UK

Showers (AM and PM) 10° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Far-right gains from Labour turmoil

By Keith Weir and Adrian Croft, Reuters

The far-right British National Party won its first seat in the European Parliament yesterday, a breakthrough that will add to pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

The BNP gained the seat in the northern English region of Yorkshire and Humber at the expense of Brown's Labour Party, which has been hurt by a scandal over politicians' expenses and questions over Brown's leadership.

Labour also lost a seat in Wales, a traditional stronghold, where its share of the vote slumped 12 points to 20 percent and it was beaten into second place by the centre-right Conservatives.

Losing a seat to the BNP will give fresh ammunition to Brown's critics in the Labour Party after a traumatic week in which six senior ministers quit the government, one of whom called on Brown to quit and said he was an electoral liability.

Rebels among Labour members of parliament (MPs) are said to be canvassing support for a letter calling on Brown to stand down to boost their chances at a general election due within a year.

The Conservatives have a commanding lead over Labour in opinion polls and are on course to return to power for the first time since 1997.

Critics say the party lacks a coherent policy agenda and that Brown is indecisive, a poor communicator and unable to transfer his confidence on the world economic stage to domestic politics.

Labour members of parliament are due to meet on Monday when rebels could go public with their criticisms of the leader.

A change of Labour leader would raise the prospect of a snap election. Brown has not faced the electorate since he took over as prime minister from Tony Blair two years ago.

Last week, sterling was hit by speculation over Brown's future, and if he manages to survive the current crisis, it looks likely he will wait for as long as possible before calling the next election, due within a year.

Brown, who reshuffled his government team on Friday after the resignations, told supporters on Sunday he would not walk away from the country's troubles.

At a Labour event in London, staged to show Brown still had support among grassroot party activists at the end of a tumultuous week, he set out his policies on public services for the coming weeks and months.

He said the country had been through a "testing time" politically and economically, but added: "What would they (the public) think of us if ever we walked away from them at a time of need? We are sticking with them."

Brown is under pressure after a drubbing in Thursday's local election.

All the main parties have been tarnished by a scandal over expenses claims by MPs, but Labour is bearing the brunt of voter rage for having presided over the system.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]danoxford1 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 10:44 pm (UTC)
Well perhaps now the main parties will start listening to the british people on issues such as Islamification, mass immigration, political correctness, the benefit culture and the running down of the English in particular as an ethnic group.
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:44 pm (UTC)
Well said!!!
(no subject) - [info]world_of_water - Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:48 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]richardm30 - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:12 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]world_of_water - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC) Expand
Sour grapes - [info]dippy_rainbow - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:16 am (UTC) Expand
Ubrigens...
[info]ron_broxted wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 10:57 pm (UTC)
Local elections, 3 seats out of over 2000. Don't break out in "Horst Wessel" just yet.
Re: Ubrigens...
[info]dippy_rainbow wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:13 am (UTC)
That's three county councillors and one MEP more than Searchlight, Hope Not Hate, United Against Fascism, Antifa, Lancaster Unity or Stop The BNP have got lol!

Horst Wessel? Who's he?
Re: Ubrigens... - [info]ron_broxted - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:47 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Ubrigens... - [info]nightside242 - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Ubrigens... - [info]eurpides - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 03:03 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Ubrigens... - [info]nightside242 - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 10:27 pm (UTC) Expand
Ineffectual hand-wringing from the main parties (and the Indie)
[info]jaded63 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:02 pm (UTC)
Watching the reaction on Sky News from William Hague, a couple of nonentities from Labour and the Lib Dems, and the editor of the Indie, I was struck by the fact that the reaction to the BNP's victory, and the subsequent interview with Nick Griffin, amounted to nothing more than ineffectual hand-wringing. There wasn't the slightest interest in addressing the concerns which have affected hundreds of thousands of British voters to the extent that they are now voting BNP.
Re: Ineffectual hand-wringing from the main parties (and the Indie)
[info]adam_smith76 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:51 am (UTC)
You're absolutely right. I'm an American, but I follow European affairs. You have about the same problem we have. All the politicians are scraping for the minority vote because they see that group growing in power. Anyone who criticizes gets labeled a racist or member of the radical right. The politicians and their supporters in the media have lost touch with the people. I'm seeing more and more people who are furious with their governments.
Brownwardly mobile Britain
[info]ameliemaryann wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:09 pm (UTC)
To say that the Labour party is losing votes because it has been "hurt" by the expenses scandal and Brown's leadership is very far from the truth. The truth is that the Labour party under Blair/Brown and under Brown/others has been a disaster for this country from 1997. They have done absolutely nothing to improve the country and everything to destroy it. They are uneducated (in the real sense of the word) bigots and zealots. They should not be in charge of a roadside chippy let alone a country and the sooner we see the backs of the nutters the better. It hardly matters who wins the next election so long as this lot is kicked into oblivion.
CONGARTULATIONS BNP.
[info]fantazamaraz wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:17 pm (UTC)
I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG

