Bankers on trial
PM's adviser blamed for collapse of HBOS
Former chairman of doomed bank 'sacked whistleblower who raised the alarm'
The Government's crisis over the banks deepened last night when one of Gordon Brown's key advisers was accused of sacking a whistleblower who predicted that reckless lending by banks would end in disaster.
The record of Sir James Crosby, now the deputy chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), in his previous job as the chief executive of HBOS, was called into question in explosive evidence to MPs by a senior official who raised the alarm that the bank was growing too fast and over-reaching itself.
Paul Moore, a barrister who was the head of regulatory risk at HBOS from 2002 to 2005, told the Treasury Select Committee that Sir James was the "original architect" of HBOS's doomed expansion. It was rescued by Lloyds in an emergency takeover last autumn. The new banking group received £17bn of taxpayers' money.
Mr Moore said: "It is now clear that this disastrous 'grow assets at all costs' strategy was what led to HBOS's downfall and humiliating demise by the forced acquisition by Lloyds." Sir James, who was knighted in 2006 on the Government's recommendation for his work in financial services, completed a major review of the mortgage market for the Treasury in November.
In a nine-page statement to the committee, Mr Moore added: "Some might now also question what his 'contribution to financial services' has in fact been when this will have led to millions of people in excessive debt, thousands who will lose their jobs and many more whose balance sheets have been impacted by the precipitous fall of the HBOS share price – apart from the reduction in competition in the retail financial services market threatened by the new Lloyds Group."
Urging the MPs to summon Sir James, he suggested that the FSA watchdog was reluctant to look into his complaints because Sir James was one of its non-executive directors at the time – an appointment made by Mr Brown as Chancellor. Sir James may now be quizzed after John McFall, the committee chairman, promised Mr Moore's claims would be "looked at".
Sir James did not comment. Lord Stevenson of Coddenham, former HBOS chairman, told the MPs that Mr Moore's allegations had been taken "very seriously" but that a nine-month inquiry had rejected them as untrue.
Mr Moore, who claimed his dismissal was Sir James's decision alone, said he signed a "gagging clause" and allegedly received substantial damages. He alleged that his team was met with "threatening behaviour" by some executives when it tried to raise their concerns.
"Being an internal risk and compliance manager at the time felt a bit like being a man in a rowing boat trying to slow down an oil tanker," he said. "Anyone whose eyes were not blinded by money, power and pride could have seen the explosion of 'excessively easy credit' was leading to disaster. But, sadly, no one wanted or felt able to speak up for fear of stepping out of line with the rest of the lemmings who were busy organising themselves to run over the edge of the cliff behind the pied piper CEOs and executive teams that were being paid so much to play that tune."
Yesterday four bankers blamed for the crisis said they were sorry for the problems, but insisted they had lost millions too as their shares collapsed. However, Andy Hornby, the former HBOS chief executive, said he did not feel "particularly personally culpable".
The Royal Bank of Scotland, in which the Government has a 68 per cent stake, announced 2,300 job cuts – about 2 per cent of its 106,000 UK workforce. The bank, which plans to pay bonuses of about £1bn, is under pressure to announce a £25,000 cap on individual cash bonuses when its bosses appear before the Treasury Committee today. Chief executive, Stephen Hester, is set for a grilling, alongside his equivalents from Lloyds (Eric Daniels), Barclays (John Varley), Abbey (Antonio Horta-Osorio) and HSBC (Paul Thurston).
Ministers are braced for more grim news. The unemployment figures, which stood at 1.92 million at the end of November, will near or exceed the 2 million mark when the statistics for the end of 2008 are published this morning.
George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor, said: "Given that Gordon Brown appointed Sir James deputy chairman of the FSA and relies upon him as a key economic adviser, the Government needs to investigate the allegations."
Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokesman, said that at HBOS Sir James privately accepted the banks were taking risks, the banker was "smart enough to realise he was on a very dangerous treadmill", he said. In meetings with him, Sir James argued he would be "fired" if he changed HBOS's behaviour while other banks pressed on, Mr Cable claimed.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
and james crosby should be immediately stood aside as FSA deputy chairman until paul moore's statement is independently investigated - and then sacked if the allegations stand up. how can the community have any faith in having an architect of the financial crisis in aa very senior post at the government regulatory authority?
The only solution is to return to primative times when such criminals were pelted with rotten fruit before being publically executed.
Lets face it. Gordon Brown doesn't have the balls to go after them. It's Labours own red tape & stupid human rights laws that mean they will get away with it. When is this country finally going to get a REAL leader?
There are other players also that need to face tough penalties in this whole saga - all previous external auditors of these institutions, the Bank of England, the senior people at the FSA and the so called "consultants" who advised these players. We must not allow the the politicians who allowed this happen on their watch scot free either. We the public MUST NOT allow the politicians to push this into the long grass of another "public enquiry" as it will just waste public money which we all know is in short supply!
Lord Stevenson's response to the committee's question as to why they did not act on Mr. Moore's RED FLAGS said it all. I paraphrase " Every one acted like sheep, I too am a sheep, therfore my action is excusable and it is okay".
Finally these white collar crimes must pe punished without fail. This is the ONLY way to avoid future disasters and make everyone in these senior positions understand THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR THEIR UNSOUND DECISIONS. If found guilty they should be put in jail too!!
Mr. Moore, former head of risk management HBOS, witness statement is a revelation. Implying he was dismissed by Crosby, then HBOS Chief Exec., after exposing serious financial risks in their flawed business model, is alarming and will have grave consequences.The fact Crosby ignored his warnings speaks volumes.
It also brings into question the atrocious judgement of the PM. He had fatally removed regulatory powers from the Bank of England and substituted with a newly created FSA. Brown appointing Crosby as its deputy head. The FSA proved to be inexperienced, incompetent and impotent in preventing mistakes, uncovering weak practices, and monitoring banks use or misuse of financial instruments.
It would appear that Brown unwittingly instigated this chain of events. His fingerprints are all over the crime scene and his apparent malfeasance finally exposed for all to see.
The FSA appear to be a complete waste of time, channeling all their efforts in to beating up small mortgage brokers yet allowing the major banks to operate completely unchecked.
That our clueless PM and erstwhile Chancellor Gordon Brown has based his economics on the advice of people like James Crosby and Fred Goodwin beggars belief.
Or perhaps Gordno's thinking is prison is too good for these people ... i'll get them to work for me , instead .
Personal Benefit versus corporate responsibility for prudence.
Bank Director versus FSA director
I cannot believe that he has not breached his responsibilities as a Director and is therfore liable to criminal prosecution.
If HM Constabulry were not so fully employed serving the corrupt government and not their Queens Warrant and the People - They might have time to catch the real criminals -
How many years for Great Train Robbery
How many years for Brinks Mat
I suggest 199 years would be too little for the Great Banking Smash and Grab
An accomplict before and after the crime is our own beloved, deluded, mentally stapped Prime "call me prudent" BROWN. But perhaps not accomplice rather the mastermind behind the crime, all in the name of Progressive Socialism - so sad.
Paul Moore for Chairman FSA or Chancellor But please, not BOTH !
So this guy (FSA deputy chairman ) is seriously blaming peer pressure then?
Unfortunately the Act in Section 178 only refers to the Cilil Consequences of Breach of The General Duties so it would appear highly unlikely that any criminal proceeding could be brought against these people.
Aww. I feel for them. I really, really, honestly do.
Game over. Pity that so many "hard-working families" were the losers.
Same for our corrupt government.
Now we know how Gordon will escape being blamed for the financial chaos. It was all the fault of his financial advisers giving him bad advice. He's just a Chancellor/PM, a figure head doing what others tell him is a good idea like screwing small businesses and the poor whilst not taxing the rich and strutting about declaring the world is following his lead. Now we know where that lead comes from ....... another failed banker.
Really, my advice then is let them go who in his right mind would employ them?