UK

Partly Sunny with Showers 14° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Ex-SAS officer is expenses whistleblower

'Leaks have exposed Parliament’s rotten core,’ says middle-man

By Nigel Morris, Deputy political editor

A former SAS officer who passed secret details of MPs’ expenses claims to The Daily Telegraph broke cover last night to insist he had “no regrets” about the leak that has rocked Westminster.

John Wick said the release of the information over the last fortnight had exposed the parliamentary expenses system to “its rotten core”.

Mr Wick, the head of a corporate intelligence company specialising in the release of hostages in war zones, was named as an intermediary between an anonymous parliamentary source and the Telegraph. He claimed that the details had not been stolen, and was withering about the “lax” security procedures in the Commons for handling the claims. Mr Wick contacted several newspapers and eventually passed over more than one million pages of unedited receipts to the Telegraph. The paper is rumoured to have paid between £60,000 and £70,000 for the details, but has consistently refused to disclose whether any money changed hands.

Mr Wick was unrepentant last night over his part in getting the uncensored claims – rather than the censored version being prepared by the Commons – into the public domain.

He said: “Parliament will be a better place, society will be a better place.

Sometimes a marker has to be put down. The public has put a marker down. It’s good.”

He disclosed he supported the Tories, but said he was not motivated by party-political concerns. “This was a scandal across the political spectrum with some Conservative MPs’ behaviour as reprehensible as their Labour counterparts. The public release of the information had to be thorough, across every party, and the Conservatives would have to accept the consequences with the other parties.”

He said he was conscious of the risks he was running, but had decided to act after the public was frustrated in its attempts to learn about politicians’ expense claims. He said: “We’ve all had concerns about the expenses purely because of how they’ve handled our requests for information. We’ve reached a stage in society where they want to know everything about us – I think we’re entitled to know about them.”

Mr Wick said he had been contacted in March about a hard drive containing all MPs’ expenses claims of the past four years. He said his contact, who he did not identify, had indicated that “those directly involved in processing the raw data were shocked and appalled by what they were seeing”.

He went on: “I was assured that the data was not stolen, but that it was an unregistered copy that had been produced as a result of the lax and unprofessional security procedures used in the House of Commons”

He claimed: “I do not believe the parliamentary staff handling the data were security cleared and people working on the information were never checked when leaving, nor did they work in a secure environment. All of this must have been known by the Speaker’s office, which failed to act and be responsible for the data and those working on it.”

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Give him an OBE
[info]rosiembanks wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:13 am (UTC)
Is there ANYTHING the Crown can do without the authorisation of Parliament? If the Queen still has any say in the awarding of honours, let her give an OBE, or even a knighthood, to this man and to the Telegraph editors who published the material.

That will not only show the MPs the contempt they deserve but will point out the difference, which the government tries so hard to efface, between serving one's government and serving one's country.
Re: Give him an OBE
[info]majorblimp wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:36 am (UTC)
The Order of the Garter, the Order of Merit, the Order of the Thistle and Royal Victorian Order are still held under the patronage of the Queen. All are orders of Chivalry. It is no surprise that when it comes to doing what is just and honourable it is members of the Armed Forces that come to the fore, but never our politicians.
[info]bowesy wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:47 am (UTC)
he certainly is not getting on my wick

whatever his intentions well done!!
So, they are not *all* chinless jolly good chaps - give him the resources necessary to
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:02 am (UTC)
clean sweep Whitehall and Westminster and hold the ground for long enough to allow democracy to put down roots.

http://news.independentminds.livejournal.com/2667979.html?thread=13974987#t13974987
Spread the net wider
[info]stewartpa wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:23 am (UTC)
How about expense claims for the House of Lords (where you can manipulate legislation for money but only be suspended for 6 months), the Civil Service, the Public Service and the various layers of Councillors (local, county etc ). Oh, and just for good measure, the quangos. Any more?

Also why not require any MP who wants to stand for re-election to have published, all their claims for their tenure in Parliament to date!
Re: Spread the net wider
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:45 am (UTC)
... the judges found by recent police raids to have wads of cash stashed in safe deposit boxes, the snouts who live in council houses needed by less well off people, the NHS gatekeepers to 'free of charge' NHS treatment who deliver second class prognoses and treatment when not consulted on a fifty pound notes generating basis...

