Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

‘Holiday tax’: Families warned of £40 charge to visit Europe after Brexit

'The EU and the commissioners may be considering alternatives – they will be considering their negotiations with us, just as we are considering it with them'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Sunday 11 September 2016 19:27 BST
Comments
Amber Rudd on EU Visa

Families were warned of a possible £40 ‘holiday tax’ to travel to the EU as the price of Brexit, after a bombshell Government admission.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd revealed that a Brussels scheme that would require permission to be granted - and a fee paid - before departure could be adopted, saying “We don’t rule it out.”

The scheme is likely to be modelled on the visa waiver system introduced by the United States, which imposes a $14 charge (about £10.50) on every adult and child.

Condemning the ‘holiday tax’, Andy Burnham, Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary said: “Tory ministers might think nothing of that, but it would make it even harder for ordinary families to afford a holiday.”

The warning came after Ms Rudd was asked about a Brussels plan for a US-style visa waiver system and its impact on the UK after it leaves the European Union.

Ms Rudd admitted British people would be “surprised” to learn the free-and-easy travel to the EU they have enjoyed for decades is now in peril.

But speaking to the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, she said: “It’s a reminder that this is a two-way negotiation.

“The EU and the commissioners may be considering alternatives – they will be considering their negotiations with us, just as we are considering it with them.

“But I am going to make sure that what we do get is in the best interests of the UK.”

Asked about the public’s reaction, the Home Secretary added: “I think they would be surprised. I don’t think it’s particularly desirable, but we don’t rule it out because we have to be allowed a free hand to get the best negotiation.”

The pay-to-visit plan emerged yesterday and is expected to be compulsory for all visitors to the 26-nation Schengen zone – which excludes Britain – from any countries that do not need a visa.

The European Commission is due to reveal draft legislation for the so-called EU Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) later this year as part of its response to the terror threat.

France and Germany back a system based on the US's Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA), the Guardian reported.

That requires visitors to the US from countries that do not require full visas to apply online for permission to travel, preferably 72 hours before they leave and pay $14 (£10.50).

Introduced in 2009, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, US immigration authorities assess whether a visitor is eligible to enter the country under its visa waiver programme, before they arrive at the border.

At present, UK nationals – as citizens of an EU but non-Schengen country – must show a valid passport to enter the zone, but can then travel freely within it.

After Brexit, however, Britons would have to apply through a future ETIAS scheme and pay to visit the continent, legal experts suggested – something Ms Rudd has now confirmed is a real possibility.

It is thought the only guaranteed way for British citizens to avoid the system would be to accept a Norway-style deal allowing free movement, something Theresa May has rejected.

British residents made more than 30 million holiday trips to EU countries last year, with Spain (13 million visits) and France (8.8 million) the most popular destinations, according to official statistics.

The EU plan is part of a series of measures planned after the Charlie Hebdo and Paris attacks in January and November last year, and the Brussels airport and metro bombings in March this year.

They were viewed as having exposed serious failings in the EU's external and internal border security systems.

In today’s interview, Ms Rudd said she now accepted the target to get net annual immigration down to “the tens of thousands”, having initially cast doubt on it.

And she hinted that some academics, scientists and health staff – people who “really add value” – could, like top bankers, be exempt from migration curbs after Brexit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in