THE BNP ARE GETTING STRONG

THE LEFT ARE NOW REJECTED

AND NICK GRIFFIN IS ELECTED

A CLEAR MESSAGE IS BEING SENT

THE BRITISH ARE VERY DISCONTENT

Not a Brown problem but a political one.
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:30 pm (UTC)
The press are putting this down to a vote against all the parties due to expenses alone. It is not just that!

The major parties are driving us into the EU hierarchy, even though we will be a small cog, and throwing our hard earned liberties away.

Give us the vote to get out of Europe, debate the Lisbon Treaty (which we were promised a referendum on), and let us have a choice of what the Government commits us to in Europe.

I do not believe this country is racist, but i do believe, which i blame all the major parties for, that the BNP would not have got a vote, if they had listened to the people about their feelings rearding Europe.
THIS IS WORRYING BUT IT IS ALL THE FAULT OF THE LABOUR PARTY
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:40 pm (UTC)
The British people have been demanding curbs on immigration for YEARS and have been treated by contempt by both the labour party and their left-leaning followers. Good British citizens have been accused of racism when they have raised quite legitimate concerns about the unfettered levels of immigration into our country. This tactic has been VERY effective in stifling debate about immigration in the UK. But not any more. People can see with their own eyes the consequences of the sheer numbers of immigrants being allowed into our country on a daily basis. Many of these immigrants are:

i) UNHEALTHY because they have no health service to speak of in their home countries and therefore present a massive burden on public health services. Immigrants are IMMEDIATELY allowed the same level of medical treatment as UK citizens - without having paid a penny in taxes. In New Zealand Canada and Australia prospective immigrants have to take a very stringent medical which includes a HIV test. Any member of the family that does not pass this medical is refused residence. The philosophy here is they would pose too high a burden on medical services. And also why would you have an unhealthy immigrant when you could have a healthy one! The UK does not ask for ANY (yes, ANY!) medical exam - it does not even require an HIV test. It is also interesting to note that immigration activists have successfully demanded that all HIV-positive immigrants be given the same standard of medical treatment as UK citizens.

ii) UNSKILLED and require support by social services. Again, New Zealand Canada and Australia only allow immigrants who are skilled and who fit within certain skills categories. Most immigrants have to have a degree.

iii) VERY POOR and require social housing - in the past immigrants who had been in the country months were places at the top of the housing queue, ahead of UK citizens who had been waiting for YEARS. This fact is often (brazenly) denies by trendy-lefties.

iv) HABOURING RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WHICH ARE STRAIGHT OUR OF THE MIDDLE AGES - including immigration due to so-called 'arranged marriages'.

Labour's irresponsible (some would say treacherous) immigration policy has changed the very character of the UK - you only have to walk down any street to see evidence of that. Labour has become so politically correct that it does not even deport FAILED asylum-seekers. How contemptible of the British people is THAT!

Labour has brazenly refused to set any targets for immigration - even when the economic situation demands it. Look at the the response of Australia to the current financial crisis. It has cut its immigration intake by a significant amount because it places the rights of its people - its citizens above any PROSPECTIVE immigrant - that is just a fair and common-sense approach. Remember, Australia does not accept ANY unskilled migrants so one can appreciate the massive extra burden imposed by continuing unfettered immigration in the UK by people I have listed above.

For too long trendy lefties, in their houses in Hampstead and Islington, have stiffled all debate about immigration by labeling people as "racists" who dare to question it. This might have worked very effectively 10 or 20 years ago but people have become aware of this disgraceful strategy and it will no longer work. Trendy lefties are partly responsible for the failure of entire immigrant communities (more noticeably the Muslim community) to integrate into our society. Trendy lefties, for example, led Hate campaigns against any person who dared to criticize the wasteful practices of councils in printing information leaflets in all known languages under the sun. Now we are paying the price for this. Just look at the treatment of British soldiers returning from battle in Afghanistan by SOME Muslims - they were abused and screamed at when they paraded down the street in what should have been a celebration of their contribution.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. The reason why the BNP have gained such inroads is because of these things. We MUST have a sensible immigration policy where only those who can contribute can have residency.
Re: THIS IS WORRYING BUT IT IS ALL THE FAULT OF THE LABOUR PARTY
[info]jeema wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 01:44 pm (UTC)
I can only speak for myself when I say that legal immigration to the UK is already very difficult, so I think you may be misled. As a college-educated American with an engineering degree, I can't even immigrate to the UK under your country's Tier-1 (highly skilled workers) status. I would have to have a work sponsor and only be eligible to take the jobs that British and EU nationals don't want.

