UK

Showers (AM and PM) 10° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Hain to complain to BBC over BNP on 'Question Time'

Minister's fury prompts anger and a bitter split with colleagues as Nick Griffin prepares to take the stage

By Jonathan Owen

Peter Hain is to make a formal complaint to the BBC Trust over the appearance of the British National Party leader, Nick Griffin, on BBC1's Question Time next week. This follows what insiders described as a "robust" meeting between the Secretary of State for Wales and the show's executive producer, Ric Bailey, during the Labour Party conference.

Mr Hain said yesterday: "I fundamentally disagree with the BBC's decision. I fully understand why colleagues feel they have to appear, but I certainly wouldn't appear with a racist, fascist representative – I think it gives them legitimacy."

But Peter Sissons, a former chairman of Question Time, attacked the Labour minister yesterday: "Instead of bleating to the BBC Trust, why doesn't the great campaigner offer to go on the programme and dismantle the BNP's policies himself?"

Separately, a recent broadcast in which two senior BNP activists were deemed to have been given an easy ride by Radio 1's Newsbeat programme has already attracted 100 complaints, says the Mail on Sunday. Mark Collett and Joseph Barber were introduced only as "Mark and Joey", and went on to claim that the England footballer Ashley Cole "was not ethnically British".

The location of the Question Time recording will be kept secret, due to security concerns, with audience members being screened in an attempt to weed out anti-fascist protesters and BNP supporters.

The broadcasting union Bectu, meanwhile, is threatening to strike if the BBC attempts to film the programme at Television Centre in London. "If they try to compel any of our members to work on the programme then, bluntly, there'll be trouble up to and including industrial action," said Luke Crawley, Bectu's assistant general secretary.

The controversy has provoked a bitter split among ministers, with Mr Hain joined by Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, in his refusal to share a platform with the BNP, while Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, has agreed to go on the show. The Tories and Liberal Democrats have yet to confirm who they will put up against Mr Griffin, who was convicted of inciting racial hatred in 1998.

Despite hundreds of complaints over its decision, the BBC shows no signs of backing down. A spokesman said: "We treat the BNP, as all legal parties, with due impartiality."

Rival views

Forty-eight people were arrested yesterday after thousands of demonstrators took to the streets in central Manchester in rival protests. Trouble flared as the English Defence League clashed with Unite Against Fascism.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
free speech
[info]kiwi_chap wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:33 am (UTC)
I am put in mind of the English parliamentarian, was it the 18th or 19th century, who made a comment along the lines of "I disagree entirely with what you have to say, but will defend to the death your right to say it".

As for the 21st century: Plus ca change, plus c'est une differente chose (to misquote another polititian).
Re: free speech
[info]jejizxjeiekds wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 01:31 am (UTC)
An English parliamentarian of the 18th or 19th century? er no, actually it was the 19th or 20th century English writer Evelyn Beatrice Hall in her biography of Voltaire - to whom the quote ""I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" has been wrongly attributed.
But the quote is quite apposite in this context, as the attempt by the establishment to muzzle free speech should be met with the full fury by all those who value our democratic traditions.
Hain
[info]rowlands wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 01:18 am (UTC)
Typical of the conceit , arrogance and intellectual cowardice of the Left. Hain and his comrades don't want people whose views and opinions fundamentally differ from their own to be publicly expressed. Yuk!
Has Hain ever stopped to realise that many of us find his own opinions and views repugnant - yet we don't want to prevent him from having his say. Should we protest to the BBC whenever the apologist for terrorism ( think Nelson Mandela) Mr Hain is due to appear on Question Time ?
Hain's Political values courtesy of his website
[info]canukgal wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 02:07 am (UTC)
QUOTE: " I BELIEVE IN PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY IN WHICH DECISION MAKING AND OWNERSHIP IS
DE-CENTRALISED
AND IN WHICH EACH INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN IS EMPOWERED" ' UNQUOTE

This is how Hain defines his political values which sound exactly right to me
EXCEPT he now wishes to have CONTROL over who shares these values??
Doesn't that contradict his own definitions?
He is reportedly trying to stop the elected MEP Nick Griffin from speaking?
What about Griffin's individual empowerment or does Hain think that should
only be extended to the Labour party and it;s stupid followers.?

Hain want to influence the BBC to stop this event is that democracy?
It must only be democratic then in Hain's opinion when HE decides it's acceptable.

