrs ago really does show you are out dated to say the least).

If you knew your facts you would know that PSD and indeed the US military know longer use the 'bubble' (sorry I will explain, because you obviously have no idea about tactics used, or indeed Iraq in general) the bubble was used to keep a vehicle threat 100m away from vehicles and worked very well. This tactic ceased to be used by PSD at the end of last year and indeed we stopped using it prior to the US military! traffic is allowed to pass freely now although the threat of suicide bombers has not diminished.

You may think we are all out here for the glory and the greed and are all nutters... however, speaking for myself, I couldnt care what you think about me, I am here purely for greed!! I earn over 100k a year sterling, whereas in the British military I was earning 30k... you do the math. Am I making a profit from the Iraq War, hell yeah! I have no debt, no mortgage, enjoy tax free wages, and when this finishes I will go to Afghan and work there! why? because I love my job, I take my leave and live like a king and have enough money in the bank to retire at 35... bragging? too right! I face death every day, I have seen my friends die, not for countries, not for money, for their FRIENDS.

As with many companies in UK, employers do not always have all the facts at interview, I am sure many of your peers can't believe you got a job for instance. Well the same applies out here as with everywhere! I know for a fact you cannot work with certain PSC without a CRB check or an SIA licence, however this does not apply to all companies! Companies employed by the US military are on General Order Number 1, which means no Alcohol, however, those employed by private companies do not come under that rule.

There are many Walter Mitty's in this life and for 'ancientoneuk to comment that his military career surpassed someone elses just proves it. We dont brag about our history, because thats what it is... HISTORY. In this job its a small world (although I wouldnt like to paint it) there is always someone that knew you prior to the current contract.

Licence to kill
[info]magenta53 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
I know someone who is in frequent contact with the admin officer at ArmorGroup and I can tell you now that this person has a severe personality disorder, possibly psychopathic. I think ArmorGroup are completely aware of their personnel's psychological makeup and choose it expressly for the missions they do in theatres of war. It takes longer to train a non-psychopath to kill than a psychopath - it has been found in research that only 10% of soldiers have a natural ability to kill in cold blood and on command, the rest have to be trained to overcome their natural revulsion at killing another person. Psychopaths have no remorse or empathy so they are perfect killing machines.

These mercenary companies are perfect in that they do not involve politics at all, if the sh*t hits the fan it's down to individuals and corporations, not the government. Just like the Foreign Legion there is no adhesion or loyalty, they are privateers who operate with the full knowledge and cooperation of the government.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date