Maybe the immigrants you're referring to are in your country illegally, in which case your problem is not the immigration laws but rather law enforcement...
[info]1caro wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:45 pm (UTC)
How can this be? Brons an MEP? What can fascism possibly do for Britain in Europe? I'm shocked & saddened. I kow the man - know how personable, how affable he is, how as a lecturer in law & politics he was "politically correct" in classes long before the term was ever invented - that's why attempts to oust him failed, his foolish students supported him! He's been a fascist since his teens - I asked people who'd been to the same school as him at the same time. The same one which had Mein Kampf in the library but not Marx! I remember looking when I was 13 or so, long after his time there, because it was my school too. I decided to read Charlie Chaplin's autobiog instead. What a doorstop that was! I quit college when he was my law lecturer because I couldn't get my head round his politics. This is awful.
1Caro wrote
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:54 pm (UTC)
If you have something to say, say it.

If true you are protected, if libelous you will be sued, if fantasy you will be found out.

Lets keep the board to serious discussion.
Re: 1Caro wrote - [info]1caro - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:21 am (UTC) Expand
Conservatives and their Muslim Support
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 11:46 pm (UTC)
As a conservative, (I know i may be damned)but i was disgusted to just find out that we are backing the Conservative Muslim Council who want judicial reforms.

These include, the teaching in schools of how Islam has improved European living, ban the right to "insult" Islam and last but not least, no elected official "should be questioned" regarding Islamic Policy.

I am not sure if i can post the link so i have not done so. If a mod gives me approval i will post the link.
Re: Conservatives and their Muslim Support
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:06 am (UTC)
"These include, the teaching in schools of how Islam has improved European living"

This is indeed sad and NOTHING could be further from the truth. Just look at a recent poll of Muslims by Gallop which asked if gay people should be allowed to live the life they wish. ZERO percent of British Muslims said they should not be allowed to be gay. This is almost an unprecedented statistic. The quantity of Zero does not normally happen in any statistical survey. It just shows the levels of intolerance in the Muslim community. This intolerance makes a mockery of those that say Islam is a tolerant religion. They will be as tolerant as possible - until, that is, they gain political power. Just look at what happened in New Zealand. A Muslim man was elected a labour MP and as soon as he was in power started to support the death penalty for gay people (he later said that this was ONLY appropriate in Muslim countries). New Zealanders were utterly disgusted by this. In the country which was the first to give women the right to vote this Muslim felt it appropriate to make this comment. Shocking!

Islam did not improve European living when some of its members planted bombs in Madrid and in London, murdering hundreds and terrorizing many more. See the following website to understand how much Islam has contributed to "European Life":

www.thereligionofpeace.com



Re: Conservatives and their Muslim Support - [info]gaolhouse - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:20 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Conservatives and their Muslim Support - [info]richardm30 - Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:26 am (UTC) Expand
It's not about expenses
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:10 am (UTC)
When, will you listen, Press and Politicians.

This is not about expenses, fiddles, peerages and politice. It is about the Political parties we elected not listening to us, the electorate.

We want a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, as was promised.
We need to be offered the choice of whether we want to join the EU and lose our currency, constitutional rights and independency. This is not a right of the "few" who see an advantage for themselves.

I am watching the BBC now, and the press political pundits, which we are paying an undisclosed for for their commentary, are behaving just like our politicians, clowns performing to the camera.

Can any of them be trusted?
A Sad Day
[info]garry6610 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:24 am (UTC)
Unbelievable but surprisingly believable for a nation that has more than it's fair share of racists. I really cannot believe the idiots that live among us.