This sounds and behaves more like the Apartheid Govt he 'says' drove him out of
Africa? Hopefully Hain will learn to his own costs that true freedom of speech very
often involved hearing things you dont like or agree with much as I feel when I
am unfortunate enough to hear more lies from the thieves/liars/criminals installed
in parliament. Yes I find a lot of what Labour says completely offensive so I have a
choice I switch off and choose to ignore them.Hain should learn to adopt my strategy.
I guess Hain does not feel inclusive towards the 1 million British voters who elected
Mr.Griffin they are just an annoying statistic are they?
Hain once more ...
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:41 am (UTC)
the villain of the piece. What a cheek this toady has! The whole point of democracy is, or used to be freedom of speech Mr Bloody Hain!!!
LABOUR CAN NO LONGER CONTROL FREE SPEECH:
[info]bgarvie wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:26 am (UTC)
So ineffectual Hain is joining with the pathetic Bradshaw (former BBC employee) in castigating the BBC. They have begun to realise they no longer control this arm of the media. For years they managed to strictly control the BBC. Brown using a place man as the Chairman of Trustees(Lyons)to protect Labour interests. Unfortunately, the writing is on the wall and Labour are fretting & getting desperate. Their policies to control are failing, their membership has collapsed and their power and influence gone. They continue to operate as if they can control 'free speech'.
What ever happened to free speech?
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:51 am (UTC)
Surely the ability to say what you want and discuss this with others is at the very heart of democracy?

Yes, your opponent may be an opinionated, racist, ageist, sexist, anti-semitic lunatic so stand up and fight for what you believe in!

Trying to belittle or ban an opponent is seen as fixing the game, if your own values have merit, then they should stand up!

Get up off your knees Peter Hain, and man up!
Re: What ever happened to free speech?
[info]chrisedwardz wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:40 pm (UTC)
Hitler was allowed free speech too and look where led to. Allowing Hitler to participate in the democratic process led to dictatorship, the outlawing of other political parties, trades unions and genocide. It took 50 million lives to stop the Nazis. Granting democratic rights is no guarantee against containing fascism. But some people learn nothing from history.

There is a double standard here. The policy towards the UAF, the anti-war movement and the left is, "starve them of the oxygen of publicity" advocated by Thatcher. But it is OK for the neo-Nazis to have as much oxygen as they like. After all, the Establishment might need the fascists one day as auxiliary storm troopers against the left. The BNP might be useful as strike breakers if things get out of hand during the recession.

And Griffin is part of the public school/OXBRIDGE old boy network that runs the BBC. He is is one of theirs. Ties that bind.
Re: What ever happened to free speech? - [info]enlitendpatriot - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:20 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: What ever happened to free speech? - [info]veronica_224 - Saturday, 24 October 2009 at 12:38 pm (UTC) Expand
Hain's Complaint
[info]cwumember wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 05:49 am (UTC)
The fact that Hain wants to prevent free speech would indicate that he, and not Griffin, is the real fascist. Or perhaps he feels that he has no answer to Griffins arguments and is worried about being exposed.
Re: Hain's Complaint
[info]enlitendpatriot wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:55 pm (UTC)
Well said - absolutely spot on!
running scared
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:45 am (UTC)
1 million people voted for the BNP, give them airtime. I want to hear everyone speak.


DEMOCRACY

joolz
Re: running scared
[info]ahrimanuk wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:59 am (UTC)
It was more like 200k in the last general election - not quite 1 million!
Re: running scared - [info]joolzg - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:20 am (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]ahrimanuk - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:51 am (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]joolzg - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]joolzg - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]ahrimanuk - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]colinru - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC) Expand
Re: running scared - [info]ahrimanuk - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:36 pm (UTC) Expand
leave the BNP alone
[info]waywoodwind wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
The problem is that the Lib/Lab/Cons believe they have the divine right to rule and any body who oppose them are fascist racists thugs

The BNP have never harmed any one let alone embezzled lied cheated or sent our troops to illegal un-winnable wars to be slaughtered

The country is in a mess and on the road to the third world, perhaps the BNP are the people to save us
Re: leave the BNP alone
[info]redjam13 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC)
"The BNP have never harmed any one"... I think you may need to do a little research on that one, old chap. BNP members and supporters have a long history of intimidation, violence, thuggery and terrorism.
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]canukgal - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:29 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]redjam13 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]berewic - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]redjam13 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:53 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:00 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]redjam13 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:19 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]redjam13 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:27 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:34 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: leave the BNP alone - [info]redjam13 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC) Expand
Not the BNP again.
[info]mh656 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
Why is it that so much attention is being given to minorities like the BNP when true representation of the English people, (the majority population of the UK), is denied even in the framework of devolution? The BNP stance about the white, christian majority, is all wrong. Most of their policies are based on inaccurate facts and falsehoods. Mind you, the main parties are not much better. I tell you this, put me up against the BNP and the others in Question Time and you will see the most controversial TV program on the BBC in a long, long, time.
Re: Not the BNP again.
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:45 am (UTC)
Why is it that 2.7% of the population SHOUT SO LOUD and we do what they say?

