Jeremy Corbyn defends using speech extracts rejected by four previous Labour leaders

Labour leader says it is not 'copying anybody's homework'

Click to follow
Indy Politics

Jeremy Corbyn has defended using several passages of words in his keynote speech to the Labour party conference that were believed to have been rejected by every Labour leader since Neil Kinnock in the 1980s

He said he was disappointed that the media was "obsessed" with the revelation that he used 350 words out of his 7,000 word address that were offered to him by speechwriting expert Richard Heller, insisting it was "adult politics" to learn and draw upon other people's work. 

It overshadowed his first address to party delegates as Labour leader, which he used to set out a vision for a "straight talking, honest" and "kinder" politics and to reaffirm his opposition to a number of previous Labour policies, such as Trident and austerity.

At least five chunks were suggested passages for Ed Miliband’s speech to the Labour party conference in 2011, which included an attack on the Coalition Government for being "made by the few – and paid by the few". 

Mr Heller said he had no idea Mr Corbyn would use his suggestions but said he was "delighted" they had finally been used after being rejected by the four previous Labour leaders. 

It’s not copying anybody’s homework. All of us research things, all of us rehearse things, all of us learn from each other

Jeremy Corbyn

Responding to criticism that it was akin to borrowing someone else’s homework, Mr Corbyn told BBC Breakfast: "There were 5,000 words and more in my speech; there were 350 words sent to me by Richard Heller. I knew Richard Heller for many years, I quite like those words, I quite like the way he put them, we changed them around a little bit, we put them into the speech. 

"I don’t think there’s anything particularly bad about that; it’s a message I wanted to put forward and it’s quite disappointing really that some people are obsessed almost with these 350 words – there were quite a lot of other words as well in the speech and there were references to many other people as well." 

He added: "It’s not copying anybody’s homework. All of us research things, all of us rehearse things, all of us learn from each other. 

 

"Is that such a bad thing? If somebody says something good and interesting and you understand and agree with it and you use it as part of a persuasive argument, I think that’s actually adult politics."

Mr Corbyn’s team confirmed that Neale Coleman, the Labour leader’s head of policy, spoke to the Mr Heller in preparation for the speech, after The Spectator first revealed the similarity between Mr Corbyn’s words today and Mr Heller’s previous suggestions. 

Mr Heller has been offering Labour leaders advice on how to attack the Tories in a range of speeches since Neil Kinnock in the 1980s. In 2011 he suggested Mr Miliband use a speech titled "You don’t have to take what you’re given" for his speech to the party conference.

Those exact same words were used by Mr Corbyn in his speech today, along with a raft of other quotes – some word-for-word and others paraphrased – from Mr Heller’s advice to Mr Miliband, which he said would be good for "setting out his basic values".

The passage – titled ‘You don’t have to take what you’re given’ – the exact same phrase Mr Corbyn used after consulting with Mr Heller began: “Since the dawn of history in virtually every human society there are some people who are given a great deal and many more people who are given little or nothing.  Some people have property and power, class and capital, status and clout which are denied to the many.”

This was very similar to Mr Heller’s suggested passage of speech offered to Mr Miliband for his 2011 conference address: “Since the dawn of history, in virtually every human society there are some people who are given a great deal and many more people who are given little or nothing. Some people have property and power, class and capital, status and even sanctity, which are denied to the multitude.”

I had no idea they were going to use it until today, but I am delighted that they have

Richard Heller

Mr Heller said he had sent the passages to Mr Corbyn’s team and said he was “delighted” and “proud” it was used by the Labour leader today, while dismissing claims it was plagiarised as "nonsense". 

Mr Corbyn’s spokesman said Mr Heller was “happy” for the extracts to be reused for Mr Corbyn’s first conference speech as Labour leader. 

The suggested passages of speech were published by Mr Heller on his website under the headline ‘A collection of zingers’. It said they were “speaking passages offered to Ed Miliband, without reply.” But were “available to others” if they emailed him. 

A Labour party spokesman said: “Heller was consulted and gave permission for his material to be sourced as Jeremy Corbyn felt it captured perfectly what he wanted to say to the British people.”

Mr Heller told the Guardian: “I sent it to Team Corbyn as I have sent it to each and every Labour leader before him. I am very proud of that passage. I had no idea they were going to use it until today, but I am delighted that they have. It is a very fine passage. I sent it by post two weeks ago, to the leader of the opposition’s office.

“I offered it to him as Labour leader, because I felt it was a passage applicable to anyone with the values of the Labour party. I also published it on my website, probably about four years ago. It may look like they took it from there but that isn’t the case and to say it was stolen or plagiarised is nonsense.”

Mr Heller used to work in politics as an adviser to veteran Labour MP Gerald Kauffman and former Labour stalwart Dennis Healey. 

Mr Corbyn’s speech was warmly welcomed by Labour delegates. He won several standing ovations as he pledged to “expose the absurd lie” that the Tories are the party of working people, confront the Government over its cosy relationships with authoritarian regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Bahrain and his pledge to prioritise social issues such as mental health, housing and parental leave.

The speech was short on policy but his shadow cabinet ministers insisted afterwards that it would have been unrealistic to offer a detailed platform of pledges just two weeks after being elected leader and five years from the next general election.

However, by sending a clear message that he had a "huge" mandate to deliver some of his strongest-held views, many of which are opposed by much of his frontbench team, will alarm centrists in the party who are hoping to moderate Mr Corbyn’s radical history. 

He said he was determined to oppose the renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent when the vote on continuing Trident comes before MPs next year. He insisted he would "make [his]own position absolutely clear" that the UK should not spend £100 billion on renewing Trident, saying he would try to win over the many Labour MPs and shadow cabinet members who disagree with him. 

Mr Corbyn’s spokesman stressed later that the 59.5 per cent of people who had voted for him in the leadership contest gave him a mandate to pursue a policy of scrapping Trident because it was one of the most important views he held. The spokesman said the party had nine months to "discuss" changing Labour party policy, which currently remains the same as it was at the general election – a full renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent.

Comments