Video of Nick Griffin spouting his racist views and how he is aiming to hide the brand of British identity... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04QolIvfQEw
Labour crisis
[info]gary0033 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:48 am (UTC)
Ah, you Brits. I'm an American from "fly over" country (Oklahoma). You're simply further down the socialist, leftist road than we are but with Obama as our new President, we're running fast to catch up to your destruction. It's insane and you should know better. You elected a real hero, Maggie Thatcher to pull you out of the socialist quagmire once before but apparently, your memories are really short. She saved your country only to have you vote to go hard left again!! The "why" is easy: As
Solzhenitsyn said, "men have forgotten God". More pointedly, YOU have forgotten God. You are at once ashamed and embarrassed by the thought of Him. Too bad, for He will not be mocked. Go ahead, try to form a national consensus without Him. Try to live in a democracy without a populous grounded in morality. In your arrogance I'm sure you just know you can do it. Over here, we need another Reagan. You need another Wesley.
In The South East
[info]trojan_horace wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:54 am (UTC)
The BNP got no seats, received one 8th of the Conservative vote, one third of the green vote... so it looks like the fascist right will need a bigger deeper recession, and a lot more misery inflicted on us, before they can openly advocate the beating up of immigrants, or wear their swastikas openly again. What's rather more dramatic, is that Labour isn't even making double figures... New Labour beaten into 5th place (6th in SW). No Labour seats whatever. Likewise in the SW - where Labour came 6th. Less than 1/10th of voters in SE voted for the Government. They are going to have to go some to avoid a complete wipe out at the next General Election whoever leads them
Brown
[info]pudzo wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 12:58 am (UTC)
Brown said he will not walk away from the country's troubles. He is the country's trouble ! Walk away Gordon
would that it were so here in u.s.
[info]ddlbb wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 01:09 am (UTC)
hopefully, we'll vote our own cheating, thieving, lying bums out soon. as europe goes, so goes america? the thought police are trying to stamp out dissent, but the voice and the will of the people will not die quietly. thanks be to god.
Heil in der Furhers face.
[info]ding_dong_daddy wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 01:32 am (UTC)
At last some sanity returning to Europe. These goofy socialfacists have messed everything up. Bush left us with $480 Billion deficit and 4% unemployment, while Obama racks up a $12 TRILLION deficit and 9.4% unemployment. Heil Hope and Heil in der furhers face.
:o(
[info]nickalito wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 01:41 am (UTC)
A sad, sad day for Britain, that 2 BNP MEP's have been elected. I never thought I would see this day, I really thought we had moved on...I am in no way a patriot, I don't love Britain, but having said that, I am gutted that people have such short memories. 1933 means nothing to the people who voted these people in. Dark days indeed! :o(
An American Opinion
[info]gary0033 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 02:19 am (UTC)
Ah, you Brits. I'm an American from "fly over" country (Oklahoma). You're simply further down the socialist, leftist road than we are but with Obama as our new President, we're running fast to catch up to your destruction. It's insane and you should know better. You elected a real hero, Maggie Thatcher to pull you out of the socialist quagmire once before but apparently, your memories are really short. She saved your country only to have you vote to go hard left again!! The "why" is easy: As
Solzhenitsyn said, "men have forgotten God". More pointedly, YOU have forgotten God. You are at once ashamed and embarrassed by the thought of Him. Too bad, for He will not be mocked. Go ahead, try to form a national consensus without Him. Try to live in a democracy without a populous grounded in morality. In your arrogance I'm sure you just know you can do it. Over here, we need another Reagan. You need another Wesley.
Conservatives are RIGHT
[info]longhorn9177 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 02:23 am (UTC)
A Brit by blood and 5th-gen Texan by birth, I'm proud that you're throwing out the socialist/communist/fascists, even if this represents only the first step. "Nickalito"... hmm... 1933 - starting the runup to WWII, is a period of shame to the Right??? (You couldn't have been referring to 336-Run cricket record vs NZ, the flight over Everest, or the first modern sighting of Nessie, could you?) I'd send every moronic Brit liberal to the Middle East and replace them with a new Churchill and Thatcher! Along with Merkel's and Sarkozy's continued ascent AND WHEN WE yanks dump the Marxist O'Bammy (didn't know he was Irish, eh ;) ... then the Free World will have a chance to recover from the ills brought on by lib-idiots. AMEN ;)
Cougar dating!
[info]nicolecage wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 02:35 am (UTC)
--== Cougarster.Com ==-- Best Cougar dating site in the world!
It's where cougars and younger men can meet(Cougar is the slang for woman who is mature, experienced and want to date with a younger man). No matter you are looking for a NSA or serious relationship, please do check it out!!!
Re: Cougar dating!
[info]big_edd wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 04:09 am (UTC)
Hopefully, the US will follow suit in the 2010 elections. Hopefully it wont be to late for us. Illegal immigration, taxes and just plain stupidy will take us down quickly if we don't act.
How I'll be labeled a racist, and a hater. I'll take the label from the left rather than see them flush or country down the loo...
Good for you British citizens...time to take your country back
Brown
[info]kl123321 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 04:08 am (UTC)
Throw him in the Thames.
Then don't pull him out . . . .
Far right?
[info]the_spiritof_76 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 04:38 am (UTC)
If the BNP is the "far right", What the devil was Henry V? A fascist lunatic racist murderer? What did that make Churchill, foe of socialists to the tune of millions of sacrificed lives? The BNP stands for the British people - not the Third World immigrants who flock to Britain with their hands out, leeching from those same indigenous Britons. Shame on you for turning your back on your own people and for what? Marginally reduced labor costs? Ha! You're a fool if you fell for that lie -- and you did it at the expense of your own kith and kin. SHAME ON YOU!
Look beyond the Immigration issue
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 04:40 am (UTC)
Nick Griffin and the BNP are widening their appeal by moving on from immigration to focus on corruption and this will strike a chord that resonates with the British people already incensed by the revelations of the expenses scandal.