joolz
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mh656 - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:45 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 12:09 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 12:10 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 12:30 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:41 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 02:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mg58 - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 05:36 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mh656 - Tuesday, 13 October 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]archie23 - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:31 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]berewic - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 07:22 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Not the BNP again. - [info]mh656 - Tuesday, 13 October 2009 at 10:51 am (UTC) Expand
People whose fundamental belief is that not all people are equal
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:07 am (UTC)
have no place taking part in a democratic debate. It is a fundamental contradiction in terms. Give the BNP power and they will deprive millions of my fellow citizens of their votes and their freedom. This is not democracy but support for racist and cultural totalitarianism. It disgusts me that the BBC is so partial to thugs like these - a partiality demonstrated again this morning as the Sunday programme proceded to give the EDF legitimacy (no mention of their BNP connections, naturally, but clearly the BBC wouldn't really care) and quoted their attacks on muslims as if they were not shameful in a civilised, secular state. As an atheist I regard all religions with the same detached regard - but not the christian BBC it seems. My anxiety does not come from the nearby mosque, but from the fact that a million English people are so hate-filled and bigoted as to vote for precisely the sort of people they also praise themselves for having defeated 60 years ago. Their ignorance should not determine the nature of our society.
Re: People whose fundamental belief is that not all people are equal
[info]rowlands wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:44 pm (UTC)
The usual lies and distortons about the BNP. The BNP does NOT aim to establish a one party state or to deprive anyone living in the UK ,whatever their ethnic background, of the right to vote. The sooner the truth gets out about this the better for Britain. The Left know that once the 'fascist' smear is seen by all to hold no water then their mutli-cultural anti-British game is up. A nation has every right to self determination - if that is to awaken to say NO to national destruction via mass immigration and mutli-culturalism then that IS democracy.
[info]bundubasher wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:08 am (UTC)
Mr Hain said yesterday: "I fundamentally disagree with the BBC's decision. I fully understand why colleagues feel they have to appear, but I certainly wouldn't appear with a racist, fascist representative – I think it gives them legitimacy."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But Mr Hain, much as you and I and others may despise them, the BNP IS a legitimate party, not a banned one.

As such they have as much right, however unpalatable Mr Hain or Labour finds it, to have their say alongside Labour and Conservatives and Green's and Lib Dem's.

Think its called democracy.
Hain to complain to BBC over BNP on 'Question Time'
[info]lifeandstyle wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:16 am (UTC)
I'd rather they weren't on it, but excluding them adds fuel to the fire. There are plenty of ways to undermine the BHP....report on the Moderation of their website, for example. Me and a group of friends have been monitoring it for week. We use loads of different identities. The will rarely publish a moderate comment or a comment containing factual information. But then the same can be said of CIF on the Guardian....at either end of the political spectrum, they are both into censorship.....we should not assist either side in this way....we break facism with the law, and by disabling the rhetoric....remember, Hitler was not a great orator.....Hitler sounded good because Geobbels was behind him....if you disable the rhetoric, you disable the power.
Re: Hain to complain to BBC over BNP on 'Question Time'
[info]canukgal wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:34 pm (UTC)
You think we dont know who the 'fake' posters are??

You dont even know where to find the real BNP website do you?
Re: Hain to complain to BBC over BNP on 'Question Time' - [info]proximaking - Monday, 12 October 2009 at 11:50 am (UTC) Expand
BNP
[info]jstorm_3 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:40 am (UTC)
Surely it is more sinister that the Broadcasting Union is refusing to work on the programme? So the camera crews are now going to choose what the public are allowed to see?
Re: BNP
[info]colinru wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:57 am (UTC)
Well said, jstorm3.
(no subject) - [info]jeesilucy - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:18 am (UTC) Expand
BNP
[info]jenil_1 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
I can't quite honestly see what all the fuss is about, seems the BNP is supported by a very large number of voters so why shouldn't they be able to listen to what they have to say.

I also notice that although the main parties call the BNP policies abhorrent they don't seem to mind adopting either the policies or their slogans.

