UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Labour candidate faces mission impossible in Norwich by-election

A seat held since 1997 seems certain to go Tory, says Andy McSmith

The Conservative candidate Chloe Smith is hoping to win the Norwich seat vacated by Ian Gibson

SUSANNAH IRELAND

The Conservative candidate Chloe Smith is hoping to win the Norwich seat vacated by Ian Gibson

One of the biggest draws at this week's Royal Norfolk Show is the human cannonball. All human life was to be seen at the show yesterday, from scruffy teenagers with ice cream dripping from their chins to ladies bedecked in finery that would not look out of place in the Royal Box at Ascot.

At 2pm an ear splitting explosion silenced them all, fireworks threw up green fireballs, and the human cannonball shot out of his cannon to execute a graceful arc high up into the sky.

When Chris Ostrowski, Labour candidate in the impending Norwich North by-election, visits the show this afternoon he may well reflect that there is only one significant difference between his situation and the human cannonball's – the human cannonball has a net to soften his landing.

Mr Ostrowski, who is a member of Labour's Christian Socialist movement, will need the forbearance of a saint in the trials facing him until polling day, on 23 July. What he and his campaign team want is to spend three weeks talking about everyday issues, particularly the petty crime that is a particular irritant in Norwich. Instead, he can expect to be forced to talk over and over again about MPs' expenses, and the resignation of Norwich North's sitting Labour MP, Ian Gibson, and to be asked – where is Gordon Brown?

David Cameron has already visited Norwich North twice, in support of the Conservative candidate, Chloe Smith, now the frontrunner in a seat Labour has held since 1997. Yesterday Mr Brown was challenged to say whether he will visit Norwich North at all, and tetchily changed the subject.

Of course the Prime Minister is not going to visit an impending disaster. Quite apart from the convention that prime ministers do not generally take part in by-elections – which Mr Brown cast aside when he scented victory in Glenrothes last year – and the general undesirability of being near the scene of a defeat, there is the extra problem that Ian Gibson's resignation has left only one Labour MP remaining in Norwich. That is Charles Clarke, the former Home Secretary, who is behind the plotting to oust Gordon Brown.

Until recently, Labour faced the additional threat that the aggrieved Mr Gibson might run as an independent. He was popular locally, but was found to have sold his taxpayer-subsidised second home to his daughter for well below the market price. It was not the worst misdemeanour to come to light during the MPs' expenses scandal, but Labour's star chamber thought it serious enough to tell Mr Gibson that he was barred from standing as a Labour candidate again.

Many people who knew him thought this was unnecessarily harsh and possibly a way of silencing an outspoken independent MP. The local chairman, Martin Booth, resigned in disgust.

This is the legacy Mr Ostrowski, a product manager for the John Lewis Group, must deal with. The first opinion poll gives Labour 30 per cent, five points behind the Conservatives, but that almost certainly overstates Labour's current support.

However, one small relief is that when Mr Ostrowski, 28, was a student at the University of East Anglia, in Norwich, one of his lecturers was Mr Gibson, who is not now expected to run against him.

In these messy circumstances, it is a safe bet that by the end of this month, 27-year-old Chloe Smith will be the new, Conservative MP for Norwich North. She lives in the centre of Norwich, just outside the constituency border, grew up in the town, and went to Swaffham comprehensive school, where she is a school governor.

Her parents and grandparents also live locally. One of her grandmothers still works, commissioning and marketing postcards. Her father was a furniture maker, her mother was a state schoolteacher, and one grandfather was a vicar. She dead-batted other questions about her personal circumstances with the comment: "You can write up that particular part of the report as 'single'." She is indisputably a Tory in the Cameron mould – young, clever, confident, and in a well-paid job with one of the country's biggest consultancies. She even copies Cameron's hand gestures, consciously or not. Just like a modern Conservative, she speaks articulately, in a pleasant tone, and says absolutely nothing controversial. She was adopted as a prospective candidate 18 months ago, with no inkling then that she would have to fight a by-election. "It was good luck that we had a candidate in place who does not look like she has a duck lake or a moat," one of her supporters remarked.

An interesting side show at the campaign is how well the Green candidate, Rupert Read, will do. The Greens are unusually strong in Norwich, with seven out of 13 of the city's seats on Norfolk County Council. They are the second biggest party on Norwich council, with 13 seats out of 39, to Labour's 20.

Mr Read lectures in philosophy at East Anglia University, and if he were elected, he would not only be the nation's first Green MP, but arguably the greatest authority on Ludwig Wittgenstein ever to hold a Commons seat.

