UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

NHS 'loses' thousands of medical records

Exclusive: Information watchdog orders overhaul after 140 security breaches in just four months

By Michael Savage, Political Correspondent

The personal medical records of tens of thousands of people have been lost by the NHS in a series of grave data security leaks. Between January and April this year, 140 security breaches were reported within the NHS – more than the total number from inside central Government and all local authorities combined.

The sacred principle of doctor-patient confidentiality is being compromised, Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, has warned. Britain's information watchdog has ordered an urgent overhaul of data security in the health service.

Some computers containing medical records have been left by skips and stolen. Others were left on encrypted discs – but the passwords allowing access were taped to the side.

In an interview with The Independent, the Information Commissioner's chief enforcer blamed the growth of a "cavalier attitude" among NHS workers across Britain for the exposure of the sensitive records.

Mr Thomas has written to the Department of Health's top civil servant, Hugh Taylor, demanding immediate improvements to the lax treatment of personal data within the NHS.

He plans to send in a crack team of inspectors to examine how data is protected by hospitals and medical workers across Britain. Over the last six months, the watchdog has been forced to take action against 14 NHS institutions for breaching data regulations.

One GP downloaded a complete patient database, including the medical histories of 10,000 people, on to an unsecured laptop. The laptop was then stolen from his home and never retrieved. In another embarrassing breach, a memory stick containing the medical histories of 6,360 prison patients and ex-inmates of Preston prison was lost. Though the data was encrypted, the password was written on a Post-It note that was attached to the device.

Camden Primary Care Trust was also found guilty of a major security breach after old computers, containing the names, addresses and medical notes of 2,500 patients, were dumped beside a rubbish skip near St Pancras Hospital last summer. The computers, which were not encrypted, were stolen and never recovered.

The Department for Health has already responded by issuing an urgent plea to hospital managers to arrest the data breaches being committed by doctors, nurses, security and management staff.

It has reminded them of rules on encrypting private patient data and those on transferring files.

Mick Gorrill, the assistant Information Commissioner in charge of enforcement, told The Independent that a number of "inexcusable" data losses within the NHS had become a cause of "great concern".

"Medical history is very sensitive personal data, which is likely to cause harm or distress. The law dictates they must keep this information confidential, but the NHS is by far the biggest offender within the public sector," Mr Gorrill said.

"There needs to be a recognition that this information affects real people and can cause real harm if lost. Just as workers would never disclose information they had been told by a patient, they should also treat information in exactly the same way."

He added: "There is a complete disconnect between the procedures laid down by managers and what happens on the ground. We need a complete audit to try to change the culture."

He warned that while the loss of the data caused obvious distress among people who expected their medical details to be kept secret, there was also a market for the data.

"We know that some insurance companies already hire private detectives to find out medical histories," he said. "This information could do a lot of damage to many people if it fell into the wrong hands."

NHS bodies soon face substantial fines for breaches under new powers to be handed to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) by the end of the year. "We would not want to impose a fine as they have better things to spend their money on. But in some of these incidents, we would have little choice," Mr Gorrill said.

"For example, a man who has had cancer or a vasectomy may have only told close family. To think that is lost and in the public domain would cause obvious distress. We need to change the cavalier attitude to data of a Facebook generation."

Michael Summers, vice-chair of the Patient's Association, said that the action from the Mr Thomas was long overdue as patients had been expressing concerns over the loss of their personal data for years.

"It is a bit late as no one has been taking responsibility for sorting this out," he said. "Patients have grown up with the idea that what they tell their GP will not be divulged. These data losses totally undermine that, causing great worry to many people."

A spokesman for the Department of Health said that Mr Taylor, the permanent secretary at the department, would be replying "in due course" to Mr Thomas's concerns. He said that action would be taken "against anyone responsible for breaching our strict data protection rules".

The spokesman added: "The Chief Executive of the NHS wrote to all senior health managers reminding them of their responsibilities.

"The Department is also providing, through the National Programme for IT, electronic patient records systems that are protected by the highest levels of access controls and other security measures, a secure NHS network for exchanging information that is centrally monitored and strongly protected and secure NHS email facilities that encrypts all data in its system."

The number of data security breaches within the NHS was only slightly lower than the total number of security breaches reported to the Information Commissioner from within the entire private sector. Stolen and lost hardware was the most common reason for information disappearing.

Privacy emergencies: NHS security breaches

*Computers containing the names, addresses and medical notes of 2,500 Camden Primary Care Trust patients were left beside a skip at St Pancras hospital, London. The computers, which were not encrypted, were stolen and never recovered.