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/chris-mullin-contrary-to-opinion-were-not-all-at-it-1689780.html
Re: Spread the net wider
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:58 am (UTC)
and we may as well throw in an end to self-regulating white colar trade unions (that enjoyed the 'there is no such as society' Crone's patronage while she was misusuing high office State resources to break organised labour, only). For instance the GMC moved against this guy http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8062199.stm and Meadow only because the police were closing in - and lawyers / judges enjoy even greater levels of impunity not enjoyed by ordinary mortals. Similar levels of misconduct in public office, if peprtrated by you or I, would be prosecuted, but organised jolly good chaps (and snouts) get awf with a slap on the wrist, meted out by cronies following investigation by cronies to whom the greatest expressions of disapproval are reserved for those club members who commit the crime of getting caught.
true hero
[info]gowithwi wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:16 am (UTC)
Yes, the lax security ,means that there is no way of ever introducing ID cards and such nonsense. Three cheers for the man that has shown easy it is . How excellent,to expose those prying snobs. Where does this absolute believe
in computers come from. Computers are ever so easy to hack. The internet is just a big pile of advertising and sell.
Could it be that the real reason would be connected to politicians trying to make even more money . A bit of info here and a bit of info there for the life insurance industry. Politicians are the very source of contacts private
business is after. Hence politicians ability to have 4 jobs in one go. Hence the abject interest in global warming .
Business does not thrive on green measures. It all adds up. Three cheers for mr wick. a modern day hero that came
in a time most needed. Those politicians better not try to criminalize these man or there shall be a revolution.
A Medal from the Mayor "Boris"
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
Give Mr. Wicks a medal on behalf of the Citizens of England--maybe the Mayor "Boris" of London could do the first Peoples' Presentation, since the Cromwellian Commonwealth?
Sauce for the goose and the gander
[info]hodgeey wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
If they insist on knowing everything about us, then there is no reason why we shouldn't know everything about them. In fact it is more so, they work for us not the other way round.
Smokescreen
[info]fiferabroad wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
Interesting that this guy is a staunch Tory. The Telegraphs a Tory paper. Seems unlikely that this would come out without some elements of the Tory party have advance warning of the revelations? Was this a smokescreen to force an election? A few Tory casualties but nothing compared to the damage that has been done to the Labour party and their standing in government. Maybe the real motivations are hidden by the justified anger over expenses.
Recommend Him For an Award
[info]neil639 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:35 am (UTC)
Whatever his motives this man should be decorated for bravery, for services to the electorate and for valuable services to the public interest.
Re: Recommend Him For an Award
[info]fiferabroad wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:39 am (UTC)
....And the Tory party of which he is a member
Whistleblower
[info]fiferabroad wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:46 am (UTC)
Wicks isnt the whistleblower. Hes acting as the go between whistleblower
Data Protection v FoI?
[info]britishairman wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
What of the issue concerning data protection laws? Quite different and seperate from the Freedom of Information by which such material became available.
John Wick - crusader or mercenary?
[info]catotheoldie wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
It is not clear from John Wick's account or newspaper reports whether he has received payment for his whistleblowing role in the expenses scandal.

If he has not received payment he is right to be proud of the part he has played, and to present himself as a 21st century crusading knight on a crusade to reform a rotten Commons.

If Mr Wick has accepted payment as an intermediary between a government employee who has stolen classified information and the Telegraph, he is little more than a fence and a moneygrubbing mercenary.

Which is it, Mr Wick? Set those venal MPs an example and come clean. Are you crusader or mercenary?
Re: John Wick - crusader or mercenary?
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 12:12 pm (UTC)
There is no supportable argument to the effect that this whistleblower assistive functionary's contribution to societal well-being should be any less well 'paid' that for example handsomely 'paid' Goldsmith's or Blair's contributions to opposite effect by brewing a pseud legal excuse for aggressive corporate welfare wars - or Hutton for covering up the killing of Kelly.

In the absence of a Cromwell, bote BNP if you can, otherwise abstain frm the pseudo-democratic circus.
http://news.independentminds.livejournal.com/2667979.html?thread=13974987#t13974987
Re: John Wick - crusader or mercenary?
[info]almightymat wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:51 pm (UTC)
Hmm, how does one 'bote' the BNP?

Or do you mean 'bone' the BNP? Their members are not normally that attractive!

Or perhaps you meant 'boke'? It's a scots colloquialism for vomiting that certainly seems appropriate when considering their policies...
[info]brush5 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 10:41 am (UTC)
Good man
a knighthood for Mr Wick
[info]mad9_man wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC)
At last - someone with the guts & integrity that is so lacking in our MP's. Now perhaps we can get down to the serious business of nailing all fraudsters ( women included, Naddy Doris - hope you read my earlier post directed at YOU).Did I read somewhere that these despicable MP's should be made to claim expenses on line? Great idea - make the URL available for anyone to access so that the whole country (well, most people have got a comp or an internet cafe nearby!)can check up : at the first sign of any impropriety, viewers could log a complaint to an independent body with absolutely no connections to any political party! This would give a whole new meaning to the adjective 'transparent'. I was going to post something about the interference + idiotic remarks by the the Archbish of Canters but suffice to say, stay out of it mate - stick to religion - much cosier.
One moment
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
Whilst we can all be quick to jump and say this guy is great and we should give him a medal, let's not forget that he stole data and sold it for personal (and possibly political) gain. Whilst release was in the public interest, release to a right wing newspaper so that maximum damage could be directed first towards the opponents of the Tories was hardly the way to go about it. If he truly cared he would have given a copy of all data to all newspapers simultaneously for free.
I'm sure next year the "right honorable" Mr Cameron will be rewarding Mr Wick with lots of juicy contracts to his company as a way of saying thank you.
Re: One moment
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 06:49 pm (UTC)
Re: One moment
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 07:48 pm (UTC)
That is pretty funny.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date