Cameron gets drawn into row as confusion over energy tariff row escalates
Andrew Grice has been Political Editor of The Independent since 1998. He was previously Political Editor of The Sunday Times, where he worked for 10 years, and he has been a Westminster-based journalist since 1982. His column, Inside Politics, appears in The Independent each Saturday.
Thursday 18 October 2012
David Cameron's pledge that gas and electricity consumers would automatically get the lowest tariff was thrown into confusion today as the Government staged a partial retreat.
Labour accused the Prime Minister of presiding over another "omnishambles" after John Hayes, the Energy Minister, stopped short of repeating Mr Cameron's promise on Wednesday of legislation to ensure "energy companies have to give the lowest tariff to their customers."
Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat Energy and Climate Change Secretary, whose department was in the dark about the surprise announcement, distanced himself from it. He suggested energy firms would be obliged to merely "offer" the cheapest tariff.
As Whitehall officials scrambled to draw up a policy to deliver Mr Cameron's promise, government sources admitted the final package might fall short of his precise words. They said the top priority was to help consumers, which would mean preserving competition between energy companies to keep prices down.
One option is for customers to be "offered" the lowest tariff from their own energy provider --but not the lowest on the market as a whole. Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, made a similar promise six months ago, based on voluntary action by the "big six" energy companies. Ministers are frustrated that only about 15 per cent of consumers "switch" providers - and many of those that do are not low income families. So they want to encourage switching by legislation.
Today Mr Cameron refused to back down. Speaking in Brussels, he insisted: "I want to be on the side of hard-pressed, hard-working families who often struggle to pay energy bills. We are going to use the forthcoming legislation, the Energy Bill coming up this year, so we make sure, we ensure, that customers get the lowest tariffs. That's what we're going to do."
Downing Street sources said the Bill would ensure consumers got the lowest tariff in a way that preserved the choices they made about how they pay their bill and their type of tariff. One option is for people on a variable tariff who pay by direct debit to be informed they will be automatically switched to the lowest variable direct debit tariff offered by their provider. They could "opt out" of that process if they wished. Officials believe such a system would promote competition between companies to offer the cheapest deals.
Answering an emergency Commons question tabled by Labour, Mr Hayes admitted he had not been forewarned about Mr Cameron's announcement at Prime Minister's Questions. He said: "We will use the Energy Bill to get people lower tariffs and of course there are different options to be considered in the process."
Caroline Flint, the shadow Energy Secretary, said: "It caused chaos in the energy industry and I have to say it left his own ministers at a loss as to what energy policy actually is. For the Government to spend a day pretending they have a policy they have no intention of implementing is no way to run the country. It is like something out of The Thick of It."
Business leaders warned that Mr Cameron's plan would damage the market and deter investors. Neil Bentley, deputy director-general of the CBI, said the statement had been "a bit of a surprise" to industry and was at odds with the idea of competition. "What this actually does is create a lot more uncertainty for companies who are looking to invest in the UK and investing in our infrastructure and new power stations," he told BBC Radio 4's The World At One.
But consumer groups urged Mr Cameron to stick to his original plan. Richard Lloyd, executive director of Which? said: "Just giving people information on the lowest tariff is not enough when trust is at an all-time low in the industry and switching levels are falling."
South Korea ferry passengers who were told to stay put 'got trapped' aboard sinking ship
Are beards attractive? Ryan Gosling says yes, but science says no. Take the A-list facial hair challenge and find out who's right
Malaysia Airlines MH370 co-pilot's phone 'was on and made contact with network tower' 30 minutes after plane turned around
Andre Johnson: Wu-Tang Clan-discovered rapper severed his penis and jumped from LA building
Oscar Pistorius trial: Defence witness 'unqualified' to testify
The food poverty scandal that shames Britain: Nearly 1m people rely on handouts to eat – and benefit reforms may be to blame
US Navy christens huge $3 billion destroyer ship USS Zumwalt that appears as a fishing boat on enemy radar
Scottish independence: It is the English who should be on their knees, begging the Scots to vote ‘No’
Nigel Farage fatigue? Half of voters ‘immune’ to Ukip’s appeal
Nigel Farage on Have I Got News For You: Ukip leader ridiculed over expenses and party 'fruitcakes'
Nigel Farage: I’m taking on the status quo, and the Establishment’s fighting back
- 1 Poveglia: 'World's most haunted island' up for sale...is anyone brave enough to buy it?
- 2 Big Bang Theory to get special Star Wars episode with help from Lucasfilm
- 3 Babies cry at night to stop mothers procreating, scientists claim
- 4 Pharrell Williams 'Happy': British Muslims dance to song in video
- 5 24 people applied for the 'world's toughest job', here are their interviews
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is a company that specializ...
£153.75 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is an innovative outsourcin...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company has been providing on site ...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: We've been supplying best of breed peopl...