*Medical details of 6,360 inmates and former inmates at Preston prison were lost after a memory stick was taken outside the grounds and went missing. The date was encrypted, but the password had been helpfully written on a note taped to the device.

*Cambridge University Hospital lost an unencrypted memory stick carrying treatment details of 741 patients was taken away in a staff member's car. The stick was found by a car wash worker who worked out who the device belonged to after accessing it.

*The unencrypted medical histories of 2,300 cancer patients were compromised by Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust after the theft of a desktop computer and a laptop.

*Two laptops were stolen from Central Middlesex hospital, and a desktop computer from nearby Northwick Park hospital, after the card security system was disabled for maintenance. Test results of 361 patients were lost. The details were encrypted.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

nhs loses data
[info]murraybc wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 06:04 am (UTC)
If anyone is to be fined, it should be the "managers" who don't oversee things properly.
NHS loses thousands of medical records-UK Politics
[info]safaa2000 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 06:16 am (UTC)
To avoid such problems NHS should take the necessary steps for using the technology of Microfilm as a perminant storage media.
.Thank You.
Safaa Elsherif
IT Consultant.
safaa2000_eg@yahoo.co.uk
Re: NHS loses thousands of medical records-UK Politics
[info]fakhry wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:06 pm (UTC)
at how much money it will cost.?
People who are working less tghan 5 years,inside or about should pay full fees for hospital to help such expensive technology.
Incompetent Data Handling Is Normal
[info]a1aco wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
Never compartmentalised information, never encrypted information, always some form of incompetent data handling - These things are normal, incompetent data handling is everyday and normal.

Accordingly loss of sensitive data is to be taken as a normal consequence of keeping data, and a change of mindset is required to accept that.

It is no good and its frankly ludicrous to continue setting up databases to be surprised and condemnatory of data losses when the natural consequence is for data to be lost.

High propensity for data to be lost should be factored in from the outset when deciding whether databases should be set up in the first place - Perhaps that much is now sinking in with MPs whose own personal data loss is currently exposing their extravagant expense claims. No, your'e right, it probably isn't.
"MPs' own personal data loss"
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC)
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
cavalier attitude" among NHS workers? Don't blame the workers. They are desperately trying to function with this crazy computer system that doesn't work.

Blame the insane privatisation process, in this case the contracting out of the IT systems to incompetent private contractors.

Support KEEP OUR NHS PUBLIC and join or set up your own local group.

http://www.keepournhspublic.com/index.php
Re lost data
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:27 am (UTC)
Again!
So, you can take your ID cards, Gordon, and you can shove them where the sun don't shine!
(no subject) - [info]fakhry - Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC)
'Ere!
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
Your typing is nearly as lousy as mine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnqCUvGhxUQ&NR=1
Re: 'Ere!
[info]fakhry wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC)
The plan to computerise NHS patients records has been an unmitigated disaster. The £12bn programme is four years overdue and there are questions over whether the data is safe and the project can still deliver benefits.
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:39 am (UTC)
"He plans to send in a crack team of inspectors to examine how data is protected by
hospitals and medical workers across Britain."


At our expense. If ever a phrase could repalce the old adage about locking
" ....the stable door after the horse has bolted" the phrase above is a prefect repacemtn. !!

Why aren't sensible security systems already in place ?
If they are - I expect to see several people being sacked . But it's unlikely !!

What is the point of having all this fancy - and very VERY expensive equipment - when you let monkeys use it ?

How many more private details are going to be lost ??

We read of one mllion pound IT disaster after another , involving the government
and the civil service.

On alternate weeks there has been substantial loss of private data.

So they waste million one week - and lose all the information they have collected the next !

never mind - it's only OUR money and OUR lives.


[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 09:57 am (UTC)
murray bc says it is the managers that don't oversee properly

maybe they don't - but that is no reason to abdicate ALL personal responsibility.
if you do something stupid - you should look in the mirror - not over your shoulder.

Civil servants have too much power over the citizens of this country - and often
excercise that power with no consideration, fairness or justification.

They delight in lecturing people and using the full power of the state to bully people.
I had to complain to my MP about unreasonable behviour of one department.

I did this because after many years of running a small business - and being bullied by petty bureaucrats from one government department or another - I was at the end of my tether.
This was not the first time - it was one of many irritating and unecessary confrontations with
people who have nothing better to do with their day than force people to account for every
move they make and very penny they spend.

To think, I did not bother claiming petrol - used on business - because I could not be bothered with the excessive and intrusive records the Inland Revenue demanded. ( I know it's the HMRC now ) -
but I now see a government minister claiming for a Kit Kat !!!

