Is Miliband set to desert sinking ship?
EU officials are backing the Foreign Secretary for the No 2 job in Brussels – and his flirtation with the post augurs badly for Labour
David Miliband's chances of becoming foreign minister of Europe increased dramatically yesterday after it emerged that the most senior figure in the EU is privately leading a campaign on behalf of the Foreign Secretary.
The likelihood that Mr Miliband will desert Labour as the party heads towards defeat at the election rose with the disclosure that the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, is backing him for the post.
While Mr Miliband has publicly insisted he is "not available" and "not a candidate", he is understood to be genuinely interested after senior EU figures at the Brussels summit last week said he would be ideal. Yet his interest in the role means he is prepared to give up the Blairite hope of succeeding Gordon Brown as leader before the election and minimise or even avert electoral catastrophe.
At the same time, Tony Blair was preparing for likely defeat in his campaign to be president of the EU after the leaders of France and Germany appeared to be lining up an alternative candidate.
The fast-moving developments in Brussels and London showed how the fortunes of the key players in the Blairite saga remain linked. The possibility of Mr Miliband departing for Brussels would have a significant impact on the career of Peter Mandelson. At the very least, he could expect to be given the job of Foreign Secretary. However, he could also parachute himself into Mr Miliband's South Shields seat in the hope of, at some stage, succeeding Mr Brown.
Mr Miliband emerged as the real winner in Brussels. His former boss, Mr Blair – who did not attend the summit – was being written off.
Mr Barroso's role in the appointment of the high representative for foreign policy is crucial because the holder would also be vice-president of the commission – and his deputy. He therefore has a veto over who would get the post. Mr Barroso does not have a direct say over the president of the council role that Mr Blair was hoping for.
While the presidency is more of a figurehead position, the foreign affairs job holds real power in the new-look executive created by the Lisbon Treaty, with the office-holder having more resources and influence over shaping the future of Europe.
But Mr Miliband risks becoming unpopular in Labour ranks if he jumps ship for a comfortable Brussels billet at such a difficult moment for the party. If he took the post he would have to step down as Labour MP for South Shields, triggering a by-election. This prospect was causing interest in Westminster yesterday because it could provide the opportunity for Lord Mandelson to return to the House of Commons and line himself up to be Mr Brown's successor.
While it is a remote possibility that the Secretary of State for Business could become leader, Lord Mandelson happened to be in South Shields last weekend delivering the town's annual lecture.
For him to stand for the constituency – and have any realistic hope of becoming Prime Minister – the Constitutional Reform Bill allowing life peers to resign from the House of Lords would have to become law by the time Mr Miliband left his seat in time for the start of his term on 1 January. The Bill is currently at committee stage in the Commons – meaning there are weeks of procedure remaining.
On Tuesday, the Czech government is expected finally to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, giving the green light to the creation of the new posts. The former prime minister has never formally announced his candidacy, but it is possible he could indicate he is ceding defeat later this week.
It would leave Mr Blair free to carry on amassing a multimillion-pound fortune through his business interests and speaking engagements. However, his expected failure to secure the backing of EU leaders reflected a stark contrast between his ambition and the strength of public opinion against him.
Last month, at a service for Iraq at St Paul's, Mr Blair appeared genuinely shocked to be snubbed by the grieving father of a soldier killed in the immediate build-up to the conflict.
Mr Blair's aides were confident of the former premier's low-key campaign succeeding – yet by the start of the Brussels summit last Thursday it was clear that an informal coalition of the centre-right, centre-left and liberal leaders was set against it.
On Friday, the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, and Germany's Chancellor, Angela Merkel, dropped heavy hints that their powerful axis would not be mobilised in support of Mr Blair.
President Sarkozy said: "The names of the first wave are not necessarily the winners of the last wave." Chancellor Merkel said that she would prefer a figure from one of the smaller countries in the 27-nation bloc.
Last night, William Hill reported that they had not taken a single bet of £10 or more for Mr Blair to become president since the Prime Minister made a public statement of support for his former rival. The bookmaker, which began offering odds of 4-7 on Mr Blair, now has him at 2-1, although he is still the favourite, according to the betting. Jan Peter Balkenende, the Dutch leader, is at 3-1, Luxembourg PM Jean-Claude Juncker is 7-2. The former Spanish premier, Felipe Gonzalez, is at 10-1.
The Czech courts are expected to clear the opposition to the Lisbon Treaty on Tuesday, and ratification could take place within hours. With the treaty signed across Europe, the Tory leader, David Cameron, will be under pressure to issue a statement on his position on a referendum.
Who profits from Blair's likely Euro humiliation?
Tony Blair
The ex-PM has not yet given up hope of becoming EU president, but it doesn't look good. He can console himself with the prospect of carry on cashing cheques at Blair Inc and keep Cherie in evening gowns. He is said to have earned £15m from commercial activities since leaving No 10 two years ago; he charges up to £100,000 a time on the lecture circuit; and through Tony Blair Associates, foreign governments pay him for advice. There's also the £12m property empire. Aides insist the bulk of his time is spent on charitable work, including his Faith Foundation, his Africa Governance Initiative and as Middle East envoy. It would seem, then, that Europe's loss is a net gain for peace and harmony on earth.