What's good for the goose etc!
Re: BNP
[info]canukgal wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC)
QUITE CORRECT; LABOUR STOLE FROM THE BNP COPYRIGHT

OPERATION FIGHTBACK BELONGS TO THE BNP PARTY

BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS BELONGS TO THE BNP

ARE JUST 2 EXAMPLES OF THEFT.
BNP and QUESTIONTIME
[info]jonpatriot wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:11 pm (UTC)
Didn't Goebbels control the media in Nazi Germany? Peter Hain and his cohorts are advocating the same. A million people voted for the BNP and many more agree with most of their policies, especially those on immigration. The BNP have a legitimate right to appear on the BBC even though their views may differ from those of Hain and others.
(no subject) - [info]barnabysdfgh - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:48 pm (UTC) Expand
Peter Hain
[info]victoriacourt wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:54 pm (UTC)
Peter Hain helped ruin South Africa for both whites and blacks. What is he trying to do, ruin this country as well?
Who are the fascists now?
[info]chippychap wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 02:40 pm (UTC)
I totally abhor the politics of the BNP, I never have, nor would I ever vote for them but it seems that the attempts to silence them and bar there appearance on Question Time is more scary than they are.
Hain is a dishonoured has-been who showed his true colours when it suited him so I am surprised he dares to show his orange face.
As for the baying, capering yobs who howl down views they do not wish to be heard..........Yob Britain at its foul worst.
YOU give them legitamacy by being able to defeat them with your arguments and points of view.
Re: Who are the fascists now?
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:30 pm (UTC)
Have you READ THE POLICIES YOURSELF or have you just read about them

Go on be brave, read through them all and then come back and tell us what you think then.

joolz
BNP = Nazis
[info]bat020 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC)
The fact that this thread is full of disgusting BNP supporters singing the praises of apartheid South Africa tells you all you need to know about this party. They are a bunch of Hitler-loving Nazis who would happily cart the rest of us off to concentration camps given the chance. The BBC should be ashamed of themselves for inviting them on, but it seems to have developed a bit of a love-in with the far right of late.
Re: BNP = Nazis
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
When have we said that? i dont want apartied and the BNP does not want that, show me the policy which says that.

you seem to be one of the un-informed, go back to believing whatever your told

joolz
Re: BNP = Nazis - [info]canukgal - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 05:25 pm (UTC) Expand
Freedom to Air Views
[info]cloudwalker_3 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:15 pm (UTC)
It's really simple:

If the evolution of your political ideology can be traced back to the extreme of race hatred that was expounded by the Nazis and Mosley's blackshirts; if your political views are centered around the removal of the rights and freedoms of others then by this I think you should loose the right to freely inflict those views on others.

NO PLATFORM FOR FASCISTS OR NAZIS END OF STORY.
Re: Freedom to Air Views
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:34 pm (UTC)
So that would mean that LIEBOUR, Liedems and Cons cant be heard or seen on TV. What Haid said and the fact that they all support the UAF shows who are the racists and facists.

Im happy with that.

joolz
Free speech carries responsibility
[info]mattsaze wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC)
I support free speach, but if someone's idea of free speech is to attack and encourage violence against minorities then it has crossed the border of acceptability and must not be allowed. If you were at a party or in the shops and someone started spouting racist rubbish would you allow them to continue, or would you tell them their views have no place in society?
This is what the BNP stand in favour of and to have them appear on Question Time would give encouragement to every racist scumbag in the country to attack anyone who isn't 'british' - whatever that might be.
Lets be clear, this isn't about legitmate political debate, this is extremist views and you can bet the BNP will be lying through their teeth when it comes to awkward questions.
Re: Free speech carries responsibility
[info]joolzg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:35 pm (UTC)
And Liebour are whiter than white. Want to start a thread with all the Liebour lies,

Please show me what is racists in the BNPs policies.

joolz
Re: Free speech carries responsibility - [info]canukgal - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:53 pm (UTC) Expand
BNP on BBC
[info]peatea wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:42 pm (UTC)
Mr Hain - toddle back off to the valleys - you're out of your depth !

Good luck to the BNP I wish them every success during QT and am very confident that their arguments will show up the main political parties as a sham and frightened of their own shadows.
NICK GRIFFIN
[info]jazzyjinks wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:44 pm (UTC)
I think it is right that he appears on Question Time - the party was voted in the same as any other party. If other political parties in the UK more represented some controversial issues within the UK, the BNP would not garner the support it does. No party has the stomach to deal with the issues affecting the UK today. They live in fear of the Eurocrats who allow Britain the take the brunt of the problems and do not allow us to deal with the issues - instead tying everything up in blanket human rights laws and other unrealistic and idealistic regulations that sound wonderful in a Utopian world but have no place in the UK today realtime.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date