Civil servants - little or no accountability - yet a lot of power over people.


as if that isn't bad enough . . .
[info]tuskerdeman wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
Even now this smokescreen issue hides even more serious and devious practices within Westminster. Theses issues of public concern promoting

furore, debate and distraction hides what is truly happening, by quietly invoking into law, further "legal" abuses to our personal private

data whilst our backs are turned.

Big issue, very important, read here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/jacqui-smith-dna-profile-database

Beyond financial charades, corporate abuses, ministers expenses and many other issues that have become public knowledge in recent times,

"the people" are denied proper and open debate on our basic freedoms.

We must stop this.

The Executive Branch of Westminster must warrant the closest scrutiny and investigation on all of the events of recent times immediately.

Write to your MPs, form action groups, contact anyone that may assist in putting a stop to this crime against the people.
Re: as if that isn't bad enough . . .
[info]thenomen wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
'the people' (still) are a bunch of dumbed down and blagged and asleep mad morons - conned, for example, into believing in the need for massively increased police state powers to prevent terrorist attack - terrorist attack incited by an illegal war of aggression started by some very dangerous spilt personality, criminal physocpathic liars in Parliament.
Re: as if that isn't bad enough . . .
[info]linchung wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 03:15 pm (UTC)
Let's outmaneuver Bliar, Brown and those cronies of "keep people out of politics". We actually have the technology to brainstorm at least as well as *those* "people".

I suggest we form some working parties of our own, online. Let's cook this stuff!
Accident?
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 11:46 am (UTC)
This is happening far far too much to be mere happenstance, these records are worth money, a lot of money to the right people ranging from criminals to insurance companies and even intelligence agencies abroad...

Stacked by a skip with the password taped to the side says more of a complacency, says to me "dead drop" or "cold drop", I think an examination of some of the people involved and the sudden appearance of a new car, mortgage paid off or inexplicable promotion might draw a line to what is really going on here.
What - Again?
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC)
How very convenient. I don't suppose for one minute it has anything to do with the thousands of serious medical cock-ups that immigrant employed NHS surgeons and doctors have been making?

After all, it's inconceivable isn't it that the Labour created/run NHS would employ ill-qualified staff to just to save money.
sorry
[info]fakhry wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 02:38 pm (UTC)
Go see history of privatization.!
When Trains were privatized ,school leaver used by "hidden hand" to ask them to put shapes to delays the trains,trains lost their name,"virgin" and privatizes the service after they ruined the name,so they bought it cheap.
Hospital gradually lost the names ,moral of Medical staff is low,efficiency is poor,at high cost,hand on hand the bankers put their knifes in the NHS by buying the hospital from inside,Restaurant,service,security,parking. ....medical notes are the final stage to use every pinny out by using Computer system that cost billions on the tax payer.
Imagine that your money is used by the bankers to privatize your own intuitions...?
This isn't news
[info]trevormann wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 03:26 pm (UTC)
Do you know that the British media actually completely makes up the 'news' that it reports? Thats right! Most of it is complete fiction. In fact, some of the major players in todays news are not even real people - they are actors! The media reports made up news about made up people! Why do they do this? Public opinion manipulation.
Re: This isn't news
[info]fakhry wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 05:12 pm (UTC)
trevormann,media is right ,unless people wanted to put their head in the sand like ostrich.
Be aware that media knows less than reality,Zion Protocol was not believed though our life is full of facts of what Zion planed to the world,day after day i an convened with this.
[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 03:43 pm (UTC)
This may sound a little naive, but sure the best way of keeping private data secure is to *ahem* not collect it in the first place?

Or if really must collect it, don't keep it on a massive centralised database?
[info]pedantiousjim wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 08:47 pm (UTC)
to carry From all the examples in the story, it's not the centralised databases that are a problem: there's no evidence that any of these have been hacked, or have accidently sent data off into cyberspace.

The trouble seems to lie in the local data protection culture - e.g. the average general medical practice has about 6,000 patients, and obviously the practice has to keep medical records for them: before computer memory was so cheap, these records would have filled several filing cabinets, and no-one would ever think of carting all those home at night-time. Now that a single memory stick can store all these records, people take copies *just because they can* (and then lose them).

A similar previous example was the naval officer who lost a laptop containing details of everyone who had applied for the navy in the last seven years (600,000 people). Why did he think he had any need to carry all that data around ?

It is people's attitudes to security that needs updating, not the security itself - if a bank worker did the same with all his customers' records, he would be sacked - NHS workers should have the same threat hanging over them, then they might take some notice ! The same goes for when they authorise disposal of a computer : whoever authorises the disposal must be held responsible for ensuring that all data is wiped before the hardware leaves the site.