David Miliband
Written off over the banana photo a year ago, the Foreign Secretary is now loved in Europe. Perhaps politicians holding soft fruit are seen as masterly, as opposed to ridiculous, on the Continent. It must be so miserable around the cabinet table at the moment; it would be easy to glide on to the next Eurostar out of St Pancras. Signs that he is flirting with the idea show how bad Labour's prospects are. If he is seriously considering leaving, it means he doesn't think he could be leader before the election, or, even if he did win, he would lead Labour to defeat. But, if he goes, the party may never forgive him. His chances of taking the crown in future would be slim.
Peter Mandelson
Mr Miliband's vacation of his seat may be bad for Labour but it would be perfect for Lord Mandelson, whose former constituency of Hartlepool is just down the road. The Secretary of State for Business is nobody's chump; surely he can see that suddenly things are coming together. A Bill allowing him to resign his peerage could be passed by Christmas. It only takes one minister to decide when it becomes law – and Lord Mandelson has 12 of those in his department. He would be a shoo-in for Foreign Secretary, but the South Shields question makes the prospect of him becoming Prime Minister tantalising indeed. Who would ever have thought it?
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
At 44, Miliband would be only 49 after his stint as High Representative. Plenty of time to become leader of the Labour Party in his fifties.
Mandleson's return to Parliament as possible Foreign Secretary would strengthen Labour's front bench. A Brown-Mandleson team could well pull off a minority Labour government, if not a small Labour majority.
Fly away David, come back Peter.
I just don't think muvh of this system of appointment to important EU roles. If you agree with me, visit us at:
.
http://www.europeanpp.wordpress.com
.
Strange that they haven't noticed he's a Blair protege whose opinions don't differ one iota from his former boss's. He's enthusiastically talked-up the Iraq War, the Afghan War, and is a keen toesucker for Georgian dictator and genocidal murderer Mikhail Suckarsevili.
But it's his role as an unpaid spokesman for AIPAC that distinguishes this vile piece of filth from his master.
Can you believe that men like him actually make decisions for us?
Time for a referendum on our membership.
The British Politicians that have surrendered so much power in the past decade (without a vote) and signed up for Lisbon (without a vote), are going to move into cushy tax payer funded jobs (without a vote) in the EU. The only likely looking vote on the matter, will see them kicked out of office in the UK. However, that no longer matters because of the powers surrendered to the undemocratic EU.
Pull out of the EU until it cleans up its act. Free trade is fine, political union is not. Even better, lets have an actual discussion and vote on the issue.
http://stopblair.eu
And by the way, can anyone list Miliband D's achievements as a politician? I can't think of any, it seems to me he has messed up every post he has had.
'But what if Mandy has snaffled the Labour leadership, by then?' 'I don't think Labour will ever love him that much. And besides, he's more likely to end up working for the Tories than leading Labour. No, I don't want to get involved in the gory details of this looming 'blame game'. I'll return to the battlefield after the slaughter is over and pick up whatever loot is still serviceable'.
Wow!
Who's standing against him and where can I make my contribution to their campaign funds?
I'd even canvass for the Tories to keep him out - and that reveals some depth of feeling!
This has all the makings of a Portillo style debacle.
THe very thought makes the upcoming election worth working for.
While we may shrink from acknowledging this for fear of being labelled anti-semitic, in most parts of the world where present conflicts threaten our wellbeing, this fact will be emphasised, and exploited as an indication that Europe, like America, has fallen under the Zionist spell.
He would be severely handicapped whatever his talents.
eleos1437 wrote :"Miliband is Jewish.
While we may shrink from acknowledging this for fear of being labelled anti-semitic, in most parts of the world where present conflicts threaten our wellbeing, this fact will be emphasised, and exploited as an indication that Europe, like America, has fallen under the Zionist spell.
He would be severely handicapped whatever his talents"
Actually I think it is Europe which would be handicapped. The Middle East rarely misses a chance to play just the card you are suggesting, while Miliband would be falling over himself to show that he wasn't part of a 'Zionist plot' would be giving way on every issue, signing it all away. It's the EU who'd lose.
For those who doubt this theres another liberal to remember, the BBC's Frank Gardner. Left paralysed from the waist down by an attack by al-Qaeda sympathisers in Saudi Arabia he now habitually over compensates for any possible hint of bitterness against his attackers by giving al-Qaeda and militant Islam an easy, even considered and sympathetic ride in his BBC broadcasts. I'm sure its good for his soul, (and I have every sympathy for him) but from an objective point of view its not good reporting. It's not good for the BBC and it's not good for the West's fight against militant Islam.
It would be the same with Miliband.
See for your self he cannot even answer the simple question - "have you read the treaty?"