The links between the civil servant mandarins, NHS managers, senior policemen, education officials, senior military officers and government ministers and their activities when they retire are only now starting to enter the public domain. These groups are responsible for contracts worth billions of pounds for equipment of consultancy services such as working on the massive computer projects like digitalising the NHS medical records.

Upon their retirement, these senior staff responsible for awarding or monitoring the contacts with private sector companies take up lucrative jobs or consultancies with them, or join the banks, private equity houses and hedge funds that provide the finance for such deals.

The BNP will return to this topic repeatedly in the future as part of a two-pronged strategy both to gain favour with the electorate and to deflect criticism. The expenses scandal still has much to be revealed because only a limited number of MPs have had their details revealed to date, but even that has been sufficient to cause the mainstream political parties to tie themselves in knots.

By attacking the corruption of 'the liberal elite' the BNP will be able to deflect criticism by referring to a compliant, client media who are attempting to cover up the activities of 'the political class' and their allies in big business.

This populist appeal to the public may prove to be rather popular and put the other mainstream parties on the defensive, like the media if they attempt to refute the allegations made by the BNP they appear complicit in the corruption itself. A few choice revelations about mainstream politicians who retired to lucractive private sector activity will prove very embarrassing!
Not over here
[info]angryamerican67 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 06:13 am (UTC)
I try to read and watch the news about what goes on in the UK. Sometimes I don't believe the things I see or read. I thought that in the UK you had alot of freedoms there but that does not seem to be the case. All the cams everywhere is just a creepy thing. I saw muslim protesting your military returning from Iraq. They even got protection. I cannot believe the signs they carry in their protests. After some of the attacks that have gone on over there it takes some big balls to come out and do that. But they know the gov't will protect them. The police said they did not want to start any trouble with them and just let them do their thing. Well that is just a bunch of crap or just plain spineless. But let a tax paying UK citizen say the wrong thing and you have the anti-social police on you. In the US if those muslims came out to protest, the police you just all happen to go on break at the same time and they didn't see or hear anything. The police might even get in on some of that action! I am happy to see you guys stand up and tell them wankers they have to go. Out with Brown! Or you could say Flush the Brown. You guys can have that one on me. That is the plan on our next election cycle is flush everyone and start over with some people with some common sense, if we can find any.
Re: Not over here
[info]richardm30 wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 07:27 am (UTC)
As a Brit I know the capacity of the British left for self-flagellation. They are so eager to accept blame and accuse their country of almost anything just to be politically correct. Somehow it is in their psychology - the only problem is they do it on behalf of the rest of us! The changes in my country due to unfettered immigration over the in the past 10 years has been astronomical. We do not even bother to repatriate FAILED asylum-seekers! We have Muslim families (5+children) ALL on social security because the father is in jail for terrorism offenses. We have a national health service which is free to all and it is creaking at the seams because of immigrants accessing it on the same terms as citizens who have contributed for years. And finally, a recent investigation has found the labour government cannot even estimate the number of illegal immigrants to the nearest 500,000! Australia, on the other hand, knows EXACTLY how many people have overstayed their visa. And yet the left, not content with being the cause of all this (permanent) damage, still are at it -campaigning for MORE immigration. They must really detest the UK. Just look at some of the comments on these pages - and you will know what I mean. Labours immigration policy has changed my country - and for THAT they need not only to be flushed but expelled from office for MANY many years. Let's hope that a new Conservative government will very significantly clamp down on immigration.



B N P ? arent they all .......
[info]britfree wrote:
Monday, 8 June 2009 at 03:20 pm (UTC)
weedy little blokes , that nobody liked at school , sticking their pigeon chests out , and talking about "the white race" (they are mostly the colour of mealy meal ) , their pathetic conversational gambits can start anywhere but always end up blaming the "darkies" , their mousey put upon wives only really come to life when a black bar is partially obscuring their washed out faces . O K they cant ALL be like that , but some definitely ARE
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date