That would be deep and meaningful, but at present it is unlikely.

Norwich North: The result in 2005

Labour 44.8%

Conservative 33.2%

Liberal Democrat 16.2%

Green 2.7%

Ukip 2.4%

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Labour candiate faces mission impossible.
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 12:34 am (UTC)
I feel sorry for the guy because he will pay the price for Brown's performance. Brown has finally admitted today that there will be cuts in Public spending, but has lied to the electorate for the last three weeks. Nobody is listening to anything that Brown or Labour says or does anymore. The government appears to either lie or as recently just does a U Turn on any difficult policy. It no longer seems to know where it is going or what its purpose is, apart from trying to keep the Tories out. Brown ducked an election two years ago saying he wanted more time to explain his vision. Two years later it is now clear he never had any vision apart from stabbing Blair in the back and getting into number 10, after that absolutely nothing, apart from incompetence and lies.
ukip also doing well
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 05:48 am (UTC)
Probably the Tory will win but dont count on it people are fed up with the main parties and the UKIP candidate is also get good results on door to door canvassing.
Re: ukip also doing well
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 11:15 am (UTC)
UKIP is not the third alternative. Dream on, Fascist boy.
Re: ukip also doing well
[info]silvatici wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 11:22 pm (UTC)
When the Lib-Lab-Con Alliance are all signed up to a Eurpean whites only federation, does Tominlondon try the stale old racist slur against UKIP, the only party commited to our traditional Commonwealth links? Maybe this is why he also uses the also known as Fascist Boy
Visionary Brown can win it for Labour
[info]catotheoldie wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
By appearing in person with by-election trump card Sarah, flourishing his moral compass and explaining his latest Big Idea to the good citizens of Norwich. Watch them flock to cheer him!

By campaigning on the manifold benefits that NuLabour has bestowed on the country: no more boom and bust; endogenous growth; thriving private pension sector; a transport system the envy of the world; thriving housing market; healthy balance of payments surplus; the fruits of education, education, education; plummeting unemployment; the NHS saved in 24 hours; tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime; and so much more.

See 'Not Flash - just Gordon' lead from the front and pull off that miracle on July 23rd. And wonder why Labour is not holding the Glasgow North East by-election on the same day for a glorious double, to send the party faithful on holiday in high old humour.
middle class 'cash cows' for this failed administration
[info]timsmith31 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 07:33 am (UTC)
Labour deserve to loose, this and every other seat they hold, for the simple reason that among many other disasters that they have orchestrated. They have ruined Britain socially, financially and morally. Labour as a party should be disbanded !
They should be utterly ashamed of what they have done to Britain, and it's inhabitents over the last 10 years.
I emigrated because I just couldn't stand living in Britain any more.
I used to be one of the middle class 'cash cows' for this failed administration, now thank goodness I am free of that yoke !
Re: middle class 'cash cows' for this failed administration
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
er, "lose".
Norwich North
[info]cjn1946 wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
Ian Gibson was turfed out, not by his constituents but by the labour party itself, not because of his expenses but because he did not always toe the party line. Another example of the so called democracy in this country. Will the Tories be any better, I doubt it. I notice there was not mention of the Liberal Democrats in the article, who came third last time, is this bias or not.
Kick the Labour scum into the sea
[info]reiksares wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
Yankee-loving traitorous scum.
Lib Dems
[info]loveablelefty wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 10:28 am (UTC)
I agree: Pretty poor showing from The Independent not mentioning the Lib Dem candidate, local businesswoman April Pond.

I expect this bias from the rest of the press, but not from the Indie, or is it just laziness?

Labour Crumbling
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC)
It seems like my dear old party is quickly collapsing from the inside out.

I feel sorry for the candidate after all of Browns gaffs this week, and then to come out with his admission that he had lied about spending cuts, i don't fancy his chances.

With this kind of leadership no wonder UKIP and the BNP gain seats!
UKIP
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 05:52 am (UTC)
Dear Tom,
Your comment exposes your ignorance. How many boys have the name "Jean" ?
UKIP fascist -what a daft statement . Fascism is State control at the expense of the individual it is the absolute reverse of what UKIP stands for which is the individual and not the state, particularly the EU state.
You may be referring to UKIP's immigration policy which is very clear which is totally non-racist i.e stop all immigration for 5 years including from EU , actually discover how many immigrants are here and then introduce a points system to allow new immigrants in.

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date