It's just a knee-jerk reaction though to call for the national databases to be scrapped: if one bank-worker failed to protect data, would we say the whole banking system should go back to paper-and-pen records ?


computer security is not easy
[info]kooliusbeezer wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 06:03 pm (UTC)
Computer security expert Ross Anderson was very clear back in 1997: just because it is possible to build an NHS-wide information system does not mean you should.

The problem is, with a million accredited users, some will pull your record if bribed.

The "sealed envelope" approach could serve as a disincentive to this sort of crime, but the UK government's track record on data security is poor and does not inspire confidence.

Not wishing to contribute to such a database as a GP was certainly a factor in my deciding to quit the UK.
It is those fire chips Dell, Sony IBM I think and not Apple
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 25 May 2009 at 10:42 pm (UTC)
It is those fire chips Dell, Sony IBM I think and not Apple
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
are you uninsured?
[info]johnmayer76 wrote:
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 at 11:01 am (UTC)
If you are uninsured and does not have insurance, you should check out the website http://UninsuredAmerica.blogspot.com - John Mayer, California
Can you really trust a doctor with your confidential information?
[info]sossanne wrote:
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 at 03:18 pm (UTC)
Well even the ex Cchair of the GP Ethics Committee first declared behind closed doors that this is not possible any longer. In a leaked message to the Guardian (A. Browne June 2000) Dame Iona Heath GP Caverham Group Practice Camden ,stated that the public had no idea of the extent their confidential information was being disclosed. A few years later the Caversham was involved in setting up one of the government Pilot Projects - the Pilot Integrated Care Project (Camden Council web site) where it was admitted confidentiality of families and individuals being tracked was not fully protected nor was their consent properly obtained.. These projects have led to the introduction of Childrens Registers, now all children are recorded on massive data bases available to thousands of care workers and a huge security risk. A few years later again Iona Heath GP now as Chair of the BMA Ethics Committee is stating that it is no longer feasible to guarantee confidentiality of medical information. Yet neither in Camden nor elsewhere the general public is not being properly informed that they have the right to opt out of having their records put onto massive data bases - and very few health workers are informing people. In yet another case of concerning loss of sensitive personal medical records, it turns out that yet again doctors from Camden Primary Care Trust can simply not be trusted, the very Trust which the Chair of Ethics works for. One of the very first breaches of data security occurred in this same Trust a few years ago. When no proper safeguards are in place for members of the public why should anybody disclose the sort of private information being requested at the practice where Iona Heath is one of the business partners? eg what is your employment history? Do you rent or morgage your house...this is just a start as the practice has stated that GPs should be collecting more and more personal information in order to research social issues. A final word about confidentiality - Iona Heath GP Chair of Ethics Committees and author of articles about rights to confidence is involved in a campaign to spread Balint Groups. Never heard of them? Well neither have most of the public yet GPs and other health workers are using extremely sensitive information in discussion groups, Balint Groups, without peoples' knowledge or consent. (see Web site for further information) Is this ethical? Is all this activity what people register with a GP for - setting up of governemnt surveillance; massive data bases to record sensitive information on children; data bases using sensitive information for research; Data bases to share basic information with consent between health workers is one thing - this creeping intrusion is not what most people expect from a medical practitioner. According to the GMC the priority of a doctor is care for the well being of the individual but this is becoming a thing of the past.
NHS shambles
[info]catfishspy wrote:
Thursday, 25 June 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
Thats why l have private critical illness life insurance.
Re:
[info]o4em wrote:
Wednesday, 16 September 2009 at 08:51 am (UTC)
[info]jasbw514 wrote:
Saturday, 19 September 2009 at 08:26 pm (UTC)
They should keep those records more carefully. Thank you. Disney Pez Dispensers || Panic Attack symptoms
[info]ryan143143 wrote:
Sunday, 20 September 2009 at 03:15 pm (UTC)
Amazing! Ive bookmarked your site for future referrence.
reverse infertility
Legit Online Jobs
stop Panic attacks without medication
[info]ramkumar143 wrote:
Thursday, 24 September 2009 at 04:05 am (UTC)
Thanks a ton for showing this. Much appreciated
Colon Cleanse Detox
Does HGH work
(no subject) - [info]tingting789 - Friday, 16 October 2009 at 03:45 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]xiashixiong789 - Friday, 16 October 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]tesla23 wrote:
Sunday, 25 October 2009 at 06:04 pm (UTC)
My issue here is so if someone unscrupulous can obtain your medical records by people leaving them about willy nilly what stops them from paying the 'caveliers' to change your medical records? Where is the protection to stop this from happening?

Are these stolen medical records being sold on??????

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date